ABSTRACT
The link between Theory of Mind (ToM) and literacy is increasingly being recognized in the literature. However, the focus to date has concentrated on the connections between reading and ToM, with an emphasis on the ways in which ToM is implicated in making inferences from text and suggestions that engaging in reading fiction can support the development of ToM. The exploratory study presented in this paper is unique in its approach as it widens the focus to consider the relationship between ToM and writing. Using a developmental framework based on the work of Westby and Robinson (Westby, C. & Robinson L. (2014). A developmental perspective for promoting theory of mind. Topics in Language Disorders 34 (4), 362-382 doi: 10.1097/TLD.0000000000000035), the written narratives of 43 deaf children (aged 7.2 years to 11.11 years) were examined for evidence of ToM. Evidence of ToM was found in the writing of 86% of the participants (n = 37) with children demonstrating abilities across the spectrum of development. Implications for both research and pedagogical practice are discussed.
Subject(s)
Deafness/psychology , Language , Theory of Mind/physiology , Writing , Child , Cochlear Implants , Female , Hearing Aids , Humans , Male , Narration , VocabularyABSTRACT
While there is an emerging body of research investigating the associations between Theory of Mind and reading in both hearing and deaf children, little attention has been given to the connections between ToM and writing, and the potential for developing ToM through the process of writing. In a descriptive study, the authors focused on investigating the use of writing in role as a means not only of looking for evidence of ToM understandings in text, but of considering the utility of writing in role as a possible strategy for the development of ToM. The written samples of 43 deaf children (aged 7;2 years-11;11 years) were examined, and evidence of ToM was found in the writing of 81% (n = 35), with children demonstrating abilities across the spectrum of development. Implications for both research and pedagogical practice are discussed.
Subject(s)
Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Theory of Mind , Writing , Child , Deafness/psychology , Female , Humans , Literacy , MaleABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Analyze the progress of hearing and language in a group of children with cerebral palsy (CP) who have received cochlear implants (CI) and compare their progress in the clinical and functional domains. METHODS: This is a prospective transdisciplinary study developed within a tertiary referral center, with a group of nine cochlear-implanted children with CP, two- to seven-year-old. The assessments undertaken included audiological, language, and communication assessments complemented by the assessment of functional abilities and the level of independence as evaluated by the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) and Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). RESULTS: The outcomes varied, as two children achieved hearing comprehension in open-set evaluations. These children presented the same type of CP, athetosis, but with different functional skills and GMFCS levels. Only one of the subjects had any spoken language at the single-word level. CONCLUSIONS: A holistic view of change and development is central to understanding progress made in children with CP who received cochlear implants (CI). The functional evaluation of these children with CP is a useful tool for monitoring their progress and measuring their outcomes with CI.
Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy/complications , Cochlear Implantation , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Activities of Daily Living , Child , Child, Preschool , Communication , Comprehension , Disability Evaluation , Female , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/psychology , Humans , Language Development , Male , Prospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
In this article, the authors explore the role that characteristics and circumstances attendant on the object of an evaluation might play in the choice of epistemological framework underpinning research design. They consider examples from the consumer-focused evaluation of the introduction of universal newborn hearing screening in England. In particular, they look at how screen- and program-specific issues exerted influence at the levels of epistemology and method, arguing that these choices are not simply a product of values and questions that underpinned one kind of approach to knowledge production in comparison with another.
Subject(s)
Hearing Tests , Knowledge , Neonatal Screening , Program Evaluation/methods , Choice Behavior , Deafness/diagnosis , England , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Mass Screening , Qualitative Research , Research DesignABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This article seeks to understand very early audiological management from a parental perspective, after the early identification of their child's hearing loss through universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS). DESIGN: Data are taken from the national evaluation of the introduction of UNHS in England. Forty-five parents and caregivers participated in a qualitative, narrative study within which they identified key challenges generated by the audiological management of very young babies with hearing loss at home. RESULTS: Concern centered on the virtual timetable constructed by parents after screening, the practical daily management issues and the need to establish infant rather than a child focus in audiological practice. In addition, specific challenges relating to moderate hearing loss were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Results are of particular relevance to pediatric audiologists, teachers of the deaf and those offering early intervention services.
Subject(s)
Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Hearing Disorders/epidemiology , Neonatal Screening , Parents , Attitude to Health , Hearing Aids , Hearing Disorders/therapy , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Social Support , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
This article concerns the first stage of a research and development project that aimed to produce both parent and professional guidelines on the promotion and provision of informed choice for families with deaf children. It begins with a theoretical discussion of the problems associated with the concept of informed choice and deaf child services and then focuses specifically on why a metastudy approach was employed to address both the overcontextualized debate about informed choice when applied to deaf children and the problems associated with its investigation in practice with families and professionals. It presents a detailed analysis of the conceptual relevance of a range of identified studies "outside" the field of deafness. These are ordered according to 2 main conceptual categories and 7 subcategories-(a) the nature of information: "information that is evaluative, not just descriptive"; "the difficulties of information for a purpose"; "the origins and status of information"; and "informed choice and knowledge, not informed choice and information" and (b) parameters and definitions of choice: "informed choice as absolute and relative concept", "preferences and presumptions of rationality", and "informed choice for whom?" Relevant deaf child literature is integrated into the discussion of each conceptual debate in order both to expand and challenge current usage of informed choice as applied to deaf children and families and to delineate possible directions in the planning of the next stage of the main project aimed at producing parent/professional guidelines.
Subject(s)
Choice Behavior , Concept Formation , Family , Informed Consent/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Child , Child, Preschool , Family/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Rights , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , United KingdomABSTRACT
As well as evaluating the newborn hearing screen itself, the government-funded evaluation of the implementation of a Newborn Hearing Screening Programme (NHSP) in England is assessing the impact of the screen on follow-up services. In the UK context, these are principally paediatric audiology, education, and social services. This article presents results from a mixed method research study involving paediatric audiology services specifically. Results demonstrate significant variety in current practice with regard to routine tests and procedures, considerable variability in number of current referrals and time allocated to caseloads, and considerable variability in expectations of how the numbers will change following newborn screening implementation. The challenges of and opportunities afforded by NHSP which were identified by respondents, highlight the urgent need for further training. The study has implications for paediatric audiology services that are yet to start NHSP in the UK, as well as for services and professionals in other countries.
Subject(s)
Child Health Services/organization & administration , Health Services Needs and Demand , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Tests/statistics & numerical data , Neonatal Screening/statistics & numerical data , Audiology/education , Audiology/organization & administration , Audiology/statistics & numerical data , Child Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Child, Preschool , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , England/epidemiology , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Hearing Tests/methods , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Screening/methods , Neonatal Screening/organization & administration , Program Development , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , WorkloadABSTRACT
This article presents data from a study undertaken as part of the national evaluation of the introduction of the newborn hearing screening programme (NHSP) in England. It considers the impact on Education and Social Services of NHSP from the perspective of how each agency perceives each other's role in circumstances where NHSP is requiring a greater focus on interagency and interprofessional working. The qualitative interview study involved 27 education and 15 social services respondents from phase 1 NHSP sites. It reveals considerable agreement on the poorly developed nature of joint working but considerable disagreement about the roots of such. Education is more likely to focus on issues of role, value and skills; social services on conflicts of ethos and culture. The problem of social services' capacity to respond to referrals concerning deaf children was common to both. The findings are placed in the context of government guidance, in particular Early Support and Children's Trusts, both of which support a strategic and statutory basis for interprofessional working in this context.