Uncovering specific genetic-respiratory disease endotypes for rheumatoid arthritis risk.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify specific genetic-respiratory disease endotypes for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) risk. METHODS: This case-control study used the Mass General Brigham (MGB) and Mayo Clinic (MC) Biobanks for discovery and replication, respectively. We matched criteria-confirmed incident RA cases to four non-RA controls on age, sex and health record history. Genetic exposures included the top 11 RA risk alleles, and a validated human leucocyte antigen (HLA) genetic risk score (GRS). We identified seven respiratory diseases by codes. Using logistic regression models adjusting for potential confounders, we estimated Rs with 95% CIs for the interactions between genetic and respiratory exposures for RA risk. RESULTS: We identified 653 RA cases and 2607 controls in MGB, and 428 incident RA cases and 1712 non-RA controls in MC (mean age 64, 69% female). Respiratory diseases were associated with an increased risk of RA (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.05, 1.71). Six out of 11 non-HLA RA risk alleles interacted strongly with specific respiratory diseases for RA risk, including NFKBIE and sinusitis (OR 5.49, 95% CI 1.56, 19.4 MGB; 5.26, 95% CI 2.00, 13.86 MC) and FAM167A and acute sinusitis for seronegative RA (OR 6.00, 95% CI 2.09, 17.24 MGB; 4.90, 95% CI 1.71, 14.1 MC). The RA HLA GRS interacted synergistically with interstitial lung disease for RA risk (OR 5.41, 95% CI 2.71, 10.8 in MC), with DPB1*02:01, DRB1*16:01 and DRB1*04:04 best predicting RA (positive predictive value 61%). CONCLUSION: Several genetic-respiratory disease interactions strongly drive RA onset. If confirmed, these novel associations may reflect RA endotypes that can facilitate individualised prevention, diagnosis and treatment.

Prevalence and mortality associations of interstitial lung abnormalities in rheumatoid arthritis within a multicentre prospective cohort of smokers.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and mortality impact of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) in RA and non-RA comparators. METHODS: We analysed associations between ILAs, RA, and mortality in COPDGene, a multicentre prospective cohort study of current and past smokers, excluding known interstitial lung disease (ILD) or bronchiectasis. All participants had research chest high-resolution CT (HRCT) reviewed by a sequential reading method to classify ILA as present, indeterminate or absent. RA cases were identified by self-report RA and DMARD use; non-RA comparators had neither an RA diagnosis nor used DMARDs. We examined the association and mortality risk of RA and ILA using multivariable logistic regression and Cox regression. RESULTS: We identified 83 RA cases and 8725 non-RA comparators with HRCT performed for research purposes. ILA prevalence was 16.9% in RA cases and 5.0% in non-RA comparators. After adjusting for potential confounders, including genetics, current/past smoking and other lifestyle factors, ILAs were more common among those with RA compared with non-RA [odds ratio 4.76 (95% CI 2.54, 8.92)]. RA with ILAs or indeterminate for ILAs was associated with higher all-cause mortality compared with non-RA without ILAs [hazard ratio (HR) 3.16 (95% CI 2.11, 4.74)] and RA cases without ILA [HR 3.02 (95% CI 1.36, 6.75)]. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of smokers, RA was associated with ILAs and this persisted after adjustment for current/past smoking and genetic/lifestyle risk factors. RA with ILAs in smokers had a 3-fold increased all-cause mortality, emphasizing the importance of further screening and treatment strategies for preclinical ILD in RA.

Rheumatoid arthritis, quantitative parenchymal lung features, and mortality among smokers.

OBJECTIVES: There have been limited investigations of the prevalence and mortality impact of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) parenchymal lung features in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined the cross-sectional prevalence and mortality associations of QCT features, comparing RA and non-RA participants. METHODS: We identified participants with and without RA in COPDGene, a multicentre cohort study of current or former smokers. Using a k-nearest neighbor quantifier, high resolution CT chest scans were scored for percentage of normal lung, interstitial changes, and emphysema. We examined associations between QCT features and RA using multivariable linear regression. After dichotomizing participants at the 75th percentile for each QCT feature among non-RA participants, we investigated mortality associations by RA/non-RA status and quartile 4 vs quartiles 1-3 of QCT features using Cox regression. We assessed for statistical interactions between RA and QCT features. RESULTS: We identified 82 RA cases and 8820 non-RA comparators. In multivariable linear regression, RA was associated with higher percentage of interstitial changes (ß = 1.7 ± 0.5, p= 0.0008) but not emphysema (ß = 1.3 ± 1.7, p= 0.44). Participants with RA and >75th percentile of emphysema had significantly higher mortality than non-RA participants (HR 5.86, 95%CI 3.75-9.13) as well as RA participants (HR 5.56, 95%CI 2.71-11.38) with ≤75th percentile of emphysema. There were statistical interactions between RA and emphysema for mortality (multiplicative p= 0.014; attributable proportion 0.53, 95%CI 0.30-0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Using machine learning-derived QCT data in a cohort of smokers, RA was associated with higher percentage of interstitial changes. The combination of RA and emphysema conferred >5-fold higher mortality.

Interstitial lung disease throughout the rheumatoid arthritis disease course.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the current understanding of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) throughout the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease course from preclinical to established disease. RECENT FINDINGS: ILD is a serious extra-articular manifestation of RA. Multiple studies have demonstrated a high prevalence of both subclinical and clinical ILD throughout the RA disease course. Investigations of patients without RA have demonstrated an association between RA-related autoantibodies like anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and interstitial abnormalities on lung imaging. A significant proportion of RA-ILD patients develop ILD prior to articular manifestations, suggesting that the lung plays a central role in RA development, perhaps through ACPA production. RA-ILD also occurs in early RA, when exuberant autoantibody production and systemic inflammation may propagate pulmonary disease activity. In patients with established RA, a high burden of subclinical and clinical ILD results in significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure. Multiple epidemiologic and genetic risk factors, as well as serum biomarkers, have been associated with RA-ILD. SUMMARY: Subclinical and clinical ILD occur frequently in preclinical, early, and established RA and may play a key role in RA-related autoantibody production and disease progression. Further studies are needed to better understand the risk factors, prognosis, and potential therapies for RA-ILD.

A Retrospective Evaluation of Vemurafenib as Treatment for BRAF-Mutant Melanoma Brain Metastases.

BACKGROUND: RAF inhibitors are an effective therapy for patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma and brain metastasis. Efficacy data are derived from clinical studies enriched with physiologically fit patients; therefore, it is of interest to assess the real-world experience of vemurafenib in this population. Tumor-specific genetic variants that influence sensitivity to RAF kinase inhibitors also require investigation. METHODS: Records of patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma and brain metastases who were treated with vemurafenib were reviewed. Clinical data were extracted to determine extracranial and intracranial objective response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. A bait-capture, next-generation sequencing assay was used to identify mutations in pretreatment tumors that could explain primary resistance to vemurafenib. RESULTS: Among patients with intracranial disease treated with vemurafenib, 27 were included in survival analyses and 22 patients were assessable for response. The extracranial and intracranial objective response rates were 71% and 50%, respectively. Discordant responses were observed between extracranial and intracranial metastatic sites in 4 of 19 evaluable patients. Median PFS was 4.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.6-7.9); median intracranial PFS was 4.6 months (95% CI: 2.7-7.9), median OS was 7.5 months (95% CI: 4.3-not reached), with a 30.4% 1-year OS rate. Outcomes were influenced by performance status. Vemurafenib was tolerable, although radiation-induced dermatitis occurred in some patients who received whole-brain radiotherapy. Adequate samples for next-generation sequencing analysis were available for seven patients. Melanomas categorized as "poorly sensitive" (≥20% tumor growth, new lesions, or ≤50% shrinkage for <4 months) harbored co-occurring mutations in genes predicted to activate the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-AKT (PI3K-AKT) pathway. CONCLUSION: Vemurafenib is highly active in BRAF-mutant melanoma brain metastases but has limited activity in patients with poor performance status. The safety and efficacy of concurrent radiotherapy and RAF inhibition requires careful clinical evaluation. Combination strategies blocking the MAPK and PI3K-AKT pathway may be warranted in a subset of patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Vemurafenib is active for BRAF-mutant intracranial melanoma metastases in an unselected patient population typical of routine oncologic practice. Patients with poor performance status appear to have poor outcomes despite vemurafenib therapy. Preliminary data indicate that co-occurring or secondary alterations in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-AKT (PI3K-AKT) pathway are involved in resistance to RAF inhibition, thus providing a rationale for dual MAPK and PI3K-AKT pathway inhibition in this patient population.

Factors Associated With Diagnostic Delay in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Impact of Clinical Factors and Social Vulnerability.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) often experience significant delay between symptom onset and diagnosis for reasons that are incompletely understood. We investigated associations between demographic, medical, and socioeconomic factors and axSpA diagnostic delay. METHODS: We identified patients meeting modified New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) or 2009 Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society criteria for axSpA in the Mass General Brigham health care system between December 1990 and October 2021. We determined the duration of diagnostic delay, defined as the duration of back pain symptoms reported at diagnosis, as well as disease manifestations and specialty care prior to diagnosis from the electronic health record. We obtained each patient's Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) by mapping their address to the US Centers for Disease Control SVI Atlas. We examined associations among disease manifestations, SVI, and diagnostic delay using ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 554 patients with axSpA who had a median diagnostic delay of 3.8 years (interquartile range 1.1-10), peripheral arthritis (odds ratio [OR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.93) and older age at symptom onset (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78-0.88 per five years) were associated with shorter delay. AS at diagnosis (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.30-2.63), a history of uveitis prior to diagnosis (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.73-4.52), and higher social vulnerability (defined as national SVI 80th to 99th percentiles; OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.06-3.84) were associated with longer diagnostic delay. CONCLUSION: Older age at back pain onset and peripheral arthritis were associated with shorter delay, whereas uveitis was associated with longer diagnostic delay. Patients with higher socioeconomic vulnerability had longer diagnostic delay independent of clinical factors.

Effectiveness and tolerability of antifibrotics in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of antifibrotics in a real-world cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung diseases (RA-ILD). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified RA-ILD patients initiating antifibrotics at Mass General Brigham Integrated Health Care System, a large multi-hospital healthcare system in Boston, MA, USA. We used electronic query to identify all patients with at least 2 RA diagnosis codes and a prescription for either nintedanib or pirfenidone (2014-2023). All analyzed patients met 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for RA and had definite RA-ILD according to Bongartz criteria. Data regarding pulmonary function test (PFT) results, adverse events (AEs), tolerability, and clinical data were collected. A linear mixed model with random intercept was used to compare the within-patient trajectory of the percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVCpp) within 18-months before to 18-months after antifibrotic initiation among those with these PFT data. Lung transplant-free survival and drug retention was estimated in a Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent baseline factors associated with lung transplant or mortality. RESULTS: We analyzed 74 patients with RA-ILD that initiated antifibrotics (mean age 67.8 years, 53 % male); 40 patients initiated nintedanib and 34 initiated pirfenidone. Median follow-up was 89 weeks (min 4, max 387). There was a significant improvement in the estimated slope of FVCpp after antifibrotic initiation (-0.3 % per year after initiation compared to -6.2 % per year before antifibrotic initiation, p = 0.03). Nintedanib and pirfenidone had similar FVCpp trajectory. Twenty-six patients (35 %) died and 4 (5 %) had undergone lung transplantation during follow-up. Male sex and heavy smoking were each associated with the composite outcome of lung transplant or mortality. AEs were reported in 41 (55 %) patients, with gastrointestinal (GI) AEs being most common (n = 30). The initial antifibrotic was discontinued in 34 (46 %) patients mostly due to GI AEs (n = 19). The median drug retention time was 142 weeks (95 %CI 56, 262) with no difference between nintedanib and pirfenidone (p = 0.68). CONCLUSION: In this first real-world study of antifibrotic use dedicated to RA-ILD, antifibrotic initiation was associated with a modestly improved trajectory of FVCpp. AEs were frequently reported, particularly GI, and discontinuation was common. However, lung transplant and mortality rates were still high, emphasizing the need for further therapeutic strategies in patients with severe RA-ILD. These real-world data complement previous trial data that investigated efficacy and safety.

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and risk of incident interstitial lung disease among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and risk of incident interstitial lung disease (ILD) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies examining the association of DMARDs with incident RA-ILD. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to November 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and post-marketing surveillance studies that investigated adults with RA and compared DMARDs of interest with placebo, no DMARDs, or other DMARDs. The outcome was incident ILD. We summarized the literature on DMARDs and incident RA-ILD risk. Among studies with sufficient quality, we performed meta-analyses to obtain odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 %CI) using the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Among 3,612 studies, we identified a total of 40 papers that encompassed 486,465 patients with RA and 3,928 incident ILD outcomes that were included in the final systematic review and meta-analysis. Among the studies, 24 were RCTs, 4 were prospective cohort studies, 9 were retrospective cohort studies, 2 were case-control studies, and 1 was a post-marketing surveillance study. The pooled analysis from RCTs revealed no statistically significant difference in the odds of ILD development for any specific DMARD across all comparisons examined. The largest identified RCT (Oral Surveillance trial) of tofacitinib (n = 2,911) vs. tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi, n = 1,451) found no relationship with incident ILD (OR 0.94, 95 %CI 0.52 to 1.69, p = 0.828). In 7 observational studies, the use of methotrexate (MTX) yielded a pooled OR for ILD of 0.49 (95 %CI 0.32 to 0.76, p < 0.001) compared to those not using MTX. In a single observational study, tofacitinib users had an OR for ILD of 0.36 (95 %CI 0.15 to 0.87, p = 0.024) compared to TNFi users. CONCLUSION: Observational data suggest no increased risk for any DMARD for incident RA-ILD risk, and perhaps a potential protective role of MTX and tofacitinib. However, these studies may be susceptible to bias, and no specific DMARD showed associations with incident RA-ILD in RCTs. Further well-designed prospective studies are warranted for definitive conclusions on the potential relationship between DMARDs and RA-ILD risk.

Reasons for multiple biologic and targeted synthetic DMARD switching and characteristics of treatment refractory rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Switching biologic and targeted synthetic DMARD (b/tsDMARD) medications occurs commonly in RA patients, however data are limited on the reasons for these changes. The objective of the study was to identify and categorize reasons for b/tsDMARD switching and investigate characteristics associated with treatment refractory RA. METHODS: In a multi-hospital RA electronic health record (EHR) cohort, we identified RA patients prescribed ≥1 b/tsDMARD between 2001 and 2017. Consistent with the EULAR "difficult to treat" (D2T) RA definition, we further identified patients who discontinued ≥2 b/tsDMARDs with different mechanisms of action. We performed manual chart review to determine reasons for medication discontinuation. We defined "treatment refractory" RA as not achieving low disease activity (<3 tender or swollen joints on <7.5 mg of daily prednisone equivalent) despite treatment with two different b/tsDMARD mechanisms of action. We compared demographic, lifestyle, and clinical factors between treatment refractory RA and b/tsDMARD initiators not meeting D2T criteria. RESULTS: We identified 6040 RA patients prescribed ≥1 b/tsDMARD including 404 meeting D2T criteria. The most common reasons for medication discontinuation were inadequate response (43.3 %), loss of efficacy (25.8 %), and non-allergic adverse events (13.7 %). Of patients with D2T RA, 15 % had treatment refractory RA. Treatment refractory RA patients were younger at b/tsDMARD initiation (mean 47.2 vs. 55.2 years, p < 0.001), more commonly female (91.8% vs. 76.1 %, p = 0.006), and ever smokers (68.9% vs. 49.9 %, p = 0.005). No RA clinical factors differentiated treatment refractory RA patients from b/tsDMARD initiators. CONCLUSIONS: In a large EHR-based RA cohort, the most common reasons for b/tsDMARD switching were inadequate response, loss of efficacy, and nonallergic adverse events (e.g. infections, leukopenia, psoriasis). Clinical RA factors were insufficient for differentiating b/tsDMARD responders from nonresponders.

Association of Somatic TET2 Mutations With Giant Cell Arteritis.

OBJECTIVE: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an age-related vasculitis. Prior studies have identified an association between GCA and hematologic malignancies (HMs). How the presence of somatic mutations that drive the development of HMs, or clonal hematopoiesis (CH), may influence clinical outcomes in GCA is not well understood. METHODS: To examine an association between CH and GCA, we analyzed sequenced exomes of 470,960 UK Biobank (UKB) participants for the presence of CH and used multivariable Cox regression. To examine the clinical phenotype of GCA in patients with and without somatic mutations across the spectrum of CH to HM, we performed targeted sequencing of blood samples and electronic health record review on 114 patients with GCA seen at our institution. We then examined associations between specific clonal mutations and GCA disease manifestations. RESULTS: UKB participants with CH had a 1.48-fold increased risk of incident GCA compared to UKB participants without CH. GCA risk was highest among individuals with cytopenia (hazard ratio [HR] 2.98, P = 0.00178) and with TET2 mutation (HR 2.02, P = 0.00116). Mutations were detected in 27.2% of our institutional GCA cohort, three of whom had HM at GCA diagnosis. TET2 mutations were associated with vision loss in patients with GCA (odds ratio 4.33, P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: CH increases risk for development of GCA in a genotype-specific manner, with the greatest risk being conferred by the presence of mutations in TET2. Somatic TET2 mutations likewise increase the risk of GCA-associated vision loss. Integration of somatic genetic testing in GCA diagnostics may be warranted in the future.

Impact of Sex, Serostatus, and Smoking on Risk for Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease Subtypes.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) includes multiple subtypes with varying histopathology, prognosis, and potential treatments. Limited research has investigated risk factors for different RA-ILD subtypes. Therefore, we examined demographic, serologic, and lifestyle associations with RA-ILD subtypes. METHODS: We systematically identified RA-ILD cases and RA controls without ILD (RA-noILD) in the Brigham RA Sequential Study and Mass General Brigham Biobank RA cohort. We determined RA-ILD subtype (usual interstitial pneumonia [UIP], nonspecific interstitial pneumonia [NSIP], and other/indeterminate) through chest high-resolution computed tomography imaging pattern. We investigated associations of demographic, lifestyle, and serologic factors with major RA-ILD subtypes using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 3,328 patients with RA, we identified 208 RA-ILD cases and 547 RA-noILD controls. RA-UIP was associated with older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03 per year, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.01-1.05), male sex (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.33-3.48), and seropositivity (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.24-3.48), whereas RA-NSIP was significantly associated only with seropositive status (OR 3.21, 95% CI 1.36-7.56). Nonfibrotic ILDs were significantly associated with smoking (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.52-5.21). Having three RA-ILD risk factors (male, seropositive, smoking) had an OR of 6.89 (95% CI 2.41-19.7) for RA-UIP compared with having no RA-ILD risk factors. CONCLUSION: Older age, seropositivity, and male sex were strongly associated with RA-UIP, whereas RA-related autoantibodies were associated with RA-NSIP. These findings suggest RA-ILD sex differences may be driven by RA-UIP and emphasize the importance of further studies to clarify RA-ILD heterogeneity and optimize screening and treatment approaches.

RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 and rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease in European ancestry.

Objective: Recently, a genome-wide association study identified an association between RA-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) and RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 in the Japanese population, especially for patients with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern. We aimed to replicate this association in a European population and test for interaction with MUC5B rs35705950. Methods: In this genetic case-control association study, patients with RA and ILD and controls with RA and no ILD were included from France, the USA and the Netherlands. Only cases and controls from European genetic ancestries determined by principal components analysis were included in the analyses. RA was defined by the 1987 ACR or 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria and ILD by chest high-resolution CT scan, except in the control dataset from the Netherlands, where the absence of ILD was determined by chart review. Patients were genotyped for RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 and MUC5B rs35705950. Associations were tested using logistic regression adjusted for sex, age at RA onset, age at ILD onset or at certified absence of ILD, tobacco smoking status and country of origin. Results: Among the 883 patients included, 322 were RA-ILD cases (36.5%). MUC5B rs35705950 was strongly associated with RA-ILD in all datasets {combined adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.9 [95% CI 2.1, 3.9], P = 1.1 × 10-11. No association between RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 and RA-ILD was observed [combined OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.8, 1.6), P = 0.31. No interaction was found between RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 and MUC5B rs35705950 (P = 0.70). Conclusion: Our findings did not support a contribution of RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 to the overall RA-ILD susceptibility in the European population.

Rheumatoid arthritis and changes on spirometry by smoking status in two prospective longitudinal cohorts.

OBJECTIVE: To compare longitudinal changes in spirometric measures between patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and non-RA comparators. METHODS: We analysed longitudinal data from two prospective cohorts: the UK Biobank and COPDGene. Spirometry was conducted at baseline and a second visit after 5-7 years. RA was identified based on self-report and disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use; non-RA comparators reported neither. The primary outcomes were annual changes in the per cent-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1%) and per cent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%). Statistical comparisons were performed using multivariable linear regression. The analysis was stratified based on baseline smoking status and the presence of obstructive pattern (FEV1/FVC <0.7). RESULTS: Among participants who underwent baseline and follow-up spirometry, we identified 233 patients with RA and 37 735 non-RA comparators. Among never-smoking participants without an obstructive pattern, RA was significantly associated with more FEV1% decline (ß=-0.49, p=0.04). However, in ever smokers with ≥10 pack-years, those with RA exhibited significantly less FEV1% decline than non-RA comparators (ß=0.50, p=0.02). This difference was more pronounced among those with an obstructive pattern at baseline (ß=1.12, p=0.01). Results were similar for FEV1/FVC decline. No difference was observed in the annual FVC% change in RA versus non-RA. CONCLUSIONS: Smokers with RA, especially those with baseline obstructive spirometric patterns, experienced lower FEV1% and FEV1/FVC decline than non-RA comparators. Conversely, never smokers with RA had more FEV1% decline than non-RA comparators. Future studies should investigate potential treatments and the pathogenesis of obstructive lung diseases in smokers with RA.

Genomic and Serological Rheumatoid Arthritis Biomarkers, MUC5B Promoter Variant, and Interstitial Lung Abnormalities.

RATIONALE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been implicated in interstitial lung disease (ILD) as majority of studies have been comprised of patients with known RA. However, it remains unclear whether an underlying risk for RA in combination with genetic risk for pulmonary fibrosis is associated with radiological markers of early lung injury and fibrosis in broader population samples. OBJECTIVE: Determine whether genetic and serological biomarkers of RA risk in combination with the MUC5B (rs35705950) risk allele (T) are associated with interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) on computed tomography (CT) scans. METHODS: Associations of RA-risk HLA-DRB1 alleles (*04:01, *04:08, *04:05, *04:04, *10:01) and serum RA autoantibodies with ILA in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA, n=4,018) and COPDGene (n=5,963) cohorts were modeled using logistic regression and adjusted for age, sex, self-reported race and ethnicity, smoking history, body mass index, and principal components of genetic ancestry. RESULTS: The prevalence of an RA risk HLA-DRB1 allele was 16.5% and 21.9% in MESA and COPDGene, respectively. ILA was present in 3.9% and 11% in MESA and COPDGene, respectively. An RA risk HLA-DRB1 allele was not significantly associated with ILA in MESA and COPDGene. In MESA, higher serum levels of IgA rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide were associated with an odds ratio (OR) for ILA of 1.20 (95% CI 1.07-1.35) and 1.19 (95% CI 1.04-1.37), respectively. Among smokers without baseline ILA, per doubling of IgM RF was associated with an OR for ILA 10 years later of 1.25 (95% CI 1.08-1.43). Associations were not significantly different by MUC5B risk allele status. CONCLUSIONS: RA-related HLA-DRB1 alleles were not associated with ILA, whereas higher serum levels of IgM RF among smokers without baseline ILA were associated with subsequent ILA.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Screening and Monitoring of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding screening for interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the monitoring for ILD progression in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), specifically rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, mixed connective tissue disease, and Sjögren disease. METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions related to screening and monitoring for ILD in patients with SARDs. A systematic literature review was performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A Voting Panel of interdisciplinary clinician experts and patients achieved consensus on the direction and strength of each recommendation. RESULTS: Fifteen recommendations were developed. For screening people with these SARDs at risk for ILD, we conditionally recommend pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography of the chest (HRCT chest); conditionally recommend against screening with 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), chest radiography, ambulatory desaturation testing, or bronchoscopy; and strongly recommend against screening with surgical lung biopsy. We conditionally recommend monitoring ILD with PFTs, HRCT chest, and ambulatory desaturation testing and conditionally recommend against monitoring with 6MWD, chest radiography, or bronchoscopy. We provide guidance on ILD risk factors and suggestions on frequency of testing to evaluate for the development of ILD in people with SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the screening and monitoring of ILD in people with SARDs.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions. A systematic literature review was then performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A panel of clinicians and patients reached consensus on the direction and strength of the recommendations. RESULTS: Thirty-five recommendations were generated (including two strong recommendations) for first-line SARD-ILD treatment, treatment of SARD-ILD progression despite first-line ILD therapy, and treatment of rapidly progressive ILD. The strong recommendations were against using glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis-ILD as a first-line ILD therapy and after ILD progression. Otherwise, glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended for first-line ILD treatment in all other SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the treatment of ILD in people with SARDs.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Screening and Monitoring of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding screening for interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the monitoring for ILD progression in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), specifically rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, mixed connective tissue disease, and Sjögren disease. METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions related to screening and monitoring for ILD in patients with SARDs. A systematic literature review was performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A Voting Panel of interdisciplinary clinician experts and patients achieved consensus on the direction and strength of each recommendation. RESULTS: Fifteen recommendations were developed. For screening people with these SARDs at risk for ILD, we conditionally recommend pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography of the chest (HRCT chest); conditionally recommend against screening with 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), chest radiography, ambulatory desaturation testing, or bronchoscopy; and strongly recommend against screening with surgical lung biopsy. We conditionally recommend monitoring ILD with PFTs, HRCT chest, and ambulatory desaturation testing and conditionally recommend against monitoring with 6MWD, chest radiography, or bronchoscopy. We provide guidance on ILD risk factors and suggestions on frequency of testing to evaluate for the development of ILD in people with SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the screening and monitoring of ILD in people with SARDs.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions. A systematic literature review was then performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A panel of clinicians and patients reached consensus on the direction and strength of the recommendations. RESULTS: Thirty-five recommendations were generated (including two strong recommendations) for first-line SARD-ILD treatment, treatment of SARD-ILD progression despite first-line ILD therapy, and treatment of rapidly progressive ILD. The strong recommendations were against using glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis-ILD as a first-line ILD therapy and after ILD progression. Otherwise, glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended for first-line ILD treatment in all other SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the treatment of ILD in people with SARDs.

Migraine and the risk of cervical artery dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Migraine is a common, disabling chronic pain condition possibly related to changes in endothelial and vascular structure and function. Several observational studies have suggested an elevated risk of cervical artery dissection (CeAD) in patients with a history of migraine. We aimed to investigate this potential association using systematic review and meta-analytic methods. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We utilized a pre-defined search protocol to identify and screen studies related to migraine and CeAD in PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science Core Collection. We assessed the risk of bias and performed a meta-analysis of selected studies to assess the association between migraine and CeAD. We also performed subgroup analyses by migraine subtype, biological sex, and the use of stroke versus non-stroke controls. RESULTS: We identified 11 studies (N = 9857 patients) for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed an association between migraine and CeAD with an odds ratio of 1.74 (95%CI 1.38-2.19). There was high heterogeneity among the included studies (I2 = 61%). Publication bias was present but the Trim-Fill imputation suggested that the impact on results was likely minimal. Subgroup analyses revealed an association between migraine without aura and CeAD (OR 1.86, 95%CI 1.55-2.24) but not migraine with aura and CeAD (OR 1.15, 95%CI 0.71-1.88). There was no difference in the association between migraine and CeAD in men compared to women. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: A history of migraine is associated with an increased risk of CeAD. Further studies are needed to elucidate the potential pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying this association.

Gene-respiratory disease interactions for rheumatoid arthritis risk.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify gene by respiratory tract disease interactions that increase RA risk. METHODS: In this case-control study using the Mass General Brigham Biobank, we matched incident RA cases, confirmed by ACR/EULAR criteria, to four controls on age, sex, and electronic health record history. Genetic exposures included a validated overall genetic risk score (GRS) for RA, a Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) GRS for RA, and the MUC5B promoter variant, an established risk factor for RA-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD). Preceding respiratory tract diseases came from diagnosis codes (positive predictive value 86%). We estimated attributable proportions (AP) and multiplicative odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for RA for each genetic and respiratory exposure using conditional logistic regression models, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: We identified 653 incident RA cases and 2,607 matched controls (mean 54 years, 76% female). The highest tertile of the overall GRS and the HLA GRS were both associated with increased RA risk (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.89,2.74; OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.67-2.45). ILD and the HLA GRS exhibited a synergistic relationship for RA risk (OR for both exposures 4.30, 95% CI 1.28,14.38; AP 0.51, 95% CI-0.16,1.18). Asthma and the MUC5B promoter variant also exhibited a synergistic interaction for seropositive RA (OR for both exposures 2.58, 95% CI 1.10,6.07; AP 0.62, 95% CI 0.24,1.00). CONCLUSION: ILD-HLA GRS and asthma-MUC5B promoter variant showed synergistic interactions for RA risk. Such interactions may prove useful for RA prevention and screening.