ABSTRACT
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune disorder that was first described in the late 1800s as a variant of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, it has recently been categorized, as a disease, especially with the discovery of aquaporin-4 (AQP4-Ab) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-Ab). Unfortunately, patient presentation is not always clear, and NMOSD may initially be diagnosed as an alternative neurological disease. We present a 58-year-old woman who was hospitalized several times for what was initially perceived as a pontine stroke. However, given worsening symptoms, serologic testing confirmed AQP4-Ab positivity and, subsequently, the NMOSD diagnosis. In addition to the case report, a systematic literature review was performed to identify NMOSD cases initially misdiagnosed as stroke. Publications were selected and curated in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Six NMOSD patients were initially thought to have had acute strokes. However, steady progression and/or the recurrence of symptoms suggested that further investigations with neuroimaging studies and serological immune assays were necessary to exclude alternative etiologies. Notably, the age at onset in all cases was significantly more advanced than patients with typical NMOSD presentations (median age 32-41). In conclusion, the NMOSD diagnosis should be considered in cases with atypical stroke-like presentations, particularly those of later onset (defined as equal to or greater than 50 years of age). This is important as early recognition and treatment with immune therapies can improve functional outcomes.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE Many patients with medically intractable epilepsy have mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS), which significantly affects their quality of life. The surgical excision of MTS lesions can result in marked improvement or even complete resolution of the epileptic episodes. Reliable radiological diagnosis of MTS is a clinical challenge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of volumetric mapping of the hippocampi for the identification of MTS in a case-controlled series of pediatric patients who underwent resection for medically refractory epilepsy, using pathology as a gold standard. METHODS A cohort of 57 pediatric patients who underwent resection for medically intractable epilepsy between 2005 and 2015 was evaluated. On pathological investigation, this group included 24 patients with MTS and 33 patients with non-MTS findings. Retrospective quantitative volumetric measurements of the hippocampi were acquired for 37 of these 57 patients. Two neuroradiologists with more than 10 years of experience who were blinded to the patients' MTS status performed the retrospective review of MR images. To produce the volumetric data, MR scans were parcellated and segmented using the FreeSurfer software suite. Hippocampal regions of interest were compared against an age-weighted local regression curve generated with data from the pediatric normal cohort. Standard deviations and percentiles of specific subjects were calculated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were determined for the original clinical read and the expert readers. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for the methods of classification to compare results from the readers with the authors' results, and an optimal threshold was determined. From that threshold the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were calculated for the volumetric analysis. RESULTS With the use of quantitative volumetry, a sensitivity of 72%, a specificity of 95%, a PPV of 93%, an NPV of 78%, and an area under the curve of 0.84 were obtained using a percentage difference of normalized hippocampal volume. The resulting specificity (95%) and PPV (93%) are superior to the original clinical read and to Reader A and Reader B's findings (range for specificity 74%-86% and for PPV 64%-71%). The sensitivity (72%) and NPV (78%) are comparable to Reader A's findings (73% and 81%, respectively) and are better than those of the original clinical read and of Reader B (sensitivity 45% and 63% and NPV 71% and 70%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Volumetric measurement of the hippocampi outperforms expert readers in specificity and PPV, and it demonstrates comparable to superior sensitivity and NPV. Volumetric measurements can complement anatomical imaging for the identification of MTS, much like a computer-aided detection tool would. The implementation of this approach in the daily clinical workflow could significantly improve diagnostic accuracy.