Patients' preferences for anti-osteoporosis drug treatment: a cross-European discrete choice experiment.

Objectives: To estimate the preferences of osteoporotic patients for medication attributes, and analyse data from seven European countries. Methods: A discrete choice experiment was conducted in Belgium, France, Ireland, the Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland and the UK. Patients were asked to choose repeatedly between two hypothetical unlabelled drug treatments (and an opt-out option) that varied with respect to four attributes: efficacy in reducing the risk of fracture, type of potential common side effects, and mode and frequency of administration. In those countries in which patients contribute to the cost of their treatment directly, a fifth attribute was added: out-of-pocket cost. A mixed logit panel model was used to estimate patients' preferences. Results: In total, 1124 patients completed the experiment, with a sample of between 98 and 257 patients per country. In all countries, patients preferred treatment with higher effectiveness, and 6-monthly subcutaneous injection was always preferred over weekly oral tablets. In five countries, patients also preferred a monthly oral tablet and yearly i.v. injections over weekly oral tablets. In the three countries where the out-of-pocket cost was included as an attribute, lower costs significantly contributed to the treatment preference. Between countries, there were statistically significant differences for 13 out of 42 attribute/level interactions. Conclusion: We found statistically significant differences in patients' preferences for anti-osteoporosis medications between countries, especially for the mode of administration. Our findings emphasized that international treatment recommendations should allow for local adaptation, and that understanding individual preferences is important if we want to improve the quality of clinical care for patients with osteoporosis.

The clinical and economic burden of poor adherence and persistence with osteoporosis medications in Ireland.

OBJECTIVES: Medication nonadherence is common for osteoporosis, but its consequences have not been well described. This study aimed to quantify the clinical and economic impacts of poor adherence and to evaluate the potential cost-effectiveness of improving patient adherence by using hypothetical behavioral interventions. METHODS: A previously validated Markov microsimulation model was adapted to the Irish setting to estimate lifetime costs and outcomes (fractures and quality-adjusted life-year [QALY]) for three adherence scenarios: no treatment, real-world adherence, and full adherence over 3 years. The real-world scenario employed adherence and persistence data from the Irish Health Services Executive-Primary Care Reimbursement Services pharmacy claims database. We also investigated the cost-effectiveness of hypothetical behavioral interventions to improve medication adherence (according to their cost and effect on adherence). RESULTS: The number of fractures prevented and the QALY gain obtained at real-world adherence levels represented only 57% and 56% of those expected with full adherence, respectively. The costs per QALY gained of real-world adherence and of full adherence compared with no treatment were estimated at € 11,834 and € 6,341, respectively. An intervention to improve adherence by 25% would result in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of € 11,511 per QALY and € 54,182 per QALY, compared with real-world adherence, if the intervention cost an additional € 50 and € 100 per year, respectively. DISCUSSION: Poor adherence with osteoporosis medications results in around a 50% reduction in the potential benefits observed in clinical trials and a doubling of the cost per QALY gained from these medications. Depending on their costs and outcomes, programs to improve adherence have the potential to be an efficient use of resources.

Primary-care prescribing of anti-osteoporotic-type medications following hospitalisation for fractures.

PURPOSE: We examined the prescribing of antiosteoporotic medications pre- and post hospital admission in patients with fragility fractures as well as factors associated with prescribing of these treatments following admission. METHODS: We identified all patients aged ≥ 55 years at a large teaching hospital between 2005 and 2008 with a fracture using the Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) system. These data were linked to prescribing data from the Health Service Executive Primary Care Reimbursement Services (HSE-PCRS) scheme before and after discharge (821 patients). Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the likelihood of prescription of antiosteoporotic medication pre- and post discharge in relation to year of discharge, age, gender, and type of fracture. RESULTS: Prescribing of antiosteoporotic treatment before fracture increased from 2.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.23-2.93%] in 2005 to 10.6% (95% CI 9.32-11.86) by 2008, whereas post fracture prescribing increased from 11% (95% CI 9.64-12.36) to 47% (95% CI 43.6-50.3). In patients discharged from hospital in 2007, postfracture prescribing was 31.8% (95% CI 28.66-35.02) at 12 months, increasing to 50.3% (95% CI 46.6-53.9) at 24 months. The highest rate of prescribing was in the 65- to 69-year age group [odds ratio (OR) 8.51, 95% CI 1.75-41.35]. Patients discharged in 2008 were eight times more likely to be treated than patients discharged in 2005 (OR 8.01, 95% CI 4.55-14.09). CONCLUSION: The percentage of patients on antiosteoporotic treatment post fracture increased significantly from 2005 to 2008. This may be largely due to the introduction of the Osteoporosis Clinic to the hospital in 2005.

Budget impact analysis of an early identification and referral model for diagnosing patients with suspected rheumatoid arthritis in Ireland.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the budget impact from the perspective of the Irish health-care system attributable to a reconfiguration in the diagnostic care pathway for patients with suspected RA by adopting an early identification and referral model (EIM). METHODS: The budget impact model evaluated the total health-care use and costs attributable to an EIM to diagnose patients with suspected RA relative to the reference scenario of current practice. The modelling also assessed a primary outcome of effect, which examined how many patients can be diagnosed by a rheumatologist within 3 months of symptom onset. The budget impact analysis model was estimated over a 5-year time frame. RESULTS: The EIM generated a cost saving for the Irish health-care system of €237 547 over the time frame relative to current practice. The cost savings were realized owing to a reduction in the number of general practitioner (GP) visits of 18 790 and a reduction in diagnostic tests carried out by GPs. The results showed that 1027 (510%) more patients were diagnosed within 3 months of symptom onset in the EIM compared with current practice. CONCLUSION: This paper has presented an alternative rheumatologist-led service design that can be used in diagnosing patients with suspected RA. The rheumatologist-led service provision detailed in this study has the potential simultaneously to reduce demand for primary care services and to improve the health outcomes of patients. The use of an EIM sees rheumatologist activity incorporate patient demand.

Identifying Incomplete Atypical Femoral Fractures With Single-Energy Absorptiometry: Declining Prevalence.

BACKGROUND: Atypical femur fractures (AFFs) are associated with long-term bisphosphonate (BP) therapy. Early identification of AFF prior to their completion provides an opportunity to intervene, potentially reducing morbidity associated with these fractures. Single-energy X-ray absorptiometry (SE) is an imaging method recently shown to detect incomplete AFF (iAFF) prior to fracture completion. METHODS: Between May 2013 and September 2014, we assessed 173 patients who had been prescribed BP therapy for >5 years for iAFF using SE at their presentation for routine bone mineral density testing. We compared these findings with those of our previously published prospective study (n = 257) in which the femur was imaged for iAFF using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. In addition, we estimated the yearly prevalence of complete AFF among patients with subtrochanteric fracture at our institution from 2006 to 2014, and we evaluated prescribing trends for BP in Ireland from 2009 to 2014. RESULTS: No patients had iAFF using SE femur compared with a prevalence of 2.7% in the earlier study. Between 2006 and 2014, we observed a rise and decline in AFFs at our hospital and a similar national trend in BP prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: AFFs appear to be decreasing. New customized scan modes of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry systems, which visualize the entire femur at high image quality and take measurements, have the potential to identify iAFF prior to fracture completion and to ascertain those at highest risk of AFF.

Adherence and persistence to urate-lowering therapies in the Irish setting.

To identify adherence and persistence levels with urate-lowering therapies using the national administrative pharmacy claim database. This was a retrospective, pharmacy claims-based analysis of dispensed anti-gout medications on the Irish national HSE-PCRS scheme database between January 2008 and December 2012. Adherence is defined by the medication possession ratio (MPR), and patients were considered to be adherent if the MPR ≥80 % (good adherers) in any given time period. Persistence was defined as continued use of therapy with no periods exceeding a refill gap of >63 days (9 weeks). Logistic regression analysis was used to predict odd ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) for persistence and adherence in relation to age, gender and level of comorbidity. There was a 53 % increase in the number of patients prescribed anti-gout medications between 2008 and 2012 with an increase of 27 % in the associated ingredient cost of these medications. Allopurinol accounted for 87 % of the prescribing and febuxostat accounted for a further 9 %. In patients who started on 100 mg allopurinol, only 14.6 % were titrated to the 300 mg dose. For all those initiating urate-lowering therapies, 45.8 % of patients were persistent with treatment at 6 months decreasing to 22.6 % at 12 months. In multivariate analysis, females had poorer adherence (OR = 0.83 (0.77-0.90)), and increasing age was associated with increased adherence (OR = 4.19 (2.53-6.15)) Increasing comorbidity score was associated with increased adherence and persistence at 6 months (OR = 0.68 (0.59-0.79)). Adherence with anti-gout medications in this study cohort was relatively low. Sustained treatment for gouty arthritis is essential in the prevention of serious adverse outcomes.Significance and Innovations-Poor adherence to medications prescribed to patients for the management of chronic diseases such as gout is an ongoing problem which urgently needs to be addressed.-Some of the reasons identified for poor adherence to anti-gout medications include the risk of flare of acute gout with the initiation of urate-lowering therapy (ULT), poor response to ULT and persistence of attacks of acute gout, suboptimal dosing of allopurinol therapy and intolerance of allopurinol.-The results of this study identified adherence and persistence rates of approximately 50 % at 6 months which is in line if not lower than many of the other published studies to date which have measured adherence and persistence using pharmacy claims databases.-The results of poor adherence and persistence affect both the health of the patients with financial implications for the healthcare service.

Usage of paracetamol-containing combination analgesics remains high in primary care.

AIMS: Paracetamol-containing combination analgesics are widely prescribed but the use of paracetamol/dextropropoxyphene (co-proxamol) is particularly controversial. We aim to examine the prescribing patterns of the paracetamol-containing analgesics in Ireland. METHODS: A national primary care prescribing database was used to investigate patterns of usage. Twenty-six thousand three hundred and eighteen patients who were new to therapy with paracetamol and paracetamol-containing analgesics between January and June 2002 were identified as follows: no previous analgesic medication in the 6 months prior to enrolment into the study, and followed up for at least 12 months from the time of enrolment. Duration of therapy and the number of prescriptions received post enrolment were analyzed according to age. Odds ratios for receiving long-term (>1 month) compared with short-term (1 month) prescriptions for co-proxamol, paracetamol only or a paracetamol combination-type analgesic were calculated for women vs. men, and in those aged over 65 vs. those aged under 65 years. RESULTS: Co-proxamol was the most commonly prescribed analgesic, accounting for 42% of all prescriptions dispensed during 2003. Long-term use of paracetamol-containing analgesic preparations was uncommon, with 56.7% receiving only 1 month's prescription during the study period. However, women (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.07, 1.28, P < 0.0001) and those over 65 years (OR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.57, 1.86, P < 0.0001) were more likely to receive a follow-up prescription for co-proxamol, but also for paracetamol (women, OR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.16, 1.39; over 65 year olds, OR = 2.67, 95% CI 2.44, 2.93) and the paracetamol combinations (women, OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.20, 1.47; over 65 year olds, OR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.53, 1.87). CONCLUSIONS: Co-proxamol was the most commonly prescribed paracetamol-containing analgesic preparation in Ireland. The results may indicate inappropriate use in primary care.

Microcosting versus DRGs in the provision of cost estimates for use in pharmacoeconomic evaluation.

Investigating the pharmacoeconomic impact of any diagnostic or therapeutic intervention in the Irish healthcare setting is currently compromised by the lack of detailed cost data. Consequently, we conducted a number of microcosting studies in the areas of acute myocardial infarction, cardiac failure and HIV, from the hospital perspective. The results of these microcosting studies were compared with the costing estimates assigned to hospital admissions, based on the diagnosis-related group system. Differences ranged from 9 to 66%. It was concluded that the diagnosis related group system is a useful estimate of costs for patient admissions in the absence of detailed cost of illness data. However, supplementary costing studies should be performed for certain therapeutic areas, particularly those where investigation and/or treatment costs are high.