ABSTRACT
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) can occur in isolation or in conjunction with other birth defects (CDH+). A molecular etiology can only be identified in a subset of CDH cases. This is due, in part, to an incomplete understanding of the genes that contribute to diaphragm development. Here, we used clinical and molecular data from 36 individuals with CDH+ who are cataloged in the DECIPHER database to identify genes that may play a role in diaphragm development and to discover new phenotypic expansions. Among this group, we identified individuals who carried putatively deleterious sequence or copy number variants affecting CREBBP, SMARCA4, UBA2, and USP9X. The role of these genes in diaphragm development was supported by their expression in the developing mouse diaphragm, their similarity to known CDH genes using data from a previously published and validated machine learning algorithm, and/or the presence of CDH in other individuals with their associated genetic disorders. Our results demonstrate how data from DECIPHER, and other public databases, can be used to identify new phenotypic expansions and suggest that CREBBP, SMARCA4, UBA2, and USP9X play a role in diaphragm development.
Subject(s)
Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital , Animals , DNA Copy Number Variations , Diaphragm , Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital/genetics , MiceABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The objective was to evaluate: (i) the proportion of prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease (CHD) associated with an abnormal quantitative fluorescence-PCR (QF-PCR), chromosome microarray (CMA), and exome sequencing (ES) result; and (ii) the diagnostic yield of these technologies based on CHD category and presence of extra-cardiac anomalies (ECAs). METHODS: This prospective cohort study was set across 12 UK foetal medicine centres. All cases underwent QF-PCR, CMA, and ES, and the diagnostic yield in n = 147 cases of prenatally diagnosed CHD was assessed. RESULTS: In 34.7% (n = 51/147), a genetic diagnosis was obtained. Using a stepwise testing strategy, the diagnostic yield for QF-PCR, CMA, and ES was 15.6% (n = 23/147), 13.7% (n = 17/124), and 10.2% (n = 11/107), respectively. Abnormal QF-PCR/shunt (septal) defects 31.4% (n = 11/35), p = 0.046, and abnormal CMA/conotruncal anomalies 22.7% (n = 10/44), p = 0.04, had significant associations. Monogenic variants were commonest in complex CHD 36.4% (n = 4/11). Multisystem CHD had a greater diagnostic yield overall compared to isolated OR 2.41 (95% CI, 1.1-5.1), particularly in association with brain and gastrointestinal tract anomalies. The proportion of variants of uncertain significance was 4.7% (n = 5/107) with ES, with none in the CMA group. CONCLUSION: In the era of prenatal ES, there remains an important role for QF-PCR and CMA. Identification of monogenic pathologic variants further allows delineation of prognosis in CHD.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Fetal structural anomalies, which are detected by ultrasonography, have a range of genetic causes, including chromosomal aneuploidy, copy number variations (CNVs; which are detectable by chromosomal microarrays), and pathogenic sequence variants in developmental genes. Testing for aneuploidy and CNVs is routine during the investigation of fetal structural anomalies, but there is little information on the clinical usefulness of genome-wide next-generation sequencing in the prenatal setting. We therefore aimed to evaluate the proportion of fetuses with structural abnormalities that had identifiable variants in genes associated with developmental disorders when assessed with whole-exome sequencing (WES). METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, two groups in Birmingham and London recruited patients from 34 fetal medicine units in England and Scotland. We used whole-exome sequencing (WES) to evaluate the presence of genetic variants in developmental disorder genes (diagnostic genetic variants) in a cohort of fetuses with structural anomalies and samples from their parents, after exclusion of aneuploidy and large CNVs. Women were eligible for inclusion if they were undergoing invasive testing for identified nuchal translucency or structural anomalies in their fetus, as detected by ultrasound after 11 weeks of gestation. The partners of these women also had to consent to participate. Sequencing results were interpreted with a targeted virtual gene panel for developmental disorders that comprised 1628 genes. Genetic results related to fetal structural anomaly phenotypes were then validated and reported postnatally. The primary endpoint, which was assessed in all fetuses, was the detection of diagnostic genetic variants considered to have caused the fetal developmental anomaly. FINDINGS: The cohort was recruited between Oct 22, 2014, and June 29, 2017, and clinical data were collected until March 31, 2018. After exclusion of fetuses with aneuploidy and CNVs, 610 fetuses with structural anomalies and 1202 matched parental samples (analysed as 596 fetus-parental trios, including two sets of twins, and 14 fetus-parent dyads) were analysed by WES. After bioinformatic filtering and prioritisation according to allele frequency and effect on protein and inheritance pattern, 321 genetic variants (representing 255 potential diagnoses) were selected as potentially pathogenic genetic variants (diagnostic genetic variants), and these variants were reviewed by a multidisciplinary clinical review panel. A diagnostic genetic variant was identified in 52 (8·5%; 95% CI 6·4-11·0) of 610 fetuses assessed and an additional 24 (3·9%) fetuses had a variant of uncertain significance that had potential clinical usefulness. Detection of diagnostic genetic variants enabled us to distinguish between syndromic and non-syndromic fetal anomalies (eg, congenital heart disease only vs a syndrome with congenital heart disease and learning disability). Diagnostic genetic variants were present in 22 (15·4%) of 143 fetuses with multisystem anomalies (ie, more than one fetal structural anomaly), nine (11·1%) of 81 fetuses with cardiac anomalies, and ten (15·4%) of 65 fetuses with skeletal anomalies; these phenotypes were most commonly associated with diagnostic variants. However, diagnostic genetic variants were least common in fetuses with isolated increased nuchal translucency (≥4·0 mm) in the first trimester (in three [3·2%] of 93 fetuses). INTERPRETATION: WES facilitates genetic diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies, which enables more accurate predictions of fetal prognosis and risk of recurrence in future pregnancies. However, the overall detection of diagnostic genetic variants in a prospectively ascertained cohort with a broad range of fetal structural anomalies is lower than that suggested by previous smaller-scale studies of fewer phenotypes. WES improved the identification of genetic disorders in fetuses with structural abnormalities; however, before clinical implementation, careful consideration should be given to case selection to maximise clinical usefulness. FUNDING: UK Department of Health and Social Care and The Wellcome Trust.
Subject(s)
Abnormal Karyotype/statistics & numerical data , Congenital Abnormalities/genetics , Exome Sequencing/statistics & numerical data , Fetal Development/genetics , Fetus/abnormalities , Abnormal Karyotype/embryology , Abortion, Eugenic/statistics & numerical data , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Congenital Abnormalities/diagnosis , Congenital Abnormalities/epidemiology , DNA Copy Number Variations/genetics , Female , Fetus/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Live Birth/epidemiology , Male , Nuchal Translucency Measurement , Parents , Perinatal Death/etiology , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Stillbirth/epidemiology , Exome Sequencing/methodsABSTRACT
Clinical testing with chromosomal microarray (CMA) is most commonly undertaken for clinical indications such as intellectual disability, dysmorphic features and/or congenital abnormalities. Identification of a structural aberration (SA) involving a cancer susceptibility gene (CSG) constitutes a type of incidental or secondary finding. Laboratory reporting, risk communication and clinical management of these structural aberrations with secondary implications (SASIs) is currently inconsistent. We undertake meta-analysis of 18 622 instances of CMA performed for unrelated indications in which 106 SASIs are identified involving in total 40 different CSGs. Here we present the recommendations of a joint UK working group representing the British Society of Genomic Medicine, UK Cancer Genetics Group and UK Association for Clinical Genomic Science. SASIs are categorised into four groups, defined by the type of SA and the cancer risk. For each group, recommendations are provided regarding reflex parental testing and cancer risk management.
Subject(s)
DNA Copy Number Variations/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Neoplasms/etiology , Neoplasms/genetics , Chromosome Aberrations , Developmental Disabilities/genetics , Disease Susceptibility , Genomics/methods , Humans , Intellectual Disability/geneticsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In light of the prospective Prenatal Assessment of Genomes and Exomes (PAGE) study, this paper aimed to determine the additional costs of using exome sequencing (ES) alongside or in place of chromosomal microarray (CMA) in a fetus with an identified congenital anomaly. METHODS: A decision tree was populated using data from a prospective cohort of women undergoing invasive diagnostic testing. Four testing strategies were evaluated: CMA, ES, CMA followed by ES ("stepwise"); CMA and ES combined. RESULTS: When ES is priced at GBP 2,100 (EUR 2,407/USD 2,694), performing ES alone prenatally would cost a further GBP 31,410 (EUR 36,001/USD 40,289) per additional genetic diagnosis, whereas the stepwise would cost a further GBP 24,657 (EUR 28,261/USD 31,627) per additional genetic diagnosis. When ES is priced at GBP 966 (EUR 1,107/USD 1,239), performing ES alone prenatally would cost a further GBP 11,532 (EUR 13,217/USD 14,792) per additional genetic diagnosis, whereas the stepwise would cost a further additional GBP 11,639 (EUR 13,340/USD 14,929) per additional genetic diagnosis. The sub-group analysis suggests that performing stepwise on cases indicative of multiple anomalies at ultrasound scan (USS) compared to cases indicative of a single anomaly, is more cost-effective compared to using ES alone. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Performing ES alongside CMA is more cost-effective than ES alone, which can potentially lead to improvements in pregnancy management. The direct effects of test results on pregnancy outcomes were not examined; therefore, further research is recommended to examine changes on the projected incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.
Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Exome Sequencing/economics , Exome/genetics , Genetic Testing/economics , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/economics , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/economics , Cohort Studies , Decision Trees , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Genetic Testing/methods , Humans , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods , Exome Sequencing/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic yield of combined exome sequencing (ES) and autopsy in fetuses/neonates with prenatally identified structural anomalies resulting in termination of pregnancy, intrauterine, neonatal, or early infant death. METHODS: ES was undertaken in 27 proband/parent trios following full autopsy. Candidate pathogenic variants were classified by a multidisciplinary clinical review panel using American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. RESULTS: A genetic diagnosis was established in ten cases (37%). Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were identified in nine different genes including four de novo autosomal dominant, three homozygous autosomal recessive, two compound heterozygous autosomal recessive, and one X-linked. KMT2D variants (associated with Kabuki syndrome postnatally) occurred in two cases. Pathogenic variants were identified in 5/13 (38%) cases with multisystem anomalies, in 2/4 (50%) cases with fetal akinesia deformation sequence, and in 1/4 (25%) cases each with cardiac and brain anomalies and hydrops fetalis. No pathogenic variants were detected in fetuses with genitourinary (1), skeletal (1), or abdominal (1) abnormalities. CONCLUSION: This cohort demonstrates the clinical utility of molecular autopsy with ES to identify an underlying genetic cause in structurally abnormal fetuses/neonates. These molecular findings provided parents with an explanation of the developmental abnormality, delineated the recurrence risks, and assisted the management of subsequent pregnancies.
Subject(s)
Congenital Abnormalities/genetics , Fetal Diseases/genetics , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Autopsy/methods , Cohort Studies , Congenital Abnormalities/diagnosis , Exome/genetics , Female , Fetal Diseases/diagnosis , Fetus/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pregnancy , Exome Sequencing/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the diagnostic yield of prenatal submicroscopic chromosome anomalies using prenatal array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH). METHOD: Prospective cohort study conducted between March 2013 and June 2017 including fetuses where an elevated nuchal translucency (NT) or structural anomaly was identified on ultrasound and common aneuploidy testing was negative. aCGH was performed using an 8-plex oligonucleotide platform with a genome wide backbone resolution of greater than 200 kb and interpretation in line with American College of Medical Genetics guidance. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred twenty-nine fetuses were included; 371 fetuses with an increased NT (32.9%) and 758 with a structural anomaly (67.1%). The rate of pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) and variant of uncertain significance (VUS) was 5.9% (n = 22) and 0.5% (n = 2) in the elevated NT group and 7.3% (n = 55) and 0.8% (n = 6) in the mid-trimester anomaly group. No pathogenic CNVs were identified in fetuses with an NT less than 4.0 mm. Multisystem and cardiac anomalies had the greatest yield of pathogenic CNV with a 22q11.2 microdeletion present in 40% (12/30). CONCLUSION: Prenatal aCGH is a useful diagnostic tool in the investigation of fetuses with a significantly elevated NT or structural anomaly. With time and experience, rates of pathogenic CNVs have increased, and VUS have reduced, supporting the prenatal application of increasingly high resolution aCGH platforms.
Subject(s)
Chromosome Aberrations , Comparative Genomic Hybridization , Fetus/abnormalities , Fetus/diagnostic imaging , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Adult , Aneuploidy , Chromosome Aberrations/embryology , Cohort Studies , Comparative Genomic Hybridization/methods , DNA Copy Number Variations , Female , Fetus/metabolism , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/diagnosis , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/embryology , Gestational Age , Humans , Karyotyping , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Ultrasonography, PrenatalABSTRACT
The genetic etiology of non-aneuploid fetal structural abnormalities is typically investigated by karyotyping and array-based detection of microscopically detectable rearrangements, and submicroscopic copy-number variants (CNVs), which collectively yield a pathogenic finding in up to 10% of cases. We propose that exome sequencing may substantially increase the identification of underlying etiologies. We performed exome sequencing on a cohort of 30 non-aneuploid fetuses and neonates (along with their parents) with diverse structural abnormalities first identified by prenatal ultrasound. We identified candidate pathogenic variants with a range of inheritance models, and evaluated these in the context of detailed phenotypic information. We identified 35 de novo single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), small indels, deletions or duplications, of which three (accounting for 10% of the cohort) are highly likely to be causative. These are de novo missense variants in FGFR3 and COL2A1, and a de novo 16.8 kb deletion that includes most of OFD1. In five further cases (17%) we identified de novo or inherited recessive or X-linked variants in plausible candidate genes, which require additional validation to determine pathogenicity. Our diagnostic yield of 10% is comparable to, and supplementary to, the diagnostic yield of existing microarray testing for large chromosomal rearrangements and targeted CNV detection. The de novo nature of these events could enable couples to be counseled as to their low recurrence risk. This study outlines the way for a substantial improvement in the diagnostic yield of prenatal genetic abnormalities through the application of next-generation sequencing.
Subject(s)
Chromosome Aberrations , Disease/genetics , Genetic Testing/methods , Genetic Variation , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Cohort Studies , DNA Mutational Analysis , Disease/etiology , Exome , Female , Genome, Human , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Mutation , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Pregnancy , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Ultrasonography, PrenatalABSTRACT
Genome-wide arrays are rapidly replacing conventional karyotyping in postnatal cytogenetic diagnostics and there is a growing request for arrays in the prenatal setting. Several studies have documented 1-3% additional abnormal findings in prenatal diagnosis with arrays compared to conventional karyotyping. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that 5.2% extra diagnoses can be expected in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities. However, no consensus exists as to whether the use of genome-wide arrays should be restricted to pregnancies with ultrasound abnormalities, performed in all women undergoing invasive prenatal testing or offered to all pregnant women. Moreover, the interpretation of array results in the prenatal situation is challenging due to the large numbers of copy number variants with no major phenotypic effect. This also raises the question of what, or what not to report, for example, how to deal with unsolicited findings. These issues were discussed at a working group meeting that preceded the European Society of Human Genetics 2011 Conference in Amsterdam. This article is the result of this meeting and explores the introduction of genome-wide arrays into routine prenatal diagnosis. We aim to give some general recommendations on how to develop practical guidelines that can be implemented in the local setting and that are consistent with the emerging international consensus.
Subject(s)
Comparative Genomic Hybridization/methods , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , DNA Copy Number Variations , Female , Genetic Counseling , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Informed Consent , PregnancyABSTRACT
Deletions of 17q12 are associated with renal cysts and maturity onset diabetes of the young, and have also been identified in women with reproductive tract anomalies due to Mullerian aplasia. Although initially identified in patients with normal cognitive ability, some patients with this recurrent microdeletion syndrome have learning problems. We identified a 17q12 microdeletion in three patients with renal cystic disease by array comparative genomic hybridization and the phenotypic spectrum of the 17q12 microdeletion syndrome is illustrated by the description of these patients. Of two patients who are old enough to be assessed, one has significant speech delay, autism spectrum disorder, and mild learning difficulty, while the other patient has only mild speech delay. This highlights the variability of cognitive involvement in this condition. The third patient presented with Alagille syndrome-like features in the neonatal period. All three patients had transient hypercalcemia in the neonatal period, a finding that has not previously been described in this condition. Moreover, two patients have mild or no dysmorphism, while one displays striking facial dysmorphism in addition to minor congenital anomalies. We suggest that while patients with 17q12 microdeletion syndrome can present with type 2 diabetes or renal cysts without any dysmorphic features, a subgroup may have dysmorphic features or present with neonatal cholestasis. Transient neonatal hypercalcemia may be a feature of this microdeletion syndrome.
Subject(s)
Chromosome Deletion , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17 , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Infant , Male , Phenotype , SyndromeSubject(s)
Bone Diseases, Developmental/diagnostic imaging , Brain/abnormalities , Chromosome Aberrations , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 14/genetics , Congenital Abnormalities/genetics , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Adult , Bone Diseases, Developmental/embryology , Bone Diseases, Developmental/genetics , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/embryology , Consanguinity , Female , Humans , Male , Pakistan/ethnology , Pregnancy , Tissue Array Analysis , Ultrasonography, PrenatalABSTRACT
The molecular genetic diagnosis of inherited metabolic disorders is challenging. The diseases are rare, and most show locus heterogeneity. Hence, testing of the genes associated with IMDs is time consuming and often not easily available. We report a resequencing array that allows the simultaneous resequencing of up to 92 genes associated with IMDs. To validate the array, DNA samples from 51 patients with 52 different known variants (including point variants, small insertion, and deletions [indels]) in seven genes (C14ORF133, GAA, NPC1, NPC2, VPS33B, WFS1, and SLC19A2) were amplified by PCR and hybridized to the array. A further patient cohort with 48 different mutations in NPC1 were analyzed blind. Out of 76 point variants, 73 were identified using automated software analysis followed by manual review. Ten insertion and deletion variants were detected in the extra tiling using mutation specific probes, with 11 heterozygous deletions and 3 heterozygous insertions. In summary, we identified 96% (95% confidence interval [CI] 89-99%) of point variants added to the array, but the pickup rate reduced to 83% (95% CI 75-89%) when insertions/deletions were included. Although the methodology has strengths and weaknesses, application of this technique could expedite diagnosis in most patients with multilocus IMDs.
Subject(s)
Metabolic Diseases/genetics , Mutation , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Carrier Proteins/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Glycoproteins/genetics , Humans , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins , Membrane Glycoproteins/genetics , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Metabolic Diseases/diagnosis , Niemann-Pick C1 Protein , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reproducibility of Results , Research Design , Vesicular Transport Proteins/genetics , alpha-Glucosidases/geneticsABSTRACT
A proportion of cytogenetic abnormalities in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) may escape detection by high-resolution genomic technologies, but can be identified by conventional cytogenetic and molecular analysis. Here, we report the detection of a reciprocal translocation t(7;21)(p22;q22) in the marrow of two adults with MDS and AML, using conventional cytogenetic analysis and fluorescence-in situ-hybridization (FISH). Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and sequence analysis identified a fusion between RUNX1 and the gene encoding ubiquitin specific peptidase-42 (USP42), with splice-variants and variable break-points within RUNX1. Combined cytomorphology and FISH studies in MDS marrow revealed abnormal RUNX1 signals within megakaryocytes, suggesting that the acquisition of t(7;21)(p22;q22) does not confer complete differentiation arrest and may represent an early genetic event in leukaemogenesis. Single nucleotide polymorphism-arrays failed to detect additional sub-microscopic genomic changes predisposing to or associated with t(7;21). Molecular analysis of 100 MDS and AML marrow specimens by RT-PCR did not reveal new cases with the RUNX1-USP42 fusion. Thus, our studies have identified t(7;21)(p22;q22) as a rare but recurrent abnormality in MDS/AML, with the existence of alternative spliced forms of the RUNX1-USP42 transcript in different patients. Further studies are required to identify the potential contribution of these splice-variants to disease heterogeneity.
Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7/genetics , Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/genetics , Translocation, Genetic , Aged , Child , Female , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Male , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methodsABSTRACT
Genomic microarrays have been implemented in the diagnosis of patients with unexplained mental retardation. This method, although revolutionizing cytogenetics, is still limited to the detection of rare de novo copy number variants (CNVs). Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarrays provide high-resolution genotype as well as CNV information in a single experiment. We hypothesize that the widespread use of these microarray platforms can be exploited to greatly improve our understanding of the genetic causes of mental retardation and many other common disorders, while already providing a robust platform for routine diagnostics. Here we report a detailed validation of Affymetrix 500k SNP microarrays for the detection of CNVs associated to mental retardation. After this validation we applied the same platform in a multicenter study to test a total of 120 patients with unexplained mental retardation and their parents. Rare de novo CNVs were identified in 15% of cases, showing the importance of this approach in daily clinical practice. In addition, much more genomic variation was observed in these patients as well as their parents. We provide all of these data for the scientific community to jointly enhance our understanding of these genomic variants and their potential role in this common disorder.
Subject(s)
Intellectual Disability/genetics , Karyotyping , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Gene Dosage , Genetic Variation , Heterozygote , Humans , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Uniparental DisomyABSTRACT
Ewing's tumors are rare pediatric neoplasms that are characterized by specific chromosomal translocations and gene rearrangements. All of the fusion genes reported to date in Ewing's tumors juxtapose the EWS gene at 22q12 to an ETS-related gene, the most common of which are FLI1 at 11q24 and ERG at 21q22. We present here four cases of Ewing's tumor, which showed no evidence of a EWS gene rearrangement, but instead contained translocations involving 16p11 and 21q22. A rearrangement involving the same chromosome bands, t(16;21)(p11;q22), is found in rare cases of acute myeloid leukemia and fuses the FUS gene at 16p11 to the ERG gene at 21q22. In two of our Ewing's tumor cases, we were able to show at the sequence level that the translocation between chromosomes 16 and 21 similarly results in a FUS/ERG fusion. In one case, exons 1-5 and most of exon 6 of FUS were fused in-frame to exon 9 of ERG; in the other case, FUS exons 1-7 were fused in-frame to ERG exons 8-9. The functional fusion transcript is expected to be expressed from the der(21)t(16;21) derivative. In the two other t(16;21)-positive Ewing's cases, we performed bacterial artificial chromosome fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis on metaphases and interphase nuclei to demonstrate colocalization of bacterial artificial chromosomes containing FUS and ERG genes, also highly suggestive of fusion gene formation. These represent the first four cases where FUS, rather than EWS, is rearranged with an ETS-family transcription factor in Ewing's tumors. Our data provide additional evidence that the transactivation domains of the TET family of RNA-binding proteins (such as EWS and FUS) are interchangeable, and suggests a novel mechanism of oncogenesis in Ewing's tumors.
Subject(s)
Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , RNA-Binding Protein FUS/genetics , Sarcoma, Ewing/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Artificial Gene Fusion , Child , Chromosome Mapping , Female , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Male , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Transcription, GeneticABSTRACT
Copy number variations are a common cause of intellectual disability (ID). Determining the contribution of copy number variants (CNVs), particularly gains, to disease remains challenging. Here, we report four males with ID with sub-microscopic duplications at Xp11.2 and review the few cases with overlapping duplications reported to date. We established the extent of the duplicated regions in each case encompassing a minimum of three known disease genes TSPYL2, KDM5C and IQSEC2 with one case also duplicating the known disease gene HUWE1. Patients with a duplication encompassing TSPYL2, KDM5C and IQSEC2 without gains of nearby SMC1A and HUWE1 genes have not been reported thus far. All cases presented with ID and significant deficits of speech development. Some patients also manifested behavioral disturbances such as hyperactivity and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Lymphoblastic cell lines from patients show markedly elevated levels of TSPYL2, KDM5C and SMC1A, transcripts consistent with the extent of their CNVs. The duplicated region in our patients contains several genes known to escape X-inactivation, including KDM5C, IQSEC2 and SMC1A. In silico analysis of expression data in selected gene expression omnibus series indicates that dosage of these genes, especially IQSEC2, is similar in males and females despite the fact they escape from X-inactivation in females. Taken together, the data suggest that gains in Xp11.22 including IQSEC2 cause ID and are associated with hyperactivity and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and are likely to be dosage-sensitive in males.
Subject(s)
Chromosome Duplication , Chromosomes, Human, X/genetics , Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors/genetics , Histone Demethylases/genetics , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Adolescent , Behavior , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Child , Child, Preschool , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/genetics , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins , Female , Gene Expression Regulation , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intellectual Disability/genetics , Male , Pedigree , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Young AdultABSTRACT
Urothelial bladder cancers (UBCs) have heterogeneous clinical characteristics that are mirrored in their diverse genomic profiles. Genomic profiling of UBCs has the potential to benefit routine clinical practice by providing prognostic utility above and beyond conventional clinicopathological factors, and allowing for prediction and surveillance of treatment responses. Urinary DNAs representative of the tumour genome provide a promising resource as a liquid biopsy for non-invasive genomic profiling of UBCs. We compared the genomic profiles of urinary cellular DNA and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from the urine with matched diagnostic formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour DNAs for 23 well-characterised UBC patients. Our data show urinary DNAs to be highly representative of patient tumours, allowing for detection of recurrent clinically actionable genomic aberrations. Furthermore, a greater aberrant load (indicative of tumour genome) was observed in cfDNA over cellular DNA (P<0.001), resulting in a higher analytical sensitivity for detection of clinically actionable genomic aberrations (P<0.04) when using cfDNA. Thus, cfDNA extracted from the urine of UBC patients has a higher tumour genome burden and allows greater detection of key genomic biomarkers (90%) than cellular DNA from urine (61%) and provides a promising resource for robust whole-genome tumour profiling of UBC with potential to influence clinical decisions without invasive patient interventions.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/urine , Carcinoma/genetics , DNA, Neoplasm/urine , Genome, Human , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Carcinoma/pathology , Carcinoma/urine , Chromosome Aberrations , DNA, Neoplasm/genetics , Humans , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/urine , Urothelium/metabolism , Urothelium/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adoption of new technology in both basic research and clinical settings requires rigorous validation of analytical performance. The OncoScan® FFPE Assay is a multiplexing tool that offers genome-wide copy number and loss of heterozygosity detection, as well as identification of frequently tested somatic mutations. METHODS: In this study, 162 formalin fixed paraffin embedded samples, representing six different tumour types, were profiled in triplicate across three independent laboratories. OncoScan® formalin fixed paraffin embedded assay data was then analysed for reproducibility of genome-wide copy number, loss of heterozygosity and somatic mutations. Where available, somatic mutation data was compared to data from orthogonal technologies (pyro/sanger sequencing). RESULTS: Cross site comparisons of genome-wide copy number and loss of heterozygosity profiles showed greater than 95% average agreement between sites. Somatic mutations pre-validated by orthogonal technologies showed greater than 90% agreement with OncoScan® somatic mutation calls and somatic mutation concordance between sites averaged 97%. CONCLUSIONS: Reproducibility of whole-genome copy number, loss of heterozygosity and somatic mutation data using the OncoScan® assay has been demonstrated with comparatively low DNA inputs from a range of highly degraded formalin fixed paraffin embedded samples. In addition, our data shows examples of clinically-relevant aberrations that demonstrate the potential utility of the OncoScan® assay as a robust clinical tool for guiding tumour therapy.
Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Genome, Human , Neoplasms/genetics , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , Tissue Fixation/methods , DNA Mutational Analysis , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Loss of Heterozygosity , Male , Mutation , Neoplasms/metabolism , Paraffin Embedding , Quality Control , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sequence Analysis, DNAABSTRACT
Gilles de la Tourette syndrome is a complex neuropsychiatric disorder with a strong genetic basis. We identified a male patient with Tourette syndrome-like tics and an apparently balanced de novo translocation [46,XY,t(2;7)(p24.2;q31)]. Further analysis using array comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) revealed a cryptic deletion at 7q31.1-7q31.2. Breakpoints disrupting this region have been reported in one isolated and one familial case of Tourette syndrome. In our case, IMMP2L, a gene coding for a human homologue of the yeast inner mitochondrial membrane peptidase subunit 2, was disrupted by the breakpoint on 7q31.1, with deletion of exons 1-3 of the gene. The IMMP2L gene has previously been proposed as a candidate gene for Tourette syndrome, and our case provides further evidence of its possible role in the pathogenesis. The deleted region (7q31.1-7q31.2) of 7.2 Mb of genomic DNA also encompasses numerous genes, including FOXP2, associated with verbal dyspraxia, and the CFTR gene.