Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Hand Ther ; 35(3): 435-446, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34312043

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized control trial. INTRODUCTION: Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of hand pain and disability. Standard conservative therapy (SCT) for thumb CMC OA includes an orthosis and instruction in joint protection, adaptive equipment, and pain relieving modalities. The dynamic stability home exercise (HE) program is complementary conservative therapy designed to strengthen the stabilizing muscles of the thumb CMC. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To investigate whether the addition of HE to SCT (SCT+HE) was more effective at reducing pain and disability in thumb CMC OA compared to SCT alone. METHODS: The study compared 2 groups: SCT and SCT+HE. The SCT group received SCT with in-home pain management instructions, joint protection strategies with adaptive equipment, and a hand-based thumb-spica orthosis. The SCT+HE group received HE program instructions for adductor stretching and opponens and first dorsal interosseous strengthening in addition to SCT. Our primary outcome measure was the numerical rating scale (NRS) with secondary outcome measures of QuickDASH (shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire), range of motion, grip strength, and pinch strength. Outcome measurements were assessed at first visit, 6 weeks, and 6 months. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups for NRS and QuickDASH at 6 weeks (P = .28 and P = .36, respectively) or 6 months (P = .52 and P = .97, respectively). However, there was a statistically significant decrease in NRS and QuickDASH scores at 6 weeks and 6 months within both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both SCT and SCT+HE are effective at reducing pain and disability in OA of the thumb CMC joint. Neither therapy program was superior to the other at improving NRS or QuickDASH scores at 6-week or 6-month follow-up.


Subject(s)
Carpometacarpal Joints , Osteoarthritis , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Thumb , Prospective Studies , Exercise Therapy , Pain , Osteoarthritis/therapy
2.
Clin J Sport Med ; 31(2): 151-162, 2021 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30730385

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Review the use of upper-extremity orthoses and casts after injuries to the wrist and hand in the pediatric, adolescent, and young adult population. The common injuries reviewed include pediatric distal radius fractures, scaphoid fractures, metacarpal fractures, mallet fingers, volar plate injuries of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, and ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears of the thumb metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a literature review from 1985 to 2016 of upper-extremity orthotic interventions. Non-English language citations and animal studies were excluded. Citations from retrieved studies were used to identify other relevant publications. This review included cases of common injuries to the upper extremity, which required orthotic intervention. MAIN RESULTS: Immobilization recommendations for nonsurgical pediatric distal radius fractures, nonsurgical metacarpal fractures, mallet fingers, and UCL tears of the thumb MCP include a removable orthosis. Nondisplaced scaphoid fracture orthosis recommendations include initial immobilization in a nonremovable short-arm thumb spica cast. Volar plate injuries of the PIP joint require buddy straps for healing. CONCLUSIONS: The literature demonstrates the effectiveness of removable orthoses in healing, patient satisfaction, and time to return to activity after many common upper-extremity injuries. Removable orthoses should be considered an equal or superior treatment method to cast immobilization, immobilization of additional joints, or longer periods of immobilization.


Subject(s)
Casts, Surgical , Fractures, Bone/therapy , Hand Injuries/therapy , Ligaments, Articular/injuries , Orthotic Devices , Wrist Injuries/therapy , Adolescent , Child , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Immobilization , Patient Compliance , Patient Satisfaction , Return to Sport , Time Factors , Young Adult
3.
Am J Occup Ther ; 73(5): 7305345020p1-7305345020p6, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31484034

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Evidence has demonstrated that shoulder pain constitutes a functional impairment for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). No studies have yet examined the efficacy of scapular mobilization of the painful shoulder among patients with ALS. OBJECTIVE: Our retrospective case series evaluated the effects of scapular mobilization on pain and shoulder motion among patients with ALS. DESIGN: Retrospective case series over 2 yr. SETTING: A multidisciplinary outpatient clinic at an academic medical institution. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight patients with ALS who had shoulder pain and range of motion (ROM) limitations. Patients were excluded if information on visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain and shoulder ROM was not available. INTERVENTION: Scapular mobilization, ROM, and caregiver education. All patients also received standard occupational therapy treatment for this patient population. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was VAS shoulder pain scores; the secondary outcome was shoulder flexion ROM. RESULTS: The median VAS pain score was 2 before treatment and 0 after treatment, with a significant median reduction of 2. Median shoulder flexion ROM was 100° before mobilization treatment and 130° after treatment, with a significant median increase of 25°. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The results provide strong evidence that both VAS pain score and shoulder ROM noticeably improve after mobilization treatment. WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS: Occupational therapists can effectively promote shoulder care techniques such as scapular mobilization to both patients and care providers to reduce pain and improve quality of life for patients with ALS.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Shoulder Pain , Humans , Quality of Life , Range of Motion, Articular , Retrospective Studies , Scapula , Shoulder Pain/therapy
4.
J Hand Surg Am ; 41(4): e21-35, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26810826

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare goniometric and visual assessments of angular hand joint and wrist joint positions measured by board-certified hand surgeons and certified hand therapists. We hypothesized that visual estimation would be similar to the goniometric measurement accuracy of digital and wrist joint positions. METHODS: The wrist, index finger metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, and index finger proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint were evaluated in different positions by 40 observers: 20 board-certified hand surgeons and 20 certified hand therapists. Each observer estimated the position of the wrist, index MCP joint, and index PIP joint of the same volunteer, who was positioned in low-profile orthoses to reproduce predetermined positions. Following visual estimation, the participants measured the same joint positions using a goniometer. The control measurement was digitally determined by a radiologist who obtained radiographs of the hand and wrist positions in each orthosis. Observers were blinded to the results of control measurements. RESULTS: When considering all joints at all positions, neither visual assessments nor goniometer assessments were consistently within ± 5° of the measurements obtained on control radiographs. When considering individual joints, goniometer measurements were significantly closer to control radiograph measurements than the visual assessments for all 3 PIP joint positions. There was no difference for the measurements at the wrist or for 2 of the 3 MCP joint positions. Significant differences between surgeon and therapist joint angle measurements were not observed when comparing visual and goniometer assessments to radiograph controls. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with radiograph measurements, neither visual nor goniometer assessment displayed high levels of accuracy. On average, visual assessment of the angular positions of the index MCP and wrist joint were as accurate as the goniometer assessment, whereas goniometer assessment of the angular position of the PIP joint was more accurate than visual assessment. There was a relatively high degree of between-observer variability in measurements, and therefore, no one person's measurements could be consistently relied upon to be accurate. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic II.


Subject(s)
Arthrometry, Articular , Hand Joints/physiology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Humans , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results
5.
Cureus ; 16(5): e59478, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38826995

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused millions of infections to date and has led to a worldwide pandemic. Most patients had a complete recovery from the acute infection, however, a large number of the affected individuals experienced symptoms that persisted more than 3 months after diagnosis. These symptoms most commonly include fatigue, memory difficulties, brain fog, dyspnea, cough, and other less common ones such as headache, chest pain, paresthesias, mood changes, muscle pain, and weakness, skin rashes, and cardiac, endocrine, renal and hepatic manifestations. The treatment of this syndrome remains challenging. A multidisciplinary approach to address combinations of symptoms affecting multiple organ systems has been widely adopted. This narrative review aims to bridge the gap surrounding the broad treatment approaches by providing an overview of multidisciplinary management strategies for the most common long COVID conditions.

6.
Cureus ; 15(2): e34697, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36909034

ABSTRACT

International concerns for another pandemic arose after emerging reports of an ongoing outbreak of the monkeypox virus (MPXV) in Europe and the United States in 2022. Severe pain is one of the most distressing complications for patients in the current outbreak, but there is a general paucity of relevant peer-reviewed medical literature from which to draw clear recommendations on appropriate pain therapies. The Centers for Disease Control recently published a letter in July 2022 urging providers to conduct further studies concerning pain management. Thus, a rapid literature search was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search of several databases from inception until August 19, 2022, was conducted. All published studies describing pain in patients who tested positive for MPXV with original data and written in English were included. Sixty-nine studies were initially identified for screening. After initial screening, 27 papers were considered for full-text review, and 15 papers met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1043 positive cases were included in this study. Most patients were men. Treatment options proposed by the authors include acetaminophen, ibuprofen, opioids, lidocaine gel, metamizole, and rectal suppositories containing emollients or steroids with oral laxatives for severe anal pain. Although most cases were mild requiring outpatient treatment, a considerable number of patients were admitted due to serious complications. Severe pain was often the reason to seek medical attention and hospital admission for pain control. Analgesic plans included oral and topical analgesia. In severe cases, pain was managed with opioids. To our knowledge, this rapid review is the first study to comprehensively summarize proposed treatments for pain associated with MPXV. Guidelines may be needed to help direct the best management to avoid morbidity in patients, particularly as adjuvants may play a key role but are not commonly utilized in published reports.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL