Predicting joint involvement through tailored prophylaxis in severe haemophilia A, is it possible?

INTRODUCTION: Tailored prophylaxis is the current treatment regimen for patients with severe haemophilia A. Recently, published guidelines describe two possible approaches, based on clinical characteristics or estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters. However, both have strengths and weaknesses, and their characteristics need to be integrated to optimize treatment appropriately. In this paper, we present a model that considers together the characteristics of prophylaxis and the relevance of each. METHODS: The age at initiation of prophylaxis, number of bleeding events, treatment regimen, therapeutic adherence, FVIII trough levels, and joint status were analyzed in 59 patients followed at La Paz University Hospital between January 2000 and December 2019. RESULTS: The mean duration of primary prophylaxis of 113.37 ± 57.79 months. Eighty-three percent (n = 49) had no joint status involvement at the end of follow-up (HJHS and HEAD-US = 0). The median ABR was 0.7 (IQR 0.2 -1.0) and 54.2% presented trough levels of FVIII during follow-up >1 IU/dL. 72,9% engaged in some type of physical activity and overall adherence was over 85% in all patients evaluated. The regression analysis performed, considering all these factors, showed that the initiation of prophylaxis before 21 months of age was the most relevant protective factor against the appearance of joint involvement (OR 88.33 p.031 CI 95% 1.49-5224.40) CONCLUSION: Early initiation of prophylaxis was the most relevant factor in the protection of joint status. More comprehensive analysis models adapted to the characteristics of each population, are needed to adequately individualize treatment.

Women with Gaucher Disease.

Gaucher disease is an inherited disorder in which there is a deficiency of the enzyme glucocerebrosidase, which leads to the accumulation of glucosylceramide. Although much scientific evidence is now available, there is still limited data on the impact on the different life stages of women with this disease. Among other alterations, a delay in menarche has been described, although it has not been related to fertility problems. Menorrhagia is relatively frequent, being related to the presence of thrombocytopenia, thrombocytopathies or coagulation disorders. On the other hand, pregnancy planning is an increasingly frequent concern. All patients should undergo genetic counseling, and it is important to monitor the appearance or worsening of organomegaly, bone and hematologic abnormalities to establish clinical and therapeutic recommendations. Management during the puerperium will depend on the evolution of gestation, and, during the lactation period, the potential appearance of bone complications should be assessed. An early onset of menopause, compared to the general population, has also been described, which may accelerate the development of osteopenia. Finally, although the usual screening protocols for neoplasms are currently being performed, it is recommended to watch for early signs of liver or renal neoplasms when examining the results of imaging tests performed during evaluations for this disease.

Long-term impact of primary prophylaxis on joint status in patients with severe hemophilia A.

Background: Primary prophylaxis with factor VIII concentrates is the therapeutic gold standard for severe hemophilia A. Although this approach will change substantially with the use of nonsubstitutive therapies, the long-term effects of primary prophylaxis remain unclear. We present information on joint health with tailored primary prophylaxis in a consecutive series at a single center. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 60 patients who did not develop early inhibitors. The annual bleeding rate and annual joint bleeding rate, prophylaxis characteristics, physical activity, adherence, and development of inhibitors were compared between those with and without joint involvement at the end of follow-up. Joint involvement was defined as a Hemophilia Joint Health Score or Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with an ultrasound score ≥1. Results: Among 60 patients with median follow-up of 113 ± 6 months after starting prophylaxis, 76.7% had no joint involvement at the end of the follow-up. Those without joint involvement started prophylaxis at a younger median age (1 [IQR 1-1] year vs 3 [IQR 2-4.3] years). They also had lower annual joint bleeding rate (0.0 [IQR 0-0.2] vs 0.2 [IQR 0.1-0.5]), were more often physically active (70% vs 50%), and had lower trough factor VIII levels. Adherence to treatment was not significantly different between groups. Conclusion: Initiation of primary prophylaxis at a younger age was the main factor associated with long-term preservation of joint status in patients with severe hemophilia A.