The utility of drug challenge testing in Brugada syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is associated with ventricular arrhythmia leading to sudden cardiac death. Risk stratification is challenging, as major arrhythmic events (MAEs) are rare. We assessed the utility of drug challenge testing in BrS by a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to May 2019. Included studies compared the incidence of MAE between spontaneous and drug challenge-induced Type 1. Mixed-effects Poisson regression was used to calculate the incidence rate ratio (IRR). Eighteen studies from 2006 to 2018 were included (4099 patients, mean follow-up: 4.5 years). Pooled annual incidences of MAE in spontaneous, drug challenge induced (regardless of symptoms), asymptomatic drug challenge induced, and symptomatic drug challenge-induced Type 1 were 23.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.8-27.8), 6.5 (95% CI: 3.9-9.1), 2.1 (95% CI: -0.3 to 4.4), and 19.6 (95% CI: 9.9-29.3) per 1000 person-years, respectively. The incidence of MAE between symptomatic drug challenge induced and asymptomatic spontaneous Type 1 was not statistically different (IRR = 1.0; 95% CI: 0.6-1.7). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of MAE in drug challenge-induced Type 1 in asymptomatic patients is low. The incidence of MAE between symptomatic drug challenge induced and asymptomatic spontaneous Type 1 was similar.

Interatrial block and its association with an increased risk of ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have suggested the association between interatrial block (IAB) and ischemic stroke. As no prior collective study has been discerned in this issue, we hence conducted systemic review and meta-analysis to assess the relationship between IAB and ischemic stroke. METHODS: We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED, and the Cochrane from inception to January 2020. Included studies were published observational studies that compared the risk of ischemic stroke among patients with and without IAB. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore heterogeneity. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in this analysis, involving total 177,249 participants. Our study demonstrated no association between partial IAB and an increased risk of ischemic stroke with OR 1.19 (95% CI 0.99-1.43 p = 0.054),but a statistical correlation with an increased risk of stroke with OR 1.85 (95% CI 1.37-2.50, p < 0.001) in advanced IAB. Interestingly, our subgroup analysis of patients with prior stroke suggested higher risk of recurrent stroke in both advanced IAB (OR 4.73) and partial IAB (OR 1.65). Meta-regression suggested a history of stroke as an effect modifier in the interplay between IAB and risk of recurrent stroke. CONCLUSION: Only advanced IAB is associated with an increased risk of stroke. However, further studies are warranted to further support this finding to confirm its clinical feasibility in stroke risk stratification.

Device infections in implantable cardioverter defibrillators versus permanent pacemakers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies suggest that implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are associated with increased risk of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections when compared with permanent pacemakers (PPMs). However, there were controversies among studies. In this study we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the risk of device infection in ICD versus PPM. METHODS: We searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to January 2019. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of Der Simonian and Laird to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies involving 202 323 CIEDs (36 782 ICDs and 165 541 PPMs) were included. Infections occurred from 9 days to 6 years postoperatively. When compared with PPM, ICD had a significantly higher risk of device infection in overall analysis (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.29-2.04). The risk was seen in subgroups such as single chamber or dual chamber device (OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.18-2.09), de novo implantation (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.29-2.69), revision implantation (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.24-2.13), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.18-2.60). CRT-defibrillator increased risk of infection over CRT-pacemaker in revision implantation (OR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.20-2.74) but not in de novo implantation (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.23-4.88). The increased risk of infection among defibrillator was higher in CRT compared to non-CRT but not significant (P = 0.654). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis demonstrates a statistically significant increased risk of device infection in CIED patients who received ICD when compared to PPM.

Atrial fibrillation and risk of major arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a common cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD). There is recent evidence that atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased risk of SCD in general population. However, whether AF increases a risk of major arrhythmic events (MAE) in patients with BrS is still unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effect of AF on MAE in BrS population. METHODS: We searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to March 2019. Included studies were published cohort studies reporting rates of MAE (ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, SCD, or sudden cardiac arrest) in BrS patients, with and without previous documented AF. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Six studies from 1,703 patients were included. There was a significant association between AF and an increased risk of MAE in patients with BrS (pooled OR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.36-4.13, p-value = .002, I2  = 40.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that AF is associated with an increased risk of MAE in patients with BrS.

The efficacy of posterior wall isolation in atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Posterior wall isolation (PWI) is an emerging approach in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, yet its efficacy remains controversial. This is the first meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of PWI in AF ablation. Objective: To assess the efficacy of PWI in reducing atrial arrhythmia recurrence following initial AF ablation at long-term follow-ups when compared to conventional methods. Methods: We conducted a literature search from inception through September 2021 in EMBASE and MEDLINE databases. We included RCTs that compared outcomes in PWI and conventional approaches of AF ablation. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Eight RCT from 2009 to 2020, including 1024 AF patients, were included. PWI did not decrease overall atrial arrhythmias recurrence (RR 0.96, 95% CI:0.88-1.05, I 2 = 31.6%, p-value 0.393). However, the pooled analysis showed a significant decrease in AF recurrence in PWI compared to controlled approaches (RR 0.88, 95% CI:0.81-0.96, I 2 = 48.2%, p-value .004). In the subgroup analysis, PWI significantly decreased AF recurrence in the studies that included only persistent AF (RR = 0.89, 95% CI:0.80-0.98, I 2 = 65.2%, p-value .014). PWI significantly decreased AF recurrence when compared to PVI with roof line (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95, I 2 0.00%, p-value .008). Conclusion: Our study suggests that adding PWI significantly decreased AF recurrence in patients with persistent AF compared to controlled approaches. It highlights the importance of considering PWI during the initial procedure in this patient population.

Delirium is associated with higher mortality in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: systemic review and meta-analysis.

Post-operative delirium (POD) has been recognized as an independent risk factor for mortality. Recent studies suggest that POD is associated with higher mortality rates in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature has not been performed. This study assessed the association between POD and TAVR by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to April 2018. Included studies were prospective or retrospective cohort studies that compared mortality among patients undergoing TAVR both with and without POD. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Seven studies consisting of 20,086 subjects undergoing TAVR (1517 with POD and 18,569 without POD) were included in this meta-analysis. POD demonstrated a trend towards higher all-cause mortality (pooled odd ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 0.98-2.37, p = 0.062, I2 = 72%). POD was associated with a significant increased long-term mortality (pooled odd ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval 1.21-3.68, p = 0.009, I2 = 62.5%). POD was associated with an increased risk of long-term all-cause mortality in patients undergoing TAVR. Our study suggests POD could be a potential risk factor of mortality among patients undergoing TAVR. Further studies implementing preventative and treatment strategies against delirium and its effect on POD and its associated mortality are needed.

Wide QRS complex and the risk of major arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited arrhythmic disease associated with an increased risk of major arrhythmic events (MAE). Previous studies reported that a wide QRS complex may be useful as a predictor of MAE in BrS patients. We aimed to assess the correlation of wide QRS complex with MAE by a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to June 2019. Included studies were cohort and case control studies that reported QRS duration and the relationship between wide QRS complex (>120 milliseconds) and MAE (sudden cardiac death, sudden cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or appropriate shock). Data from each study were combined using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies from 2007 to 2018 were included in this meta-analysis involving 4,814 BrS patients. The mean age was 46.1 ± 12.8 years. The patients were predominately men (77.6%). Wide QRS duration was an independent predictor of MAE (pooled risk ratio 1.55, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-2.30, P = .30, I 2 = 38.4%). QRS duration was wider in BrS who had history of MAE (weight mean difference = 8.12 milliseconds, 95% confidence interval: 5.75-10.51 milliseconds). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that QRS duration is wider in BrS who had history of MAE, and a wide QRS complex is associated with 1.55 times higher risk of MAE in BrS populations. Wide QRS complex can be considered for risk stratification in prediction of MAE in patients with BrS, especially when considering implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement in asymptomatic patients.

Previous coronary artery bypass graft is not associated with higher mortality in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: systemic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) are usually considered as high-risk groups perioperatively. Recent studies suggest that previous CABG is not associated with mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature has not been done. Thus, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between previous CABG and mortality in patients undergoing TAVR.Methods: We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to July 2018. Included studies were published prospective or retrospective cohort studies that evaluated the effects of previous CABG status on mortality risk among patients undergoing TAVR. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals.Results: Eleven cohort studies from March 2010 to April 2018 were included in this meta-analysis involving 7299 subjects with severe AS undergoing TAVR (1890 with and 5409 without previous CABG). Previous CABG was not associated with all-cause mortality (pooled risk ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.80-1.16, p=.66, I2=21%) and cardiovascular (CV) mortality (pooled risk ratio = 1.23, 95% confidence interval: 0.64-2.39, p=.72, I2=35%).Conclusions: Previous CABG is not associated with either all-cause mortality or CV mortality in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR. TAVR should be considered as an alternative or first-line treatment option among severe AS patient, regardless of previous CABG status.

Cognitive impairment and 30-day rehospitalization rate in patients with acute heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is one of the world leading causes of hospitalization and rehospitalization. Cognitive impairment has been identified as a risk factor for rehospitalization in patients with heart failure. However, previous studies reported mixed results. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between cognitive impairment and 30-day rehospitalization in patients with HF. METHOD: We performed a comprehensive literature search through July 2018 in the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE. Included studies were cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies or randomized controlled trials that compared the risk of 30-day rehospitalization in HF patients with cognitive impairment and those without. We calculated pooled relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and I2 statistic using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Five studies with a total of 2,342 participants (1,004 participants had cognitive impairment) were included for meta-analysis. In random-effect model, cognitive impairment significantly increased the risk of 30-day rehospitalization in HF participants (pooled RR=1.63, 95%CI: 1.19-2.24], I2=64.2%, p=0.002). Subgroup analysis was performed on the studies that excluded patients with dementia. The results also showed that cognitive impairment significantly increased the risk of 30-day rehospitalization in participants with HF (pooled RR=1.29, 95%CI: 1.05-1.59, I2=0.0%, p=0.016), which was consistent with our overall analysis. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the presence of cognitive impairment is associated with 30-day rehospitalization in patients with HF.