[Evaluating health care of the immigrant population in Italy through indicators of a national monitoring system]. / Valutazione dell'assistenza sanitaria della popolazione immigrata in Italia attraverso alcuni indicatori di un sistema nazionale di monitoraggio.

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate maternal and child healthcare, avoidable hospitalisation, access to emergency services among immigrants in Italy. DESIGN: cross sectional study of some health and health care indicators among Italian and foreign population residing in Italy in 2016-2017. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: indicators based on the national monitoring system coordinated by the Italian National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP) of Rome, calculated on perinatal care (CedAP), hospital discharge (SDO), emergency services (EMUR) archives for the years 2016-2017, by of the following regions: Piedmont, Trento, Bolzano, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Umbria, Lazio, Basilicata, Sicily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: number and timeliness of pregnancy visits, number of ultrasounds, invasive prenatal investigations; perinatal mortality rates, birth weight, Apgar score at 5 minutes, need for neonatal resuscitation; standardized rates of avoidable hospitalisation and access to emergency services by triage code. RESULTS: more often than Italians, immigrant women have during pregnancy: less than 5 gynaecological examination (16.3% vs 8.5%), first examination after the 12th week of gestational age (12.5% vs 3.8%), less than 2 ultrasounds (3.8% vs 1.0%). Higher perinatal mortality rates among immigrants compared to Italians (3.6 vs 2.3 x1,000). Higher standardized rates (x1,000) among immigrants compared to Italians of avoidable hospitalisation (men: 2.1 vs 1.4; women: 0.9 vs 0.7) and of white triage codes in emergency (men: 62.0 vs 32.7; women: 52.9 vs 31.4). CONCLUSIONS: study findings show differences in access and outcomes of healthcare between Italians and immigrants. National monitoring system of indicators, coordinated by INMP, represents a useful tool for healthcare intervention policies aimed to health equity.

Effects of Covid-19 on the elective surgery: an approach based on the case of the Italian Province of Bolzano.

BACKGROUND: As of February 2020, the rise of COVID-19 cases led to significant pressures in the Northern parts of Italy, including the province of Bolzano (a small territorial reality on the border between Italy and Austria), and left the Italian National Health System (NHS) unprepared for the initial wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. OBJECTIVE/METHODS: By dividing the analyses into two phases, the study assesses the effect of COVID-19 for the years 2018-2019 and 2020-2021. The first phase highlights the hospitalization rates in the Province of Bolzano in comparison to other Italian regions. In the second step, the Systematic Component of Variation (SCV) has been applied to calculate the differences between the admission rates for the elective surgery (tonsillectomy, vein stripping, hip replacement, knee replacement, and arthroscopy) in the four health districts (HDs) of the Province of Bolzano. RESULTS: Overall, the findings demonstrate that the effect of COVID-19 cases has resulted in a 20% reduction in hospitalization rates. A variation of less than 30% for knee and hip replacements and up to 75% for vein stripping is seen for elective surgeries. According to the SCV values for each elective procedure, the results indicate comparable levels of variation across the two time periods, with tonsillectomy showing the lowest levels of variation, arthroscopy and vein stripping having the highest levels, hip replacement having a high level and knee replacement having a low-medium level. CONCLUSIONS: The data show no significant changes in the variation between the four HDs in the province of Bolzano, suggesting that the COVID-19 cases have a proportionate impact on hospitalization rates.

Incidence rates of in-hospital carpal tunnel syndrome in the general population and possible associations with marital status.

BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a socially relevant condition associated with biomechanical risk factors. We evaluated age-sex-specific incidence rates of in-hospital cases of CTS in central/northern Italy and explored relations with marital status. METHODS: Seven regions were considered (overall population, 14.9 million) over 3-6-year periods between 1997 and 2002 (when out-of-hospital CTS surgery was extremely rare). Incidence rates of in-hospital cases of CTS were estimated based on 1) codified demographic, diagnostic and intervention data in obligatory discharge records from all Italian public/private hospitals, archived (according to residence) on regional databases; 2) demographic general population data for each region. We compared (using the chiscore test) age-sex-specific rates between married, unmarried, divorced and widowed subsets of the general population. We calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for married/unmarried men and women. RESULTS: Age-standardized incidence rates (per 100,000 person-years) of in-hospital cases of CTS were 166 in women and 44 in men (106 overall). Married subjects of both sexes showed higher age-specific rates with respect to unmarried men/women. SIRs were calculated comparing married vs unmarried rates of both sexes: 1.59 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.57-1.60) in women, and 1.42 (95% CI, 1.40-1.45) in men. As compared with married women/men, widows/widowers both showed 2-3-fold higher incidence peaks during the fourth decade of life (beyond 50 years of age, widowed subjects showed similar trends to unmarried counterparts). CONCLUSION: This large population-based study illustrates distinct age-related trends in men and women, and also raises the question whether marital status could be associated with CTS in the general population.

A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of the Implementation of Surgical Safety Checklists in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

IMPORTANCE: The appropriately coached implementation of surgical safety checklists (SSCs) reduces the incidence of perioperative complications and 30-day mortality of patients undergoing surgery. The association of the introduction of SSCs with 90-day mortality remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between the implementation of SSCs and all-cause 90- and 30-day mortality rates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Evaluation of the outcomes of surgical procedures performed during the 6 months before (January 1 to June 30, 2010) and after (January 1 to June 30, 2013) the introduction of SSCs by retrospective analysis of administrative databases. The study was conducted in a public, regional, university-affiliated hospital in Italy. Data were collected from October 23, 2013, to November 12, 2014, including 90-day all-cause mortality, 30-day all-cause mortality, length of hospital stay, and 30-day readmission rate among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Patients undergoing surgery during the 6-month periods before and after the implementation of SSCs were compared. Data were analyzed from September 17, 2014, to July 31, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Risk-adjusted rates of 90- and 30-day mortality, readmission rate, and length of stay. RESULTS: The total study sample of 10 741 patients included 5444 preintervention and 5297 postintervention patients (5093 [47.4%] male and 5648 [52.6%] female patients; mean [SD] age, 53.0 [23.0] years). Ninety-day all-cause mortality was 2.4% (129 patients) before compared with 2.2% (118 patients) after the SSC implementation, for an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.56-0.96; P = .02). Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 1.36% (74 patients) before compared with 1.32% (70 patients) after the SSC implementation, for an AOR of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.56-1.11; P = .17). Thirty-day readmission occurred in 797 patients (14.6%) in the preimplementation group vs 766 patients (14.5%) in the postimplementation group, for an AOR of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.81-1.01; P = .79). The adjusted length of stay was 10.4 (95% CI, 10.3-10.6) days in the preimplementation group compared with 9.6 (95% CI, 9.4-9.7) days in the postimplementation group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The data cannot prove causality owing to the study design. The implementation of SSCs was associated with a 27% reduction of the adjusted risk for all-cause death within 90 days but not within 30 days. The adjusted length of stay was reduced after implementation of SSCs.