ABSTRACT
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: A consensus on whether a fully digital workflow can replace conventional methods of manufacturing partial-coverage restorations is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the accuracy, fit, and clinical outcomes of inlay, onlay, overlay, and endocrown restorations obtained with both digital and conventional workflows. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (CRD42021258696). Studies evaluating the accuracy, fit, and clinical outcomes of inlay, onlay, overlay, and endocrown restorations obtained with digital and conventional workflows were included from 5 databases searched in November 2022. The Checklist for Reporting Randomized Clinical Studies (ROB 2) and the Checklist for Reporting In vitro Studies (CRIS guidelines) were used to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included in this review. Sixteen studies evaluated marginal and internal fit, 5 evaluated accuracy, 3 evaluated fracture resistance, and 1 evaluated long-term clinical performance. Although most studies reported acceptable clinical outcomes for both workflows, 11 studies showed better results with the conventional workflow, 10 with the digital workflow, and 2 reported that the outcomes of the workflows were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically acceptable values have been reported for the parameters evaluated in both digital and conventional workflows, and no consensus has been reached regarding the more efficient method.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: to evaluate trueness and precision of digital casts from intraoral scanning (IOS) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT); trueness and precision of 3D-printed casts using digital light processing (DLP) and fused deposition modeling (FDM); the influence of digitizing method in the 3D-printed casts and, to compare STL data after DICOM segmentation and conversion. METHODS: a reference cast was digitized with IOS and CBCT, and 3D-printed using FDM and DLP. Linear measurements of occlusocervical (OC), interarch (IEA), and mesiodistal (MD) dimensions were taken on reference, digital and 3D-printed casts. Trueness was observed as the distortion, and precision was observed as the variation of measurements. One and Two-way ANOVA, Student t-test, and Chi-Square were applied to analyze data. RESULTS: distortion varied between digital casts for all dimensions; at OC, both showed expanded dimensions with IOS being significantly greater; in turn, CBCT digital casts showed higher distortion at IEA and MD. Dimensions of 3D-printed casts showed a predominance of shrinkage, DLP presented higher distortion compared to FDM for both digitizing methods. Digitizing methods influenced the 3D-printing of casts, especially for DLP. Regarding precision, no statistical difference was found. STL converted from DICOM showed statistical difference in IEA (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: digital casts showed distortion depending on the digitizing method. IOS was better in IEA and MD, and CBCT in OC dimensions. Overall, DLP casts presented higher distortion compared to FDM. The digitizing method influences trueness on 3D-printed casts. File conversion from DICOM to STL per se could change the dimension. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This investigation showed that digital casts from IOS and CBCT as well 3D-printed casts from FDM and DLP can show different trueness. It is clinically relevant as clinicians have various workflows available in Digital Dentistry which involve these digitizing and manufacturing methods.
Subject(s)
Computer-Aided Design , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Humans , Dental Impression Technique , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Models, Dental , Printing, Three-DimensionalABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study observed whether changes in diagnosis caused by analysis of three-dimensional images can lead to alterations in the treatment plans of impacted lower third molars (ILTMs). METHODS: Sets of panoramic (PAN) - cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of 218 patients were assessed for ILTM classification, contact with mandibular canal, contact and resorption of the lower second molar (LSM), intraoperative planning and post-operative expectations. RESULTS: Percentage agreement and McNemar test compared PAN vs CBCT assessments. Logistic regression analyzed the dependency of change in surgical planning considering the changes in diagnostic features; descriptive statistics was used to observe the expectation of post-operative complications and paresthesia. Differences were found between PAN vs CBCT for classification of impaction and positioning, LSM relationship, choice for crown and root sectioning and expectation of post-operative complications (all with p < 0.001). Logistic regression indicated that the change in diagnosis caused by CBCT examination did not change the clinical decision to extract ILTM but altered the planning of intraoperative steps such as osteotomy, crown sectioning and relaxing incision. The expectation of post-operative complications decreased when professionals planned the ILTM removal using tri-dimensional images. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that changes in the diagnosis after CBCT examination can lead to alterations in the treatment plan of impacted lower third molar.
Subject(s)
Molar, Third , Tooth, Impacted , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Humans , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Mandible/surgery , Molar, Third/diagnostic imaging , Molar, Third/surgery , Radiography, Panoramic , Tooth, Impacted/diagnostic imaging , Tooth, Impacted/surgeryABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to observed the anesthetic efficacy of the alveolar nerve block on nine patients that CBCT diagnosed unilateral retromolar canal on a double-blind, split-mouth approach. The assessments of patient response to thermal (pulp vitality test) and pressure (compression of soft tissue) stimuli were carried out before and 5 minutes after the inferior alveolar nerve block procedure, using both visual analog scale (VAS) and Mc Gill pain questionnaires (McG). The mean percentage of patient response decreased after alveolar nerve block, according to both VAS and McG, and was statistically similar among hemi mandibles with and without retromolar canal (Wilcoxon>0.05); however, those without retromolar canal presented greater reduction in patient response in 6 out of 9 cases. Therefore, the retromolar canal is not a determinant factor of inferior alveolar nerve block failure.
El objetivo de este estudio fue observar la eficacia anestésica del bloqueo del nervio alveolar en nueve pacientes que CBCT diagnosticó canal retromolar unilateral en un abordaje de boca dividida doble ciego. Las evaluaciones de la respuesta del paciente a los estímulos térmicos (prueba de vitalidad pulpar) y de presión (compresión de los tejidos blandos) se realizaron antes y 5 minutos después del procedimiento de bloqueo del nervio alveolar inferior, utilizando tanto la escala analógica visual (VAS) como los cuestionarios de dolor de Mc Gill ( McG). El porcentaje medio de respuesta de los pacientes disminuyó tras el bloqueo del nervio alveolar, según EVA y McG, y fue estadísticamente similar entre hemimandíbulas con y sin canal retromolar (Wilcoxon>0,05); sin embargo, aquellos sin canal retromolar presentaron mayor reducción en la respuesta del paciente en 6 de 9 casos. Por lo tanto, el canal retromolar no es un factor determinante del fracaso del bloqueo del nervio alveolar inferior.