A High Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Hormone Receptor Score on Skin Biopsy is Associated with Sézary Syndrome Diagnosis: A Study of 91 Patients with Erythroderma.

Erythroderma is challenging to diagnose. The aim of this single-centre retrospective study was to identify factors that can be used to improve the diagnosis of erythroderma. Among 91 patients with erythroderma, 21 were diagnosed with eczema, 17 with psoriasis, 20 with drug-induced erythroderma, 13 with erythrodermic mycosis fungoides and 20 with Sézary syndrome. Nail alterations, ear involvement, and severe scaling were significantly associated with psoriasis (p = 0.044). Fever and hypereosinophilia were associated with drug-induced erythroderma. Expression of programmed cell death protein 1 was observed in all skin biopsies. However, with Sézary syndrome, programmed cell death protein 1 expression was significantly higher than with other aetiologies. A programmed cell death protein 1 hormone receptor score (H-score) >50 was associated with Sézary syndrome (p < 0.001, sensitivity 75%, specificity 92%) as well as CXCL13 expression (p < 0.044). CD7 loss was more frequent with erythrodermic mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome (p = 0.022). This study reports the importance of programmed cell death protein 1 expression for the differential diagnosis of Sézary syndrome and other aetiologies, including erythrodermic mycosis fungoides.

[Impact of algorithms proposed by the Cutaneous Lymphoma French Study Group for diagnosis of cutaneous lymphoproliferations]. / Impact des algorithmes du groupe français d'étude des lymphomes cutanés (GFELC) sur le diagnostic anatomopathologique des lymphoproliférations cutanées.

After a first diagnosis proposition, management of cutaneous lymphomas requires a systematic review by an expert pathologist and each case is presented to a multidisciplinary meeting in the setting of the French Study Group of Cutaneous Lymphomas to propose an adequate treatment. A retrospective study of the 2760 cutaneous lymphoproliferations retrieved between 2010 and 2011 were analyzed and demonstrated the interest of diagnostic algorithms we built with the group. The objective of our study was to compare two cohorts from 2010-2011 and 2015-2017 regarding the proportion of cases sent for validation or expertise, the concordance and mismatch rates and potential diagnostic issues using our diagnostic algorithms. Between 2015-2017, 5640 skin lymphoproliferation cases were examined. It appeared that Pathologists were more confident and effective in finding the right diagnosis. Indeed, the rate of concordant diagnosis increased from 57% to 67%. Moreover, in comparison with the 2010-2011 concordant cases sent for expertise, 73.5% of concordant cases were sent for validation in 2015-2017. 14% of cases remained discordant, mainly sent for expertise. Furthermore, half of questionable cases (26.3%) were resolved after expertise, and 12.1% cases remained unsolved. These priority cases are important to be presented at multidisciplinary meeting. The analysis of discordant and doubtful cases unveiled recurrent diagnostic problems for which we proposed appropriate diagnostic algorithms including large B cell lymphomas, CD4+ T cell lymphoproliferations, epidermotropic CD8+ T-cell lymphoproliferations and the differential diagnosis of mycosis fongoïdes/Sezary syndrome versus inflammatory dermatitis.

Primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphomas: relevance of the 2017 World Health Organization classification: clinicopathological and molecular analyses of 64 cases.

AIMS: We applied the 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) classification criteria to categorise a series of 64 primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphomas (PCLBCLs), containing a majority (≥80%) of large cells and a proliferative rate of ≥40%, raising the problem of the differential diagnosis between PCLBCL, leg type (PCLBCL-LT) and primary cutaneous follicle centre lymphoma, large cell (PCFCL-LC). The aims were to determine the reproducibility and prognostic relevance of the 2017 WHO criteria. METHODS AND RESULTS: Morphology and phenotype identified 32 PCLBCLs-LT and 25 PCFCLs-LC; seven cases (11%) remained unclassified. Morphology was less reproducible than immunophenotype. Pertinent markers for the differential diagnosis were MUM1, FOXP1, CD10, and IgM. bcl-2 and bcl-6 were expressed by both PCFCLs-LC and PCLBCLs-LT at substantial levels. Neither Ki67 expression nor p63 expression was of diagnostic value. MYD88 was found to be mutated only in PCLBCLs-LT (n = 22, 69%). According to Hans/Hans modified algorithms, 23 of 25 PCFCLs-LC had germinal centre (GC) status, and the 32 PCLBCLs-LT had non-GC status. Overall survival was poorer for PCLBCLs-LT than PCFCLs-LC (P = 0.0002). Non-GC cases had poorer overall survival than GC cases (P = 0.0007). In PCLBCLs-LT, MYC expression was associated with cutaneous relapses (P = 0.014). When GC/non-GC status was applied to unclassified cases, only a single case remained discordant. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the 2017 WHO classification criteria for PCLBCL diagnosis. The Hans modified algorithm using CD10 and MUM1 distinguished PCFCLs-LC from PCLBCLs-LT with optimal diagnostic value without requiring bcl-6 immunolabelling (poorly reproducible). Rare unclassified cases may constitute a provisionally heterogeneous subgroup for which GC/non-GC status (relevant for prognosis) may guide therapeutic decisions.

Double-hit or dual expression of MYC and BCL2 in primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphomas.

In nodal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, the search for double-hit with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements or for dual expression of BCL2 and MYC defines subgroups of patients with altered prognosis that has not been evaluated in primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma. Our objectives were to assess the double-hit and dual expressor status in a cohort of 44 patients with primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma according to the histological subtype and to evaluate their prognosis relevance. The 44 cases defined by the presence of more than 80% of large B-cells in the dermis corresponded to 21 primary cutaneous follicle centre lymphoma with large cell morphology and 23 primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type. Thirty-one cases (70%) expressed BCL2 and 29 (66%) expressed MYC. Dual expressor profile was observed in 25 cases (57%) of either subtypes (n = 6 or n = 19, respectively). Only one primary cutaneous follicle centre lymphoma, large-cell case had a double-hit status (2%). Specific survival was significantly worse in primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type than in primary cutaneous follicle centre lymphoma, large cell (p = 0.021) and for the dual expressor primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma group (p = 0.030). Both overall survival and specific survival were worse for patients belonging to the dual expressor primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type subgroup (p = 0.001 and p = 0.046, respectively). Expression of either MYC and/or BCL2 negatively impacted overall survival (p = 0.017 and p = 0.018 respectively). As the differential diagnosis between primary cutaneous follicle centre lymphoma, large cell and primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type has a major impact on prognosis, dual-expression of BCL2 and MYC may represent a new diagnostic criterion for primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type subtype and further identifies patients with impaired survival. Finally, the double-hit assessment does not appear clinically relevant in primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma.

Proliferative Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes' Abundance within the Microenvironment Impacts Clinical Outcome in Cutaneous B-Cell Lymphomas.

Primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma, leg-type (PCLBCL-LT) is the most aggressive primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (PCBCL). Tumor microenvironment has a crucial role in tumor development, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) can be targeted by immunotherapies. We characterized TILs in 20 PCBCLs to identify the tumor microenvironment features associated with clinical outcomes. We developed a seven‒multiplex immunofluorescence panel using Opal staining and image analysis using HALO software. In PCLBCL-LT, TILs were sparsely intermingled within tumor infiltrate in contrast to those in indolent PCBCL where TILs were scattered around tumor nodule edges with variable tumor infiltration. In PCLBCL-LT, TILs were composed of CD8 and CD4, whereas CD4 was predominant in indolent PCBCL. Proliferative TILs (CD3+Ki-67+ cells) were more abundant in PCLBCL-LT (P = 0.0036) than in indolent PCBCL. In PCLBCL-LT, proliferative TILs' abundance tended to be associated with better progression-free survival. These data were confirmed in a second independent cohort of 23 cases showing that proliferative TILs were more abundant in PCLBCL-LT (P = 0.0205) and that in PCLBCL-LT, high CD3+Ki-67+ cell density was associated with better progression-free survival (P = 0.002). These distinct TILs composition and distribution among PCBCL suggest that proliferative T lymphocytes represent a good prognostic factor in PCLBCL-LT and that stimulating their functions may represent a therapeutic approach.

Integrative diagnosis of primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphomas supports the relevance of cell of origin profiling.

Primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphomas (PCLBCL) represent a diagnostic challenge because they are classified as PCLBCL, leg type (PCLBCL, LT) or primary cutaneous follicle centre lymphoma, large cell (PCFCL, LC), which differ by prognosis and therapeutic requirement. Unclassified cases with discordant clinical presentations, morphologies, and immunophenotypes may be classified into the not otherwise specified (PCLBCL, NOS) category based on ancillary molecular analyses. Cell-of-origin profiling as germinal centre (GC) type or non-GC type by immunohistochemistry is not considered reproducible because of variable CD10 expression. In a series of 55 PCLBCL cases with > 80% large cells, we reported 21 PCFCL, LC cases as GC-type and 27 PCLBCL, LT as non-GC-type; 7 cases were considered PCLBCL, NOS. Here, we demonstrate the accuracy of molecular profiling of PCLBCL as GC or non-GC type using a reverse transcriptase multiplex ligation assay (RT-MLPA). RT-MLPA classified the seven PCLBCL, NOS cases in accordance with their mutational profile. An integrative principal component analysis confirmed the main criteria and the relevance of genomic profiling of PCFCL, LC as GC-derived, and PCLBCL, LT as non-GC-derived. Both the cell-of-origin classification of PCLBCL and the integrative analysis identified two clinically relevant subgroups according to overall survival, which may help to standardize PCLBCL diagnosis and patient management.

PD-L1 and PD-L2 Are Differentially Expressed by Macrophages or Tumor Cells in Primary Cutaneous Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Leg Type.

As checkpoint molecules' inhibition may represent a therapeutic option in relapsing cases, we assessed programmed death ligands' (PD-L1/PD-L2) expression in a series of 29 primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg-type (PCDLBCL-LT) cases. Double immunostaining for either PD-L1 or PD-L2 was associated either with PAX5 staining to evaluate tumor cells or with CD68 or CD163 staining for macrophages. The microenvironment of PCDLBCL-LT was characterized by immunostainings for CD3 (tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes), FOXP3 (regulatory T cells), programmed cell death-1, and CD33 (myeloid-derived suppressor cells). The 9p24.1 locus encoding for PD-L1/PD-L2 was evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization. A PD-L1 expression was observed in all cases. However, double staining with PD-L1/PAX5 identified only 1 case harboring PD-L1 expression by tumor cells. All cases displayed PD-L1 expression by numerous immune cells, characterized as CD68 CD163 M2 macrophages. A normal fluorescence in situ hybridization pattern was observed in 21 of 26 cases. Three cases (11.5%) harbored a low polysomy status including the case with PD-L1 expression by tumor cells. Interestingly, 2 cases (7.7%) exhibited a PD-L1/PD-L2 locus break-apart pattern, and PD-L2 expression by tumor cells was observed. PD-L2 expression by tumor cells was not observed in the 24 cases without 9p24.1 rearrangement. Treating patients with relapsing PCDLBCL-LT by using immune checkpoint inhibitors may have an indirect effect through immune cells, except in rare cases with 9p24.1 rearrangement leading to PD-L2 expression by tumor cells. Reprogramming tumor-associated macrophages with anticancer therapies is appealing in such lymphoma subtypes wherein M2 macrophages represent the majority of immune cells.