Suprapapillary placement of plastic versus metal stents for malignant biliary hilar obstructions: a multicenter, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The efficacy of the suprapapillary placement of inside plastic stents (iPSs) for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstructions (MHOs) is unknown compared with that of uncovered inside metal stents (iMSs). This randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the outcomes of endoscopic placement of these stents for unresectable MHOs. METHODS: This open-label, randomized study was conducted at 12 Japanese institutions. The enrolled patients with unresectable MHOs were allocated to iPS and iMS groups. The primary outcome was defined as the time to recurrent biliary obstruction in patients for whom the intervention was both technically and clinically successful. RESULTS: Among 87 enrollments, 38 patients in the iPS group and 46 patients in the iMS group were analyzed. Technical success rates were 100% (38 of 38) and 96.6% (44 of 46), respectively (P = 1.00). After transferring 1 unsuccessful iMS-group patient to the iPS group (since iPSs were deployed), the clinical success rates were 90.0% (35 of 39) for the iPS group and 88.9% (40 of 45) for the iMS group from a per-protocol analysis (P = 1.00). Among the patients with clinical success, the median times to recurrent biliary obstruction were 250 (95% confidence interval, 85-415) and 361 (95% confidence interval, 107-615) days (log-rank test, P = .34). No differences were detected in rates of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This Phase II randomized trial did not show any statistically significant difference in stent patency between suprapapillary plastic versus metal stents. Considering the potential advantages of plastic stents for malignant hilar obstruction, these findings suggest that suprapapillary plastic stents could be a viable alternative to metal stents for this condition.

Clinical outcomes and predictors of technical failure of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) has been performed as an alternative therapy against cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis. To date, few studies have reported the safety, efficacy, and factors affecting ETGBD. We evaluated the clinical outcomes and predictors of technical failure of ETGBD. METHODS: Patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent ETGBD were retrospectively reviewed, and consecutive patients were included in the study. The technical success rate, clinical success rate, adverse events, and the predictors associated with the technical failure of ETGBD were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients were enrolled in the study. The technical success rate of ETGBD and clinical success rate of technically successful ETGBD cases were 87% and 93%, respectively. We experienced cystic duct injury in 24 patients as an ETGBD-related adverse event, and pancreatitis in 12 patients as an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related adverse event. Multivariate analysis indicated that cystic duct injury was the independent predictor associated with the technical failure of ETGBD (odds ratio, 11; 95% confidence interval, 3.9-29; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ETGBD was a safe and effective treatment method for acute cholecystitis with acceptable adverse events. There was no predictor based on the information from patient characteristics; however, cystic duct injury was associated with the technical failure of ETGBD.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage using a novel spiral plastic stent in acute calculus cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting (EGBS) is considered for patients with contraindications to early surgery for acute calculus cholecystitis. However, evidence regarding the long-term outcomes of EGBS is insufficient to date. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of EGBS as a bridge to or alternative to surgery when there are contraindications. METHODS: We reviewed the cases of patients who underwent EGBS using a novel spiral-shaped plastic stent for acute calculus cholecystitis between January 2011 and December 2019. We retrospectively evaluated the long-term outcomes of EGBS using a novel spiral-shaped plastic stent. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included. The clinical success rate of EGBS was 97%. After EGBS, 25 patients (surgery group) underwent elective cholecystectomy and 24 patients did not (follow-up group). In the surgery group, the median period from EGBS to surgery was 93 days. There was a single late adverse event with cholecystitis recurrence. In the follow-up group, the median follow-up period was 236 days. Late adverse events were observed in eight patients, including recurrence of cholecystitis (four patients), duodenal penetration by the distal stent end (two patients), and distal stent migration (two patient). In the follow-up group, the time to recurrence of biliary obstruction was 527 days. CONCLUSIONS: EGBS with a novel spiral-shaped plastic stent is safe and effective for long-term acute calculus cholecystitis. There is a possibility of EGBS to be a bridge to surgery and a surgical alternative for acute calculus cholecystitis in patients with contraindications to early cholecystectomy.

Incidence and management of cystic duct perforation during endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Evidence regarding the incidence and clinical outcome of cystic duct perforation (CDP) during endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) is inadequate. The present study aimed to evaluate the incidence and management of CDP during ETGBD. METHODS: Between March 2011 and December 2019, 249 patients underwent initial ETGBD for acute cholecystitis. The incidence of CDP was retrospectively examined and the outcomes between the CDP and non-CDP groups were compared. RESULTS: CDP during ETGBD occurred in 23 (9.2%) of 249 patients (caused by guidewire in 15 and cannula in 8). ETGBD was successful in 10 patients following CDP. In 13 patients who failed ETGBD, 11 underwent bile duct drainage during the same session; nine patients underwent gallbladder decompression by other methods, such as percutaneous drainage. Clinical resolution for acute cholecystitis was achieved in 20 patients, and no bile peritonitis was noted. ETGBD technical success rates (45.3% vs. 91.2%, p < 0.001), ETGBD procedure times (66.5 vs. 54.8 min, p = 0.041), and hospitalization periods (24.5 vs. 18.7 days, p = 0.028) were significantly inferior in the CDP group (n = 23) compared with the non-CDP group (n = 216). There were no differences in clinical success and adverse events other than CDP between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Cystic duct perforation reduced the ETGBD technical success rate. However, even in patients with cystic duct perforation, an improvement of acute cholecystitis was achieved by subsequent successful ETGBD or additional procedures, such as percutaneous drainage.

Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation as a risk factor for stone residue after endoscopic transpapillary stone removal.

BACKGROUND: Recent improvements in stone extraction implements and apparatus have lessened the complexity of the endoscopic bile duct stone treatment. However, despite confirmation of complete removal, cases of residual stones have been reported, which can result in recurrent biliary symptoms, cholangitis, and pancreatitis and considerably increase cost given the need for repeat imaging and/or procedures. To date, risk factors for residual bile duct stones following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) extraction have not been thoroughly evaluated. This study retrospectively investigated the incidence and risk factors of residual bile duct stones following extraction via ERCP. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all ERCP cases that underwent endoscopic bile duct stone extraction between April 2014 and March 2019. A total of 505 patients were enrolled and evaluated for the incidence and risk factors of residual bile duct stones after ERCP. RESULTS: The rate of residual stones was 4.8% (24/505). Residual stones were detected by computed tomography (12/24) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (12/24). In univariate analyses, a large number of stones (P = 0.01), long procedure time (P = 0.005), and performance of the pancreatic duct guidewire placement method (P-GW) for selective bile duct cannulation (P = 0.01) were the factors involved in residual stones. In multiple logistic regression analysis, performing P-GW was retained as the only independent factor of residual stones (adjusted odds ratio, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.19-9.88; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: When removing bile duct stones with a pancreatic guidewire in place, paying attention to residual stones is necessary.

Diagnostic Ability of Endoscopic Bile Cytology Using a Newly Designed Biliary Scraper for Biliary Strictures.

BACKGROUND: A new device with metallic wires for scrape cytology was developed. AIMS: To compare the diagnostic performance of scrape cytology and conventional cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for biliary strictures. METHODS: A total of 420 cases with biliary stricture underwent transpapillary bile cytology. Among them, there are 79 cases with scrape cytology using the new device (scrape group) and 341 cases with conventional cytology (control group). Seventy-two and 174 cases underwent biliary biopsy at the same time as bile cytology in the scrape and control group, respectively. RESULTS: The sensitivity for malignancy of bile cytology in the scrape and control group was 41.2% [pancreatic cancer (PC): 23.1%, biliary cancer (BC): 52.5%] and 27.1% (PC: 16.3%, BC: 38.0%), respectively (P = 0.023). When analyzed PC and BC, respectively, there was no significant difference between the two groups. In the both groups, the sensitivity was significantly higher for BC than PC. In the scrape group, there was no difference in the sensitivity between cytology and biopsy [39.7% (PC: 17.4%, BC: 55.3%)], but in the control group, a significantly lower sensitivity was observed with cytology than biopsy (36.4% (PC: 19.7%, BC: 50.0%)) (P = 0.046). When analyzed PC and BC, respectively, there was no significant difference between cytology and biopsy. The sensitivity of combined cytology and biopsy was 55.6% (PC: 30.4%, BC: 71.1%) in the scrape group and 47.0% (PC: 24.6%, BC: 64.3%) in the control group. CONCLUSION: Scrape bile cytology for biliary strictures may be superior to conventional cytology.

A case of Ménétrier's disease seemingly caused by hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

A 54-year-old man presented to our department with abdominal discomfort and anorexia and was diagnosed as having Ménétrier's disease (MD) with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Based on his clinical examination, there was no evidence of Helicobacter pylori or cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Although we administered proton pump inhibitor and high-calorie enteral nutrition, hypoproteinemia did not improve, and the refractory protein-losing enteropathy persisted. However, interestingly, MD improved immediately after resection of the hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Generally, the etiology of MD is unknown, but H. pylori and CMV infections have been implicated. To our knowledge, there has been no previous report indicating that a malignant tumor could be involved in the etiology of MD. Thus, we report an extremely rare case of MD which is seemingly caused by malignancy.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography using an anterior oblique-viewing endoscope in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is technically more challenging in patients who have undergone gastrointestinal (GI) reconstruction. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of the anterior oblique-viewing endoscope (AOE) for ERCP in patients with a retained major duodenal papilla after GI reconstruction. METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving 40 patients (50 procedures) with a retained papilla after GI reconstruction who underwent ERCP using AOE. Reconstruction consisted of Billroth II gastrectomy (BII) in 25 patients (30 procedures) and Roux-en-Y anastomosis (RY) in 15 patients (20 procedures). In RY cases, the long single-balloon enteroscope (LSBE) was exchanged with AOE after reaching the papilla. RESULTS: The overall rate of reaching the papilla using AOE was 90.0 % (45/50) [BII; 86.7 % (26/30), RY; 95.0 % (19/20)]. The overall rate of biliary cannulation was 97.8 % (44/45) [BII; 100 % (26/26), RY; 94.7 % (18/19)], and the rate of biliary cannulation for intact papilla was 96.6 % (28/29) [BII; 100 % (14/14), RY; 93.3 % (14/15)]. Treatment success rate in cases of successful biliary cannulation was 97.7 % (43/44) [BII; 100 % (26/26), RY; 94.4 % (17/18)]. The rate of adverse events was 6.0 % (3/50) [BII; 3.3 % (1/30), RY; 10.0 % (2/20)], with mild pancreatitis occurring in 3 cases. CONCLUSIONS: High biliary cannulation and treatment rates can be achieved during ERCP using AOE in altered GI anatomy cases with a retained papilla, as long as the papilla can be reached. In RY cases, exchanging AOE with LSBE is useful after reaching the papilla.

A Novel Approach for Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation with the Guidewire Left in the Pancreatic Duct to Ensure Pancreatic Stenting.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) was reported to be superior for preserving the function of the sphincter of Oddi and to cause fewer late complications than endoscopic sphincterotomy. If the early complication of post-EPBD pancreatitis can be prevented, EPBD might be useful as long-term outcomes. This study assessed the feasibility of a novel EPBD for the purpose of reliable post-EPBD pancreatic stenting. METHODOLOGY: Among 1814 ER-CPs, in 17 patients undergoing biliary cannulation with pancreatic duct guidewire placement method, we performed EPBD with the guidewire left in the pancreatic duct by the two-devices-in-one-channel method. This approach employed in order to ensure pancreatic stenting. RESULTS: Procedures were successfully performed without the guidewire displacement, and pancreatic stents were easily placed in all patients. Post-EPBD pancreatitis occurred in only 1 patient (5.9%), and the severity was mild. Asymptomatic hyperamylasemia occurred in 3 patients (17.6%). There were no other early complications. The mean serum amylase levels (mean ± SD) before, 1 day, and 2 days after procedure were 81.4 ± 61.9, 301.2 ± 273.0, and 220.0 ± 177.6 IU/L. CONCLUSIONS: EPBD with a guidewire left in the pancreatic duct is useful method allowing reliable pancreatic stenting and may contribute to the prevention of pancreatitis.

A novel endoscopic papillectomy after a pancreatic stent placement above the pancreatic duct orifice: inside pancreatic stenting papillectomy.

BACKGROUND: Although pancreatic stenting is recommended for the prevention of postprocedure pancreatitis during endoscopic papillectomy (EP), in some patients it is technically difficult to perform postprocedure insertion of a pancreatic stent after endoscopic resection. GOALS: This study assessed the feasibility of a novel EP for the purpose of reliable post-EP pancreatic stenting. STUDY: We conducted a prospective pilot study involving 10 consecutive patients with tumor of the major duodenal papilla. We developed a novel pancreatic stent, which is attached to a suture, and devised a method by which the stent is first placed at an upstream migration into the major pancreatic duct above the orifice before resection and then placed at an appropriate location after endoscopic resection by pulling the suture attached to the stent [inside pancreatic stenting papillectomy (IPSP)]. RESULTS: The pancreatic stent was successfully placed at an upstream migration into the pancreatic duct above the orifice in 9 of the 10 patients. For the 9 patients with successful pancreatic stent placement, IPSP was performed. Although the suture was cut in 1 patient, pancreatic stents could be placed appropriately across the orifice by pulling the suture in all patients. Although bleeding occurred in 3 patients, there was no pos-procedure pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: IPSP is a practicable method allowing reliable post-EP pancreatic stenting and can contribute to pancreatitis prevention. However, larger studies need to be performed before its use can be recommended.

[Three cases of liver abscess associated with the Streptococcus anginosus group].

Reports of pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) caused by the Streptococcus anginosus group (SAG) have increased. Coinfection with SAG and anaerobic bacteria enhances the tendency for abscess formation. Furthermore, it has been reported that SAG infection results in pylethrombophlebitis as a complication. We experienced 3 cases of PLA caused by SAG: one case was complicated by the development of pylethrombophlebitis and the other 2 cases had coinfection with anaerobic bacteria. We report these cases together with bibliographic consideration of 23 cases previously reported in Japan.

A novel self-assembling peptide hemostatic gel as rescue therapy for fistula bleeding after endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy.

The novel synthetic self-assembling peptide PuraStat has been approved for hemostasis in endoscopic procedures. Nakahara and colleagues describe their application of PuraStat for hemostasis of refractory fistula bleeding after endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy. The effective and technically easy procedure is a useful option when hemostasis cannot be achieved by other means.

Technique of straightening the guidewire using a balloon catheter for successful endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting.

Video 1The technique of straightening the guidewire, looped in the neck of the gallbladder because of segmental adenomyomatosis, using a balloon catheter during endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stent placement.

Double-guidewire technique for endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting.

Highlight Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting is effective for acute cholecystitis with high surgical risk. However, looping of the guidewire in the cystic duct sometimes impedes placement of the stent. Nakahara and colleagues present a case of successful endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting after straightening the looped guidewire using a double-guidewire technique.

Efficacy of endoscopic large balloon dilation extended for 2 minutes in bile duct stone removal: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: There is no evidence regarding the optimal balloon dilation time during endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD). The study aim was to evaluate the efficacy of 2-minute extended balloon dilation for EPLBD. METHODS: Two hundred and five patients who underwent EPLBD during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for bile duct stones at three tertiary centers were included in the analysis. Clinical outcomes and the adverse events were compared between the 0-minute group (n = 94, balloon deflated immediately after waist disappearance) and the 2-minute group (n = 111, balloon dilation maintained for 2 minutes after waist disappearance). The risk factors of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) after EPLBD were assessed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the stone removal rates and hospitalization periods between the two groups. However, the total ERCP procedure time was significantly shorter in the 2-minute group (40.6 vs 48.9 min, P = .03). The incidence of PEP was 7.4% in the 0-minute group and significantly lower at 0.9% in the 2-minute group (P = .04). Multivariate analysis identified without 2-minute extended EPLBD as a significant risk factor of PEP (OR: 9.9, P = .045). CONCLUSIONS: Extension of EPLBD for 2 minutes helped prevent PEP and shortened the procedure time.

The Influence of Pre-Procedural Imaging and Cystic Duct Cholangiography on Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage in Acute Cholecystitis.

Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) for acute cholecystitis is challenging. We evaluated the influence of pre-procedural imaging and cystic duct cholangiography on ETGBD. Patients who underwent ETGBD for acute cholecystitis were retrospectively examined. The rate of gallbladder contrast on cholangiography, the accuracy of cystic duct direction and location by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), and the relationship between pre-procedural imaging and the technical success of ETGBD were investigated. A total of 145 patients were enrolled in this study. Gallbladder contrast on cholangiography was observed in 29 patients. The accuracy of cystic duct direction and location (proximal or distal, right or left, and cranial or caudal) by CT were, respectively, 79%, 60%, and 58% by CT and 68%, 55%, and 58% by MRCP. Patients showing gallbladder contrast on cholangiography underwent ETGBD with a significantly shorter procedure time and a lower rate of cystic duct injury. No other factors affecting procedure time, technical success, and cystic duct injury were identified. Pre-procedural evaluation of cystic duct direction and location by CT or MRCP was difficult in patients with acute cholecystitis. Patients who showed gallbladder contrast on cholangiography showed a shorter procedure time and a lower rate of cystic duct injury.

Clinical Outcomes of Early Endoscopic Transpapillary Biliary Drainage for Acute Cholangitis Associated with Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.

Acute cholangitis (AC) is often associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), and endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage (EBD) under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a treatment of choice. However, no evidence exists on the outcomes of EBD for AC associated with DIC. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the treatment outcomes of early EBD and compared endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) and endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD). We included 62 patients who received early EBD (EBS: 30, ENBD: 32) for AC, associated with DIC. The rates of clinical success for AC and DIC resolution at 7 days after EBD were 90.3% and 88.7%, respectively. Mean hospitalization period was 31.7 days, and in-hospital mortality rate was 4.8%. ERCP-related adverse events developed in 3.2% of patients (bleeding in two patients). Comparison between EBS and ENBD groups showed that the ENBD group included patients with more severe cholangitis, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score, systemic inflammatory response syndrome score, and serum bilirubin level were significantly higher in this group. However, no significant difference was observed in clinical outcomes between the two groups; both EBS and ENBD were effective. In conclusion, early EBD is effective and safe for patients with AC associated with DIC.