Model-informed Evidence for Clinical Non-inferiority of Every-2-Weeks Versus Standard Weekly Dosing Schedule of Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Cetuximab was initially developed and approved as a first-line treatment in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) for weekly administration (250 mg/m2 Q1W with 400 mg/m2 loading dose). An every-2-weeks schedule (500 mg/m2 Q2W) was approved recently by several health authorities. Being synchronized with chemotherapy, Q2W administration should improve patients' convenience and healthcare resource utilization. Herein, we present evidence of non-inferiority of Q2W cetuximab, compared with Q1W dosing using pharmacometrics modeling and clinical trial simulation (CTS). Pooled data from five phase I-III clinical trials in 852 patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC treated with Q1W or Q2W cetuximab were modeled using a population exposure-tumor size (TS) model linked to overall survival (OS); exposure was derived from a previously established population pharmacokinetic model. A semi-mechanistic TS model adapted from the Claret model incorporated killing rate proportional to cetuximab area under the concentration-time curve over 2 weeks (AUC) with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status as covariate on baseline TS. The OS was modeled with Weibull hazard using ECOG, baseline TS, primary tumor location, and predicted percent change in TS at 8 weeks as covariates. Model-based simulations revealed indistinguishable early tumor shrinkage and survival between Q2W vs. Q1W cetuximab. CTS evaluated OS non-inferiority (predefined margin of 1.25) in 1,000 trials, each with 2,000 virtual patients receiving Q2W or Q1W cetuximab (1:1), and demonstrated non-inferiority in 94% of cases. Taken together, these analyses provide model-based evidence for clinical non-inferiority of Q2W vs. Q1W cetuximab in mCRC with potential benefits to patients and healthcare providers.

Tumor growth inhibition modeling in patients with second line biliary tract cancer and first line non-small cell lung cancer based on bintrafusp alfa trials.

This analysis aimed to quantify tumor dynamics in patients receiving either bintrafusp alfa (BA) or pembrolizumab, by population pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic modeling, and investigate clinical and molecular covariates describing the variability in tumor dynamics by pharmacometric and machine-learning (ML) approaches. Data originated from two clinical trials in patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC; NCT03833661) receiving BA and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; NCT03631706) receiving BA or pembrolizumab. Individual drug exposure was estimated from previously developed population PK models. Population tumor dynamics models were developed for each drug-indication combination, and covariate evaluations performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NLME) and ML (elastic net and random forest models) approaches. The three tumor dynamics' model structures all included linear tumor growth components and exponential tumor shrinkage. The final BTC model included the effect of drug exposure (area under the curve) and several covariates (demographics, disease-related, and genetic mutations). Drug exposure was not significant in either of the NSCLC models, which included two, disease-related, covariates in the BA arm, and none in the pembrolizumab arm. The covariates identified by univariable NLME and ML highly overlapped in BTC but showed less agreement in NSCLC analyses. Hyperprogression could be identified by higher tumor growth and lower tumor kill rates and could not be related to BA exposure. Tumor size over time was quantitatively characterized in two tumor types and under two treatments. Factors potentially related to tumor dynamics were assessed using NLME and ML approaches; however, their net impact on tumor size was considered as not clinically relevant.

A multistate modeling and simulation framework to learn dose-response of oncology drugs: Application to bintrafusp alfa in non-small cell lung cancer.

The dose/exposure-efficacy analyses are often conducted separately for oncology end points like best overall response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Multistate models offer to bridge these dose-end point relationships by describing transitions and transition times from enrollment to response, progression, and death, and evaluating transition-specific dose effects. This study aims to apply the multistate pharmacometric modeling and simulation framework in a dose optimization setting of bintrafusp alfa, a fusion protein targeting TGF-ß and PD-L1. A multistate model with six states (stable disease [SD], response, progression, unknown, dropout, and death) was developed to describe the totality of endpoints data (time to response, PFS, and OS) of 80 patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving 500 or 1200 mg of bintrafusp alfa. Besides dose, evaluated predictor of transitions include time, demographics, premedication, disease factors, individual clearance derived from a pharmacokinetic model, and tumor dynamic metrics observed or derived from tumor size model. We found that probabilities of progression and death upon progression decreased over time since enrollment. Patients with metastasis at baseline had a higher probability to progress than patients without metastasis had. Despite dose failed to be statistically significant for any individual transition, the combined effect quantified through a model with dose-specific transition estimates was still informative. Simulations predicted a 69.2% probability of at least 1 month longer, and, 55.6% probability of at least 2-months longer median OS from the 1200 mg compared to the 500 mg dose, supporting the selection of 1200 mg for future studies.