ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic differences in health care may result in significant morbidity. The objective of this study was to determine whether there was an association between a patient's race or ethnicity and the receipt of an antiemetic agent preoperatively, during surgery, and in the recovery room. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective study of adult patients (>18 years) who had undergone cancer-related operating room procedures under anesthesia between March 2016 and August 2021 was conducted. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to estimate the effects of covariates on antiemetic administration. RESULTS: Of the 60,595 patients included in the study, 3053 (5.0%) self-identified as Asian, 5376 (8.9%) as Black, 8431 (13.9%) as Hispanic or Latino, 42,533 (70.2%) as White, and 1202 (2.0%) as belonging to another racial or ethnic group. Multivariable analyses showed significant associations between a patient's race or ethnicity and the receipt of antiemetics in the preoperative holding area, operating room, and recovery room (all P < .001). In the preoperative holding area, White patients (8962 of 42,533 [21.1%]; odds ratio [OR], 1.188; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.100-1.283; P < .001) had higher odds of receiving an antiemetic than Black patients (1006 of 5376 [18.7%]). Intraoperatively, the odds were significantly greater for Hispanic or Latino (7323 of 8431 [86.9%]; OR, 1.175; 95% CI, 1.065-1.297; P = .001) and patients who identified as belonging to another race (1078 of 1202 [89.7%]; OR, 1.582; 95% CI, 1.290-1.941; P < .001) than for Black patients (4468 of 5376 [83.1%]). In the recovery room, Asian (499 of 3053 [16.3%]; OR, 1.328; 95% CI: 1.127-1.561; P < .001), Hispanic or Latino (1335 of 8431 [15.8%]; OR, 1.208; 95% CI, 1.060-1.377; P < .005), and White patients (6533 of 42,533 [15.4%]; OR, 1.276; 95% CI, 1.140-1.427; P < .001) had significantly higher odds of receiving antiemetics than Black patients (646 of 5376 [12%]). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study suggests significant differences between the administrations of antiemetics to patients of different races or ethnicities, with Black patients often being less likely to receive an antiemetic than patients belonging to all other races or ethnicities.
ABSTRACT
Background: Non-metastatic muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer (MIBC) has a poor prognosis and standard of care (SOC) includes neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) combined with cystectomy. Patients receiving NAC have at best <10% improvement in five-year overall survival compared to cystectomy alone. This major clinical problem underscores gaps in our understanding of resistance mechanisms and a need for reliable pre-clinical models. The chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) represents a rapid, scalable, and cost-effective alternative to immunocompromised mice for establishing patient-derived xenografts (PDX) in vivo. CAM-PDX leverages an easily accessible engraftment scaffold and vascular-rich, immunosuppressed environment for the engraftment of PDX tumors and subsequent functional studies. Methods: We optimized engraftment conditions for primary MIBC tumors using the CAM-PDX model and tested concordance between cisplatin-based chemotherapy response of patients to matching PDX tumors using tumor growth coupled with immunohistochemistry markers of proliferation and apoptosis. We also tested select kinase inhibitor response on chemotherapy-resistant bladder cancers on the CAM-PDX using tumor growth measurements and immuno-detection of proliferation marker, Ki-67. Results: Our results show primary, NAC-resistant, MIBC tumors grown on the CAM share histological characteristics along with cisplatin-based chemotherapy resistance observed in the clinic for matched parent human tumor specimens. Patient tumor specimens acquired after chemotherapy treatment (post-NAC) and exhibiting NAC resistance were engrafted successfully on the CAM and displayed decreased tumor growth size and proliferation in response to treatment with a dual EGFR and HER2 inhibitor, but had no significant response to either CDK4/6 or FGFR inhibition. Conclusions: Our data suggests concordance between cisplatin-based chemotherapy resistance phenotypes in primary patient tumors and CAM-PDX models. Further, proteogenomic informed kinase inhibitor use on MIBC CAM-PDX models suggests a benefit from integration of rapid in vivo testing of novel therapeutics to inform more complex, pre-clinical mouse PDX experiments for more effective clinical trial design aimed at achieving optimal precision medicine for patients with limited treatment options.