Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 58
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Muscle Nerve ; 66(1): 39-49, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35098554

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: ALS is a heterogeneous disease that may be complicated or in part driven by inflammation. NP001, a regulator of macrophage activation, was associated with slowing disease progression in those with higher levels of the plasma inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP) in phase 2A studies in ALS. Here, we evaluate the effects of NP001 in a phase 2B trial, and perform a post hoc analysis with combined data from the preceding phase 2A trial. METHODS: The phase 2B trial enrolled 138 participants within 3 y of symptom onset and with plasma hs-CRP values >1.13 mg/L. They were randomized 1:1 to receive either placebo or NP001 for 6 mo. Change from baseline ALSFRS-R scores was the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary endpoints included vital capacity (VC) change from baseline and percentage of participants showing no decline of ALSFRS-R score over 6 mo (non-progressor). RESULTS: The phase 2B study did not show significant differences between placebo and active treatment with respect to change in ALSFRS-R scores, or VC. The drug was safe and well tolerated. A post hoc analysis identified a 40- to 65-y-old subset in which NP001-treated patients demonstrated slower declines in ALSFRS-R score by 36% and VC loss by 51% compared with placebo. A greater number of non-progressors were NP001-treated compared with placebo (p = .004). DISCUSSION: Although the phase 2B trial failed to meet its primary endpoints, post hoc analyses identified a subgroup whose decline in ALSFRS-R and VC scores were significantly slower than placebo. Further studies will be required to validate these findings.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/diagnosis , Biomarkers , C-Reactive Protein , Disease Progression , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Vital Capacity/physiology
2.
Muscle Nerve ; 65(3): 291-302, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34890069

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative illness with great unmet patient need. We aimed to evaluate whether mesenchymal stem cells induced to secrete high levels of neurotrophic factors (MSC-NTF), a novel autologous cell-therapy capable of targeting multiple pathways, could safely slow ALS disease progression. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled ALS participants meeting revised El Escorial criteria, revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) ≥25 (screening) and ≥3 ALSFRS-R points decline prior to randomization. Participants received three treatments of MSC-NTF or placebo intrathecally. The primary endpoint evaluated efficacy of MSC-NTF through a responder analysis and safety. A change in disease progression post-treatment of ≥1.25 points/mo defines a clinical response. A pre-specified analysis leveraged baseline ALSFRS-R of 35 as a subgroup threshold. RESULTS: Overall, MSC-NTF treatment was well tolerated; there were no safety concerns. Thirty-three percent of MSC-NTF and 28% of placebo participants met clinical response criteria at 28 wk (odds ratio [OR] = 1.33, P = .45); thus, the primary endpoint was not met. A pre-specified analysis of participants with baseline ALSFRS-R ≥ 35 (n = 58) showed a clinical response rate at 28 wk of 35% MSC-NTF and 16% placebo (OR = 2.6, P = .29). Significant improvements in cerebrospinal biomarkers of neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, and neurotrophic factor support were observed with MSC-NTF, with placebo unchanged. DISCUSSION: The study did not reach statistical significance on the primary endpoint. However, a pre-specified subgroup suggests that MSC-NTF participants with less severe disease may have retained more function compared to placebo. Given the unmet patient need, the results of this trial warrant further investigation.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/diagnosis , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Nerve Growth Factors/metabolism , Transplantation, Autologous
3.
Muscle Nerve ; 2018 Mar 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29510461

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: More than 90% of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients have muscle cramps, but evidence-based treatments have not been available. METHODS: A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of mexiletine 150 mg twice daily was conducted in ALS patients requesting treatment of symptomatic muscle cramps. RESULTS: Muscle cramp frequency was reduced in 18 of 20 patients; 13 reductions were attributed to treatment (P < 0.05). The average reduction, based on t tests, was 1.8 cramps per day (a reduction from 5.3 with placebo to 3.5 with mexiletine). The estimated reduction of cramp severity was 15 units on a 100-unit scale (P = 0.01) from a baseline average of 46. No effect on fasciculations was noted. One patient discontinued the study because of dizziness, and another patient discontinued the study to start open-label mexiletine therapy. No serious adverse event occurred. DISCUSSION: Mexiletine is a well tolerated and effective medication for controlling the symptom of muscle cramps in ALS. Muscle Nerve, 2018.

4.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 1: CD006049, 2017 01 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28067943

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Imbalance of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) and related modulators has been implicated as an important factor in the pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), which is also known as motor neuron disease (MND). In this context, the role and mechanism of action of gabapentin and baclofen have been extensively investigated, although with conflicting results. This is the first systematic review to assess clinical trials of GABA modulators for the treatment of ALS. OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of gabapentin, baclofen, or other GABA modulators in delaying the progression of ALS, and to evaluate adverse effects of these interventions SEARCH METHODS: On 16 August 2016, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, AMED, and LILACS. In addition, we checked the bibliographies of the trials found in order to identify any other trials, and contacted trial authors to identify relevant unpublished results or additional clinical trials. On 30 August 2016, we searched two clinical trials registries. SELECTION CRITERIA: Types of studies: double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTsTypes of participants: adults with a diagnosis of probable or definite ALSTypes of interventions: gabapentin, baclofen, or other GABA modulators compared with placebo, no treatment, or each otherPrimary outcome: survival at one year from study enrollmentSecondary outcomes: individual rate of decline of maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), expressed as arm megascore; rate of decline of per cent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC); rate of decline of ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS); health-related quality of life; survival evaluated by pooling hazards; and adverse events DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors independently checked titles and abstracts identified by the searches. The review authors obtained and independently analyzed original individual participant data from each included study; additional review authors and the Cochrane Neuromuscular Managing Editor checked the outcome data. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias in included studies. Data collection and analysis: At least two review authors independently checked titles and abstracts identified by the searches. The review authors obtained and independently analyzed original individual participant data from each included study; additional review authors and the Cochrane Neuromuscular Managing Editor checked the outcome data. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias in included studies. MAIN RESULTS: We identified two double-blind RCTs of gabapentin treatment in ALS for inclusion in this review. We found no eligible RCTs of baclofen or other GABA modulators. The selected studies were phase II and phase III trials, which lasted six and nine months, respectively. They were highly comparable because both were comparisons of oral gabapentin and placebo, performed by the same investigators. The trials enrolled 355 participants with ALS: 80 in the gabapentin group and 72 in the placebo group in the first (phase II) trial and 101 in the gabapentin group and 102 in the placebo group in the second (phase III) trial. Neither trial was long enough to report survival at one year, which was our primary outcome. We found little or no difference in estimated one-year survival between the treated group and the placebo group (78% versus 77%, P = 0.63 by log-rank test; high-quality evidence). We also found little or no difference in the rate of decline of MVIC expressed as arm megascore, or rate of FVC decline (high-quality evidence). One trial investigated monthly decline in the ALSFRS and quality of life measured using the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) and found little or no difference between groups (moderate-quality evidence). The trials reported similar adverse events. Complaints that were clearly elevated in those taking gabapentin, based on analyses of the combined data, were light-headedness, drowsiness, and limb swelling (high-quality evidence). Fatigue and falls occurred more frequently with gabapentin than with placebo in one trial, but when we combined the data for fatigue from both trials, there was no clear difference between the groups. We assessed the overall risk of bias in the included trials as low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: According to high-quality evidence, gabapentin is not effective in treating ALS. It does not extend survival, slow the rate of decline of muscle strength, respiratory function and, based on moderate-quality evidence, probably does not improve quality of life or slow monthly decline in the ALSFRS. Other GABA modulators have not been studied in randomized trials.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/drug therapy , GABA Agents/therapeutic use , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/therapeutic use , Adult , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/mortality , Baclofen/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , GABA Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Time Factors , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/adverse effects
5.
Mol Microbiol ; 89(5): 816-30, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23782391

ABSTRACT

Multi-drug resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii are increasingly being isolated in hospitals worldwide. Among the virulence factors identified in this bacterium there is a general O-glycosylation system that appears to be important for biofilm formation and virulence, and the capsular polysaccharide, which is essential for resistance to complement killing. In this work, we identified a locus that is responsible for the synthesis of the O-pentasaccharide found on the glycoproteins. Besides the enzymes required for the assembly of the glycan, additional proteins typically involved in polymerization and transport of capsule were identified within or adjacently to the locus. Mutagenesis of PglC, the initiating glycosyltransferase prevented the synthesis of both glycoproteins and capsule, resulting in abnormal biofilm structures and attenuated virulence in mice. These results, together with the structural analysis of A. baumannii 17978 capsular polysaccharide via NMR, demonstrated that the pentasaccharides that decorate the glycoproteins are also the building blocks for capsule biosynthesis. Two linked subunits, but not longer glycan chains, were detected on proteins via MS. The discovery of a bifurcated pathway for O-glycosylation and capsule synthesis not only provides insight into the biology of A. baumannii but also identifies potential novel candidates for intervention against this emerging pathogen.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii/metabolism , Bacterial Capsules/metabolism , Metabolic Networks and Pathways/genetics , Protein Processing, Post-Translational , Acinetobacter Infections/microbiology , Acinetobacter Infections/pathology , Acinetobacter baumannii/genetics , Acinetobacter baumannii/pathogenicity , Acinetobacter baumannii/physiology , Animals , Bacterial Capsules/chemistry , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , Biofilms/growth & development , Gene Knockout Techniques , Glycosylation , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Mass Spectrometry , Mice , Virulence
6.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (3): CD001447, 2012 Mar 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22419278

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Riluzole is approved for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in most countries. Questions persist about its clinical utility because of high cost and modest efficacy. OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of riluzole in prolonging survival and in delaying the use of surrogates (tracheostomy and mechanical ventilation) to sustain survival, and to assess the effect of riluzole upon functional health. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (20 April 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2011, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2011), EMBASE (1980 to May 2011) and made enquiries of authors of trials, Aventis (manufacturer of riluzole) and other experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Types of studies: randomized controlled trials TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS: adults with a diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Types of interventions: treatment with riluzole or placebo Types of outcome measures: Primary: pooled hazard ratio of tracheostomy-free survival over all time points with riluzole 100 mg. Secondary: per cent mortality with riluzole 50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg; neurologic function, muscle strength and adverse events. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One author performed data extraction and two other authors checked them. One author checked the data and entered them into the computer. The other authors verified the data entry. We obtained missing data from the trial authors whenever possible. MAIN RESULTS: The four trials examining tracheostomy-free survival included a total of 974 riluzole-treated patients and 503 placebo-treated patients. No new randomized controlled trials were found when we updated the searches for this update in 2011. The methodological quality was acceptable and three trials were easily comparable, although one trial (169 participants) included older patients in more advanced stages of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and one (195 participants) had multiple primary endpoints. Riluzole 100 mg per day provided a benefit for the homogeneous group of patients in the first two trials (hazard ratio (HR) 0.80, 95% confidence internal (CI) 0.64 to 0.99, P= 0.042) and there was no evidence of heterogeneity (P = 0.33). When the third trial (which included older and more seriously affected patients) was added, there was evidence of heterogeneity (P < 0.0001) and the overall treatment effect was reduced but still significant (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.698 to 0.997, P= 0.046). This represented a 9% gain in the probability of surviving one year (49% in the placebo and 58% in the riluzole group), and increased median survival from 11.8 to 14.8 months. There was a small beneficial effect on both bulbar and limb function, but not on muscle strength. A three-fold increase in serum alanine transferase was more frequent in riluzole-treated patients than controls (mean difference 2.62, 95% CI 1.59 to 4.31). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Riluzole 100 mg daily is reasonably safe and probably prolongs median survival by about two to three months in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/drug therapy , Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists/therapeutic use , Neuroprotective Agents/therapeutic use , Riluzole/therapeutic use , Age Factors , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/mortality , Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists/adverse effects , Humans , Life Expectancy , Neuroprotective Agents/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Riluzole/adverse effects , Tracheostomy
7.
N Engl J Med ; 357(8): 775-88, 2007 Aug 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17671248

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Approximately 90% of persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) have the sporadic form, which may be caused by the interaction of multiple environmental factors and previously unknown genes. METHODS: We performed a genomewide association analysis using 766,955 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) found in 386 white patients with sporadic ALS and 542 neurologically normal white controls (the discovery series). Associations of SNPs with sporadic ALS were confirmed in two independent replication populations: replication series 1, with 766 case patients with the disease and 750 neurologically normal controls, and replication series 2, with 135 case patients and 275 controls. RESULTS: We identified 10 genetic loci that are significantly associated (P<0.05) with sporadic ALS in three independent series of case patients and controls and an additional 41 loci that had significant associations in two of the three series. The most significant association with disease in white case patients as compared with controls was found for a SNP near an uncharacterized gene known as FLJ10986 (P=3.0x10(-4); odds ratio for having the genotype in patients vs. controls, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.62). The FLJ10986 protein was found to be expressed in the spinal cord and cerebrospinal fluid of patients and of controls. Specific SNPs seem to be associated with sex, age at onset, and site of onset of sporadic ALS. CONCLUSIONS: Variants of FLJ10986 may confer susceptibility to sporadic ALS. FLJ10986 and 50 other candidate loci warrant further investigation for their potential role in conferring susceptibility to the disease.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/genetics , Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteins/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Age of Onset , Case-Control Studies , Female , Genome, Human , Genotype , Humans , Immunoblotting , Male , Mutation , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , Sequence Analysis, DNA
8.
Ann Neurol ; 65 Suppl 1: S24-8, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19191307

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the care of patients with ALS following the publication of the standardized recommendations for the management of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) published in 1999 by the American Academy of Neurology. METHODS: Specific aspects of ALS patient management have been evaluated serially using a national Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Clinical Assessment, Research, and Education (ALS CARE) database to encourage compliance with these recommendations and to assure continuing quality improvement. RESULTS: The most recent analysis of 5,600 patients shows interesting epidemiological observations and treatment trends. Proper management of many ALS symptoms has increased substantially since the first publication of the guidelines, and awareness of pseudobulbar affect has increased. Other recommendations are underutilized: Only 9% undergo percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, although this procedure was recommended in 22% of patients; and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation was used by only 21% of patients despite being associated with improved 5-year survival rates. INTERPRETATION: This observational database has been a useful tool in monitoring compliance with the standard of care for patients with ALS and may have resulted in greater adherence to guidelines.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/diagnosis , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/therapy , Research/trends , Adult , Aged , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/epidemiology , Databases, Factual , Female , Gulf War , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic , North America/epidemiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Practice Guidelines as Topic
9.
Amyotroph Lateral Scler ; 11(3): 259-65, 2010 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19961263

ABSTRACT

More than 30 phase II or III clinical trials have been carried out in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Only riluzole, however, has been shown to extend survival and/or time to tracheostomy. Many early ALS trials lacked solid pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data for the treatment being tested, challenging the interpretation of the efficacy and pathway relevance. Understanding of the genetics and pathophysiology of ALS has improved considerably in the past decade, but biomarkers of disease activity remain lacking. A more efficient approach to early phase clinical trials is needed to accelerate the identification of useful agents for ALS. Here we summarize our current thinking about phase II design options and the potential benefits of a clinical trial network for phase II trials in ALS.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/drug therapy , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic/methods , Neuroprotective Agents/therapeutic use , Riluzole/therapeutic use , Biomarkers , Humans , Neuroprotective Agents/pharmacology , Research Design , Riluzole/pharmacology , Treatment Outcome
10.
J Neuroimmunol ; 206(1-2): 121-4, 2009 Jan 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19013651

ABSTRACT

The present study reports elevated levels of endotoxin/lipopolysaccharide (LPS) concentrations in plasma from patients with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (sALS) and Alzheimer's (AD) as compared to healthy controls. Levels of plasma LPS showed a significant positive correlation with degree of blood monocyte/macrophage activation in disease groups and was most elevated in patients with advanced sALS disease. There was a significant negative relationship between plasma LPS and levels of monocyte/macrophage IL-10 expression in sALS blood. These data suggest that systemic LPS levels and activated monocyte/macrophages may play significant roles in the pathogenesis of sALS.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/blood , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/immunology , Endotoxins/blood , Lipopolysaccharides/blood , Aged , Alzheimer Disease/blood , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/pathology , Analysis of Variance , Female , Flow Cytometry/methods , HLA-DR Antigens/metabolism , Humans , Interleukin-10/metabolism , Macrophages/immunology , Macrophages/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Monocytes/immunology , Monocytes/metabolism
11.
Neurology ; 92(14): e1610-e1623, 2019 04 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30850440

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To revise the 1999 Airlie House consensus guidelines for the design and implementation of preclinical therapeutic studies and clinical trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: A consensus committee comprising 140 key members of the international ALS community (ALS researchers, clinicians, patient representatives, research funding representatives, industry, and regulatory agencies) addressed 9 areas of need within ALS research: (1) preclinical studies; (2) biological and phenotypic heterogeneity; (3) outcome measures; (4) disease-modifying and symptomatic interventions; (5) recruitment and retention; (6) biomarkers; (7) clinical trial phases; (8) beyond traditional trial designs; and (9) statistical considerations. Assigned to 1 of 8 sections, committee members generated a draft set of guidelines based on a "background" of developing a (pre)clinical question and a "rationale" outlining the evidence and expert opinion. Following a 2-day, face-to-face workshop at the Airlie House Conference Center, a modified Delphi process was used to develop draft consensus research guidelines, which were subsequently reviewed and modified based on comments from the public. Statistical experts drafted a separate document of statistical considerations (section 9). RESULTS: In this report, we summarize 112 guidelines and their associated backgrounds and rationales. The full list of guidelines, the statistical considerations, and a glossary of terms can be found in data available from Dryad (appendices e-3-e-5, doi.org/10.5061/dryad.32q9q5d). The authors prioritized 15 guidelines with the greatest potential to improve ALS clinical research. CONCLUSION: The revised Airlie House ALS Clinical Trials Consensus Guidelines should serve to improve clinical trial design and accelerate the development of effective treatments for patients with ALS.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Clinical Trials as Topic , Guidelines as Topic , Research Design , Biomarkers , Delphi Technique , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Selection , Statistics as Topic
12.
Amyotroph Lateral Scler ; 9(4): 212-22, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18608093

ABSTRACT

Combining agents with different mechanisms of action may be necessary for meaningful results in treating ALS. The combinations of minocycline-creatine and celecoxib-creatine have additive effects in the murine model. New trial designs are needed to efficiently screen the growing number of potential neuroprotective agents. Our objective was to assess two drug combinations in ALS using a novel phase II trial design. We conducted a randomized, double-blind selection trial in sequential pools of 60 patients. Participants received minocycline (100 mg)-creatine (10 g) twice daily or celecoxib (400 mg)-creatine (10 g) twice daily for six months. The primary objective was treatment selection based on which combination best slowed deterioration in the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R); the trial could be stopped after one pool if the difference between the two arms was adequately large. At trial conclusion, each arm was compared to a historical control group in a futility analysis. Safety measures were also examined. After the first patient pool, the mean six-month decline in ALSFRS-R was 5.27 (SD=5.54) in the celecoxib-creatine group and 6.47 (SD=9.14) in the minocycline-creatine group. The corresponding decline was 5.82 (SD=6.77) in the historical controls. The difference between the two sample means exceeded the stopping criterion. The null hypothesis of superiority was not rejected in the futility analysis. Skin rash occurred more frequently in the celecoxib-creatine group. In conclusion, the celecoxib-creatine combination was selected as preferable to the minocycline-creatine combination for further evaluation. This phase II design was efficient, leading to treatment selection after just 60 patients, and can be used in other phase II trials to assess different agents.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/drug therapy , Creatine/therapeutic use , Minocycline/therapeutic use , Neuroprotective Agents/therapeutic use , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Celecoxib , Creatine/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Drug Eruptions , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Minocycline/administration & dosage , Minocycline/adverse effects , Neuroprotective Agents/administration & dosage , Patient Selection , Pyrazoles/administration & dosage , Sulfonamides/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
13.
J Palliat Med ; 11(3): 470-5, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18363490

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The concept of hope in palliative care is an important and neglected area of research. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a progressive degenerative motor neuron disease, offers an excellent opportunity to study this construct as the illness is virtually always fatal. Our research explored the meaning of hope in individuals with ALS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients (13 males and 3 females; mean age, 54) were interviewed during routine clinic visits to the Forbes Norris MDA/ALS Research Center at California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco. The Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Scale and the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) and a Hope Scale were administered. Themes of hope were identified and categorized. RESULTS: Hope categories included: (1) hope for a cure, (2) social support, (3) search for information, (4) spiritual beliefs, (5) limiting the impact, (6) adapting to changing capacities, (7) living in the moment, and (8) self-transcendence. The relationship between hope and the FVC value and individual as well as overall ALSFRS-R ratings were examined, and none were significant. DISCUSSION: Individuals varied in their capacity to cope with their illness unrelated to their physical ability. Themes ranged from a primary focus on the self to one of heightened concern for others, on continuum from narcissism to altruism. Respondents cited using a number of categories of hope (mean=5). CONCLUSION: Patients draw upon a variety of mechanisms to sustain hope when facing chronic disease, including hope for a cure, support from others, seeking information, spiritual beliefs, limiting the impact, adapting to changing capacities, living in the moment, and transcending the self. The palliative care team can play an important role by promoting discussions regarding hopefulness and its many forms in individuals with ALS.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/psychology , Palliative Care/psychology , Adult , Aged , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/therapy , Attitude , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Morale , San Francisco , Social Support , Spirituality
14.
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am ; 19(3): 633-51, xi-xii, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18625421

ABSTRACT

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating condition characterized by progressive muscle wasting, inanition, respiratory failure, and death within approximately 2 to 5 years of onset. ALS is among the most common neuromuscular conditions, with an overall prevalence in the world of approximately 5 to 7 cases/100,000 population. Epidemiologic studies have identified some potential risk factors for developing ALS, including a high-fat, low-fiber diet; cigarette smoking; slimness and athleticism; and living in urban areas. Between 5% and 10% of ALS is genetic, with up to 11 genetic loci identified. Although understanding of the pathophysiology of this disease has advanced over the past 60 years, scant progress has been made regarding effective treatment. The authors review the current understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms of ALS and approaches to treating the disease.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/drug therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Neuroprotective Agents/therapeutic use , Animals , Humans , Treatment Outcome
15.
Lancet Neurol ; 6(12): 1045-53, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17980667

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Minocycline has anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects in vitro, and extends survival in mouse models of some neurological conditions. Several trials are planned or are in progress to assess whether minocycline slows human neurodegeneration. We aimed to test the efficacy of minocycline as a treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: We did a multicentre, randomised placebo-controlled phase III trial. After a 4-month lead-in phase, 412 patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or minocycline in escalating doses of up to 400 mg/day for 9 months. The primary outcome measure was the difference in rate of change in the revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R). Secondary outcome measures were forced vital capacity (FVC), manual muscle testing (MMT), quality of life, survival, and safety. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00047723. FINDINGS: ALSFRS-R score deterioration was faster in the minocycline group than in the placebo group (-1.30 vs -1.04 units/month, 95% CI for difference -0.44 to -0.08; p=0.005). Patients on minocycline also had non-significant tendencies towards faster decline in FVC (-3.48 vs -3.01, -1.03 to 0.11; p=0.11) and MMT score (-0.30 vs -0.26, -0.08 to 0.01; p=0.11), and greater mortality during the 9-month treatment phase (hazard ratio=1.32, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.10; p=0.23) than did patients on placebo. Quality-of-life scores did not differ between the treatment groups. Non-serious gastrointestinal and neurological adverse events were more common in the minocycline group than in the placebo group, but these events were not significantly related to the decline in ALSFRS-R score. INTERPRETATION: Our finding that minocycline has a harmful effect on patients with ALS has implications for trials of minocycline in patients with other neurological disorders, and for how potential neuroprotective agents are screened for use in patients with ALS.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Minocycline/therapeutic use , Aged , Confidence Intervals , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle, Skeletal/drug effects , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects , Quality of Life , Survival Analysis , Vital Capacity/drug effects
16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28872909

ABSTRACT

ALS is a lethal neurodegenerative disease wherein the diagnosis is often delayed. Our understanding of the pathobiology is slowly expanding, and the number of new genes is rapidly increasing. The development of potential treatments targeting specific mechanisms is beginning to offer hope. Evidence-based treatments and the development of quality measures have raised the standard of care. The current status of treatment for ALS includes one drug riluzole that slows progression modestly, and another drug edaravone that was recently approved by FDA to slow ALS progression. Multidisciplinary clinics and symptomatic treatments ease the burden of ALS and prolong life. An overview of these treatments is provided here.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/diagnosis , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/drug therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Dietary Supplements , Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists/therapeutic use , Humans , Quality of Health Care/standards , Riluzole/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
17.
JAMA Neurol ; 74(6): 660-667, 2017 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28384752

ABSTRACT

Importance: Various factors have been proposed as possible candidates associated with the prognosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); however, there is still no consensus on which biomarkers are reliable prognostic factors. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a biomarker of the inflammatory response that shows significant prognostic value for several diseases. Objective: To examine the prognostic significance of CRP in ALS. Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients' serum CRP levels were evaluated from January 1, 2009, to June 30, 2015, in a large cohort of patients with ALS observed by an Italian tertiary multidisciplinary center. Results were replicated in an independent cohort obtained from a population-based registry of patients with ALS. A post hoc analysis was performed of the phase 2 trial of NP001 to determine whether stratification by levels of CRP improves differentiation of responders and nonresponders to the drug. Main Outcomes and Measures: Serum CRP levels from the first examination were recorded to assess their effect on disease progression and survival. Results: A total of 394 patients with ALS (168 women and 226 men; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 60.18 [13.60] years) were observed in a tertiary multidisciplinary center, and the analysis was replicated in an independent cohort of 116 patients with ALS (50 women and 66 men; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 67.00 [10.74] years) identified through a regional population-based registry. Serum CRP levels in the 394 patients with ALS correlated with severity of functional impairment, as measured by total score on the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised, at first evaluation (r = -0.14818; P = .004), and with patient survival (hazard ratio, 1.129; 95% CI, 1.033-1.234; P = .007). Similar results were found in the independent cohort (hazard ratio, 1.044; 95% CI, 1.016-1.056; P ≤ .001). Moreover, a post hoc analysis of the phase 2 trial of NP001 using the same CRP threshold showed that patients with elevated baseline CRP levels receiving the higher dose of NP001 had significantly less functional impairment after the treatment period compared with patients with normal baseline CRP, regardless of whether patients with normal CRP levels received NP001 or placebo (3.00 [3.62] vs -7.31 [6.23]; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that patients with ALS and elevated serum CRP levels progress more rapidly than do those with lower CRP levels and that this elevation may reflect a neuroinflammatory state potentially responsive to the immune regulators such as NP001.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/blood , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/drug therapy , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Disease Progression , Immunologic Factors/pharmacology , Registries , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunologic Factors/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged
18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27589995

ABSTRACT

We performed a randomized, double-blind phase I clinical trial for six months on the effects of oral L-serine in patients with ALS. The protocol called for enrollment of patients with a diagnosis of probable or definite ALS, age 18-85 years, disease duration of less than three years and forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥ 60%. Patients were randomly assigned to four different oral twice-daily dose regimens (0.5, 2.5, 7.5, or 15 g/dose). Blood, urine and CSF samples, ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores and forced vital capacity (FVC) were obtained throughout the trial. Disease progression was compared with matched historical placebo controls from five previous ALS therapeutic trials. Of 20 patients enrolled, one withdrew before receiving study drug and two withdrew with gastro-intestinal problems. Three patients died during the trial. L-serine was generally well tolerated by the patients and L-serine did not appear to accelerate functional decline of patients as measured by slope of their ALSFRS-R scores. Based on this small study, L-serine appears to be generally safe for patients with ALS.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/drug therapy , Serine/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease Progression , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Vital Capacity/drug effects , Young Adult
19.
J Neuroimmunol ; 179(1-2): 87-93, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16857270

ABSTRACT

Recent studies suggest that monocyte activation may play a role in ALS pathogenesis. Therefore, monocyte CCR2, the receptor for monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and plasma levels of MCP-1 were measured in 42 sALS patients, 38 healthy and 34 age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) controls. MCP-1 was elevated in both sALS and ARMD patients, but CCR2 levels were significantly decreased on sALS but not on ARMD monocytes. Loss of monocyte CCR2 expression was inversely correlated with degree of monocyte/macrophage activation in sALS and this decrease was unlikely due to receptor down-regulation given the ARMD results. Defective monocyte/macrophages may play an active role in sALS.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/metabolism , Monocytes/metabolism , Receptors, Chemokine/biosynthesis , Aged , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/drug therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Biomarkers/blood , Chemokine CCL2/blood , Drug Therapy, Combination , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Macrophage Activation/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Neuroprotective Agents/therapeutic use , Receptors, CCR2 , Riluzole/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL