ABSTRACT
Solid tumors or predisposition syndromes are increasingly suspected before birth. However optimal management and outcomes remain unclear. We have performed a ten-year retrospective study of oncologic indications of prenatal diagnosis in public hospitals in Marseille. Data were obtained from prenatal diagnosis center and hospital imaging databases and pediatric oncology department files. Fifty-one cases were identified, 40 with mass: adrenal 17, sacrococcygeal 9, cardiac 7, abdominal 4, ovarian 1, cervical 2; 8 with developmental abnormalities (omphalocele 4, macroglossia 4), 3 WITH familial predisposition syndromes (familial rhabdoid 2, Li-Fraumeni 1). Median detection time was 30 week. Termination of pregnancy was decided for 9 fetuses (4 cardiac lesions and suspected tuberous sclerosis, 2 sacrococcygeal tumors, 1 Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome, 2 SMARCB1 mutations. Preterm birth occurred in 8 cases. Eleven newborns (26,1%) required intensive care (8 for mechanical complications). Of of 17 adrenal mass ES, 4 disappeared before birth and 5 before one year. Seventeen newborns underwent surgery: 13 masses (teratoma 7, myelomeningocele 2, cystic nephroma 1, neuroblastoma 2), 4 omphaloceles, one biopsy. Surgery performed after one year for incomplete regression identified 1 neuroblastoma, 2 bronchogenic cysts and 2 nonmalignant masses. Three newborns received chemotherapy. Except one patient with BWS who died of obstructive apnea, all children are alive disease free with a median follow-up of 60 months [9-131 months]. Twelve have sequelae. Various solid tumors and cancer predisposition syndromes can be detected before birth. A multidisciplinary collaboration is strongly recommended for optimal management before and after birth.
Subject(s)
Neuroblastoma , Oncologists , Premature Birth , Pregnancy , Female , Child , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Prenatal DiagnosisABSTRACT
Pediatric melanoma is a rare cancer, especially in young children, and it remains a diagnostic challenge. We report a case of massively metastatic melanoma in young patient with an atypical clinical and biological presentation and with no risk factors.
Subject(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasms, Second Primary , Skin Neoplasms , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Melanoma/pathology , Risk Factors , Skin Neoplasms/pathologySubject(s)
Neuroblastoma , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Humans , Liquid Biopsy , Mutation , Mutation, Missense , Neuroblastoma/drug therapy , Neuroblastoma/genetics , Protein Kinase Inhibitors , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Pyridones/therapeutic use , PyrimidinonesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This multicenter Phase I study (NCT03585465) evaluated nivolumab in combination with 3 metronomic chemotherapy (MC) regimens in children with refractory/relapsing solid tumors. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the three regimens METHODS: Patients aged < 18 years were enrolled. Nivolumab was combined with cyclophosphamide and vinblastine (arm A), capecitabine (arm B), or cyclophosphamide, vinblastine and capecitabine (arm C). Arm A and B were allocated sequentially. Arm C opened only if A and B were deemed safe. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were evaluated over the first two cycles. Patients were evaluable if they received > 2 cycles and > 70% of the planned dose. POPULATION: Sixteen patients were enrolled, 3 in arm A, 6 in arm B, and 7 in arm C. Median age was 11.5 years (range, 5-19). Patients previously received a median of 3.5 (range, 1-4) lines of systemic treatment, 14 patients had surgery and 11 had radiotherapy. RESULTS: Median number of cycles was 2 (1-24), median treatment duration was 56 days (18-714). In arm C, median number of cycles was 4 with median treatment duration of 95 days. No DLT was observed. Grade 3 adverse events (AE) and serious AE were observed in 8 patients (50%) and 1 patient (6%), respectively, over the first 2 cycles. No grade 4 AE occurred. The 6-month PFS and OS were 12% and 44%, respectively, in the whole population. Prolonged stable disease was observed in a high-grade glioma and an atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor. CONCLUSION: Arm C appears safe. A randomized phase II trial evaluating the addition of nivolumab to the triple MC is ongoing.
Subject(s)
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Nivolumab , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Capecitabine/therapeutic use , Cyclophosphamide , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Vinblastine/therapeutic use , Child, PreschoolABSTRACT
(1) Background: Children and young adults with cancer are poorly represented in COVID-19 vaccination studies, and long-term protection conferred by vaccination is not known. (2) Objectives: 1. To determine the adverse effects associated with BNT162B2 vaccination in children and young adults with cancer. 2. To assess its efficacy in stimulating immunological response and in preventing severe COVID-19 disease. (3) Methods: Retrospective single-center study evaluating patients aged 8 to 22 years, with cancer, who underwent vaccination from January 2021 to June 2022. ELISA serologies and serum neutralization were collected monthly from the first injection. Serologies below 26 were considered negative, while those above 264 BAU/mL were considered positive and indicative of protection. Antibodies titers were considered positive above 20. Data on adverse events and infections were collected. (4) Results: 38 patients were included (M/F = 1.7, median age 16 years), of whom 63% had a localized tumor and 76% were undergoing treatment at the time of the first vaccination. Two or three vaccine injections were administered in 90% of patients. Adverse events were mainly systemic and not severe, except for seven grade 3 toxicities. Four cancer-related deaths were reported. Median serology was negative the month following the first vaccination and became protective during the third month. At 3 and 12 months, median serology was 1778 and 6437 BAU/mL, respectively. Serum neutralization was positive in 97% of the patients. COVID-19 infection occurred despite vaccination in 18%; all were mild forms. (5) Conclusions: In children and young adults with cancer, vaccination was well tolerated and conferred effective serum neutralization. COVID-19 infections were mild, and vaccine seroconversion persisted after 12 months in most patients. The value of additional vaccination should be further established.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Relapses in pediatric high-risk brain tumors remain unmet medical needs. Over the last 15 years, metronomic chemotherapy has gradually emerged as an alternative therapeutic approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a national retrospective study of patients with relapsing pediatric brain tumors treated according to the MEMMAT or MEMMAT-like regimen from 2010 to 2022. Treatment consisted of daily oral thalidomide, fenofibrate, and celecoxib, and alternating 21-day cycles of metronomic etoposide and cyclophosphamide associated with bevacizumab and intraventricular chemotherapy. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included. The most frequent malignancies were medulloblastoma (22) and ATRT (8). Overall, the best responses were CR in eight patients (20%), PR in three patients (7%), and SD in three patients (7%), for a clinical benefit rate of 34%. The median overall survival was 26 months (IC95% = 12.4-42.7), and median EFS was 9.7 months (IC95% = 6.0-18.6). The most frequent grade ¾ toxicities were hematological. Dose had to be adjusted in 27% of the cases. There was no statistical difference in outcome between full or modified MEMMAT. The best setting seems to be when MEMMAT is used as a maintenance and at first relapse. CONCLUSIONS: The metronomic MEMMAT combination can lead to sustained control of relapsed high-risk pediatric brain tumors.
ABSTRACT
The overall survival rate after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for inborn errors of immunity (IEI) has improved considerably, and its indications have broadened. As a consequence, addressing the issue of long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become crucial. Our study focuses on the health and HRQoL of post-HSCT survivors. We conducted a multicenter prospective follow-up study enrolling IEI patients who underwent transplantation in childhood before 2009. Self-reported data from the French Childhood Immune Deficiency Long-term Cohort and the 36-item Short Form questionnaires were compiled. One hundred twelve survivors were included with a median duration period from HSCT of 15 years (range 5-37), of whom 55 underwent transplantation for a combined immunodeficiency. We show that in patients evaluated at least 5 years after HSCT, 55% are still affected by a poor or very poor health status. Poor and very poor health status correlated with an abnormal graft function, defined as host or mixed chimerism, abnormal CD3+ count, or diagnosis of chronic graft-versus-host disease (poor health: odds ratio [OR] = 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-5.9, P = .028; very poor health: OR = 3.6, 95% CI, 1.1-13, P = .049). Poor health was directly linked to a poorer HRQoL. Significant improvements in graft procedures have translated into better survival rates, but we show here that about half of the transplanted patients remain affected by an altered health status with a correlation to both abnormal graft function and impaired HRQoL. Additional studies are needed to confirm the impact of those improvements on long-term health status and HRQoL.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Quality of Life , Humans , Prospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Health Status , SurvivorsABSTRACT
Precision oncology requires tumor molecular profiling to identify actionable targets. Tumor biopsies are considered as the gold standard, but their indications are limited by the burden of procedures in children. Blood-derived liquid biopsy (LB) is a potential alternative that is not yet documented in real-world settings, especially in pediatric oncology. We performed a retrospective analysis of children and teenagers with a relapsing or refractory disease, upon whom LB was performed using the Foundation One® liquid CDx from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021 in a single center. Forty-five patients (27 boys) were included, with a median age of 9 years of age (range: 1.5-17 years old). Underlying malignancies were neuroblastoma (12 patients), bone sarcoma (12), soft tissue sarcoma (9), brain tumors (7), and miscellaneous tumors (5). Forty-three patients had metastatic disease. Six patients had more than one biopsy because of a failure in first LB. Median time to obtain results was 13 days. Overall, analysis was successful for 33/45 patients. Eight patients did not present any molecular abnormalities. Molecular alterations were identified in 25 samples with a mean of 2.1 alterations per sample. The most common alterations concerned TP53 (7 pts), EWS-FLI1 (5), ALK (3), MYC (3), and CREBBP (2). TMB was low in all cases. Six patients received treatment based on the results from LB analysis and all were treated off-trial. Three additional patients were included in early phase clinical trials. Mean duration of treatment was 85 days, with one patient with stable disease after eight months. Molecular profiling using Foundation One® Liquid CDx was feasible in pediatric patients with high-risk solid tumors and lead to identification of targetable mutations in a subset of patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: COVID-19 infection in paediatric patients with cancer is severe or critical in 20% of the patients. It can therefore directly affect paediatric patients with cancer and/or their care. We aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in adolescents and young adults (AYA) with solid tumour. METHODS: This study includes a retrospective analysis of safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine administered to patients, ≥16 years old, under treatment for a solid tumour or within 6 months after treatment from 15th February 2021 to 15th April 2021. Two administrations of the vaccine 3 weeks apart were given. Sera were tested for anti-SARS-Cov-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies directed against the S1 domain of the spike protein. In case of positive serology, neutralisation of SARS-Cov-2 was tested. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with solid tumours were identified and proposed to get vaccinated. Nine patients refused, and 1 previously developed COVID-19 infection with positive serology. At the time of writing, 13 patients (10 M/2 F; median age: 17) started vaccination. All patients received 2 injections except 2 patients who stopped vaccination because of tumour progression. Ten patients were under treatment (alone or in combination: chemotherapy: 7 patients [pts], immunotherapy: 2 pts, targeted therapy: 3 pts, follow-up: 3 patients). Overall, vaccines were well tolerated. Five patients did not report any side-effects after the first injection and 4 after the second injection. The main local reactivity symptom was mild pain at the site of injection (6 and 2 pts). Fatigue (2 pts and 5 pts) was the most frequent systemic symptom. One patient refused serology testing. All patients but 1 had pre-vaccination negative serology; 7 of 10 patients tested had positive serology before second vaccine injection, and 9 of 10 patients had positive serology one month after the second injection. All patients with seroconversion had positive COVID-19 neutralisation test. No patient developed COVID infections. CONCLUSIONS: We report the good safety profile and good efficacy of the BNT162B2 vaccine in AYA with solid tumours. Larger series and monitoring of the kinetics of anti-Sars-Cov-2 IgG antibodies for several months are mandatory to confirm these preliminary results and to determine long-term vaccination.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , Immunization , Neoplasms/therapy , Adolescent , Age Factors , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Viral/blood , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , France , Humans , Immunization/adverse effects , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/immunology , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate dermal remodeling effects of crystal-free microdermabrasion on photodamaged skin. DESIGN: Biochemical analyses of human skin biopsy specimens following microdermabrasion treatment in vivo. SETTING: Academic referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteer sample of 40 adults, aged 50 to 83 years, with clinically photodamaged forearms. Intervention Focal microdermabrasion treatment with diamond-studded handpieces of varying abrasiveness on photodamaged forearms and serial biopsies at baseline and various times after treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantitative polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were used to quantify changes in inflammatory, proliferative, and remodeling effectors of normal wound healing. Type I and type III procollagen served as the main outcome marker of dermal remodeling. RESULTS: Coarse-grit microdermabrasion induces a wound healing response characterized by rapid increase in induction of cytokeratin 16 and activation of the AP-1 transcription factor in the epidermis. Early inflammation was demonstrated by induction of inflammatory cytokines, antimicrobial peptides, and neutrophil infiltration in the dermis. AP-1 activation was followed by matrix metalloproteinase-mediated degradation of extracellular matrix. Consistent with this wound-healing response, we observed significant remodeling of the dermal component of the skin, highlighted by induction of type I and type III procollagen and by induction of collagen production enhancers heat shock protein 47 and prolyl 4-hydroxylase. Dermal remodeling was not achieved when microdermabrasion was performed using a medium-grit handpiece. CONCLUSIONS: Microdermabrasion using a coarse diamond-studded handpiece induces a dermal remodeling cascade similar to that seen in incisional wound healing. Optimization of these molecular effects is likely the result of more aggressive treatment with a more abrasive handpiece.