Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc ; 25(4): 280-288, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30009653

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Workplace violence is a major public health concern. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, from 2002 to 2013, incidents of serious workplace violence (those requiring days off) were four times more common in health care than in private industry. AIMS: An interprofessional committee developed, implemented, and evaluated a quality improvement project from 2012 to 2016 to reduce workplace violence and prevent staff injury. The initiative termed S.A.F.E. Response stands for Spot a threat, Assess the risk, Formulate a safe response, Evaluate the outcome. METHOD: An institutional review board-approved quality improvement survey was implemented and evaluated. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. An interprofessional committee developed and implemented a comprehensive program to prevent injury, which included (a) a mandatory eLearning educational training, (b) a S.A.F.E. Response with standardized interventions for the clinical conditions affecting safety, and (c) a clinical debriefing process. A reduction in nursing staff assault incidence rates was identified as a success. RESULTS: Nursing staff injury rates decreased an average of 40%. CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in nursing staff assault incidence rates was notable. Clinicians equipped with knowledge, skills, and resources can identify and defuse unsafe situations to prevent violence. This clinical approach shifts the focus from crisis intervention to crisis prevention, which reduces injury.


Subject(s)
Nursing Staff, Hospital , Psychiatric Nursing , Workplace Violence/prevention & control , Hospitals, General , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , New England , Urban Health Services
2.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 63: 33-38, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30665667

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether continuous virtual monitoring, an intervention that facilitates patient observation through video technology, can be used to monitor suicide risk in the general hospital and emergency department (ED). METHOD: This was a retrospective analysis of a protocol in which select patients on suicide precautions in the general hospital and ED received virtual monitoring between June 2017 and March 2018. The primary outcome was the number of adverse events among patients who received virtual monitoring for suicide risk. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of patients for whom virtual monitoring was discontinued for behavioral reasons and the preference for observation type among nurses. RESULTS: 39 patients on suicide precautions received virtual monitoring. There were 0 adverse events (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.000-0.090). Virtual monitoring was discontinued for behavioral reasons in 4/38 cases for which the reason for terminating was recorded (0.105, 95%CI = 0.029-0.248). We were unable to draw conclusions regarding preference for observation type among nurses due to a low response rate to our survey. CONCLUSIONS: Suicide risk can feasibly be monitored virtually in the general hospital or ED when their providers carefully select patients for low impulsivity risk.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospitals, General , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Observation , Risk Assessment , Suicide Prevention , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
3.
Psychosomatics ; 50(3): 218-26, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19567760

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Falls and delirium in general-hospital inpatients are related to increases in morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Patients fall despite safeguards and programs to reduce falling. OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to determine the prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed delirium in patients who fell during their hospital stay. METHOD: The authors performed a retrospective electronic chart review of 252 patients who fell during their hospital stay. Falls were categorized by their severity (i.e., minor, moderate, and major). Demographic information, patient outcomes, and diagnostic criteria for delirium (per DSM-IV) were collected on the day of admission, the day of the fall, and the 2 days preceding the patient's fall. RESULTS: Falls in the general hospital were associated with delirium (both diagnosed and undiagnosed), advanced age, and specific surgical procedures. CONCLUSION: Improving the recognition of undiagnosed delirium may lead to sustainable and successful fall prevention programs. Detection of impairments in mental status can assist staff to create individualized patient care plans. Knowledge about which patients are at risk for injury from delirium and falls can lead to improvements in patient safety, functioning, and quality of life.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Delirium/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delirium/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Hospitals, General/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Massachusetts , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Secondary Prevention , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL