Long-term results of fluorescence and indigo carmine blue dye-navigated sentinel lymph node biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is widely applied for the management of clinically node-negative breast cancer, and a radioisotope with a blue dye are most often used as tracers. Fluorescence of indocyanine green could also potentially be used as tracer. This study aimed to demonstrate the long-term survival results of fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer who underwent surgery as initial treatment were included in this study. Both fluorescence of indocyanine green and indigo carmine blue dye were used as tracers. Axillary lymph node dissection was omitted unless metastasis was pathologically proven in sentinel nodes. Breast cancer recurrence and death were recorded and prognostic factors were identified using disease-free survival and overall survival data. RESULTS: A total of 565 patients were analyzed. There were 14 (2.5%) patients whose sentinel nodes could not be identified, yielding an identification rate of 97.5%. Axillary dissection was performed in 90 patients. Forty-three recurrences including 6 ipsilateral axilla recurrence and 13 deaths were observed during the median 83 months of follow-up period. Seven-year disease-free and overall survival were 92.4% and 97.3%, respectively. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that pre-menopausal status and invasive lobular carcinoma were significant unfavorable prognostic factors of disease-free survival. Half of ipsilateral axilla recurrences occurred within 5 years after surgery and these recurrences were correlated with inappropriate adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: Fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy demonstrated favorable prognostic results and could be alternative to the radioisotope for clinically node-negative breast cancer.

Risk Factors for Skin Flap Necrosis in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Mastectomy Followed by Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) are the standard techniques for achieving a cosmetic outcome, but necrosis of a cutaneous flap including the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) is a serious complication. To analyze the risk factors for skin flap necrosis, we retrospectively evaluated a clinical database of breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction. METHODS: Four hundred and twelve cases were consecutively recorded between 2006 and 2016. Body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI), distance from NAC to referent tumor, distance from overlying skin to the tumor and weight of breast resection (WBR) as measured in the operating theater were included in the statistical analysis. RESULTS: NSM, SSM and total mastectomy were performed in 123 (30%), 96 (23%) and 193 cases (47%), respectively. A tissue expander was used in 379 cases (92%), a silicone implant in 8 (2%) and autologous breast reconstruction in 25 (6%). Skin flap necrosis was found in 7% of all cases and NAC necrosis in 13% of NSM cases. In a univariate analysis, BW, NSM and WBR were risk factors for skin flap necrosis, and BW, BMI and WBR were risk factors for NAC necrosis. In a multivariate analysis, NSM and WBR remained significant risk factors for skin flap necrosis, and WBR was a significant risk factor for NAC necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: WBR is an important risk factor for skin flap necrosis. Especially, NAC necrosis should be considered for patients with large-volume breasts who undergo NSM and immediate breast reconstruction.

Progesterone receptor expression in proliferating cancer cells of hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer.

Breast cancer has been suggested to have two distinct driving mechanisms: the hormone receptor and the growth factor receptor pathways. We hypothesized that each driving system produces a different expression pattern of estrogen-regulated genes, such as progesterone receptor, in proliferating cells. Progesterone receptor and Ki67 expressions were assessed by dual-fluorescence immunohistochemistry in estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer tissues. Two distinct proliferating cell populations were observed: progesterone-receptor-positive and progesterone-receptor-negative. In the training cohort, tissues with progesterone-receptor-positive proliferating cells were associated with lower grade and better disease-free survival (p = 0.0055 and 0.0026, respectively). These associations were confirmed in the validation cohort from the neoadjuvant endocrine trial JFMC34 (p = 0.033 and 0.0003, respectively). In the validation cohort, patients with progesterone-receptor-positive proliferating cells responded better to endocrine therapy and had a lower Oncotype DX Recurrence Score. In the multivariate analysis, progesterone receptor status of proliferating cells, but not progesterone receptor or Ki67 alone, was an independent predictor of disease-free survival in both cohorts (p = 0.0043 and 0.0026). In conclusion, the progesterone receptor status of proliferating cancer cells was associated with histological grade and Recurrence Score, and a potent prognostic factor in estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancers. Results suggest that different driving systems generate different expression patterns of progesterone receptor in proliferating cancer cells. Further studies are warranted to validate the findings.

Paradigm shift in axilla surgery for breast cancer patients treated with sentinel node biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is a standard technique for the diagnosis of regional lymph node metastases in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. In the case of pathologically negative sentinel lymph nodes (SLN), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be avoided. METHODS: Recent clinical studies on SNB in breast cancer were reviewed regarding the pathological and molecular diagnosis of SLN, the tools used to predict non-SLN metastases, the prognostic significance of isolated tumor cells (ITC) and micrometastases (MIC), and axilla surgery. RESULTS: ITC or MIC in SLN was associated with worse survival in patients treated with SNB alone or SNB followed by ALND. However, this effect was limited and adjuvant therapy improved survival. If T1 and one SLN-positive breast cancer patients are treated with whole-breast irradiation and adjuvant therapy, additional ALND may not be necessary. CONCLUSIONS: SNB without ALND can be adopted for patients with a small number of SLN metastases. Although the lack of apparent regional lymph node recurrence, similar to tumor dormancy, cannot be fully explained, ALND should be performed in cases that are highly suspected to be non-SLN metastases.