A 6-month, prospective, randomized controlled trial of customized adherence enhancement versus a bipolar-specific educational control in poorly adherent adolescents and young adults living with bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have addressed medication adherence in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with bipolar disorder (BD). This 6-month prospective randomized-controlled trial (RCT) tested customized adherence enhancement for adolescents and young adults (CAE-AYA), a behavioral intervention for AYAs versus enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU). METHODS: Inclusion criteria were AYAs age 13-21 with BD type I or II with suboptimal adherence defined as missing ≥20% of medications. Assessments were conducted at Screening, Baseline, and weeks 8, 12 and 24. Primary outcome was past 7 day self-reported Tablets Routine Questionnaire (TRQ) validated by electronic pillbox monitoring (SimpleMed). Symptom measures included the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). RESULTS: The mean sample age (N = 36) was 19.1 years (SD = 2.0); 66.7% (N = 24) female, BD Type I (81%). The mean missed medication on TRQ for the total sample was 35.4% (SD = 28.8) at screening and 30.4% (SD = 30.5) at baseline. Both CAE-AYA and ETAU improved on TRQ from screening to baseline. Baseline mean missed medication using SimpleMed was 51.6% (SD = 38.5). Baseline HAM-D and YMRS means were 7.1 (SD = 4.7) and 6.0 (SD = 7.3), respectively. Attrition rate at week 24 was 36%. Baseline to 24-week change on TRQ, adjusting for age, gender, educational level, living situation, family history, race, and ethnicity, showed improvement favoring CAE-AYA versus ETAU of 15%. SimpleMed interpretation was limited due to substantial missing data. There was a significant reduction in depression favoring CAE-AYA. CONCLUSIONS: CAE-AYA may improve adherence in AYAs with BD, although conclusions need to be made cautiously given study limitations. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04348604.

Screening and treatment of anxiety symptoms within an interdisciplinary comprehensive epilepsy center.

Youth with epilepsy (YWE) are at elevated risk for anxiety, yet anxiety is often undetected and understudied in this population. Most research on anxiety in YWE is based on parent proxy-report and broad-band measures with limited sensitivity. The aim of the current study was to: 1) examine rates of anxiety symptoms in YWE using a diagnosis-specific, self-report measure of anxiety symptoms, 2) assess differences in anxiety symptoms by sociodemographic and medical variables, and 3) evaluate changes in anxiety symptoms following a brief behavioral health intervention delivered within an interdisciplinary epilepsy clinic visit. As part of routine clinical care, 317 YWE [Mage=13.4+2.5 years (range 7-19 years); 54% female; 84% White: Non-Hispanic] completed the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children, self-report (MASC-10), with a subset completing the MASC-10 at a second timepoint (n=139). A retrospective chart review was completed and sociodemographic, medical variables and behavioral health interventions were collected. Thirty percent of YWE endorsed elevated anxiety symptoms, with higher rates in those who were younger. YWE who received a behavioral health intervention for anxiety (n=21) demonstrated greater decreases in anxiety symptoms from Time 1 to Time 2 compared to those who did not receive a behavioral intervention (n=108). The integration of psychologists into pediatric epilepsy clinics may have allowed for early identification of anxiety symptoms, as well behavioral interventions to address these symptoms, which has the potential to decrease the need for more intensive services.

Emotion coaching skills as an augmentation to family-based therapy for adolescents with anorexia nervosa: A pilot effectiveness study with families with high expressed emotion.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the feasibility and acceptability of augmenting family-based treatment (FBT) for adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN) or atypical anorexia nervosa (AAN) with a parent emotion coaching intervention (EC) focused on reducing parent expressed emotion. METHOD: In this pilot effectiveness trial, families of adolescents with AN/AAN exhibiting high expressed emotion received standard FBT with either (1) EC group or (2) support group (an attention control condition focused on psychoeducation). RESULTS: Forty-one adolescents with AN or AAN were recruited (88% female, Mage = 14.9 ± 1.6 years, 95% White: Non-Hispanic, 1% White: Hispanic, 1% Bi-racial: Asian). Most study adolescents were diagnosed with AN (59%) while 41% were diagnosed with AAN. Participating parents were predominantly mothers (95%). Recruitment and retention rates were moderately high (76% and 71%, respectively). High acceptability and feasibility ratings were obtained from parents and interventionists with 100% reporting the EC intervention was "beneficial"-"very beneficial." The FBT + EC group demonstrated higher parental warmth scores at post-treatment compared to the control group (standardized effect size difference, d = 1.58), which was maintained at 3-month follow-up. Finally, at post-treatment, the FBT + EC group demonstrated higher rates of full remission from AN/AAN (40%) compared to FBT + support (27%), and were nine times more likely to be weight restored by 3-month follow-up. DISCUSSION: Augmenting FBT with emotion coaching for parents with high expressed emotion is acceptable, feasible, and demonstrates preliminary effectiveness. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Family based treatment for AN/AAN is the recommended treatment for youth but families with high criticism/low warmth are less likely to respond to this treatment. Adding a parent emotion coaching group (EC) where parents learn to talk to their adolescents about tough emotions is feasible and well-liked by families.

Integrated psychological care services within seizure settings: Key components and implementation factors among example services in four ILAE regions: A report by the ILAE Psychiatry Commission.

Mental health comorbidities are prevalent and problematic in patients with seizures but often suboptimally managed. To address common gaps in care, the Integrated Mental Health Care Pathways Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Psychiatry Commission was tasked with providing education and guidance on the integration of mental health management (e.g., screening, referral, treatment) into routine seizure care. This report aims to describe a variety of established services in this area, with a specific focus on psychological care models. Services were identified by members of the ILAE Psychiatry Commission and authors of psychological intervention trials in epilepsy. A total of eight services met inclusion criteria and agreed to be showcased. They include three pediatric and five adult services located across four distinct ILAE regions (Europe, North America, Africa, Asia Oceania). The report describes the core operations, known outcomes, and implementation factors (i.e., barriers and facilitators) of these services. The report concludes with a set of practical tips for building successful psychological care services within seizure settings, including the importance of having local champions, clearly defining the scope of the service, and establishing sustainable funding models. The breadth of exemplars demonstrates how models tailored to the local environment and resources can be implemented. This report is an initial step to disseminate information regarding integrated mental health care within seizure care settings. Future work is needed to systematically examine both psychological and pharmacological care models and to further establish the evidence base in this area, especially around clinical impact, and cost-effectiveness.

Pilot randomized controlled clinical trial of an adherence social norms intervention for adolescents with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Non-adherence to anti-seizure medications (ASMs) is common for adolescents with epilepsy, with potentially devastating consequences. Existing adherence interventions in epilepsy do not meet the unique challenges faced by adolescents. Leveraging social norms capitalizes on the increased importance of peer influence while simultaneously targeting the low motivation levels of many adolescents. The current study examined the feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction of a social norms adherence intervention in adolescents with epilepsy. METHODS: A pilot RCT of a mHealth social norms intervention was conducted with adolescents with epilepsy who demonstrated non-adherence (≤95% adherence) during baseline. Adolescents were randomized to either (1) mHealth social norms (reminders, individualized and social norms adherence feedback) or (2) control (reminders and individualized adherence feedback). Primary outcomes included feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction. Exploratory outcomes included electronically monitored adherence, seizure severity, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). RESULTS: One hundred four adolescents were recruited (53% female; Mage = 15.4 ± 1.4 years; 81% White: Non-Hispanic; 5% Black, 10% Bi/Multiracial; 2% White: Hispanic; 1% Other: Hispanic; 1% Bi/Multiracial-Hispanic). Forty-five percent screen-failed due to high adherence, 16% withdrew, and 38% were randomized to treatment (n = 19) or control (n = 21). Recruitment (75%), retention (78%), and treatment satisfaction were moderately high. Engagement with the intervention was moderate, with 64% of participants engaging with intervention notifications. Exploratory analyses revealed that after controlling for COVID-19 impact, the social norms intervention group maintained higher adherence over time compared to the control group. Small to moderate effect sizes were noted for seizure severity and HRQOL between groups. CONCLUSION: This pilot intervention appeared feasible and acceptable. Increases in adherence in the treatment versus control group were modest, but a future larger more adequately powered study is needed to detect effects. Notably, it appeared the COVID pandemic influenced adherence behaviors during our trial.

A randomized clinical trial to support adherence regimens in children with epilepsy: Examining potential mechanisms of change.

OBJECTIVE: A family-tailored education and problem-solving intervention, Supporting Treatment Adherence Regimens (STAR), was developed to address the adherence challenges common in youth with epilepsy and their families. Randomized clinical trial (RCT) results indicated a 21% adherence improvement in the STAR group compared with an education-only (EO) group 12-months post-intervention. The current study examined group differences (STAR vs. EO) in epilepsy-specific knowledge, barriers to medication adherence, problem-solving skills, caregiver emotional distress, and family functioning over time and whether these factors mediated group differences in adherence at 12-months post-intervention. METHODS: Two-hundred children (ages 2-12) with epilepsy and their caregivers were included as RCT participants. Children with new-onset epilepsy and adherence <95% were randomized to receive either the STAR (n = 27) or EO (n = 29) intervention. Caregivers completed questionnaires assessing outcomes of interest at baseline, midpoint of the intervention, post-intervention, and 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. Regression-based analyses of covariance and longitudinal mixed effect linear models were conducted. RESULTS: Results generally revealed no significant group differences across outcomes of interest at post-intervention or over time. However, one significant model did emerge for social problem-solving skills (b = -1.74, p = 0.04), such that these scores were initially higher in the STAR group compared to the EO group, then decreased slightly in the STAR group over time while remaining stable in the EO group. None of these factors mediated group differences in adherence at 12-months post-intervention. CONCLUSION: Future research should examine other potential mechanisms of treatment change after adherence interventions, such as STAR. Nonsignificant findings can inform the development of future study designs and intervention efforts.

Predictors of objective treatment adherence in adolescents with epilepsy: The important role of motivation.

OBJECTIVE: Adolescents with epilepsy are at heightened risk for suboptimal anti-seizure medication (ASM) adherence; however, there is a paucity of adherence interventions for this age group. The current study aimed to identify a comprehensive and novel set of predictors of objective, electronically-monitored ASM adherence in adolescents with epilepsy. METHODS: Participants included 104 adolescents (13-17 years old; M = 15.36 ± 1.40), diagnosed with epilepsy and their caregivers. Cross-sectional data were collected from adolescents, caregivers, healthcare providers, and medical chart reviews, including demographics (i.e., age, race/ethnicity, sex, insurance status), the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e., participation before versus during), seizure characteristics (i.e., presence and severity), ASM side effects (Pediatric Epilepsy Side Effects Questionnaire), adherence motivation (1-item 6-point Likert scale item), and adherence barriers (Pediatric Epilepsy Medication Self-Management Questionnaire). Electronically-monitored adherence data was collected via the AdhereTechTM pill bottle or the Vaica SimpleMedTM pillbox over 30 days. RESULTS: Adolescents demonstrated suboptimal adherence at 78 ± 31.6%, despite high ASM adherence motivation (M = 4.43 ± .94) and minimal adherence barriers (M = 35.64 ± 3.78). Hierarchical multiple regression, which included non-modifiable sociodemographic and medical variables (Block 1) and behaviorally modifiable psychosocial variables (Block 2) was significant, F(12,87) = 3.69, p < .001. Specifically, having private insurance (versus Medicaid or public insurance; t = -2.11, p = .038) and higher adherence motivation (t = 2.91, p = .005) predicted higher objective ASM adherence. CONCLUSION: Routine assessment of adherence predictors is vital for the promotion of adherence among adolescents with epilepsy. Adolescent adherence motivation may be an important element of multi-component interventions focused on improving ASM adherence in adolescents with epilepsy.

Key predictors of epilepsy-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in youth with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Epilepsy-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important outcome in youth with epilepsy (YWE). The PedsQL™ Epilepsy Module is the only caregiver-proxy and youth self-report epilepsy-specific HRQOL measure that can be used with youth 2-25 years. Multiple factors affect HRQOL, including epilepsy-specific characteristics, comorbid mental and behavioral health concerns, as well as sociodemographic factors. However, we have not yet examined the cumulative impact of these factors on epilepsy-specific HRQOL in YWE using the PedsQL™ Epilepsy module. METHOD: Youth with epilepsy (n = 281) and their caregivers completed questionnaires focused on sociodemographic factors (e.g., youth biological sex and age), mood/anxiety and behavior symptoms (i.e., Behavioral Assessment Scale for Children - Second Edition; BASC-2, Parent Rating Scale), epilepsy characteristics [e.g., seizure frequency, number of anti-seizure medications (ASMs), ASM side effects, and years since diagnosis], and the PedsQL™ Epilepsy module (subscales: Impact, Cognitive Functioning, Executive Functioning, Sleep, and Mood/Behavior). RESULTS: Hierarchical linear regressions were conducted to examine caregiver-proxy and youth self-reported factors that affect epilepsy-specific HRQOL. Results indicate the strongest key shared predictors of HRQOL in YWE, for both youth and caregiver informants, were mental and behavioral health symptoms. For instance, caregiver-proxy report of YWE HRQOL indicated BASC-2 Externalizing (p < 0.05), Behavioral Symptoms (p < 0.01), and Adaptive Skills (p < 0.001) explained 58 % of the variance in youth Cognitive Functioning HRQOL, while youth self-report of HRQOL indicated that BASC-2 Externalizing (p < 0.01), Behavioral Symptoms (p < 0.05), and Adaptive Skills (p < 0.001) contributed only 36 % of the variance in Cognitive Functioning HRQOL above and beyond the variance explained by sociodemographic and epilepsy-specific characteristics. Similar results were noted for Executive Functioning HRQOL domain, wherein caregiver-proxy report of YWE HRQOL indicated BASC-2 Internalizing (p < 0.01), Behavioral Symptoms (p < 0.001) and Adaptive Skills (p < 0.001) explained 65 % of variance in Executive Functioning, whereas youth self-report of Executive Functioning HRQOL indicated that caregiver-proxy BASC-2 Internalizing (p < 0.001) and Behavioral Symptoms (p < 0.01) explained 34 % of the variance in Executive Functioning HRQOL, above and beyond the variance explained by sociodemographic and epilepsy-specific characteristics. Unique mental and behavioral health predictors of YWE HRQOL were also found for both caregiver-proxy and youth self-report. CONCLUSIONS: Given the integral role of mental and behavioral health symptoms in epilepsy-specific HRQOL, it is critical to address mental and behavioral health symptoms preventatively and proactively to provide YWE with the most optimal health plan, including good seizure control, minimal ASM side effects, and the best possible HRQOL.

A Pilot Randomized Trial of an Obesity Prevention Program for High-Risk Infants in Primary Care.

OBJECTIVE: Rapid infant weight gain is associated with later obesity. Novel interventions to prevent rapid infant weight gain that are accessible to infants and families are needed, especially for those at the highest risk. Our aims were to examine: (a) feasibility and acceptability of a responsive parenting intervention delivered via Integrated Behavioral Health (IBH) in pediatric primary care and (b) preliminary effects on infant weight gain from birth to 6 (post-treatment) and 9 (follow-up) months. METHODS: A parallel design, proof-of-concept randomized control trial was conducted with 65 mother-infant dyads (32 randomized to intervention, 33 randomized an IBH attention control focused on promoting healthy mental health), in which the majority identify as Black (80%) and low income (91% receiving Medicaid). Participants and assessors were masked to treatment condition. Outcomes included feasibility (enrollment), acceptability (retention and adherence), and conditional weight gain (CWG), an indicator of rapid weight gain. RESULTS: The intervention was feasible (90% of eligible families enrolled) and acceptable (89% of families retained), with 81% receiving ≥3 of 4 treatment sessions. A medium effect was found on CWG (d = -0.54 post-treatment, d = -0.57 follow-up), with the infants in the treatment group showing significantly lower CWG (mean = -0.27, 95% CI, -0.63, 0.09) compared to the control group (mean = 0.29, 95% CI, -0.17, 0.76) at 9 months (p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of implementing a responsive parenting obesity prevention intervention within primary care. Delivery in pediatric primary care is advantageous for implementation and reaching at-risk populations. The preliminary effects on CWG are promising and support testing in a larger trial.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion within Pediatric Adherence Science.

Given the long-standing history of systemic racism in psychological science, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts are increasingly vital to the advancement and improvement of the field. This commentary extends the seminal work of the article Upending Racism in Psychological Science: Strategies to Change How Our Science is Conducted, Reported, Reviewed, and Disseminated (Buchanan et al., Am Psychol, https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6nk4x , 2020) by providing tangible applications and recommendations to improve DEI integration into pediatric adherence science. Real-world adherence examples are discussed regarding the challenges faced in systematically integrating DEI principles, potential solutions to overcoming barriers, and the implications of these efforts on scientific advancement in an effort to address and dismantle research practices that perpetuate inequity and White supremacy. Specifically, we provide discourse and practical guidance related to the conduct, reporting, reviewing, and dissemination of pediatric adherence science to promote dialog and produce actionable change toward the promotion of health equity and social justice.

A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Adherence Promotion Strategies to Improve Rejection Rates in Adolescent Kidney Transplant Recipients.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Nonadherence to medical regimens increases the risk of graft loss among adolescent and young adult recipients of kidney transplants. Interventions that improve adherence may decrease rejection rates, but their perceived costs are a barrier to clinical implementation. We developed a model to assess the cost-effectiveness of an adherence promotion strategy, the Medication Adherence Promotion System (MAPS). STUDY DESIGN: Simulation-based. Data sources included published articles indexed in Medline or referenced in bibliographies of relevant English-language articles. Data on costs and outcomes were taken from a single clinical center. SETTING & POPULATION: US adolescent patients after their first kidney transplant. INTERVENTION: Usual posttransplant care versus usual care plus MAPS. OUTCOME: Effectiveness measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs measured in 2020 US dollars. MODEL, PERSPECTIVE, & TIMEFRAME: Markov state transition decision model. We used a health care system perspective with a lifelong time horizon. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, MAPS was more effective and less costly than usual care. MAPS cost $9,106 per patient less than usual care and resulted in a gain of 0.32 QALYs. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, MAPS was cost saving 100% of the time. Extending results to a program level with 100 patients, any adherence promotion intervention similar in effectiveness to MAPS would cost less than $50,000/QALY if the start-up costs were <$2.5 million and annual costs <$188,000. Strategies with costs similar to MAPS that reduce the risk of rejection by as little as 3% would also have similar cost-effectiveness. LIMITATIONS: Estimates of components and costs for MAPS were based on a single center. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence promotion strategies with costs similar to MAPS can be cost-effective as long as they reduce rejection rates by at least 3%. This model can be applied to study the cost-effectiveness of adherence promotion strategies with varying costs and outcomes.

A Medication Adherence Promotion System to Reduce Late Kidney Allograft Rejection: A Quality Improvement Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Adolescent and young adult kidney transplant recipients have a high risk of rejection related to suboptimal adherence. Multicomponent interventions improve adherence in controlled trials, but clinical implementation is lacking. We describe an initiative to reduce allograft rejection using evidence-based adherence promotion strategies. STUDY DESIGN: Interrupted time series. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Kidney transplant recipients cared for at Cincinnati Children's Hospital ≥ 1 year after transplant and taking ≥1 immunosuppressive medication(s) from 2014 through 2017. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES: The following interventions, collectively called MAPS (Medication Adherence Promotion System), were implemented over 14 months: (1) adherence promotion training for clinical staff, 2) electronic health record-supported adherence risk screening, (3) systematic assessment of medication adherence barriers, (4) designation of specific staff to address adherence barriers, (5) shared decision-making with the patients to overcome adherence barriers, (6) follow-up evaluation to assess progress, and (7) optional electronic medication monitoring. OUTCOMES: Primary Outcome: Late acute rejection. Process measures were conducted to assess barriers, identify barriers, and perform interventions. The secondary outcomes/balancing measures were de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA), biopsy rate, and rejections per biopsy. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Time series analysis using statistical process control evaluated patient-days between acute rejections as well as monthly rejections per 100 patient-months before and after implementation. To control for known rejection risk factors including changes in treatment and case mix, multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: The monthly rejection rate fell from 1.61 rejections per 100 patient-months in the 26 months before implementation to 0.88 rejections per 100 patient-months in the 22 months after implementation. In the multivariable analysis, MAPS was associated with a 50% reduction in rejection incidence (incidence rate ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.27-0.91]; P = 0.02). DSA and time since transplant (per each additional year) were also associated with rejection incidence (incidence rate ratio, 2.27 [P = 0.02] and 0.87 [P = 0.02], respectively). LIMITATIONS: Single-center study, and potential confounding by unmeasured variables. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical implementation of evidence-based adherence-promotion strategies was associated with a 50% reduction in acute rejection incidence over 2 years.

Key predictors of the need for a family-focused pediatric epilepsy adherence intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Nonadherence to antiseizure drugs is a significant problem in pediatric epilepsy and is linked to increased morbidity and mortality, clinically unnecessary medication changes, and increased health care costs. Family interventions can improve adherence. However, it is challenging to determine which families will struggle with nonadherence and require intervention. This study aims to identify specific parent, family, child, and medical factors that predict which families most need family-based adherence interventions. METHODS: Families enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of a family-based adherence intervention completed measures assessing parent, family, child, and medical factors. Families also used an electronic adherence monitor. Adherence of ≥95% was considered high adherence (not requiring intervention), and <95% was considered suboptimal adherence (requiring intervention). We conducted a stepwise logistic regression analysis to assess demographic, medical, child, family, and parent predictors of membership to the suboptimal adherence group. RESULTS: Of the 200 families of children with new onset epilepsy who enrolled, 177 families completed the study. Of these families, 121 (68%) were in the high adherence group and 56 (32%) were in the suboptimal adherence group. Families with lower socioeconomic status (SES), children of color, lower general family functioning, and more parent distress were more likely to be in the suboptimal adherence group. SIGNIFICANCE: We identified that parent and family factors, as well as sociodemographic characteristics, predicted membership in the suboptimal adherence group. It is critical to find creative and practical solutions for assessing and intervening upon key adherence predictors. These may include streamlined screening for parental distress and family functioning, as well as recognition that families of lower SES and communities of color may be at heightened risk for suboptimal adherence.

Pediatric Epilepsy Learning Healthcare System Quality of Life (PELHS-QOL-2): A novel health-related quality of life prompt for children with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric epilepsy is often associated with diminished health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Our aim was to establish the validity of the Pediatric Epilepsy Learning Healthcare System Quality of Life (PELHS-QOL-2) questions, a novel two-item HRQOL prompt for children with epilepsy, primarily for use in clinical care. METHODS: We performed a multicenter cross-sectional study to validate the PELHS-QOL-2. Construct validity was established through bivariate comparisons with four comparator measures and known drivers of quality of life in children with epilepsy, as well as by creating an a priori multivariable model to predict the Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire (QOLCE-55). Validity generalization was established through bivariate comparisons with demographic and clinical information. Content validity and clinical utility were established by assessing how well the PELHS-QOL-2 met eight design criteria for an HRQOL prompt established by a multistakeholder group of experts. RESULTS: The final participant sample included 154 English-speaking caregivers of children with epilepsy (mean age = 9.7 years, range = .5-18, 49% female, 70% White). The PELHS-QOL-2 correlated with the four comparator instruments (ρ = .44-.56), was significantly associated with several known drivers of quality of life in children with epilepsy (p < .05), and predicted QOLCE-55 scores in the multivariate model (adjusted R2 = .54). The PELHS-QOL-2 item was not associated with the age, sex, and ethnicity of the children nor with the setting and location of data collection, although PELHS-QOL-Medications was significantly associated with race (worse for White race). Following both quantitative and qualitative analysis, the PELHS-QOL-2 met seven of eight design criteria. SIGNIFICANCE: The PELHS-QOL-2 is a valid HRQOL prompt and is well suited for use in clinical care as a mechanism to routinely initiate conversations with caregivers about quality of life in children with epilepsy. The association of PELHS-QOL-Medications with race merits further study.

A qualitative study of epilepsy self-management barriers and facilitators in Black children and caregivers in Arkansas.

OBJECTIVES: To identify facilitators and barriers of epilepsy self-management practices among Black children and caregivers. METHODS: Qualitative semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 11 child-caregiver dyads (11 children with epilepsy and 11 caregivers). A deductive-inductive analysis was undertaken to describe the range of barriers and facilitators significant to participants. RESULTS: The barriers and facilitators were classified into 3 management themes: epilepsy-specific knowledge and information, treatment, and lifestyle. Within these themes, several important subthemes were identified. Two subthemes related to knowledge barriers emerged: children and caregivers' limited understanding and retention of complex written and spoken information and variable training and confidence in seizure first-aid. In contrast, facilitators for introducing and encouraging access to epilepsy self-management concepts were participants' eagerness to learn about this topic and a keen interest in using educational materials enriched with visual aids on a phone platform as an adjunct to in-person education. The second theme revealed various practical barriers to optimum treatment adherence, including mistrust of the healthcare system. In comparison, caregivers' collaborative approach and innovative strategies were identified as facilitators for treatment adherence. Finally, the lifestyle management barriers included a lack of defined processes to adopt healthy behaviors and challenges with disclosing epilepsy. Facilitators of this theme were comprised of building a team around the child to foster wellbeing and making healthy habits a fun and joyful experience for children. DISCUSSION: Qualitative evidence in this study highlights caregivers' mistrust in the healthcare system and the lack of community support. Culturally competent interventions may improve access to and quality and utilization of self-management programs in Black children and families while reducing disparities.

Behavioral health screening in pediatric epilepsy: Which measures commonly used in the United States are 'good enough'?

PURPOSE: To improve evidence-based implementation of behavioral health screening measures in pediatric epilepsy care, guidance is needed in the selection and interpretation of evidence-based screening measures. Therefore, the goals of this project were to (1) evaluate the clinical utility and psychometric properties of screening instruments frequently used in the United States (US) for anxiety, depression, and behavior problems in youth with epilepsy (YWE), and (2) provide guidance around selection and interpretation of these behavioral health screening measures. METHOD: The critique was conducted in three phases: (1) identification of articles based on search criteria; (2) full review of articles for eligibility assessment; (3) evaluation of screening measures and organization into Tiers. Nine behavioral health measures frequently used to screen for anxiety, depression, and disruptive behaviors in the US were selected for evaluation. PubMed, CINAHL, Medline, and APA databases were searched using the following search terms: [target area] + [screening measure] + epilepsy + children [youth], [adolescents]. Inclusion/exclusion criteria for articles were as follows: (1) focused on YWE, (2) written in English, and (3) conducted in the US. Once articles were selected, Hunsley and Mash's criteria were used to evaluate and categorize the screening measures' psychometric properties, which have clear relevance to clinical practice. Measures were also classified into three tiers by the level of validation according to established evidence-based criteria. RESULTS: Forty-one unique papers were identified through the literature search and assessed as eligible. Evaluation of screening measures revealed only two psychometrically sound measures that met criteria for Tier 1, the NDDI-E-Y and the Pediatric NeuroQoL-Depression, both depression screening measures. Several additional depression screening measures met criteria for Tier 2 (CDI-2, BASC-2-Depression Scale, and CBCL Withdrawn/Depressed Scale). Anxiety screening measures have not been validated in pediatric epilepsy and thus only met the criteria for Tier 2 (BASC-2 Anxiety Scale, CBCL DSM-IV Oriented Anxiety Problems Scale, MASC). Similarly for disruptive behaviors, two measures met Tier 2 criteria (BASC-2 Externalizing Problems Index, CBCL Externalizing Problems Index). CONCLUSION: Strides have been made in the validation of behavioral health screening measures for YWE; however, continued research in this area is necessary to validate existing psychometrically sound measures and to develop and evaluate epilepsy-specific measures in the pediatric epilepsy population.

Racial Disparities in Medication Adherence Barriers: Pediatric Epilepsy as an Exemplar.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how racial disparities in medication adherence barriers relate to key clinical outcomes (i.e., seizure control and adherence) in pediatric epilepsy and to identify the most critical barriers in determining health outcomes in Black youth and White youth. METHODS: This observational study included a sample of youth aged 2-17 years with epilepsy obtained by combining data from four different studies. A total of 226 caregivers and 43 adolescents reported on adherence barriers. An electronic monitor was used to measure adherence to the primary antiepileptic drug. Racial disparities in individual barriers were examined. The relative importance of different types of barriers in determining clinical outcomes was evaluated in both Black and White youth. RESULTS: Adherence barriers, including running out of medications, access to pharmacies, competing demands, and difficulty swallowing, disproportionally affected Black children with epilepsy compared to White children. System- and community-level barriers emerged as the most important in determining seizure outcomes among Black youth. Both system- and individual-level barriers, on the other hand, were important for adherence outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: System- and community-level barriers, as opposed to individual-level barriers, are more highly endorsed by Black families compared to White families. These barriers are also the most critical in driving seizure outcomes among Black youth. There is a critical need to shift from a primary focus on individual-level barriers to an approach that deliberately targets larger systemic barriers to reduce the existing adherence and health disparities that affect Black children with pediatric conditions.

Factors Associated With Participation in Clinical Trials Among Patients With Lupus.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Participation rates for clinical trials, including lupus trials, in the United States are low, but are even lower for underrepresented minorities. The impact of underrepresentation in trials can be far-reaching and is problematic because female subjects of color with lupus experience greater morbidity and mortality. As such, the overarching goal of this study was to characterize the factors that influence participation in lupus clinical trials. METHODS: The Lupus and Allied Diseases Association, the Lupus Foundation of America, and the Lupus Research Alliance collected data for their externally led Patient-Focused Drug Development Initiative-for the purpose of understanding and improving the rates of participation in lupus-related clinical trials. Participants completed a 46-question survey (in English or Spanish) electronically or on paper, which was distributed online or at lupus events. Logistic regression was used to test whether demographic and disease characteristics were associated with participation in past lupus trials. RESULTS: Data were available for 2220 respondents. Black respondents with lupus were more likely, than their White and Hispanic counterparts, to have participated in past clinical trials (p < 0.05). Although not statistically significant, Hispanic respondents were also more likely to have participated than their White counterparts (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-2.11). Both demographic (ie, race/ethnicity) and medical (ie, disease severity defined as more organ involvement) factors seem to be important determinants of participation in clinical trials (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Combining the results from this study and prior research provides insight into recruitment strategies to increase participation rates of historically underrepresented minorities.

Supporting treatment adherence regimens in children with epilepsy: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to examine the efficacy of a family-tailored education and problem-solving behavioral intervention, Supporting Treatment Adherence Regimens (STAR), in young children (2-12 years old) with new onset epilepsy compared to an attention control (i.e., education only [EO]) intervention. Participants randomized to the STAR intervention were hypothesized to demonstrate significantly improved adherence at postintervention and 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits compared to the EO intervention. Seizure and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes were also examined. METHODS: Two hundred children with new onset epilepsy and their caregivers were recruited during routine epilepsy clinic visits. Baseline questionnaires were completed, and electronic adherence monitors were provided. Participants with adherence less than 95% during the run-in period were randomized to either STAR or EO intervention. Active intervention was provided to both groups for 4 months. Questionnaires were completed at conclusion of the active intervention phase and three follow-up time points (3, 6, and 12 months). Group differences in adherence, seizure outcomes, and HRQOL were examined using regression-based analyses of covariance and longitudinal mixed effect linear or logistical models. RESULTS: Adherence at 12-month follow-up was significantly different between the STAR (mean = 82.34, SD = 21.29) and EO intervention groups (mean = 61.77, SD = 28.29), with the STAR group demonstrating 20.6% greater adherence (b = 19.11, p = .04, 95% confidence interval = 1.00-37.22, d = .83). No significant differences were found between groups in seizure and HRQOL outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: A family-based behavioral adherence intervention demonstrated sustained adherence improvements 1 year following epilepsy diagnosis compared to an epilepsy-specific education intervention. STAR is an efficacious adherence intervention that can easily be implemented into routine epilepsy care.

Modifiable factors related to transition readiness in adolescents and young adults with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize transition readiness in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with epilepsy and validate the social-ecological model of AYA readiness to transition (SMART) in a sample of AYAs with epilepsy. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included typically developing youth with epilepsy 13-25 years old seen in a comprehensive epilepsy center. Adolescents and young adults completed measures of transition readiness (Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire; TRAQ), epilepsy knowledge, epilepsy self-management, developmental factors, and emotional and behavioral functioning. Adolescents and young adults also completed a measure of their relationship quality with healthcare providers. Caregiver report was included when available. RESULTS: Participants included 82 AYAs (Mage = 17.3 ±â€¯2.8; 86.6% White Non-Hispanic, 53.7% females) with epilepsy. Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire scores (M = 3.33, SD = 0.86) were correlated with modifiable and non-modifiable factors: age (r = 0.66, p < 0.001), income (r = -0.23, p = 0.04), AYA cognitive problems (r = 0.24, p = 0.03), AYA knowledge (r = 0.31, p = 0.005), AYA expectations (r = 0.26, p ≤ 02), AYA inattention (r = -0.24, p = 0.03), AYA executive dysfunction (r = 0.25, p = 0.02), caregiver-reported AYA odd behaviors (r = -0.25, p = 0.036), and caregiver-reported AYA communication problems (r = 0.25, p = 0.04). Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire scores were higher in AYAs who had seen adult providers for general healthcare issues (e.g., primary care), but were not related to other demographic (e.g., minority status, insurance), medical (years since diagnosis, type of epilepsy, polytherapy, seizure frequency), developmental (e.g., adaptive skills, cognitive functioning) or emotional/behavioral factors (e.g., skills, relationship with the provider, psychosocial functioning). Linear regression including variables significantly correlated with the outcome of transition readiness (F (7, 59) = 9.70, p < 0.001) explained 54% of the variance. Specifically, age was the only significant model predictor. SIGNIFICANCE: Transition readiness in AYAs with epilepsy was predicted by non-modifiable (e.g., age) and correlated with modifiable factors (e.g., knowledge, psychosocial/cognitive functioning). Providers must better prepare patients prior to transfer, and future research should use an epilepsy-specific measure of transition readiness to identify targets for intervention.