Grade 4 Neutropenia Frequency as a Binary Risk Predictor for Adverse Clinical Consequences of Chemotherapy­Induced Neutropenia: A Meta-analysis.

Neutropenia is the major toxicity of myelosuppressive cancer chemotherapy. Grade 4 neutropenia (Gr4N) is a measure of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) severity. We conducted a meta-analysis of CIN data. Gr4N incidence was significantly correlated with febrile neutropenia (FN), days of severe neutropenia (DSN), and nadir absolute neutrophil count (ANC), which are all important predictors of morbidity. With a Gr4N threshold of 65%, both FN and DSN were below levels for low risk of adverse CIN outcomes. Gr4N was highly predictive for adverse CIN outcomes, and a 65% threshold demarcated low vs. high risk for FN and other adverse CIN outcomes.

Indirect Evaluation of Bone Saturation with Zoledronic Acid After Long-Term Dosing.

BACKGROUND: Zoledronic acid (ZA), a potent bisphosphonate used for treatment of bone metastasis, has high bone affinity. This post hoc analysis evaluated the effects of long-term treatment and reduction in dosing frequency of ZA on bone saturation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pharmacokinetic data from three independent studies, OPTIMIZE-2 (patients receiving ≥9 doses of bisphosphonates) and two phase I studies, CZOL4460503 and CZOL4460506 (patients who were bisphosphonate naïve/bisphosphonate free for ≥1 year after previous dosing), were pooled. Serial urine and plasma samples were used as surrogate markers to determine ZA plasma area under the curve (AUC) over 6 hours (AUC0-6h) and dose excreted in urine over 6 hours (urine0-6h). Potential relationships between the number of years for which patients had been treated previously at time of study entry and AUC0-6h or urine0-6h were analyzed graphically. RESULTS: Creatinine clearances for patients were similar across the three studies and at all time points analyzed. The levels of AUC0-6h ZA in plasma at week 0 in every (q) 4 and q12 weekly arms of OPTIMIZE-2 were 0.366 h × mg/L and 0.397 h × mg/L compared with 0.345 h × mg/L and 0.356 h × mg/L in CZOL4460503 and CZOL4460506, respectively. In OPTIMIZE-2, the AUC0-6h ZA plasma levels were the same (0.428 h × mg/L) at week 36 in both q4 and q12 arms. The levels of ZA urine0-6h at week 36 in OPTIMIZE-2 (q4 and q12 week arms), CZOL4460503, and CZOL4460506 were 36.6%, 30.8%, 26.5%, and 27.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Long-term ZA treatment may not impact bone saturation, and ZA dosing frequency does not seem to influence drug retention rates. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Zoledronic acid (ZA), used along with standard antineoplastic therapy to treat bone metastases associated with solid tumors and multiple myeloma, requires frequent (every 3-4 or every 12 weeks) long-term administration. This may result in bone saturation and subsequently lead to a higher risk of adverse events such as osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical fractures. This post hoc analysis used surrogate markers to demonstrate that prolonged ZA administration does not cause bone saturation. Furthermore, reduction in ZA dosing frequency does not affect its retention level in bones over time. These findings will help in addressing clinicians' concerns regarding prolonged ZA administration.

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of the New Aldose Reductase Inhibitor Govorestat (AT-007) After a Single and Multiple Doses in Participants in a Phase 1/2 Study.

In classic galactosemia (CG) patients, aldose reductase (AR) converts galactose to galactitol. In a phase 1/2, placebo-controlled study (NCT04117711), safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of govorestat were evaluated after single and multiple ascending doses (0.5-40 mg/kg) in healthy adults (n = 81) and CG patients (n = 14). Levels of govorestat in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood levels of galactitol, galactose, and galactose-1-phosphate (Gal-1p) were measured for population PK and PK/PD analyses. Govorestat was well tolerated. Adverse event frequency was comparable between placebo and govorestat. Govorestat PK displayed a 2-compartment model with sequential zero- and first-order absorption, and no effect of demographic factors. Multiple-dose PK of govorestat was linear in the 0.5-40 mg/kg range, and CSF levels increased dose dependently. Elimination half-life was ∼10 h. PK/PD modeling supported once-daily dosing. Change from baseline in galactitol was -15% ± 9% with placebo and -19% ± 10%, -46% ± 4%, and -51% ± 5% with govorestat 5, 20, and 40 mg/kg, respectively, thus was similar for 20 and 40 mg/kg. Govorestat did not affect galactose or Gal-1p levels. In conclusion, govorestat displayed a favorable safety, PK, and PD profile in humans, and reduced galactitol levels in the same magnitude (∼50%) as in a rat model of CG that demonstrated an efficacy benefit on neurological, behavioral, and ocular outcomes.

Efficacy of Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for Prevention of Docetaxel-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and its clinical consequences is an unmet need for which plinabulin, a selective immunomodulating microtubule-binding agent, is being tested. Objective: To demonstrate noninferiority between plinabulin and pegfilgrastim for days of severe neutropenia in cycle 1 in patients with solid tumors treated with docetaxel. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for the Prevention of Docetaxel-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors (PROTECTIVE-1) double-blind phase 3 randomized clinical trial was performed in multiple centers in China, Russia, Ukraine, and the US. Participants included patients with breast, prostate, or non-small cell lung cancer treated with single-agent docetaxel chemotherapy. Data were collected from June 1, 2018, to January 31, 2019. The database was locked on February 18, 2021. Data analysis was based on intention to treat and safety and performed from October 5, 2018, to February 23, 2021. Interventions: Plinabulin, 40 mg, plus placebo or pegfilgrastim, 6 mg, plus placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was day of severe neutropenia in cycle 1. Additional end points included clinical consequences of CIN (febrile neutropenia, hospitalizations, infections, antibiotic use, and modifications of chemotherapy dose), patient-reported outcomes for bone pain score, markers for immune suppression (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR] of >5), immature neutrophils (band, promyelocyte, and myelocyte counts >0), and safety. Results: Among the 105 patients included in the analysis (65 [6.19%] women; median age, 59 [range, 31-81] years), the primary end point was met within a noninferiority margin of 0.65 days, with a mean difference of 0.52 days (98.52% CI, 0.40-0.65 days). Grade 4 neutropenia frequency in cycle 1 was not significantly different. Plinabulin had earlier onset of action with less grade 4 neutropenia in week 1 of cycle 1. Plinabulin had fewer adverse clinical consequences with rates of febrile neutropenia (0 of 52 vs 1 of 53 [1.9%]), infections (4 of 52 [7.7%] vs 8 of 53 [15.1%]), chemotherapy dose delay of more than 7 days (2 of 52 [3.8%] vs 3 of 53 [5.7%]), and permanent chemotherapy discontinuation (7 of 52 [13.5%] vs 14 of 53 [26.4%]). Patients receiving plinabulin had significantly less bone pain (difference, -0.67 [95% CI, -1.17 to -0.16]; P = .01) and a better immunosuppressive profile (NLR >5 at day 8, 2 of 52 [3.8%] vs 24 of 51 [46.0%]; P < .001). Plinabulin was well tolerated, with comparable safety to pegfilgrastim. Conclusions and Relevance: Plinabulin has comparable efficacy to pegfilgrastim for the prevention of CIN, with better safety and a better immunosuppressive profile. Plinabulin's same-day dosing compared with pegfilgrastim's next-day dosing offers distinct advantages, including reducing use of health care services. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03102606.

Plinabulin, a Distinct Microtubule-Targeting Chemotherapy, Promotes M1-Like Macrophage Polarization and Anti-tumor Immunity.

Reprogramming tumor infiltrating myeloid cells to elicit pro-inflammatory responses is an exciting therapeutic maneouver to improve anti-tumor responses. We recently demonstrated that a distinct microtubule-targeting drug, plinabulin-a clinical-stage novel agent-modulates dendritic cell maturation and enhances anti-tumor immunity. Here, we investigated the effects of plinabulin on macrophage polarization in vitro and in vivo. Plinabulin monotherapy induced significant tumor growth inhibition in mice bearing subcutaneous MC38 colon cancer. Importantly, the regressing tumors were characterized by an increase in M1-like/M2-like tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) ratio. The efficacy of plinabulin remained unaltered in T cell-deficient Rag2-/- mice, suggesting an important role of macrophages in driving the drug's anti-tumor effect. Exposure of murine and healthy human macrophages to plinabulin induced polarization toward the M1 phenotype, including increased expression of co-stimulatory molecules CD80, CD86 and pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1ß, IL-6, and IL-12. M2-associated immunosuppressive cytokines IL-10 and IL-4 were reduced. This pro-inflammatory M1-like skewing of TAMs in response to plinabulin was dependent on the JNK pathway. Functionally, plinabulin-polarized human M1 macrophages directly killed HuT 78 tumor cells in vitro. Importantly, plinabulin induced a functional M1-like polarization of tumor infiltrating macrophages in murine tumors as well as in tumor samples from ovarian cancer patients, by preferentially triggering M1 proliferation. Our study uncovers a novel immunomodulatory effect of plinabulin in directly triggering M1 polarization and proliferation as well as promoting TAM anti-tumoral effector functions.

Plinabulin ameliorates neutropenia induced by multiple chemotherapies through a mechanism distinct from G-CSF therapies.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) increases the risk of infections and mortality in cancer patients. G-CSF therapies are approved for the treatment of CIN, but non-G-CSF therapies are needed to increase efficacy and minimize side effects. Plinabulin is an inhibitor of tubulin polymerization that ameliorates CIN caused in patients by the microtubule stabilizer docetaxel. The present study evaluates the potential of plinabulin to reduce neutropenia induced by chemotherapies of different classes in a manner not dependent on increasing G-CSF. METHODS: The anti-CIN benefits of plinabulin were tested in rodents co-treated with docetaxel, cyclophosphamide or doxorubicin. Effects on G-CSF levels were evaluated in tissues by immunoassay. Flow cytometry was utilized to test treatment effects on femur bone marrow cell counts from immunocompetent mice-bearing orthotopic 4T1 breast cancer tumors. RESULTS: Plinabulin alleviated neutropenia induced by microtubule stabilizing, DNA cross-linking and DNA intercalating chemotherapies, yet did not affect bone marrow or blood G-CSF levels. The number of lineage-/Sca1+/c-Kit+ (LSK) hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPC) in murine bone marrow collected 2 days after treatment was not affected by docetaxel monotherapy despite increased plasma G-CSF in this group. LSK cell number was, however, increased when plinabulin was combined with docetaxel, without affecting G-CSF. CONCLUSIONS: Results support the clinical testing of plinabulin as a non-G-CSF-based treatment for CIN associated with chemotherapies of different mechanisms. Results also support HSPC as a focal point for future mechanism-of-action work aimed at understanding the ability of plinabulin to reduce this serious side effect of cytotoxic therapy in cancer patients.

Efficacy of Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Adults With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Plinabulin is a novel, non-granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) small molecule with both anticancer and neutropenia-prevention effects. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of plinabulin compared with pegfilgrastim for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia following docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with non-small lung cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial of 4 treatment arms that was conducted in 19 cancer treatment centers in the United States, China, Russia, and Ukraine. Participants were adult patients with non-small cell lung cancer whose cancer had progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. Data were collected from April 2017 through March 2018 and analyzed from August 2019 through February 2020. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 doses of plinabulin (5, 10, or 20 mg/m2) on day 1 or to pegfilgrastim 6 mg on day 2. Patients were treated every 21 days for 4 chemotherapy cycles. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the determination of the recommended phase 3 dose of plinabulin based on the days of severe neutropenia during chemotherapy cycle 1. Daily complete blood cell counts and absolute neutrophil counts were drawn during times of anticipated neutropenia during cycle 1. RESULTS: Of the 55 patients randomized and evaluated, the mean (SD) age was 61.3 (10.2) years, and 38 (69.1%) were men. With each escalation of the plinabulin dose, the incidence of any grade of neutropenia decreased. There were no significant differences in mean (SD) days of severe neutropenia among those treated with pegfilgrastim (0.15 [0.38] days) when dosed at day 2 vs plinabulin 20 mg/m2 (0.36 [0.93] days; P = .76) when dosed at day 1, and no safety signals were detected. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Single dose-per-cycle plinabulin has a similar neutropenia protection benefit as pegfilgrastim. Plinabulin 40 mg fixed dose, which is pharmacologically equivalent to 20 mg/m2, will be compared with pegfilgrastim 6 mg in the phase 3 portion of this trial. Noninferior days of severe neutropenia will be the primary end point, and bone pain reduction, thrombocytopenia reduction, and quality of life maintenance will be secondary end points. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03102606.

c-Jun N-terminal kinases mediate reactivation of Akt and cardiomyocyte survival after hypoxic injury in vitro and in vivo.

Akt is a central regulator of cardiomyocyte survival after ischemic injury in vitro and in vivo, but the mechanisms regulating Akt activity in the postischemic cardiomyocyte are not known. Furthermore, although much is known about the detrimental role that the c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs) play in promoting death of cells exposed to various stresses, little is known of the molecular mechanisms by which JNK activation can be protective. We report that JNKs are necessary for the reactivation of Akt after ischemic injury. We identified Thr450 of Akt as a residue that is phosphorylated by JNKs, and the phosphorylation status of Thr450 regulates reactivation of Akt after hypoxia, apparently by priming Akt for subsequent phosphorylation by 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase. The reduction in Akt activity that is induced by JNK inhibition may have significant biological consequences, as we find that JNKs, acting via Akt, are critical determinants of survival in posthypoxic cardiomyocytes in culture. Furthermore, in contrast to selective p38-mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibition, which was cardioprotective in vivo, concurrent inhibition of both JNKs and p38-mitogen-activated protein kinases increased ischemia/reperfusion injury in the heart of the intact rat. These studies demonstrate that reactivation of Akt after resolution of hypoxia and ischemia is regulated by JNKs and suggest that this is likely a central mechanism of the myocyte protective effect of JNKs.

Continued Treatment Effect of Zoledronic Acid Dosing Every 12 vs 4 Weeks in Women With Breast Cancer Metastatic to Bone: The OPTIMIZE-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Zoledronic acid, a potent bisphosphonate, is commonly administered to patients with bone metastases to reduce the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs). However, there have been concerns regarding its long-term monthly administration. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether zoledronic acid every 12 weeks was noninferior to zoledronic acid every 4 weeks in patients with metastatic breast cancer that involved the bone who had previously received a standard dosing regimen of zoledronic acid and/or pamidronate disodium. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: OPTIMIZE-2 was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 3 trial of intention-to-treat (full analysis set), evaluable (per protocol), and safety populations. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive 4.0 mg of intravenous zoledronic acid every 4 or every 12 weeks with placebo for interim infusions for 1 year. The study was conducted at 102 clinical trial centers in the United States from March 3, 2006, to July 25, 2013. Data analysis was performed from October 7, 2013, to March 24, 2014. The study randomized 416 women (≥18 years old) with bone metastases from breast cancer who previously received 9 or more doses of zoledronic acid and/or pamidronate during the first 10 to 15 months of therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the proportion of patients with 1 or more SRE on study (SRE rate). The key secondary end points included time to first SRE and skeletal morbidity rate (SMR). RESULTS: A total of 416 women were randomized: 200 patients received zoledronic acid every 4 weeks (mean [SD] age, 59.2 [11.1] years; 173 were white [86.5%]), 203 patients received zoledronic acid every 12 weeks (mean [SD] age, 58.6 [11.2] years; 178 were white [87.7%]), and 13 patients received placebo (mean [SD] age, 60.8 [12.2] years; 13 were white [100%]). Baseline characteristics were similar in both zoledronic acid treatment arms. After 1 year of follow-up, SREs occurred in 44 patients (22.0%) in the zoledronic acid every 4 weeks group and 47 patients (23.2%) in the zoledronic acid every 12 weeks group (proportional difference of -1.2%; 1-sided 97.5% CI bound of the difference in SRE rate between arms, -9.8%; noninferiority P = .02). The time to first SRE between treatment groups was not statistically significantly different (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% CI, 0.70-1.60; P = .79). The mean (SD) SMR was 0.46 (1.06) vs 0.50 (1.50) events per year in the every 4 weeks vs every 12 weeks groups (P = .85). The safety profiles of the every 4 weeks and every 12 weeks groups were comparable, with 189 patients (95.5%) in the every 4 weeks group having at least 1 adverse event compared with 189 (93.5%) in the every 12 weeks group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The every 12 weeks regimen of zoledronic acid was noninferior to the every 4 weeks regimen for the proportion of patients experiencing 1 or more SRE. These results may have a substantial influence on current clinical practice for treatment of patients with bone metastasis from breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00320710.

Long-Term Safety Follow-Up of Subjects Previously Treated with Non-Replicating Retroviral Vector-Based Gene Therapies.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the life-long safety profile of gene therapy using retroviral (non-replicating) vectors (nRCR), or cell products in 127 subjects with hemophilia, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or cancer, previously treated with such gene therapy. METHODS: We assessed the occurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs), deaths and presence of replication competent retrovirus (RCR). RESULTS: A total of 23 subjects remained until the data cut-off date of 31 July 2013 and provided safety information of up to 18 years. Of the 104 subjects who discontinued, the primary reason was loss to follow-up (47.2 %; n = 60). The follow-up period for the 60 subjects lost to follow-up was 7-10 years. A total of 41 subjects experienced at least one SAE, and 15 subjects died. We reviewed SAEs and cause of death (none related to the active therapy), but no evidence was found for safety signals related to new malignancy or neurologic, rheumatological, autoimmune, or hematologic disorder. RCR results were negative, indicating no evidence for in vivo vector persistence. CONCLUSION: Despite the loss of follow-up, which is the limiting factor in this long-term safety trial, the findings from this long-term follow-up study are encouraging.

Effect of selective inhibition of the p38 MAP kinase pathway on platelet aggregation.

Systemic inflammation has been shown to be a contributing factor to the instability of atherosclerotic plaques in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). VX-702, a novel p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitor, is currently under investigation in ACS patients with unstable angina to evaluate its safety and efficacy during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The role of p38 MAPK in platelet aggregation of normal individuals was examined using the selective second generation p38 MAPK inhibitor VX-702. Treatment of platelets with thrombin (activates PAR1 and PAR4 thrombin receptors), SFLLRN (PAR1), AYPGKF (PAR4), collagen (alpha2beta1 and GPVI/FCgammaIIR receptors) and U46619 (TXA(2)) resulted in strong activation of p38 MAPK. Activation of the GPIb von Willebrand factor receptor with ristocetin did not stimulate p38 MAPK. Pre-treatment of platelets with 1 microM VX-702 completely inhibited activation of p38 MAPK by thrombin, SFLLRN, AYPGKF, U46619, and collagen. There was no effect of VX-702 on platelet aggregation induced by any of the agonists in the presence or absence of aspirin, heparin or apyrase. It has been postulated that a potential role of p38 MAPK is to activate phospholipase A(2) (cPLA(2)) which catalyses formation of arachidonic acid leading to production of thromboxane. Interestingly, we show contrasting effects of p38 MAPK inhibition as compared to aspirin inhibition on platelet aggregation in response to collagen. Blockade of TXA(2) production by aspirin results in significant inhibition of collagen activation. However,VX-702 has no effect on collagen-mediated platelet aggregation, suggesting that blocking p38 MAPK does not effect thromboxane production in human platelets. Therefore, unlike aspirin blockade of thromboxane production in platelets, p38 MAPK inhibitors such as VX-702 do not significantly affect platelet function and would not be expected to contribute to an elevated risk of bleeding side-effects in treated patients.

Anticipatory anxiety in moderately to highly-anxious oral surgery patients as a screening model for anxiolytics: evaluation of alprazolam.

Alprazolam, a benzodiazepine anxiolytic, was evaluated in anxious patients prior to oral surgery. This population represents a possible acute screening model for novel anxiolytic agents. Healthy subjects, preselected for a moderate to high degree of dental anxiety based upon Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale, were enrolled in a three-arm parallel design study and randomly assigned to receive double-blind placebo (N=15), alprazolam 0.25 mg (N=16) or alprazolam 1 mg (N=16). Subjective self-reported anxiety was rated using the State Anxiety Inventory and visual analog scales. Objective measures included galvanic skin conductance, heart rate variability, blood pressure, pulse rate, and respiration. At 90 minutes after dosing, there were statistically significant (p<0.05) reductions compared with placebo in subjective anxiety and skin conductance mean level for the alprazolam-treated subjects. Changes from pre-dose (mean +/- SEM) at 90 minutes in the placebo, alprazolam 0.25 mg, and alprazolam 1 mg groups were -4.73 +/- 2.79, -13.75 +/- 2.49, and -12.81 +/- 2.32 for the State Anxiety Inventory and 5.44 +/- 6.71, -31.88 +/- 5.88, and -32.34 +/- 5.32 mm for analog anxiety scores. Corresponding skin conductance mean level at 100 minutes in the three groups (respectively) changed 0.64 +/- 0.24, -0.53 +/- 0.21, -0.71 +/- 0.22 microSiemens. The 0.25 mg and 1 mg dosages of alprazolam were not differentiated. Changes in heart rate variability, blood pressure, pulse rate, and respiration did not reflect subjective anxiety. Overall, the oral surgery anticipation anxiety model was found to be a sensitive test for benzodiazepine anxiolytic activity and may represent a potential screening model for evaluation of investigational agents.