ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recent case reports have described the efficacy of daratumumab to treat refractory pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) following major ABO mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In this report, we describe the use of daratumumab as a first-line agent for treatment of delayed red blood cell (RBC) engraftment following a major ABO mismatched pediatric HSCT and provide a review of the literature. STUDY DESIGN AND MATERIALS: We report on a 14-year-old with DOCK8 deficiency who underwent a myeloablative, haploidentical bone marrow transplant from her major ABO mismatched sister (recipient O+, donor A+) for treatment of her primary immunodeficiency. Despite achieving full donor chimerism, she had delayed RBC engraftment requiring ongoing transfusions. Due to iron deposition, symptomatic anemia, and persistence of anti-A iso-hemagglutinins despite discontinuation of immunosuppression, treatment for delayed RBC engraftment with the CD38-targeted monoclonal antibody daratumumab was selected as a less immunosuppressive agent that could more selectively target iso-hemagglutinin producing plasma cells without causing broad B-cell aplasia. RESULTS: Clinical effect with daratumumab was demonstrated by reduced iso-hemagglutinin titer, increased reticulocytosis, normalization of her hemoglobin, and transfusion independence. In the 11-month follow-up period to date, no additional transfusions or immunosuppression have been necessary, despite persistence of low-level anti-A iso-hemagglutinin. CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that daratumumab was an effective first-line therapy for delayed RBC engraftment and that earlier consideration for daratumumab in treatment of delayed RBC engraftment may be warranted.
Subject(s)
ABO Blood-Group System/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology , Bone Marrow Transplantation/methods , Delayed Graft Function/drug therapy , Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors/deficiency , Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases/therapy , Adolescent , Aftercare , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Chimerism , Erythrocytes/immunology , Female , Hemagglutinins/blood , Hemagglutinins/drug effects , Humans , Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases/diagnosis , Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases/genetics , Red-Cell Aplasia, Pure/drug therapy , Transplantation, Haploidentical/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell , Heterocyclic Compounds , Multiple Myeloma , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Peripheral Blood Stem Cells , Anemia, Sickle Cell/therapy , Antigens, CD34 , Benzylamines , Cyclams , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Transplantation, AutologousABSTRACT
Recent studies suggest that plerixafor mobilization and apheresis in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) is safe and can allow collection of sufficient CD34+ hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) collection for clinical gene therapy applications. However, the quantities of plerixafor-mobilized CD34+ cells vary between different SCD patients for unknown reasons. Twenty-three participants with SCD underwent plerixafor mobilization followed by apheresis, processing, and HSC enrichment under a phase 1 safety and efficacy study conducted at 2 institutions. Linear regression or Spearman's correlation test was used to assess the relationships between various hematologic and clinical parameters with total CD34+ cells/kg collected. Median CD34+ cells/kg after 2 or fewer mobilization and apheresis cycles was 4.0 × 106 (range, 1.5-12.0). Similar to what is observed generally, CD34+ yield correlated negatively with age (P < .001) and positively with baseline (P = .003) and preapheresis blood CD34+ cells/µL (P < .001), and baseline white blood cell (P = .01) and platelet counts (P = .03). Uniquely for SCD, CD34+ cell yields correlated positively with the number of days hydroxyurea was held (for up to 5 weeks, P = .01) and negatively with markers of disease severity, including hospitalization frequency within the preceding year (P = .01) and the number of medications taken for chronic pain (P = .002). Unique SCD-specific technical challenges in apheresis were also associated with reduced CD34+ cell collection efficiency and purification. Here, we describe factors that impact plerixafor mobilization success in patients with SCD, confirming known factors as described in other populations in addition to reporting previously unknown disease specific factors in patients with SCD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03226691.