ABSTRACT
Increases in throughput and decreases in costs have facilitated large scale metabolomics studies, the simultaneous measurement of large numbers of biochemical components in biological samples. Initial large scale studies focused on biomarker discovery for disease or disease progression and helped to understand biochemical pathways underlying disease. The first population-based studies that combined metabolomics and genome wide association studies (mGWAS) have increased our understanding of the (genetic) regulation of biochemical conversions. Measurements of metabolites as intermediate phenotypes are a potentially very powerful approach to uncover how genetic variation affects disease susceptibility and progression. However, we still face many hurdles in the interpretation of mGWAS data. Due to the composite nature of many metabolites, single enzymes may affect the levels of multiple metabolites and, conversely, levels of single metabolites may be affected by multiple enzymes. Here, we will provide a global review of the current status of mGWAS. We will specifically discuss the application of prior biological knowledge present in databases to the interpretation of mGWAS results and discuss the potential of mathematical models. As the technology continuously improves to detect metabolites and to measure genetic variation, it is clear that comprehensive systems biology based approaches are required to further our insight in the association between genes, metabolites and disease. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: From Genome to Function.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified many common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that associate with clinical phenotypes, but these SNPs usually explain just a small part of the heritability and have relatively modest effect sizes. In contrast, SNPs that associate with metabolite levels generally explain a higher percentage of the genetic variation and demonstrate larger effect sizes. Still, the discovery of SNPs associated with metabolite levels is challenging since testing all metabolites measured in typical metabolomics studies with all SNPs comes with a severe multiple testing penalty. We have developed an automated workflow approach that utilizes prior knowledge of biochemical pathways present in databases like KEGG and BioCyc to generate a smaller SNP set relevant to the metabolite. This paper explores the opportunities and challenges in the analysis of GWAS of metabolomic phenotypes and provides novel insights into the genetic basis of metabolic variation through the re-analysis of published GWAS datasets. RESULTS: Re-analysis of the published GWAS dataset from Illig et al. (Nature Genetics, 2010) using a pathway-based workflow (http://www.myexperiment.org/packs/319.html), confirmed previously identified hits and identified a new locus of human metabolic individuality, associating Aldehyde dehydrogenase family1 L1 (ALDH1L1) with serine/glycine ratios in blood. Replication in an independent GWAS dataset of phospholipids (Demirkan et al., PLoS Genetics, 2012) identified two novel loci supported by additional literature evidence: GPAM (Glycerol-3 phosphate acyltransferase) and CBS (Cystathionine beta-synthase). In addition, the workflow approach provided novel insight into the affected pathways and relevance of some of these gene-metabolite pairs in disease development and progression. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the utility of automated exploitation of background knowledge present in pathway databases for the analysis of GWAS datasets of metabolomic phenotypes. We report novel loci and potential biochemical mechanisms that contribute to our understanding of the genetic basis of metabolic variation and its relationship to disease development and progression.