Inadvertent hypothermia after endovascular therapy is not associated with improved outcome in stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hypothermia may be neuroprotective in acute ischemic stroke. Patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (acLVO) are frequently hypothermic after endovascular therapy (EVT). We sought to determine whether this inadvertent hypothermia is associated with improved outcome. METHODS: We extracted data of consecutive patients (January 2016 to May 2019) who received EVT for acLVO from our prospective EVT register of all patients screened for EVT at our tertiary stroke center. We assessed functional outcome at 3 months and performed multivariate analysis to calculate adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) for favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale scores = 0-2) and mortality across patients who were hypothermic (<36°C) and patients who were normothermic (≥36°C to <37.6°C) after EVT. Moreover, we compared the frequency of complications between these groups. RESULTS: Among 837 patients screened, 416 patients received EVT for acLVO and fulfilled inclusion criteria (200 [48.1%] male, mean age = 76 ± 16 years, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score = 16, interquartile range [IQR] = 12-20). Of these, 209 patients (50.2%) were hypothermic (median temperature = 35.2°C, IQR = 34.7-35.7) and 207 patients were normothermic (median temperature = 36.4°C, IQR = 36.1-36.7) after EVT. In multivariate analysis, hypothermia was not associated with favorable outcome (aRR = 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-1.31) and mortality (aRR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.84-1.66). More hypothermic patients suffered from pneumonia (36.4% vs. 25.6%, p = 0.02) and bradyarrhythmia (52.6% vs. 16.4%, p < 0.001), whereas thromboembolic events were distributed evenly (5.7% vs. 6.8%, not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Inadvertent hypothermia after EVT for acLVO is not associated with improved functional outcome or reduced mortality but is associated with an increased rate of pneumonia and bradyarrhythmia in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Universal laboratory testing for SARS-CoV-2 in hyperacute stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: Stroke patients are thought to be at increased risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). To evaluate yield of universal laboratory testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in acute stroke patients and its impact on hyperacute stroke care. METHODS: Between weeks 14 and 18 in 2020, a protected code stroke protocol including infection control screening and laboratory testing for SARS-CoV-2 was prospectively implemented for all code stroke patients upon arrival to the emergency department. If infection control screen was positive, patients received protective hygienic measures and laboratory test results were available within four hours from testing. In patients with negative screen, laboratory results were available no later than the next working day. Door-to-imaging times of patients treated with thrombolysis or thrombectomy were compared with those of patients treated during the preceding weeks 1 to 13 in 2020. RESULTS: During the 4-weeks study period, 116 consecutive code stroke patients underwent infection control screen and laboratory testing for SARS-CoV-2. Among 5 (4.3%) patients whose infection control screen was positive, no patient was tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. All patients with negative infection control screens had negative test results. Door-to-imaging times of patients treated with thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy were not different to those treated during the preceding weeks (12 [9-15] min versus 13 [11-17] min, p = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Universal laboratory testing for SARS-CoV-2 provided useful information on patients' infection status and its implementation into a protected code stroke protocol did not adversely affect hyperacute stroke care.

Acute kidney injury in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction undergoing hyperosmolar therapy with mannitol.

PURPOSE: To assess the kidney safety profile of mannitol in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied consecutive patients with malignant MCA infarction (01/2008-01/2018). Malignant MCA infarction was defined according to DESTINY criteria. We compared clinical endpoints including acute kidney injury (AKI; according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes [KDIGO]) and dialysis between patients with and without mannitol. Multivariable model was built to explore predictor variables of AKI and in-hospital death. RESULTS: Overall, 219 patients with malignant MCA infarction were included. Mannitol was administered in 93/219 (42.5%) patients with an average dosage of 650 g (250-950 g). Patients treated with mannitol more frequently suffered from AKI (39.8% vs. 11.9%; p < 0.001) and required hemodialysis (7.5% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.01) than patients without mannitol. At discharge, more patients in the mannitol group had persistent AKI than control patients (23.7% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.001). In multivariable model, mannitol emerged as independent predictor of AKI (OR 5.02, 95%CI 2.36-10.69; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Acute kidney injury appears to be a frequent complication of hyperosmolar therapy with mannitol in patients with malignant MCA infarction. Given the lack of evidence supporting effectiveness of mannitol in these patients, its routine use should be carefully considered.

Endovascular therapy for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion in telestroke.

INTRODUCTION: Recent exploratory analysis suggested comparable outcomes among stroke patients undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion, whether selected via the telestroke network or admitted directly to an EVT-capable centre. We further studied the role of telemedicine in selection of ischaemic stroke patients potentially eligible for EVT. METHODS: We prospectively included consecutive ischaemic stroke patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who underwent EVT at our neurovascular centre (January 2016 to March 2018). We compared safety and efficacy including symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH), successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b/3), 90-day favourable outcome (mRS ≤ 2) and 90-day survival between patients transferred from telestroke hospitals and patients directly admitted. RESULTS: Of 280 potentially EVT-eligible patients, 72/129 (56%) telestroke and 91/151 (60%) direct admissions eventually underwent EVT (age 76 (66-82) years, median (interquartile range), 46% men, NIHSS score 17 (13-20)). Telestroke patients had larger pre-EVT infarct cores (ASPECTS: 7 (6-8) vs. 8 (7-9); p < 0.0001) and shorter door-to-groin puncture times (71 (56-84) vs. 101 (79-133) min; p < 0.0001) than directly admitted patients. sICH (2.8% vs. 1.1%; p = 0.58), successful reperfusion (81% vs. 77%; p = 0.56), 90-day favourable outcome (25% vs. 29%; p = 0.65) and 90-day survival (73% vs. 67%; p = 0.39) rates were comparable among telestroke and direct admissions. DISCUSSION: Our data underpins the important role of telemedicine in identifying acute ischaemic stroke patients lacking immediate access to EVT-capable stroke centres. Stroke patients selected via telemedicine and those directly admitted had comparable chances of favourable outcomes after EVT for large vessel occlusion.

Association of history of cerebrovascular disease with severity of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a history of cerebrovascular disease (CVD) increases risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: In a retrospective multicenter study, we retrieved individual data from in-patients treated March 1 to April 15, 2020 from COVID-19 registries of three hospitals in Saxony, Germany. We also performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA recommendations using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases and bibliographies of identified papers (last search on April 11, 2020) and pooled data with those deriving from our multicenter study. Of 3762 records identified, 11 eligible observational studies of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients were included in quantitative data synthesis. Risk ratios (RR) of severe COVID-19 according to history of CVD were pooled using DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q and I2-statistics. Severity of COVID-19 according to definitions applied in included studies was the main outcome. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for clusters of studies with equal definitions of severity. RESULTS: Pooled analysis included data from 1906 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients (43.9% females, median age ranging from 39 to 76 years). Patients with previous CVD had higher risk of severe COVID-19 than those without [RR 2.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-2.81; p < 0.0001]. This association was also observed in clusters of studies that defined severe manifestation of the disease by clinical parameters (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.22-1.71; p < 0.0001), necessity of intensive care (RR 2.79, 95% CI 1.83-4.24; p < 0.0001) and in-hospital death (RR 2.18, 95% CI 1.75-2.7; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: A history of CVD might constitute an important risk factor of unfavorable clinical course of COVID-19  suggesting a need of tailored infection prevention and clinical management strategies for this population at risk.

Association of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy on Transthoracic Echocardiography.

INTRODUCTION: Arterial hypertension is the most frequent cause for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and may also cause left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). We sought to analyze whether hypertensive sICH etiology is associated with LVH. METHODS: We analyzed consecutive patients with sICH who were admitted to our tertiary stroke center during a four-year period and underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) as part of the diagnostic work-up. We defined hypertensive sICH as typical localization of hemorrhage in patients with arterial hypertension and no other identified sICH etiology. We defined an increased end-diastolic interventricular septal wall thickness of ≥11 mm on TTE as a surrogate parameter for LVH. RESULTS: Among 395 patients with sICH, 260 patients (65.8%) received TTE as part of their diagnostic work-up. The median age was 71 years (interquartile range (IQR) 17), 160 patients (61.5%) were male, the median baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 8 (IQR 13). Of these, 159 (61.2%) patients had a hypertensive sICH and 156 patients (60%) had LVH. In univariable (113/159 (71.1%) vs. 43/101 (42.6%); odds ratio (OR) 3.31; 95% confidence interval (CI95%) 1.97-5.62); and multivariable (adjusted OR 2.95; CI95% 1.29-6.74) analysis, hypertensive sICH was associated with LVH. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with sICH, LVH is associated with hypertensive bleeding etiology. Performing TTE is meaningful for diagnosis of comorbidities and clarification of bleeding etiology in these patients. Future studies should include long-term outcome parameters and assess left ventricular mass as main indicator for LVH.

Association of Anesthetic Exposure Time With Clinical Outcomes After Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Background: The optimal sedative regimen with general anesthesia (GA) or conscious sedation for patients undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) remains controversial. Apart from sedative regimen, the duration of anesthetic exposure may affect clinical outcomes. We aimed to determine whether there is an association between anesthetic exposure time and clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated stroke patients undergoing EVT for large vessel occlusion. Methods: This was an observational study of consecutive ischemic stroke patients who underwent EVT for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion under GA from January 2016 to March 2018. To minimize confounding by indication, we restricted our analysis to patients whose anesthetic exposure lasted <72 h. Multivariable logistic regression modeling adjusted for covariates was employed to evaluate whether 90-days independent functional outcome (defined as modified Rankin Scale scores 0-2) and 90-days survival could be predicted by anesthetic exposure time. Results: During the study period, 138 patients with ischemic stroke who underwent EVT received GA and fulfilled our study criteria: median age was 77 years (interquartile range, 65-82); 46.4% were men; median NIHSS score was 18 (15-21), median ASPECT score was 7 (6-8). Median duration of GA was 5.4 (2.5-19.7) h. Logistic regression modeling revealed an independent association between duration of anesthetic exposure and both 90-days independent functional outcome (p = 0.034) and 90-days survival (p = 0.011). Each additional 15-min of anesthetic exposure decreased the likelihood of achieving an independent functional outcome at 90 days by 1.5% and of being alive at 90 days by 1.0%. Conclusion: Our data promotes the notion that ischemic stroke patients who require peri-interventional GA for EVT should be extubated as soon as possible after the procedure.

Misjudgment of pre-stroke functional status contradicts beneficial outcomes after endovascular therapy for large vessel occlusion.

Endovascular therapy (EVT) trials enrolled ischemic stroke patients with good pre-stroke functional status. However, this information needed for rapid decision-making is commonly lacking in clinical practice. We hypothesized that initial misjudgment of pre-stroke functional status attenuates clinical outcomes of EVT. Data were derived from our prospective registry of ischemic stroke patients undergoing EVT for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (01/2016-12/2017). Considering all information accumulated during hospital course, pre-stroke modified Rankin scale (mRS) was independently re-assessed and compared with pre-EVT assessments. Misjudgment was defined as any difference in mRS categories between first- and second-look assessments. Multivariable model was built to adjust for confounding variables of unfavorable outcome (mRS 3-6) and death at 90 days. Overall, we studied 217 patients: median age 75 years (IQR 64-81), 54% women, median NIHSS 17 (12-20) points. Second-look assessment of pre-stroke mRS revealed 73 (34%) cases initially being misjudged by ≥ 1 category and 17 (8%) by ≥ 2 categories. None of the second-look mRS assessments resulted in a lower mRS category than initially rated. Patients whose pre-stroke mRS score was misjudged prior to EVT showed more frequently unfavorable outcome (62/73 [84.9%] vs. 94/144 [65.3%], p = 0.002) or were deceased (30/73 [41.1%] vs. 25/144 [17.4%], p < 0.001) at 90 days than patients with consistent mRS assessments. Moreover, unfavorable outcomes occurred in nearly all patients whose initial mRS was misjudged by ≥ 2 categories (mRS 3-6: 17/17 [100%]; death: 14/17 [82.4%]; p < 0.001). In conclusion, thorough pre-EVT assessment of pre-stroke functional status appears decisive for proper selection of EVT candidates.