Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 45(3): 700-705, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33221825

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: A growing body of data suggests that obesity influences coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our study's primary objective was to assess the association between body mass index (BMI) categories and critical forms of COVID-19. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Data on consecutive adult patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 at Amiens University Hospital (Amiens, France) were extracted retrospectively. The association between BMI categories and the composite primary endpoint (admission to the intensive care unit or death) was probed in a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In total, 433 patients were included, and BMI data were available for 329: 20 were underweight (6.1%), 95 have a normal weight (28.9%), 90 were overweight (27.4%), and 124 were obese (37.7%). The BMI category was associated with the primary endpoint in the fully adjusted model; the odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for overweight and obesity were respectively 1.58 [0.77-3.24] and 2.58 [1.28-5.31]. The ORs [95% CI] for ICU admission were similar for overweight (3.16 [1.29-8.06]) and obesity (3.05 [1.25-7.82]) in the fully adjusted model. The unadjusted ORs for death were similar in all BMI categories while obesity only was associated with higher risk after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that overweight (and not only obesity) is associated with ICU admission, but overweight is not associated with death.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Obesity/complications , Overweight/complications , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Mass Index , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Female , France , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Retrospective Studies
2.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 37(3): e3388, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32683744

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a rapidly progressing pandemic, with four million confirmed cases and 280 000 deaths at the time of writing. Some studies have suggested that diabetes is associated with a greater risk of developing severe forms of COVID-19. The primary objective of the present study was to compare the clinical features and outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with vs without diabetes. METHODS: All consecutive adult patients admitted to Amiens University Hospital (Amiens, France) with confirmed COVID-19 up until April 21st, 2020, were included. The composite primary endpoint comprised admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and death. Both components were also analysed separately in a logistic regression analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 433 patients (median age: 72; 238 (55%) men; diabetes: 115 (26.6%)) were included. Most of the deaths occurred in non-ICU units and among older adults. Multivariate analyses showed that diabetes was associated neither with the primary endpoint (odds ratio (OR): 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-1.90) nor with mortality (hazard ratio: 0.73; 95%CI: 0.40-1.34) but was associated with ICU admission (OR: 2.06; 95%CI 1.09-3.92, P = .027) and a longer length of hospital stay. Age was negatively associated with ICU admission and positively associated with death. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes was prevalent in a quarter of the patients hospitalized with COVID-19; it was associated with a greater risk of ICU admission but not with a significant elevation in mortality. Further investigation of the relationship between COVID-19 severity and diabetes is warranted.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Mass Index , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Female , France/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
3.
Qual Manag Health Care ; 32(3): 145-148, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36223546

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In 2017, our French 1671-bed university hospital opened a 12-bed unit for very short stays, post-emergency (unit of transitory admission in geriatric [UTAG] area), dedicated to frail patients older than 75 years requiring short-term care. We sought to investigate whether this new organization's shortened length of stay (LOS) was associated or not with a higher rate of readmission. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective descriptive study based on the daily activity of the UTAG over 6 months including all patients consecutively hospitalized in the unit via the computerized medical file of the hospital. The data collected included the Rockwood score, the primary diagnoses, the LOS and any 1-month readmission. RESULTS: From August 2019 to January 2020, 646 older adult patients were hospitalized in the UTAG. Two-thirds of the hospitalized patients were women; the mean age of this population was 86.7 ± 6.2 years. The main causes of hospitalization were infectious pathologies (19.8%), falls and their consequences (17.3%), and cardiac pathologies (17.2%). The mean LOS was of 2.7 ± 2.0. Seventy readmissions were observed in the month after discharge. One-month readmissions were more frequent when patients had presented with acute heart failure and among nursing home residents. CONCLUSION: The creation of the UTAG reduced LOS and so contributed to decreased iatrogenic disabilities without putting patients at increased risk of readmission. The development of cardiac and geriatric dedicated outpatient pathways and a community-based geriatric mobile team intervening in nursing homes could optimize the care of frail older adult patients and avoid readmissions.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Patient Readmission , Humans , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Male , Retrospective Studies , Length of Stay , Patient Discharge , Hospitals, University
4.
Vaccine ; 40(3): 531-535, 2022 01 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34893341

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in older adults. Although the advent of the first vaccines has significantly reduced these rates, data on older adults in clinical trials are scarce. OBJECTIVES: We quantified and compared the humoral response in individuals with vs. without pre-existing seropositivity to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), in a cohort of 69 patients living in a nursing home and who had received the recommended two doses of the Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech®) vaccine. RESULTS: All 69 patients (100%) tested positive for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 at 2 months post-vaccination. Residents with a pre-vaccination infection had significantly higher titers of anti-spike 1 IgG than those with no prior infection (median [interquartile range]: 55,726 [14463-78852] vs. 1314 [272-1249] arbitrary units, respectively; p < 0.001). The same result was observed for neutralizing antibodies titers (704 [320-1280] vs. 47 [20-40] respectively; p < 0.001). Between the pre-vaccination and post-vaccination periods, for IgG and neutralizing antibodies, we observed a 49 and 8-fold increase respectively. In comparison to the wild-type Receptor Binding Domain (RBD), the binding capacity of these vaccine sera was significantly decreased on the B.1.351 and P.1 variants RBD but not decreased with respect to the B.1.1.7 RBD. Although all nursing home residents developed a humoral response following Comirnaty vaccine, its intensity appeared to depend on the pre-vaccination serological status. CONCLUSION: Our results raise the question of how many doses of vaccine should be administered in older and how long the protection will be effective.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , Aged , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Immunity, Humoral , Nursing Homes , SARS-CoV-2 , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
5.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 146: 112481, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35062049

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patients over 80 years of age are more prone to develop severe symptoms and die from COVID-19. Antibiotics were massively prescribed in the first days of the pandemic without evidence of super infection. Antibiotics may increase the risk of mortality in cases of viral pneumonia. With age and antibiotic use, the microbiota becomes altered and less protective effect against lethal viral pneumonia. Thus we assessed whether it is safe to prescribe antibiotics for COVID-19 pneumonia to patients over 80 years of age. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective monocentric study in a 1240-bed university hospital. Our inclusion criteria were patients aged ≥ 80 years, hospitalized in a COVID-19 unit, with either a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR from a nasopharyngeal swab or a CT scan within 72 h after or prior to hospitalization in the unit suggestive of infection. RESULTS: We included 101 patients who received antibiotics and 48 who did not. The demographics in the two groups were similar. Overall mortality was higher for the group that received antibiotics than for the other group (36.6% vs 14.6%,). According to univariate COX analysis, the risk of mortality was higher (HR = 1.98 [0.926; 4.23]) but non-significantly for the antibiotic group. In multivariate analysis, independent risk factors of mortality were an increased leukocyte count and decreased oxygen saturation (HR = 1.097 [1.022; 1.178] and HR = 0.927 [0.891; 0.964], respectively). CONCLUSION: This study raises questions about the interest of antibiotic therapy, its efficacy, and its effect on COVID-19 and encourages further research.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19/mortality , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hospitalization , Hospitals, University , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Mortality , Multivariate Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34903505

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Since December 2019, an emerging infectious viral disease triggered by SARS-CoV-2 has caused a global pandemic. Elderly people, being more fragile, are the most affected by the severity and lethality of this disease. The residential care facility for dependent elderly people (Ehpad) and the long-term care facilities at the Amiens University Hospital registered their first COVID-19 cases in February 2020, which lead to the opening of a dedicated COVID-19 unit and aspecific protocol for isolation. METHODS: This descriptive study analysed the prevalence of COVID-19 seroconversion within the Ehpad and the long-term care facilities at the Amiens University Hospital. Both this screening test and the nasopharyngeal swab PCRs were used to assess the impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on the residents of the Ehpad and the long-term care facilities. RESULTS: On 15 and 16 June 2020, the serological tests for COVID-19 were positive for 146 (66.1%) of the residents tested. The seroconversion rate was significantly different (p < 0.001) between the Ehpad (88.7%) and the long-term care facility (45.6%). DISCUSSION: During the epidemic, there was no excess mortality index within the Ehpad and the long-term care facility services of the Amiens University Hospital. Among frail patients, the role of immunosenescence can be evoked to account for the absence of this inflammatory reaction. This study showed that isolating the infected patient in a dedicated unit significantly reduces the risk of seroconversion and contamination compared to isolating them within their own unit.

7.
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil ; 19(3): 274-278, 2021 Sep 01.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34387193

ABSTRACT

Since December 2019, an emerging infectious viral disease implicating a coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has caused a global pandemic. Elderly people, being more fragile, are the most affected by the severity and lethality of this disease. The NH and LTCU of the Amiens University Hospital registered their first Covid-19 cases in February 2020, which lead to the opening of a Covid-19 dedicated unit and of specific protocol for confinement. This descriptive study was analyzing the prevalence of Covid-19 seroconversion within the NH and the LTCU of the Amiens University Hospital. Both this screening test and the nasopharyngeal swab PCRs were in order to assess the impact of the Covid-19 epidemic in NH and LTCU. On June 15th and 16th, the serological tests for Covid-19 were positive for 146 (66.1%) of the residents tested. The seroconversion rate was significantly different (p < 0.001) between the NH (88.7%) and the LTCU (45.6%). During the epidemic, there was no excess mortality index within the NH and LTCU services of the Amiens University Hospital. Among frail patients, the role of immunosenescence can be discussed to account for the absence of this inflammatory reaction. This study showed that isolating the infected patient in a dedicated unit significantly reduces the risk of seroconversion and contamination compared to isolating them within their own unit.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Long-Term Care , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Seroconversion , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19 Serological Testing , Hospitals , Humans , Immunization, Passive , Immunosenescence , Nursing Homes , Prevalence , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Serologic Tests , COVID-19 Serotherapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL