Possible role of Cdx2 in the serrated pathway of colorectal cancer characterized by BRAF mutation, high-level CpG Island methylator phenotype and mismatch repair-deficiency.

Colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease at the histomorphological, clinical and molecular level. Approximately 20% of cases may progress through the "serrated" pathway characterized by BRAF mutation and high-level CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP). A large subgroup are additionally microsatellite instable (MSI) and demonstrate significant loss of tumor suppressor Cdx2. The aim of this study is to determine the specificity of Cdx2 protein expression and CpG promoter hypermethylation for BRAF(V600E) and high-level CIMP in colorectal cancer. Cdx2, Mlh1, Msh2, Msh6, and Pms2 were analyzed by immunohistochemistry using a multi-punch tissue microarray (TMA; n = 220 patients). KRAS and BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis, CDX2 methylation and CIMP were investigated. Loss of Cdx2 was correlated with larger tumor size (P = 0.0154), right-sided location (P = 0.0014), higher tumor grade (P < 0.0001), more advanced pT (P = 0.0234) and lymphatic invasion (P = 0.0351). Specificity was 100% for mismatch repair (MMR)-deficiency (P < 0.0001), 92.2% (P < 0.0001) for BRAF(V600E) and 91.8% for CIMP-high. Combined analysis of BRAF(V600E)/CIMP identified Cdx2 loss as sensitive (80%) and specific (91.5%) for mutation/high status. These results were validated on eight well-established colorectal cancer cell lines. CDX2 methylation correlated with BRAF(V600E) (P = 0.0184) and with Cdx2 protein loss (P = 0.0028). These results seem to indicate that Cdx2 may play a role in the serrated pathway to colorectal cancer as underlined by strong relationships with BRAF(V600E), CIMP-high and MMR-deficiency. Whether this protein can only be used as a "surrogate" marker, or is functionally involved in the progression of these tumors remains to be elucidated.

The apoptotic and proliferation rate of tumour budding cells in colorectal cancer outlines a heterogeneous population of cells with various impacts on clinical outcome.

AIMS: In colorectal cancer (CRC), tumour buds represent an aggressive cell type at the invasive front with apparently low proliferation. The aim of this study was to determine proliferation and apoptotic rates of buds in comparison to tumour centre, front and mucosa. METHODS AND RESULTS: Whole tissue sections from 188 CRC patients underwent immunohistochemistry for Ki67. Ten high-power fields (HPFs) were evaluated in mucosa, tumour centre, tumour front and tumour buds (total = 40 HPFs/case). Caspase-3 and M30 immunohistochemistry were performed on a multipunch tissue microarray from the same cohort. Ki67, caspase-3 and M30 immunoreactivity were correlated with outcome. The average percentage of cells showing Ki67 positivity was 5.2% in mucosa, and was not significantly different between the centre and front of the tumour (38.2% and 34.9%; P < 0.0001); 0.3% of buds showed Ki67 positivity (P < 0.0001). Caspase-3 expression was similar in mucosa, tumour centre and tumour front, but lower in tumour buds (<0.1%; P < 0.0001). M30 staining in buds was decreased (0.01%; P < 0.0001) in comparison to other areas. Ki67 positivity in buds was detrimental to survival in univariate (P = 0.0352) and multivariate (P = 0.0355) analysis. Caspase-3-positive tumours showed better outcome than negative tumours (P = 0.0262); but tumours with caspase-3-positive buds showed a worse outcome than those with caspase-3-negative buds (P = 0.0235). CONCLUSIONS: Ki67, caspase-3 and M30 staining is absent in most tumour buds, suggesting decreased proliferation and apoptosis. However, the fact that Ki67 and caspase-3 immunoreactivity was associated with unfavourable prognosis points to a heterogeneous population of tumour buds.

Hepatocellular and cholangiolar carcinoma-derived cell lines reveal distinct sets of chromosomal imbalances.

OBJECTIVES: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiolar carcinoma (CC) cell lines are used to analyze the basic mechanisms of carcinogenesis and target therapies. However, it is not yet clear which chromosomal aberrations are to be typically expected in such cell lines. It is also not clear whether there are prerequisites for in vitro growth on the genomic and/or expression level. We therefore analyzed HCC and CC cell lines for typical genetic settings. METHODS: The HCC cell lines HLE, HLF, Huh7, HepG2 and Hep3b and the CC cell lines EGI1, MzCha1 and TFK-1 were analyzed using high-density arrays for comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH; 244,000 oligonucleotides). Additional fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses were done to confirm the aCGH results and to add information regarding the aneuploidy of cell lines. RESULTS: The gain of 1q, in particular q21-22, was detected in all HCC cell lines also as a partial loss of 13q. In contrast, a loss of 8p in combination with a relative gain of 8q was seen in all CC but no HCC cell lines. Interestingly, a gain of 17q was seen in all cell lines. These aberrations are also well documented for surgical tumor specimens. Besides these imbalances, the cell lines revealed imbalances for 11p, 12p, 14q, 16p, 16q, 21q and 22q, respectively, only rarely seen in surgical tumor specimens. These aberrations could be of importance for the in vitro cultivation of tumor cells. Structural aberrations were accompanied by aneuploidy in 3 of 5 HCC cell lines and 2 of 3 CC cell lines. Ploidy status was not correlated to any of the imbalances mentioned above. CONCLUSIONS: HCC and CC cell lines revealed characteristic chromosomal imbalances similar to those seen in surgical tumor specimens including chromosomes 1, 8, 13 and 17, respectively. These aberrations are characteristic of the histogenetic origin of the tumor cells. However, the chromosomal imbalances that occurred probably led to the ability of tumor cells to grow in vitro.