ABSTRACT
Identifying issues in early childhood enables timely interventions, potentially mitigating future mental health risks. In this context, this study seeks to validate the model of Preschool Pediatric Symptom Checklist for detecting social and emotional challenges among Chilean preschoolers, as reported by their caregivers. In the first stage, 36 cognitive interviews using the published Spanish version of the PPSC were conducted with caregivers, parents and/or teachers of preschool aged children, so that they could review the questions and be sure that they understood them. In stage 2, 12 experts checked the questions for coherence and consistency. As a result, only one item was slightly modified. Then, 1009 preschool caregivers answered the preliminary version of the Chilean-adapted scale (PPSC-CL). Taking into account the minor changes incorporated in the scale, and using latent variable analysis techniques, it was possible to obtain evidence of validity for the four-factor structure of the PPSC-CL. Additionally, by using the questions about children's difficulties, a robust bifactor model was established, highlighting the presence of a general factor whose items have a specific component that sustain the existence of latent dimensions for internalizing, externalizing, and attentional problems. Thanks to this advancement, it will now be possible to identify and report the occurrence of global mental health challenges in preschool-aged children.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the prevalence of psychosocial risk in children and adolescents changed from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic and whether these changes differed by age group, sex, and season, based on a standardized psychosocial measure completed as a routine part of primary care. METHODS: Children and adolescents aged 5.5 to 17.9 years were screened with a parent report Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17 (PSC-17P) between November 2017 and June 2022. Changes in the prevalence of psychosocial risk (global, internalizing, externalizing, and attention scales) from before to during the pandemic were compared by age group, sex, and season. RESULTS: In a sample of 459,767 health supervision visits, the prevalence of PSC-17P global, internalizing, and attention risk worsened significantly from before to during the pandemic, especially among female adolescents (ages 12.0-17.9). For a pediatrician seeing a hypothetical sample of 1000 adolescent girls, the expected number at risk would have increased from 103 to 131 on the global scale (26.6% increase), from 189 to 231 on the internalizing subscale (22.0% increase), and from 60 to 82 on the attention subscale (35.7% increase). Seasonality had a large effect, with significantly lower PSC-17P risk in the summer every year. CONCLUSION: Data from a large, national sample of pediatric visits suggested that global, internalizing, and attention concerns increased slightly overall from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic, with different patterns by age group and sex. Adolescent girls showed substantially increased global, internalizing, and attention problems. These increases support the need for further research and additional individual and system-level interventions.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Adolescent , Child , Female , Male , Child, Preschool , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Sex Factors , Prevalence , Age FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the prevalence of psychosocial risk in children and adolescents changed from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic and whether these changes differed by age group, sex, and season, based on a standardized psychosocial measure completed as a routine part of primary care. METHODS: Children and adolescents aged 5.5 to 17.9 years were screened with a parent report Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17 (PSC-17P) between November 2017 and June 2022. Changes in the prevalence of psychosocial risk (global, internalizing, externalizing, and attention scales) from before to during the pandemic were compared by age group, sex, and season. RESULTS: In a sample of 459,767 health supervision visits, the prevalence of PSC-17P global, internalizing, and attention risk worsened significantly from before to during the pandemic, especially among female adolescents (ages 12.0-17.9). For a pediatrician seeing a hypothetical sample of 1000 adolescent girls, the expected number at risk would have increased from 103 to 131 on the global scale (26.6% increase), from 189 to 231 on the internalizing subscale (22.0% increase), and from 60 to 82 on the attention subscale (35.7% increase). Seasonality had a large effect, with significantly lower PSC-17P risk in the summer every year. CONCLUSION: Data from a large, national sample of pediatric visits suggested that global, internalizing, and attention concerns increased slightly overall from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic, with different patterns by age group and sex. Adolescent girls showed substantially increased global, internalizing, and attention problems. These increases support the need for further research and additional individual and system-level interventions.
ABSTRACT
Universal depression screening in adolescent primary care often encompasses questions about suicide risk. We conducted a retrospective chart review of well-child visits where adolescents (ages 13-17.9) had endorsed self-injurious thoughts and behaviors or suicidal ideation. The goal was to investigate primary care providers' follow-up actions, including documentation, further assessment, and referrals. Over 3-quarters of the progress notes showed evidence of further assessment, and two-thirds documented same-day actions, including mental health referrals, emergency department referrals, safety plans, medication changes, primary-care follow-up, and talking to parents. Actions varied by depression severity. Cases without interventions often had justifications. Owing to the variety of possible meanings and severity underlying positive screens, providers implemented an array of interventions, using clinical judgment to tailor actions to patients' individual needs and preferences. From these observations, we propose that standardized guidelines for suicide risk screening and follow-up should involve a clinical assessment and individualized treatment planning.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic posed numerous obstacles to psychosocial wellbeing for children. We conducted a longitudinal study to evaluate child mental health and social risks during the pandemic. METHODS: Participants were 172 caregivers of children aged 6-11 years old who attended well child visits within 6 months before pandemic onset at an urban safety net hospital in the US. Prepandemic data was extracted from the electronic medical record, and surveys were administered at three time points between August 2020 and July 2021. We measured mental health symptoms with the Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17, social risks (e.g., food and housing insecurity) with the THRIVE questionnaire, and school modality (in-person, hybrid, remote). RESULTS: Compared to pre-pandemic, children had significantly higher PSC-17 total scores (overall mental health symptoms) and THRIVE total scores (total burden of social risks) at all three mid-pandemic waves. Using longitudinal mixed models accounting for time, social risks, and school modality, both social risks (B = 0.37, SE = 0.14, p < 0.01) and school modality were significantly associated with PSC-17 scores (B = - 1.95, SE = 0.63, p < 0.01). Children attending in-person school had fewer mental health symptoms than those attending remote or hybrid school. CONCLUSION: Mental health symptoms and social risks remained significantly higher fifteen months after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to prepandemic. In-person attendance at school appeared protective against persistently elevated mental health symptoms.