Characterizing the PK/PD relationship for inhibition of capsaicin-induced dermal vasodilatation by MK-3207, an oral calcitonin gene related peptide receptor antagonist.

AIMS: Calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists are effective acute migraine treatments. A capsaicin-induced dermal vasodilatation (CIDV) model has been developed to provide target-engagement information in healthy volunteers. In the model, CGRP release is provoked after dermal capsaicin application, by activating transient receptor potential vanilloid-type-1 (TRPV1) receptors at peripheral sensory nerves. Laser Doppler imaging is used to quantify CIDV and subsequent inhibition by CGRP receptor antagonists. We sought to evaluate a CGRP receptor antagonist, MK-3207, in the biomarker model and to assess the predictability of the CIDV response to migraine clinical efficacy. METHODS: An integrated population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model was developed to describe the exposure-response relationship for CIDV inhibition by CGRP and TRPV1 receptor antagonists. MK-3207 dose-response predictions were made based on estimated potency from the PK/PD model and mean plasma concentrations observed at the doses investigated. RESULTS: The results suggested that a 20 mg dose of MK-3207 (EC50 of 1.59 nm) would be required to attain the peripheral CIDV response at a target level that was shown previously to correlate with 2 h clinical efficacy based on phase 3 telcagepant clinical data, and that a plateau of the dose-response would be reached around 40-100 mg. These predictions provided a quantitative rationale for dose selection in a phase 2 clinical trial of MK-3207 and helped with interpretation of the efficacy results from the trial. CONCLUSIONS: The integrated CIDV PK/PD model provides a useful platform for characterization of PK/PD relationships and predictions of dose-response relationships to aid in future development of CGRP and TRPV1 receptor antagonists.

The potent calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, telcagepant, does not affect nitroglycerin-induced vasodilation in healthy men.

AIMS: To assess the effect of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, telcagepant, on the haemodynamic response to sublingual nitroglycerin (NTG). METHODS: Twenty-two healthy male volunteers participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, two-period, crossover study. Subjects received 500 mg telcagepant or placebo followed, 1.5 h later, by 0.4 mg NTG. To assess the haemodynamic response the following vascular parameters were measured: blood pressure, aortic augmentation index (AIx) and brachial artery diameter (BAD). Data are presented as mean (95% confidence interval, CI). RESULTS: The aortic AIx following NTG decreased by -18.50 (-21.02, -15.98) % after telcagepant vs. -17.28 (-19.80, -14.76) % after placebo. The BAD fold increase following NTG was 1.14 (1.12, 1.17) after telcagepant vs. 1.13 (1.10, 1.15) after placebo. For both AIx and BAD, the hypothesis that telcagepant does not significantly affect the changes induced by NTG is supported (P < 0.0001). In addition, no vasoconstrictor effect of telcagepant could be demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Telcagepant did not affect NTG-induced haemodynamic changes. These data suggest that NTG-induced vasodilation is not CGRP dependent.

Effect of telcagepant on spontaneous ischemia in cardiovascular patients in a randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of the study was to explore the safety and tolerability of telcagepant in patients with stable coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND: Triptans are effective acute anti-migraine drugs whose vasoconstrictive effects limit their use in patients at risk for adverse cardiovascular events. Telcagepant, a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, is being developed for the acute treatment of migraine. Antagonism of calcitonin gene-related peptide, which does not appear to cause vasoconstriction, may allow for treatment of migraine in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, patients with documented stable coronary artery disease were assigned to 1 of 2 treatment sequences: telcagepant then placebo, or placebo then telcagepant. In each treatment period, patients received 2 doses of telcagepant 300-mg or placebo 2 hours apart. They remained in the research center for 24 hours after receiving the first dose of each period, during which time continuous 12-lead ambulatory electrocardiographic (Holter) monitoring was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled; all patients completed the study and were included in all analyses. Telcagepant was generally well tolerated. No laboratory or serious adverse experiences were reported, and no patient discontinued due to an adverse experience. There were no consistent treatment-related changes in laboratory, vital signs or electrocardiogram safety parameters. Three patients (2 after receiving placebo and 1 after receiving telcagepant) experienced ST segment depression during the study; none of these patients reported chest pain. CONCLUSIONS: Two doses of 300-mg telcagepant, administered 2 hours apart, did not appear to exacerbate spontaneous ischemia and were generally well tolerated in a small cohort of patients with stable coronary artery disease. Results of this study support further evaluation of telcagepant in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Inhibition of capsaicin-induced increase in dermal blood flow by the oral CGRP receptor antagonist, telcagepant (MK-0974).

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: * Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) was first described as a potent vasodilator. * CGRP is also increasingly recognized as a key player in the pathophysiology of migraine, and CGRP receptor antagonists potentially offer a new approach for treating migraine. * A novel pharmacodynamic assay to measure CGRP receptor antagonist activity non-invasively in humans has been developed, which involves measuring the increase in dermal blood flow induced by topical application of capsaicin on the forearm. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: * This study shows that the novel oral CGRP receptor antagonist, telcagepant, inhibits the increases in dermal blood flow induced by the topical application of capsaicin on the human forearm. * This experimental medicine model may have utility to assist in dose selection for the development of CGRP receptor antagonists. AIMS: To evaluate inhibition of capsaicin-induced increase in dermal blood flow (DBF) following telcagepant (MK-0974), a potent and selective orally bioavailable calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist being developed for the acute treatment of migraine. METHODS: A three-period crossover study in 12 healthy adult men. Each subject received a single oral dose of telcagepant 300 mg, telcagepant 800 mg or placebo at 0 h, followed 0.5 and 3.5 h later by two topical doses of 300 and 1000 microg capsaicin per 20 microl water-ethanol mixture. Capsaicin was applied at two sites on the volar surface of the subjects' left and right forearms. DBF was assessed by laser Doppler perfusion imaging immediately before ('baseline'), and 0.5 h after each capsaicin application at 1 and 4 h. Plasma samples to determine telcagepant concentrations were collected immediately after laser Doppler perfusion imaging. A pharmacodynamic model was developed to explore the relationship between plasma concentration and inhibition of capsaicin-induced increase in DBF. RESULTS: Geometric mean plasma concentrations after dosing with 300 mg and 800 mg telcagepant were 720 and 1146 nm, respectively, at 1 h, vs. 582 and 2548 nm, respectively, at 4 h. The pharmacodynamic model suggested that the EC(90) for telcagepant inhibition of capsaicin-induced increases in DBF was 909 nm. CONCLUSIONS: Telcagepant inhibits the increases in DBF induced by the topical application of capsaicin on the human forearm. This experimental medicine model may have utility to assist in dose selection for the development of CGRP receptor antagonists.

In vitro and in vivo properties of 3-tert-butyl-7-(5-methylisoxazol-3-yl)-2-(1-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-ylmethoxy)-pyrazolo[1,5-d]-[1,2,4]triazine (MRK-016), a GABAA receptor alpha5 subtype-selective inverse agonist.

3-tert-Butyl-7-(5-methylisoxazol-3-yl)-2-(1-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-ylmethoxy)-pyrazolo[1,5-d][1,2,4]triazine (MRK-016) is a pyrazolotriazine with an affinity of between 0.8 and 1.5 nM for the benzodiazepine binding site of native rat brain and recombinant human alpha1-, alpha2-, alpha3-, and alpha5-containing GABA(A) receptors. It has inverse agonist efficacy selective for the alpha5 subtype, and this alpha5 inverse agonism is greater than that of the prototypic alpha5-selective compound 3-(5-methylisoxazol-3-yl)-6-[(1-methyl-1,2,3-triazol-4-hdyl)methyloxy]-1,2,4-triazolo[3,4-a]phthalazine (alpha5IA). Consistent with its greater alpha5 inverse agonism, MRK-016 increased long-term potentiation in mouse hippocampal slices to a greater extent than alpha5IA. MRK-016 gave good receptor occupancy after oral dosing in rats, with the dose required to produce 50% occupancy being 0.39 mg/kg and a corresponding rat plasma EC(50) value of 15 ng/ml that was similar to the rhesus monkey plasma EC(50) value of 21 ng/ml obtained using [(11)C]flumazenil positron emission tomography. In normal rats, MRK-016 enhanced cognitive performance in the delayed matching-to-position version of the Morris water maze but was not anxiogenic, and in mice it was not proconvulsant and did not produce kindling. MRK-016 had a short half-life in rat, dog, and rhesus monkey (0.3-0.5 h) but had a much lower rate of turnover in human compared with rat, dog, or rhesus monkey hepatocytes. Accordingly, in human, MRK-016 had a longer half-life than in preclinical species ( approximately 3.5 h). Although it was well tolerated in young males, with a maximal tolerated single dose of 5 mg corresponding to an estimated occupancy in the region of 75%, MRK-016 was poorly tolerated in elderly subjects, even at a dose of 0.5 mg, which, along with its variable human pharmacokinetics, precluded its further development.

Tolerability, pharmacokinetics and night-time effects on postural sway and critical flicker fusion of gaboxadol and zolpidem in elderly subjects.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Body sway increases in older adults and may lead to an increase in the risk of falling. The problem of impaired stability in the elderly may be compounded by the use of hypnotics, which have been associated with an increased risk of next-day falls as well as drowsiness. The potential adverse effects of hypnotic drugs on steadiness may be exacerbated during the night, in the event that an individual needs to get out of bed. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This study examines the effects of gaboxadol (an investigational treatment for insomnia), zolpidem (a current hypnotic included as an active control) and placebo on body sway and attention/information processing ability following bedtime dosing in elderly subjects who were woken during the night for assessments. Zolpidem and gaboxadol increased body sway at various time points during the night relative to placebo; at 1.5 h post dose, the time of peak concentrations of both drugs, gaboxadol produced less impairment than zolpidem. Compared with placebo, neither gaboxadol nor zolpidem impaired attention/information-processing ability as assessed by critical flicker fusion. AIMS: To evaluate tolerability, pharmacokinetics and night-time effects on body sway and critical flicker fusion (CFF) of gaboxadol following bedtime dosing in healthy elderly subjects. METHODS: Subjects (17 women, seven men) aged 65-75 years received gaboxadol 10 mg, zolpidem 5 mg (active control) or placebo at 22.00 h in a three-period, randomized, double-blind crossover study. They were awakened during the night for evaluation of body sway and CFF. Pharmacokinetics of gaboxadol were assessed during a fourth single-blind treatment period. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: The number of subjects with adverse events was 14 for gaboxadol 10 mg, seven for zolpidem and nine for placebo; most were mild or moderate in intensity. Two women discontinued the study following gaboxadol; one vomited and one experienced a severe vasovagal syncope after venepuncture. Mean gaboxadol t(max) was 2 h, t((1/2)) was 1.7 h, AUC(0-infinity) was 430 ng.h ml(-1) and C(max) was 139 ng ml(-1). At 1.5 h and 4 h post dose, zolpidem increased body sway relative to placebo (P < 0.01). Gaboxadol increased body sway at 4 h (P < 0.001) and 8 h (P < 0.05) relative to placebo. At 1.5 h, the time point closest to peak drug concentrations, zolpidem increased body sway compared with gaboxadol (P < 0.01). Gaboxadol and zolpidem had no effects on CFF vs. placebo. CONCLUSIONS: A bedtime dose of gaboxadol 10 mg was generally well tolerated. Changes in body sway at 1.5 h after bedtime dosing were smaller with gaboxadol 10 mg than with zolpidem 5 mg, whereas changes were similar at 4 h for both treatments and returned to near baseline at 8 h.

Lack of effect of aprepitant or its prodrug fosaprepitant on QTc intervals in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: A single 115-mg dose of fosaprepitant, the IV prodrug of the NK(1) receptor antagonist aprepitant, is bioequivalent to a 125-mg dose of oral aprepitant. Thus far, fosaprepitant/aprepitant has not shown a meaningful effect on QTc intervals; in this study, we sought to confirm these findings. METHODS: This double-blind, active-controlled, randomized, three-treatment, three-period, crossover study in healthy young subjects evaluated the effect of a 200-mg dose of fosaprepitant on QTc prolongation. In each period, subjects received 400 mg moxifloxacin per os, 200 mg fosaprepitant IV, or placebo in randomized sequence. The effect of fosaprepitant on QTc interval was assessed by 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs). The baseline value for QTc interval for each subject during each period was defined as the average of five replicate baseline QTc intervals extracted from predose ECGs. ECGs were performed at predose, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 min; and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 h postinfusion. Values for individual QTc change from baseline were evaluated in a repeated-measures mixed model appropriate for a crossover design. A two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for the true difference in QTc interval change from baseline at each timepoint was calculated for fosaprepitant versus placebo and for moxifloxacin versus placebo. RESULTS: After fosaprepitant 200-mg administration, the mean (95% CI) QTc interval change from baseline at T(max) was -1.45 (-4.67 to 1.77) ms, and the placebo-corrected mean (90% CI) QTc interval change from baseline was -1.37 (-4.78 to 2.05) ms. Neither was statistically significant at alpha = 0.05. After 400 mg moxifloxacin administration, the mean (95% CI) QTc interval change from baseline at 2 h was 9.71 (6.49-12.93) ms, and the placebo-corrected mean (90% CI) QTc interval change from baseline at moxifloxacin T(max) was 10.50 (7.09-13.92) ms. Both were statistically significant at alpha = 0.05. The maximum aprepitant concentration after fosaprepitant 200 mg administration was 6300 ng/mL (approximately twofold, fourfold, and ninefold higher than that observed historically with fosaprepitant 115 mg [3095 ng/mL], aprepitant 125 mg [1600 ng/mL], and aprepitant 40 mg [675 ng/mL]). CONCLUSIONS: In subjects receiving fosaprepitant 200 mg, no clinically meaningful increases in QTc were seen at any timepoint, whereas after moxifloxacin 400 mg, increases were observed at the approximate T(max) of moxifloxacin and additional timepoints. The lack of QTc increase at this high dose of fosaprepitant and resulting aprepitant plasma exposures support the expectation that clinical doses of fosaprepitant or aprepitant will not be associated with significant QTc prolongation.

Tolerability of fosaprepitant and bioequivalency to aprepitant in healthy subjects.

Fosaprepitant is an intravenous formulation of aprepitant, an oral NK1 antagonist used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. This randomized study was designed to evaluate fosaprepitant in polysorbate 80 vehicle for tolerability and bioequivalency to aprepitant. Tolerability was assessed by physical and laboratory examinations and adverse events. Plasma collected for 72 hours was assayed for aprepitant and fosaprepitant. Analysis of variance models were applied to natural log-transformed aprepitant area under the curve (AUC) data. Fosaprepitant up to 150 mg (1 mg/mL) was generally well tolerated. Fosaprepitant 115 mg was AUC bioequivalent to aprepitant 125 mg; the 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean ratio of aprepitant AUC for fosaprepitant 115 mg/aprepitant 125 mg fell within prespecified equivalence bounds of 0.80 to 1.25.

Lack of effect of aprepitant on hydrodolasetron pharmacokinetics in CYP2D6 extensive and poor metabolizers.

To prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, aprepitant is given with a corticosteroid and a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 antagonist, such as dolasetron. Dolasetron is converted to the active metabolite hydrodolasetron, which is cleared largely via CYP2D6. The authors determined whether aprepitant, a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor, alters hydrodolasetron pharmacokinetics in CYP2D6 poor and extensive metabolizers. Six CYP2D6 poor and 6 extensive metabolizers were randomized in an open-label, crossover fashion to treatment A (dolasetron 100 mg on day 1) and treatment B (dolasetron 100 mg plus aprepitant 125 mg on day 1, aprepitant 80 mg on days 2-3). For hydrodolasetron area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC0-infinity) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax), geometric mean ratios (B/A) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) fell below the predefined limit (2.0) for clinical significance (AUC0-infinity, 1.09 [90% CI, 1.01-1.18], Cmax, 1.08 [90% CI, 0.94-1.24]). Aprepitant did not affect the pharmacokinetics of hydrodolasetron, regardless of CYP2D6 metabolizer type, and was generally well tolerated when coadministered with dolasetron in volunteers.

Pharmacokinetics of famotidine in infants.

BACKGROUND: Although famotidine pharmacokinetics are similar in adults and children older than 1 year of age, they differ in neonates owing to developmental immaturity in renal function. Little is currently known about the pharmacokinetics of famotidine in infants aged between 1 month and 1 year, a period when renal function is maturing. OBJECTIVE: To characterise the pharmacokinetics of famotidine in infants. DESIGN: This was a two-part multicentre study with both single dose (Part I, open-label) and multiple dose (Part II, randomised) arms. PATIENTS: Thirty-six infants (20 females and 16 males) who required treatment with famotidine and who had an indwelling arterial or venous catheter for reasons unrelated to the study. METHODS: Infants in Part I were administered a single dose of famotidine 0.5 mg/kg; the dose was intravenous or oral according to the judgement of the attending physician. Infants receiving 0.5 mg/kg intravenously were divided into two groups by age, and pharmacokinetic parameters in infants 0-3 months and >3 to 12 months of age were compared. Infants in Part II were randomised to one of the following treatments: 0.25 mg/kg/dose intravenously or 0.5 mg/kg/dose orally on day 1 and subsequent days, or 0.25 mg/kg/dose intravenously or 0.5 mg/kg/dose orally on day 1 followed by doses of either 0.5 mg/kg/dose intravenously or 1 mg/kg/dose orally on subsequent days. From day 2 onwards, age-adjusted dose administration regimens (once daily in infants <3 months of age and every 12 hours in infants >3 months of age) were used; the total number of famotidine doses ranged from 3 to 11 and the total number of days of dose administration ranged from two to eight. RESULTS: In infants <3 months of age, plasma and renal clearance of famotidine were decreased compared with infants >3 months of age. Pharmacokinetic parameters for the older infants (i.e. those >3 months) were similar to those previously reported for children and adults. Approximate dose-proportionality, no accumulation on multiple dosing and an estimated bioavailability similar to adult values were also observed. CONCLUSION: A short course of famotidine therapy in infants appears generally well tolerated, and the characteristics of famotidine pharmacokinetics during the first year of life are explained to a great degree by the development of renal function, the primary route of elimination for this drug.

Lack of effect of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Aprepitant is a selective neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist that is effective for the prevention of nausea and vomiting caused by highly emetogenic chemotherapy. In vitro, aprepitant is a moderate inhibitor of the CYP3A4 enzyme, which is involved in the clearance of several chemotherapeutic agents. In this study we examined the potential for aprepitant to affect the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of intravenously administered docetaxel, a chemotherapeutic agent that is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4. METHODS: A total of 11 cancer patients (4 male, 7 female, aged 50-68 years) were enrolled in this multicenter, randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover study. Patients received a single infusion of docetaxel monotherapy, 60-100 mg/m(2), on two occasions at least 3 weeks apart. During one of the cycles (treatment A), patients received docetaxel alone. During the alternate cycle (treatment B), they also received aprepitant 125 mg orally 1 h prior to docetaxel infusion (day 1), and a single oral dose of aprepitant 80 mg on days 2 and 3. The pharmacokinetic profile of docetaxel was assessed over 30 h following docetaxel infusion. Blood counts were monitored on days 1, 4, 7, and 14. RESULTS: Ten patients completed the study. Concomitant administration of aprepitant did not cause any statistically or clinically significant changes in docetaxel pharmacokinetics. Values for docetaxel alone (treatment A) versus docetaxel with aprepitant (treatment B) were as follows: geometric mean AUC(0-last) was 3.26 vs 3.17 microg h/ml (P>0.25; ratio B/A 0.97); geometric mean AUC(0-infinity) 3.51 vs 3.39 microg h/ml (P>0.25; ratio B/A 0.96); geometric mean C(max) was 3.53 vs 3.37 microg/ml (P>0.25; ratio B/A 0.95); and geometric mean plasma clearance was 23.3 vs 24.2 l/h/m(2) (P>0.25; ratio B/A 1.04). The corresponding harmonic mean half-life values were 10.1 and 8.5 h. The two treatment regimens had similar tolerability profiles; the median absolute neutrophil count nadirs were 681/mm(3) during treatment with docetaxel alone and 975/mm(3) during aprepitant coadministration. CONCLUSIONS: Aprepitant had no clinically significant effect on either the pharmacokinetics or toxicity of standard doses of docetaxel in cancer patients. Aprepitant at clinically recommended doses may have a low potential to affect the pharmacokinetics of intravenous chemotherapeutic agents metabolized by CYP3A4.

Effects of the neurokinin1 receptor antagonist aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone.

BACKGROUND: Aprepitant is a neurokinin(1) receptor antagonist that, in combination with a corticosteroid and a 5-hydroxytryptamine(3) receptor antagonist, has been shown to be very effective in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. At doses used for the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, aprepitant is a moderate inhibitor of cytochrome P4503A4 and may be used in conjunction with corticosteroids such as dexamethasone and methylprednisolone, which are substrates of cytochrome P4503A4. The effects of aprepitant on the these 2 corticosteroids were evaluated. METHODS: Study 1 was an open-label, randomized, incomplete-block, 3-period crossover study with 20 subjects. Treatment A consisted of a standard oral dexamethasone regimen for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (20 mg dexamethasone on day 1, 8 mg dexamethasone on days 2 to 5). Treatment B was used to examine the effects of oral aprepitant (125 mg aprepitant on day 1, 80 mg aprepitant on days 2 to 5) on the standard dexamethasone regimen. Treatment C was used to examine the effects of aprepitant on a modified dexamethasone regimen (12 mg dexamethasone on day 1, 4 mg dexamethasone on days 2 to 5). All subjects also received 32 mg ondansetron intravenously on day 1 only. Study 2 was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 2-period crossover study with 10 subjects. Subjects in one group received a regimen consisting of 125 mg methylprednisolone intravenously on day 1 and 40 mg methylprednisolone orally on days 2 to 3. Subjects in the other group received oral aprepitant (125 mg aprepitant on day 1, 80 mg aprepitant on days 2 to 3) in addition to the methylprednisolone regimen. RESULTS: In study 1, the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC(0-24)) of oral dexamethasone on days 1 and 5 after the standard dexamethasone plus ondansetron regimen (treatment A) was increased 2.2-fold (P <.010) with coadministration of aprepitant (treatment B). Coadministration of aprepitant with the modified dexamethasone plus ondansetron regimen (treatment C) resulted in an AUC0-24 for dexamethasone similar to that observed after the standard dexamethasone plus ondansetron regimen (treatment A). In study 2, aprepitant increased the AUC0-24 of intravenous methylprednisolone 1.3-fold on day 1 (P <.010) and increased the AUC0-24 of oral methylprednisolone 2.5-fold on day 3 (P <.010). CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of aprepitant with dexamethasone or methylprednisolone resulted in increased plasma concentrations of the corticosteroids. These findings suggest that the dose of these corticosteroids should be adjusted when given with aprepitant.

Lack of effect of aprepitant on digoxin pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects.

Aprepitant is a highly selective neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist that, in combination with a corticosteroid and a 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5HT3) receptor antagonist, has been shown to be efficacious in the prevention of highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. In vitro data suggest that aprepitant is a substrate and a weak inhibitor of P-glycoprotein. Thus, the effect of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin, a P-glycoprotein substrate, was examined in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, two-period crossover study in 12 healthy subjects. Each subject received daily oral doses of digoxin 0.25 mg on Days 1 through 13 during both treatment periods. Aprepitant 125 mg (or matching placebo) was coadministered orally with digoxin on Day 7, and aprepitant 80 mg (or matching placebo) was coadministered orally with digoxin on Days 8 to 11. Aprepitant did not affect the pharmacokinetics of digoxin. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval [CI]) for plasma AUC0-24 h of digoxin (with/without aprepitant) were 0.99 (0.91, 1.09) and 0.93 (0.83, 1.05) on Days 7 and 11, respectively, and the geometric mean ratios (90% CI) for the 24-hour urinary excretion of immunoreactive digoxin (with/without aprepitant) were 0.91 (0.80, 1.04) and 1.00 (0.91, 1.09) on Days 7 and 11, respectively. Thus, aprepitant, when dosed as a 5-day regimen, did not interact with a known substrate of the P-glycoprotein transporter.

Effects of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron and granisetron in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: The neurokinin-1-receptor antagonist aprepitant, when given in combination with a corticosteroid and a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT(3))-receptor antagonist, has been shown to be effective for the prevention of acute and delated chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). OBJECTIVE: Two studies were conducted to determine whether concomitant administration of aprepitant altered the pharmacokinetic profiles of ondansetron and granisetron, two 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists commonly used as antiemetic therapy for CINV. METHODS: The 2 studies were randomized, open-label, crossover trials conducted in healthy subjects aged between 18 and 46 years. Study 1 involved the following 2 treatment regimens: aprepitant 375 mg PO, dexamethasone 20 mg PO, and ondansetron 32 mg IV on day 1, followed by aprepitant 250 mg PO and dexamethasone 8 mg PO on days 2 through 5; and dexamethasone 20 mg PO and ondansetron 32 mg IV on day 1, followed by dexamethasone 8 mg PO on days 2 through 5. Study 2 involved the following 2 treatment regimens: aprepitant 125 mg PO with granisetron 2 mg PO on day 1, followed by aprepitant 80 mg PO on days 2 and 3; and granisetron 2 mg PO on day 1 only. Individual plasma samples were used to estimate area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0- infinity )), peak plasma concentration, and apparent terminal elimination half-life (t(12)) of both ondansetron and granisetron. RESULTS: Study 1 included 19 subjects (10 women, 9 men), and study 2 included 18 subjects (11 men, 7 women). Coadministration of aprepitant 375 mg produced a small but statistically significant increase in the AUC(0- infinity ) for intravenous ondansetron (from 1268.3 to 1456.5 ng.h/mL; P = 0.019), with no significant effect on peak concentration at the end of the infusion (360.8 ng/mL with aprepitant vs 408.4 ng/mL without) or t(12) (5.0 vs 4.5 hours, respectively). Coadministration of aprepitant 125 mg/80 mg did not alter the mean pharmacokinetic characteristics of oral granisetron (AUC(0- infinity ), 101.4 ng.h/mL with aprepitant vs 92.2 ng.h/mL without; maximum plasma concentration, 9.0 ng/mL with and without aprepitant; time to maximum plasma concentration, both 3.0 hours; t(12), 6.5 vs 6.9 hours, respectively). CONCLUSION: Concomitant administration of aprepitant had no clinically significant effect on the mean pharmacokinetic characteristics of either ondansetron or granisetron in these healthy subjects.

Early-stage comparative effectiveness: randomized controlled trial with histamine inverse agonist MK-7288 in excessive daytime sleepiness patients.

Histaminergic neurons are regulators of the sleep-wake cycle. We evaluated the alerting effects of MK-7288 (10, 20 mg), a novel histamine-3 receptor inverse agonist (H3RIA), along with modafinil (200 mg), a standard treatment, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover study of 56 patients with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). Efficacy was assessed using maintenance of wakefulness tests (MWT) and car driving simulation tests. MK-7288 and modafinil significantly prolonged MWT sleep latency (improvements vs. placebo of 8.1 to 8.2 min for MK-7288 and 10.2 min for modafinil), and improved car driving simulation standard deviation of lane position (reduction vs. placebo of -0.1 m for each treatment). MK-7288 was associated with more insomnia (29%) than modafinil (9%) and placebo (6%). The study demonstrated the potential of the H3RIA mechanism for treating EDS, but did not show efficacy differentiation from modafinil. Early-stage comparative effectiveness can help prevent late-stage failure and increase the cost-effectiveness of drug development.

A Single-Dose Bioequivalence and Food Effect Study With Aprepitant and Fosaprepitant Dimeglumine in Healthy Young Adult Subjects.

Fosaprepitant dimeglumine, a lyophilized prodrug, is rapidly converted to aprepitant, a substance P/neurokinin 1 (NK1 ) receptor antagonist. Intravenous (IV) fosaprepitant and oral aprepitant are used in combination with other antiemetics to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. This randomized, phase 1 study was designed to assess the aprepitant area under the curve (AUC0-∞ ) equivalence of a single, oral 165-mg or 185-mg dose of aprepitant to a single 150-mg fosaprepitant IV dose infused over 20 minutes, and to evaluate the effect of food on the bioavailability of the oral 165-mg and 185-mg aprepitant doses. Plasma samples were analyzed for aprepitant, and linear mixed-effects models were applied to natural log-transformed aprepitant AUC data. A 2 one-sided tests procedure was used to evaluate bioequivalence; the adjusted P values for the AUC0-∞ of both oral doses versus the IV dose were < .05, supporting the hypothesis that each single, oral dose of aprepitant is equivalent to the AUC0-∞ of a single IV infusion of fosaprepitant. Food effect results suggest that dose adjustment would not be necessary with a single oral dose of aprepitant. Single-dose administration of oral 165 mg and 185 mg aprepitant and IV 150 mg fosaprepitant was generally well tolerated.

Effect of a novel histamine subtype-3 receptor inverse agonist and modafinil on EEG power spectra during sleep deprivation and recovery sleep in male volunteers.

RATIONALE: Histamine and dopamine contribute to the maintenance of wakefulness. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to conduct an exploratory analysis of the effects of 10 and 50 mg of MK-0249, a novel histamine subtype-3 receptor inverse agonist, and 200 mg of modafinil, a presumed dopaminergic compound, on EEG power spectra during sleep deprivation and subsequent recovery sleep. METHODS: A total of 25 healthy men were recruited to a double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over design. EEG power spectra, an electrophysiological marker of changes in sleepiness and vigilance, were obtained at the beginning of wake maintenance tests at two-hourly intervals throughout a night and day of sleep deprivation, which is an established model of excessive sleepiness. RESULTS: After placebo, sleep deprivation was associated with enhancements in delta and theta and reductions in alpha and beta activity. Following dosing at 02:00 h, MK-0249 and modafinil reduced delta and theta activity and enhanced alpha and beta activity, compared to placebo. During recovery sleep initiated at 21:00 h, latency to sleep onset and number of awakenings were not different from placebo for any of the active treatments. Wake after sleep onset and stage 1% was increased and total sleep time, SWS% and REM% were reduced after both doses of MK-0249. Compared to placebo, MK-0249, the 50-mg dose in particular, reduced activity in some delta and theta/alpha frequencies and enhanced beta activity during NREM sleep and REM sleep. After modafinil, no changes were observed for power spectra during sleep. CONCLUSION: Both MK-0249 and modafinil exert effects on the EEG which are consistent with wake promotion.

Double-blind crossover study to assess potential differences in cytochrome P450 3A4 activity in healthy subjects receiving ondansetron plus dexamethasone, with and without aprepitant.

PURPOSE: Because glucocorticoids and the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist aprepitant influence CYP3A4 activity, this study assessed whether aprepitant added to a 5-HT(3) antagonist and glucocorticoid would affect CYP3A4 induction. METHODS: In this double-blind, 2-period crossover study, 12 subjects were randomized to receive a triple regimen (oral aprepitant [A] 125 mg, intravenous ondansetron [O] 32 mg, and oral dexamethasone [D] 12 mg day 1; A 80 mg and D 8 mg days 2-3; D 8 mg day 4) in 1 of 2 periods, and a dual regimen (O 32 mg and D 20 mg day 1; D 8 mg bid days 2-4); the D dose was adjusted to account for known dexamethasone/aprepitant interaction. Oral (2 mg) and intravenous (1 mg) stable isotope ((13)C(5) (15)N(1))-labeled midazolam were simultaneously given as probes on days -1, 6, 8, 15, and 22 of each period. If the a priori 90% confidence interval for the day 6 geometric mean oral midazolam AUC(0-∞) ratio (triple/dual regimen) of fold-change from baseline was above 0.5, it would be concluded that there was no clinically meaningful between-regimen difference in CYP3A4 activity. RESULTS: Day 6 oral midazolam AUC(0-∞) geometric mean fold-change from baseline was 0.84 (0.30-1.58 with A, 0.46-1.69 without A). The ratio of geometric mean oral midazolam AUC(0-∞) fold-changes was 1.00 (90% confidence interval 0.80, 1.25). CONCLUSIONS: Aprepitant plus a 5-HT(3) antagonist and dexamethasone is unlikely to have a significant additional inductive effect on CYP3A4 activity beyond that of the dual regimen.

The Dose Proportionality of Telcagepant after Administration of Single Oral and Intravenous Doses in Healthy Adult Subjects.

INTRODUCTION: Telcagepant (MK-0974) is a novel, orally active and selective CGRP receptor antagonist being investigated for acute treatment of migraine. Early clinical data suggested greater than dose proportional increases in exposure following oral administration. The aim of the present studies was to definitively characterize the oral and IV dose proportionality of telcagepant. METHODS: Healthy adult subjects were enrolled in two separate open-label randomized dose proportionality studies: 1) single oral dose crossover from 50 to 600 mg (N = 19); 2) single IV dose parallel group from 5 to 250 mg (N = 10 per dose). Blood samples were collected at time points from 0 to 48 hours postdose. RESULTS: Telcagepant was rapidly absorbed with a T(max) of approximately 1 to 2 hours after oral administration. The terminal half-life was approximately 8 to 9 hours after IV dosing and approximately 4 to 7 hours after oral dosing. Oral administration of telcagepant resulted in greater than dose proportional increases in exposure, while IV administration resulted in approximately dose proportional increases in exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Telcagepant was generally well tolerated. Oral telcagepant exhibits non-linear pharmacokinetics.

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and tolerability of telcagepant, an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, in adults.

Telcagepant is a novel, orally active, and selective calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist being developed for acute treatment of migraine with and without aura. Three separate clinical studies were conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of telcagepant following single oral doses in healthy young and elderly men and women and multiple oral doses in men. Telcagepant was rapidly absorbed with a time to maximum concentration of approximately 1.5 hours. The terminal half-life was approximately 6 hours. A greater than dose-proportional increase was observed in the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from zero to infinity. Following twice-daily dosing, with each dose separated by 2 hours, steady state was achieved in approximately 3 to 4 days with an accumulation ratio of approximately 2. There were no clinically meaningful pharmacokinetic differences when compared across age and gender. Telcagepant was generally well tolerated up to single doses of 1200 mg and multiple doses of 400 mg twice daily.