The RECIPE study: reducing emergency Caesareans and improving the Primiparous experience: a blinded, prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: The RECIPE study aims to validate a risk prediction model for intrapartum caesarean delivery which has been developed by our group. The Genesis study was a prospective observational study carried out by the Perinatal Ireland Research Consortium across 7 clinical centres in Ireland between October 2012 and June 2015. Genesis investigated a range of maternal and fetal parameters in a prospective blinded study of 2336 singleton pregnancies between 39 + 0-41 + 0 weeks' gestational age. This resulted in the development of a risk prediction model for Caesarean Delivery in nulliparous women at term. The RECIPE study now proposes to provide external validation of this risk prediction tool. METHODS: In order to externally validate the model, we aim to include a centre which was not involved in the original study. We propose a trial of risk-assignment for intrapartum caesarean amongst nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy between 38 + 0 and 40 + 6 weeks' gestational age who are planning a vaginal birth. Results of the risk prediction tool will be concealed from participants and from midwives and doctors providing labour care.. Participants will be invited for an ultrasound scan and delivery details will be collated postnatally. The principal aim of this study is to externally validate the risk prediction model. This prediction model holds the potential to accurately identify nulliparous women who are likely to achieve an uncomplicated vaginal birth and those at high prospect of requiring an unplanned caesarean delivery. DISCUSSION: Validation of the Genesis prediction model would enable more accurate counselling for women in the antenatal setting regarding their own likelihood of requiring an intrapartum Caesarean section. It would also provide valuable personalised information to women about the anticipated course of their own labour. We believe that this is an issue of national relevance that will impact positively on obstetric practice, and will positively empower women to make considered, personalised choices surrounding labour and delivery.

The effect of maternal subclinical hypothyroidism on IQ in 7- to 8-year-old children: A case-control review.

BACKGROUND: In Ireland, pregnant women are not routinely screened for subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH). AIM: Our objective was to compare the intelligence quotient (IQ) of children whose mothers had been diagnosed with SCH prenatally with matched controls using a case-control retrospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a previous study from our group, 1000 healthy nulliparous women were screened anonymously for SCH. This was a laboratory diagnosis involving elevated TSH with normal fT4 or normal TSH with hypothyroxinaemia. We identified 23 cases who agreed to participate. These were matched with 47 controls. All children underwent neurodevelopmental assessment at age 7-8. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children IV assessment scores were used to compare the groups. Our main outcome measure was to identify whether there was a difference in IQ between the groups. RESULTS: From the cohort of cases, 23 mothers agreed to the assessment of their children as well as 47 controls. The children in the control group had higher mean scores than those in the case group across Verbal Comprehension Intelligence, Perceptual Reasoning Intelligence, Working Memory Intelligence, Processing Speed Intelligence and Full Scale IQ. Mann-Whitney U-test confirmed a significant difference in IQ between the cases (composite score 103.87) and the controls (composite score 109.11) with a 95% confidence interval (0.144, 10.330). CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight significant differences in IQ of children of mothers who had unrecognised SCH during pregnancy. While our study size and design prevents us from making statements on causation, our data suggest significant potential public health implications for routine prenatal screening.

Postoperative Ovarian Morphology on Ultrasound after Ovarian Torsion-Effect of Immediate Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine if ovarian surgery at the time of ovarian detorsion is associated with impaired short-term ovarian function as indicated by ovarian morphology on ultrasound when compared with detorsion alone. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study SETTING: The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto PARTICIPANTS: Patients ≤ 18 years old with confirmed ovarian torsion from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2018, with ovarian-sparing surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were collected on demographics, procedure, intraoperative findings, and postoperative ultrasound. To determine ovarian function, we compared the morphology on the postoperative ultrasound between those with surgery to the ovary and those without surgery to the ovary at the time of detorsion. We also compared the ovarian volume of affected and contralateral ovaries after detorsion and surgery to the affected ovary. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 67 (56%) had detorsion with surgery to the ovary and 52 (44%) had detorsion alone. There was no statistically significant difference in appearance on the postoperative ultrasound between these groups (P =.446). There was also no statistically significant difference on the postoperative ultrasound of affected and contralateral ovarian volumes after detorsion and surgery to the affected ovary (P = .69). Patients who underwent surgery to the ovary experienced a lower rate of recurrence; however, this did not reach statistical significance, with a P value of 0.080. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that surgery, eg cystectomy to the ovary at the time of ovarian detorsion, does not appear to impact ovarian function when compared with detorsion alone, as indicated on postoperative imaging. There was also no difference in volume of the affected and contralateral ovaries in those cases that underwent surgery at the time of initial detorsion. This evidence would support that immediate cystectomy at the time of initial ovarian detorsion is not associated with impaired ovarian function, thus avoiding the need for an interval cystectomy.

Loss of STARD10 expression identifies a group of poor prognosis breast cancers independent of HER2/Neu and triple negative status.

The phospholipid transfer protein STARD10 cooperates with c-erbB signaling and is overexpressed in Neu/ErbB2 breast cancers. We investigated if STARD10 expression provides additional prognostic information to HER2/neu status in primary breast cancer. A published gene expression dataset was used to determine relationships between STARD10 and HER2 mRNA levels and patient outcome. The central findings were independently validated by immunohistochemistry in a retrospective cohort of 222 patients with breast cancer with a median follow-up of 64 months. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Patients with low STARD10 or high HER2 tumor mRNA levels formed discrete groups each associated with a poor disease-specific survival (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0058, respectively). In the immunohistochemical study low/absent STARD10 expression i.e. < or = 10% positive cells was observed in 24 of 222 (11%) tumors. In a univariate model, low/absent STARD10 expression was significantly associated with decreased patient survival (p = 0.0008). In multivariate analyses incorporating tumor size, tumor grade, lymph node status, ER, PR and HER2 status, low STARD10 expression was an independent predictor of death from breast cancer (HR: 2.56 (95% CI: 1.27-5.18), p = 0.0086). Furthermore, low/absent STARD10 expression, HER2 amplification and triple negative status were independent prognostic variables. Loss of STARD10 expression may provide an additional marker of poor outcome in breast cancer identifying a subgroup of patients with a particularly adverse prognosis, which is independent of HER2 amplification and the triple negative phenotype.

High Notch1 protein expression is an early event in breast cancer development and is associated with the HER-2 molecular subtype.

AIMS: Activation of Notch signalling results in hyperplasia and tumorigenesis in murine mammary epithelium. However, there is little information regarding the expression of Notch1 in premalignant lesions and early breast cancer. We investigated expression of Notch1 in breast cancer development and its association with molecular subtypes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Immunohistochemical expression of Notch1 was determined in a murine model of mammary carcinogenesis and in breast tissue from two cohorts of breast cancer patients, the first (n=222) comprising a histological progression series and the second an outcome series of 228 patients with operable invasive ductal carcinoma. Enhanced expression of Notch1 protein was an early event in both murine and human breast cancer development with progressive increases in expression with the development of hyperplasia and malignancy. High Notch1 was not prognostic in the outcome cohort. There was, however, a highly significant association of high Notch1 protein with the HER-2 molecular subtype of breast cancer (P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that aberrant Notch regulation is an early event in mammary carcinogenesis and is associated with the HER-2 molecular subtype of breast cancer, and suggest the Notch signalling pathway may be a potential therapeutic target worthy of further investigation.

Reducing emergency cesarean delivery and improving the primiparous experience: Findings of the RECIPE study.

OBJECTIVE: The ability to predict the need for emergency Cesarean delivery holds the potential to facilitate birth choices. The objective of the RECIPE study (Reducing Emergency Cesarean delivery and Improving the Primiparous Experience) was to externally validate a Cesarean delivery risk prediction model. This model, developed by the Genesis study, identified five key predictive factors for emergency Cesarean delivery: maternal age, maternal height, BMI, fetal head circumference (HC) and fetal abdominal circumference (AC). STUDY DESIGN: This prospective, observational study was conducted in two tertiary referral perinatal centers. Inclusion criteria were as follows: primiparous women with a singleton, cephalic presentation fetus in the absence of fetal growth restriction (FGR), oligohydramnios, pre-eclampsia, pre-existing diabetes mellitus or an indication for planned Cesarean delivery. Between 38 + 0 and 40 + 6 weeks' gestational age, participants attended for prenatal assessment that enabled the determination of an individualized risk calculation for emergency Cesarean delivery during labour based on maternal height, BMI, fetal HC and AC, with crucially both participants and care providers being blinded to the resultant risk prediction score. Labor, delivery and postnatal outcomes were ascertained. Calibration and receiver operator curves were generated to determine the predictive capacity for emergency Cesarean delivery of the Genesis risk prediction model in this cohort. RESULTS: 559 primiparous participants were enrolled from May 2017 to April 2019, of whom 142 (25 %) had an emergency Cesarean delivery during labour. Participants with a low predicted risk score (<10 %) had a mean predicted rate of 8% (+/- standard deviation of 2%) and a similarly low actual observed rate of Cesarean delivery (8%). Participants with a high predicted risk (>50 %) had a mean predicted Cesarean delivery rate of 64 % (+/- standard deviation of 9%) and also had a high actual observed Cesarean delivery rate (62 %). The calibration curve and receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated that this validation study had comparable discriminatory power for emergency Cesarean delivery to that described in the original Genesis study. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) in Genesis was 0.69, whereas the AUC in RECIPE was 0.72, which reflects good predictive capacity of the risk prediction model. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the Genesis Cesarean delivery prediction tool is supported by this validation study.

Inter-hospital comparison of Cesarean delivery rates should not be considered to reflect quality of care without consideration of patient heterogeneity: An observational study.

OBJECTIVE: Contemporary approaches to monitoring quality of care in obstetrics often focus on comparing Cesarean Delivery rates. Varied rates can complicate interpretation of quality of care. We previously developed a risk prediction tool for nulliparous women who may require intrapartum Cesarean delivery which identified five key predictors. Our objective with this study was to ascertain if patient heterogeneity can account for much of the observed variation in Cesarean delivery rates, thereby enabling Cesarean delivery rates to be a better marker of quality of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the Genesis study. This was a large prospective study of 2336 nulliparous singleton pregnancies recruited at seven hospitals. A heterogeneity score was calculated for each hospital. An adjusted Cesarean delivery rate was also calculated incorporating the heterogeneous risk score. RESULTS: A cut-off at the 90th percentile was determined for each predictive factor. Above the 90th percentile was considered to represent 'high risk' (with the exception of maternal height which identified those below the 10th percentile). The patient heterogeneous risk score was defined as the number of risk factors > 90th percentile (<10th percentile for height). An unequal distribution of high-risk patients between centers was observed (p < 0.001). The correlation between the Cesarean delivery rate and the patient heterogeneous risk score was high (0.76, p < 0.05). When adjusted for patient heterogeneity, Cesarean delivery rates became closer aligned. CONCLUSION: Inter-institutional diversity is common. We suggest that crude comparison of Cesarean delivery rates between different hospitals as a marker of care quality is inappropriate. Allowing for marked differences in patient characteristics is essential for correct interpretation of such comparisons.

c-Myc overexpression and endocrine resistance in breast cancer.

The oncoprotein c-Myc is frequently overexpressed in breast cancer and ectopic expression in breast cancer cell lines attenuates responses to antiestrogen treatment. Here, we review preliminary data aimed at further elucidating a potential role for c-Myc in clinical endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Immunohistochemical and semi-quantitative PCR revealed that c-Myc protein and c-myc mRNA were frequently overexpressed in both ER-positive and ER-negative breast carcinoma. Furthermore, both constitutive and inducible c-Myc overexpression in MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines markedly reduced their sensitivity to the growth inhibitory effects of the pure antiestrogen ICI 182,780. In order to identify potential downstream targets of c-Myc that mediate this effect, Affymetrix microarrays were employed to examine the patterns of gene expression shared by MCF-7 cells stimulated by estrogen, or by induction of c-Myc. Approximately 50% of estrogen target genes identified 6h after treatment were also regulated by c-Myc. One novel target, EMU4, was transcriptionally regulated by c-Myc. In addition, there was a strong correlation between c-myc and EMU4 mRNA expression in a battery of breast cancer cell lines. These data confirm that c-Myc overexpression is a common event in breast cancer, and that this is associated with resistance to antiestrogens in vitro. Furthermore, the development of an experimental paradigm for the discovery of c-Myc and estrogen target genes associated with endocrine resistance provides a framework for the discovery and validation of genes involved in estrogen signalling, and c-Myc-mediated-antiestrogen resistance.

Jehovah's Witness patients presenting with ruptured ectopic pregnancies: two case reports.

INTRODUCTION: The management of emergencies in Jehovah's Witnesses presents several challenges to obstetricians and gynaecologists. We present two cases of ectopic pregnancies in Jehovah's Witnesses recently managed in our institution. This is the first case review series of its kind that we could identify. We feel it is of clinical importance for all physicians caring for Jehovah's Witnesses. CASE PRESENTATION: The first patient was a 28-year-old Caucasian Irish woman who presented in a state of collapse and a ruptured ectopic pregnancy was suspected. She refused treatment and took her own discharge against the advice of senior hospital staff. She re-presented to our Emergency Room 6 hours later in hypovolaemic shock. She ultimately consented to blood products including plasma and platelets and underwent laparoscopic left-sided salpingectomy. This consent was queried postoperatively by her next-of-kin but the validity of her consent was clarified by the hospital legal team.The second patient was a 35-year-old Nigerian woman who presented to our Emergency Room with a 2-week history of intermittent vaginal bleeding and abdominal pain with a haemoglobin of 5.4 g/dL. An ectopic pregnancy was diagnosed following assessment. She refused all blood products and underwent right-sided salpingectomy. Intravenous tranexamic acid was administered and cell salvage employed intraoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: We feel that this case review series emphasises the importance of appropriate management of Jehovah's Witnesses in our units. In both of the above cases, these women were in potentially life-threatening situations. Advances in haematology and pharmaceutical therapy contributed to their survival. We welcome these advances in the treatment of this patient population.