Hodgkin lymphoma survivor perspectives on their engagement in treatment decision-making and discussion of late effects.

BACKGROUND: Hodgkin lymphoma has a bimodal age distribution with the first peak occurring within young adulthood and the second, among older adults. Although current therapy provides excellent disease control, survivors are at risk of developing treatment-related late effects (LEs). We sought to understand how survivors in active survivorship care perceived their role in treatment decision-making and when they acquired an understanding of LEs. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted until saturation was reached. Themes were identified through direct content analysis and consensus coding by a multidisciplinary team of coders, including hematology/oncology providers, patient navigators, and survivor stakeholders. RESULTS: Seventeen interviews were conducted. Role in initial treatment decision-making fluctuated between passive and active engagement with providers identified as being crucial to this process. Half of interviewees (53%) expressed unmet information needs. Survivors reported having learned about LEs at multiple time points, spanning from before treatment commenced through when a LE was diagnosed. The majority (71%) expressed a desire to have learned about LEs before initial treatment ended. The impact of cancer and fertility discussions were also disclosed. DISCUSSION: Participants highlighted the importance of discussions on LEs early in the care continuum. These preliminary data will be incorporated in a planned treatment decision-making tool that incorporates information on potential LEs. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Patient-centered communication approaches should be embraced to assist in treatment decision-making, while considering long-term health consequences. Survivors must be educated on their risk of LEs and encouraged to disclose their perspectives and preferences with their providers to optimize outcomes.

Enhancing patients' understanding of and adherence to oral anticancer medication: Results of a longitudinal pilot intervention.

BACKGROUND: Oral anticancer medications (OAM) make administration more convenient for patients, but shifts the responsibility of care from clinical providers to the patients themselves. Following an institutional pilot study showing inadequate understanding and adherence among vulnerable patients taking OAM, a longitudinal intervention was developed using an oncology specialty pharmacist and medication navigators to enhance OAM understanding and adherence. METHODS: Patients initiating OAM were approached for four formalized teaching and check-in sessions, supplemented with medication information sheets and individualized calendars. At each session, participants were assessed on their OAM understanding and adherence using teach-back and validated measures. A study evaluation elicited feedback from participants on the usefulness of the intervention. RESULTS: Of 80 eligible patients, 58 (72.5%) received formal OAM teaching from the specialty pharmacist. Of those, 54 (93.1%) enrolled in the study with 39 (72%) completing the intervention for final analysis. At study completion, all participants adequately understood OAM taking, but 41.0% had inadequate understanding of OAM handling. Throughout the study, participants reported issues that were addressed by the intervention team (28.2% to 31.6%) as well as those requiring additional assistance from the treatment team (26.3% to 38.5%), Most participants found the intervention to be very beneficial (initial evaluation, 86.5%; final evaluation, 76.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot intervention addressed gaps identified by our institutional assessment through formalized OAM teaching and follow-up. Improved understanding of taking and handling OAM through this subsequent study illustrated the enhanced effect of a multidisciplinary and multicomponent intervention to better educate and support patients on OAM.

Providing Survivorship Care for a Young Adult With a History of Blood Cancer.

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with a history of cancer are at an increased risk for late effects from their cancer treatment and have higher rates of long-term morbidity and mortality compared to their age-matched peers. As a result, this vulnerable population needs attentive follow-up care, end-organ surveillance, and secondary cancer screening; however, a history of cancer can often become buried on a problem list or not addressed at all. This case report illustrates an AYA survivor of classic Hodgkin lymphoma who relocates to a new city and establishes care with a new primary care provider (PCP). The PCP's awareness of a prior cancer diagnosis and the previous treatment regimen is a critical component in providing comprehensive care. In this case, the PCP's first step is to reach out and collaborate with oncology providers to gather an accurate treatment summary and then consult evidence-based guidelines to develop a plan of care. Based on the patient's previous treatment with chemotherapy adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine, the PCP orders recommended testing, reviews results, and provides subsequent counseling on health promotion and psychosocial wellness. This case illustrates strategies healthcare providers can use to provide coordinated, evidence-based care for AYA cancer survivors.

Financial distress and medical financial hardship among young adult survivors of blood cancer.

BACKGROUND: The long-term financial impact of cancer care has not been adequately addressed in young adults. As part of a remote intervention study, we describe medical financial distress and hardship among young adult survivors of blood cancer at study entry. METHODS: Young adults were recruited from 6 US hospitals. Using a Research Electronic Data Capture link, young adults confirmed their eligibility-namely, currently 18 to 39 years of age, blood cancer diagnosis 3 or more years ago, off active treatment, and not on parent's insurance. Following consent, the baseline assessment was sent. The primary outcome measure, the Personal Financial Wellness Scale, measured financial distress (scored as severe, 1-2; high, 3-4; average, 5-6; and low to no, 7-10). Medical financial hardship encompassed material hardship, psychological impact, and coping behaviors. Descriptive summary statistics and linear regression were used. RESULTS: Among the 126 participants, 54.5% came from minority racial or ethnic groups. Median time since diagnosis was 10 years (interquartile range = 6-16 years), with 56% having received a diagnosis when they were between 18 and 39 years of age. The overall mean (standard deviation) Personal Financial Wellness Scale score was 5.1 (2.4), but 49% reported severe or high distress. In multivariable analysis, female sex, Hispanic ethnicity, and lower income were strongly associated with worse Personal Financial Wellness Scale scores. Among participants with severe financial distress (n = 26), 72% reported 2 or more household material hardships, had worse scores across all psychological domains, and altered survivorship care because of cost (68%). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of long-term young adult cancer survivors reported severe or high levels of financial distress. Individuals with severe or high distress also reported more medical financial hardship than other participants. This finding highlights the need for ongoing financial intervention in this vulnerable population. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT05620979.

Adolescent and Young Adult Survivorship Care: Emerging from the COVID-19 Pandemic Stronger Through Teleoncology.

The Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) survivorship clinic at Tufts Medical Center transitioned to telehealth appointments when ambulatory clinics closed at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020. This review analyzes 195 survivorship telehealth visits for 90 patients, diagnosed with cancer younger than the age of 40 years. This cohort, seen during the Massachusetts State of Emergency, exemplifies the success and acceptance of telehealth among AYA survivors. The clinic's long-term goal is to advocate for telehealth as a standard in AYA survivorship care; however, telehealth faces increasing barriers as modifications to address the pandemic are amended or lifted.

Evaluating the role of financial navigation in alleviating financial distress among young adults with a history of blood cancer: A hybrid type 2 randomized effectiveness-implementation design.

BACKGROUND: Young adulthood (YA) is a complex phase of life, marked by key developmental goals, including educational and vocational attainment, housing independence, maintenance of social relationships, and financial stability. A cancer diagnosis during, or prior to, this phase of life can compromise the achievement of these milestones. Studies of adults with cancer have demonstrated that >70% report experiencing financial side-effects, which are associated with increased mortality, diminished health-related quality of life, and forgone medical care. The goal of this project is to evaluate financial distress of YA-aged survivors of blood cancers, and the impact of financial navigation on alleviating this distress. METHODS: This three-arm, multi-site, hybrid type 2 randomized effectiveness-implementation design (EID) study will be conducted through remote consent, remote data capture and telephone-based/virtual financial navigation. Participants will be aged 18-39, and more than three years from their blood cancer diagnosis. In this six-month intervention, the study will compare the primary outcome of financial distress in three arms: (1) usual care (2) participant-initiated, ad hoc navigation, and (3) study-directed proactive navigation. The study will be evaluated via the five-component Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) outcome strategy with a mixed-methods approach through quantitative assessment of participant-reported financial distress using the Personal Financial Wellness Scale™, as the primary outcome measure, and qualitative assessment through interviews. CONCLUSION: The study will address many unanswered questions regarding financial navigation within the YA survivor population and will inform the most successful strategies to mitigate financial distress in this vulnerable population.

Perceptions of Role in Treatment Decision Making and Understanding of Late Effects Among Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors: Results From a National Survey HL Decision Making and Late Effects.

BACKGROUND: Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) survivors are at risk of treatment-related late effects (LEs). With these potential risks and increasing numbers of treatment options for newly diagnosed patients, communication and shared decision making are essential to supporting patients throughout the cancer care continuum. We aimed to gather perspectives of HL survivors about their actual role in treatment decision making and their understanding of LEs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After initial pilot testing at a cancer survivor conference, we disseminated a 23-question survey in a single-wave e-mail through the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society's national listserv. We focused on 4 constructs: (1) patient's understanding of HL at diagnosis; (2) initial discussions with an oncologist; (3) factors in decision making of treatment, and (4) current health status. RESULTS: A total of 135 participants responded to the survey. While 73% of survey respondents perceived some involvement in decision making, one-half of respondents felt the treatment plan was a shared decision with their provider. Among patient-level factors, side effects/LEs were most frequently endorsed as important to treatment decisions. Eighty-four percent of respondents had been educated about risk for potential LEs. Thirty-six percent had been diagnosed with a LE at the time of survey completion with 3% reporting a second cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Survey respondents described their role in treatment decision making for newly diagnosed HL. Nearly half of patients did not endorse participating in shared decision making. A substantial number had experienced LEs. Future work should focus on improving patient-provider communication in decision processes for newly diagnosed HL.

The Creation of a Comprehensive Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivorship Program: "Lost in Transition" No More.

Purpose: The Reid R. Sacco AYA Cancer Program set out to improve survivorship care for AYA-aged patients (15-39 years) of pediatric or AYA cancer. This article discusses the steps in establishing the clinic, including the creation of a database on cancer history, exposures, and attendant risks of late effects. Results from the database tell the broader story of AYAs who seek care within a dedicated survivorship clinic. Methods: The database was created with REDCap® (Research Electronic Data Capture), a secure web-based, HIPAA compliant application for research and clinical study data. Data were abstracted and analyzed by trained members of the program team. Results: A total of 144 patients were seen for their initial survivorship visit between January 2013 and September 2019. Regarding physical health, two-thirds of the patients presented with an established late effect, one third with an established medical comorbidity, and 11% (n = 16) with secondary cancer related to their oncologic treatment. In assessing mental health, a significant cohort reported a known affective disorder (32%, n = 46) with one quarter already taking a psychotropic medication. Despite the transient nature of AYAs, 85% of patients remained in care within the long-term follow-up clinical model. Conclusions: Data presented illustrate how multilayered and complex survivorship care needs can be, as patients enter the clinic with complicated pre-existing psychosocial issues, significant late effects, and comorbidities. This study reinforces the value of a clinical database to better understand AYA survivors with the ultimate goal of optimizing and coordinating care.

Personal Narrative: Raising Awareness of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors in Similarly Aged University Students.

Purpose: As part of a programmatic educational initiative, we developed a personal narrative presentation, embedded with evidence-based data, to raise awareness of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) who have been diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 15 and 39 years among similarly aged university students. The narrative encompassed the cancer care continuum from signs of the disease through survivorship and incorporated psychosocial aspects of the experience. Methods: The presenter, diagnosed with lymphoma at the age of 25 years in 2007, interwove AYA data with her narrative in a series of 26 invited lectures given over 2 academic years, 2016-2017 and 2017-2018. Students were asked to provide anonymous open-ended feedback. Six hundred thirteen forms were collected and retrospectively dually coded and analyzed. Results: The majority of students (97%) referenced at least one of the presentation's three objectives: (1) build awareness of the AYA demographic; (2) encourage a personal health care focus; and (3) expand awareness of the far-reaching impact of cancer (i.e., psychological, social, and medical) both during and beyond the treatment phase. Format- and/or content-related suggestions and potential benefits of hearing the narrative also were reported. Conclusion: The use of personal narrative to raise awareness of the AYA cancer experience in an academic setting is both feasible and effective. Students demonstrated a new or enhanced understanding of AYA cancer and its biopsychosocial implications. We provide evidence to inform the design of awareness interventions directed at similarly aged university students.