Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 33
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
J Infect Dis ; 221(3): 356-366, 2020 01 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31314899

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The effect of neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) treatment on length of stay (LoS) in patients hospitalized with influenza is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a one-stage individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis exploring the association between NAI treatment and LoS in patients hospitalized with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) virus (A[H1N1]pdm09) infection. Using mixed-effects negative binomial regression and adjusting for the propensity to receive NAI, antibiotic, and corticosteroid treatment, we calculated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Patients with a LoS of <1 day and those who died while hospitalized were excluded. RESULTS: We analyzed data on 18 309 patients from 70 clinical centers. After adjustment, NAI treatment initiated at hospitalization was associated with a 19% reduction in the LoS among patients with clinically suspected or laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection (IRR, 0.81; 95% CI, .78-.85), compared with later or no initiation of NAI treatment. Similar statistically significant associations were seen in all clinical subgroups. NAI treatment (at any time), compared with no NAI treatment, and NAI treatment initiated <2 days after symptom onset, compared with later or no initiation of NAI treatment, showed mixed patterns of association with the LoS. CONCLUSIONS: When patients hospitalized with influenza are treated with NAIs, treatment initiated on admission, regardless of time since symptom onset, is associated with a reduced LoS, compared with later or no initiation of treatment.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Length of Stay , Neuraminidase/antagonists & inhibitors , Pandemics , Adolescent , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 59(12): 3666-3675, 2020 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32160295

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccine in people with autoimmune rheumatic disease (AIRDs) is not known. We investigated whether the influenza vaccine is effective in preventing respiratory morbidity, mortality and all-cause mortality in AIRD patients. METHODS: Adults with AIRDs treated with DMARDs prior to 1 September of each year between 2006 and 2009, and 2010 and 2015 were identified from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Exposure and outcome data were extracted. Data from multiple seasons were pooled. Propensity score (PS) for vaccination was calculated. Cox-proportional hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were calculated, and were (i) adjusted, (ii) matched for PS for vaccination. RESULTS: Data for 30 788 AIRD patients (65.7% female, 75.5% with RA, 61.1% prescribed MTX) contributing 125 034 influenza cycles were included. Vaccination reduced risk of influenza-like illness [adjusted HR (aHR) 0.70], hospitalization for pneumonia (aHR 0.61) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (aHR 0.67), and death due to pneumonia (aHR 0.56) on PS-adjusted analysis in the influenza active periods (IAPs). The associations were of similar magnitude and remained statistically significant on PS-matched analysis except for protection from influenza-like illness, which became non-significant. Sub-analysis restricted to pre-IAP, IAP and post-IAP did not yield evidence of residual confounding on influenza-like illness and death due to pneumonia. Vaccination reduced risk of all-cause mortality, although IAP-restricted analysis demonstrated residual confounding for this outcome. CONCLUSION: Influenza vaccine associates with reduced risk of respiratory morbidity and mortality in people with AIRDs. These findings call for active promotion of seasonal influenza vaccination in immunosuppressed people with AIRDs by healthcare professionals.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Autoimmune Diseases/drug therapy , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapy , Rheumatic Diseases/immunology , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Vaccines, Inactivated
3.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 42(2): 353-361, 2020 05 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32100008

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lay diagnosis is a widely used diagnostic approach for home management of common illnesses in Nigeria. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of caregivers and healthcare professionals on lay diagnosis of childhood malaria and pneumonia. Aligned to this, the study sought to explore the feasibility of training caregivers in the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) guidelines for improved recognition and treatment of these diseases. METHODS: A qualitative study using individual face-to-face semi-structured interviews was conducted in Benin City, Nigeria. Participants included 13 caregivers with children under 5 years and 17 healthcare professionals (HPs). An inductive approach to thematic analysis was used to generate themes and analyses. RESULTS: Caregivers relied on lay diagnosis but recognised its limitations. The perceived severity of malaria and pneumonia significantly influenced caregivers' preference for reliance on lay diagnosis practices, health-seeking behaviour and willingness to undertake training in IMCI guidelines for home management of diseases. Safety and potential unintended misuse of medications were recognised by caregivers and HPs as the main challenges. CONCLUSIONS: The high level of acceptance among caregivers to receive IMCI training could help improve effective management of childhood malaria and pneumonia at the community level through early recognition and prompt treatment.


Subject(s)
Malaria , Pneumonia , Caregivers , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Malaria/diagnosis , Malaria/therapy , Nigeria , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Pneumonia/therapy , Qualitative Research
4.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 78(8): 1122-1126, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31036623

ABSTRACT

ObjectivesTo examine the association between inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) administration and primary care consultation for joint pain, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) flare, corticosteroid prescription, vasculitis and unexplained fever in people with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs). METHODS: We undertook within-person comparisons using self-controlled case-series methodology. AIRD cases who received the IIV and had an outcome of interest in the same influenza cycle were ascertained in Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The influenza cycle was partitioned into exposure periods (1-14 days prevaccination and 0-14, 15-30, 31-60 and 61-90 days postvaccination), with the remaining time-period classified as non-exposed. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% CI for different outcomes were calculated. RESULTS: Data for 14 928 AIRD cases (69% women, 80% with RA) were included. There was no evidence for association between vaccination and primary care consultation for RA flare, corticosteroid prescription, fever or vasculitis. On the contrary, vaccination associated with reduced primary care consultation for joint pain in the subsequent 90 days (IRR 0.91 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.94)). CONCLUSION: This study found no evidence for a significant association between vaccination and primary care consultation for most surrogates of increased disease activity or vaccine adverse-effects in people with AIRDs. It adds to the accumulating evidence to support influenza vaccination in AIRDs.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases/physiopathology , Disease Progression , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Rheumatic Diseases/immunology , Vaccination/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Fever/chemically induced , Fever/physiopathology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Male , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/methods , Reference Values , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Rheumatic Diseases/physiopathology , Risk Management , Vaccination/methods , Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology , Vasculitis/chemically induced , Vasculitis/physiopathology
5.
Br J Anaesth ; 123(2): 118-125, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31101323

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest that beta blockers are associated with increased perioperative risk in hypertensive patients. We investigated whether beta blockers were associated with an increased risk in elderly patients with raised preoperative arterial blood pressure. METHODS: We conducted a propensity-score-matched cohort study of primary care data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (2004-13), including 84 633 patients aged 65 yr or over. Conditional logistic regression models, including factors that were significantly associated with the outcome, were constructed for 30-day mortality after elective noncardiac surgery. The effects of beta blockers (primary outcome), renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, calcium-channel blockers, thiazides, loop diuretics, and statins were investigated at systolic and diastolic arterial pressure thresholds. RESULTS: Beta blockers were associated with increased odds of postoperative 30-day mortality in patients with systolic hypertension (defined as systolic BP >140 mm Hg; adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-3.51). After excluding patients for whom prior data suggest benefit from perioperative beta blockade (patients with prior myocardial infarction or heart failure), rather than adjusting for them, the point estimate shifted slightly (aOR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.09-3.89). Compared with no use, statins (aOR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.17-0.75) and thiazides (aOR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.10-0.78) were associated with lower mortality in patients with systolic hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the safety of perioperative beta blockers may be influenced by preoperative blood pressure thresholds. A randomised controlled trial of beta-blocker withdrawal, in select populations, is required to identify a causal relationship.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure/physiology , Hypertension/drug therapy , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Preoperative Care/methods , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/administration & dosage , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Male , Risk Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiology
6.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 41(2): 379-390, 2019 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29955851

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many countries have acquired antiviral stockpiles for pandemic influenza mitigation and a significant part of the stockpile may be focussed towards community-based treatment. METHODS: We developed a spreadsheet-based, decision tree model to assess outcomes averted and cost-effectiveness of antiviral treatment for outpatient use from the perspective of the healthcare payer in the UK. We defined five pandemic scenarios-one based on the 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic and four hypothetical scenarios varying in measures of transmissibility and severity. RESULTS: Community-based antiviral treatment was estimated to avert 14-23% of hospitalizations in an overall population of 62.28 million. Higher proportions of averted outcomes were seen in patients with high-risk conditions, when compared to non-high-risk patients. We found that antiviral treatment was cost-saving across pandemic scenarios for high-risk population groups, and cost-saving for the overall population in higher severity influenza pandemics. Antiviral effectiveness had the greatest influence on both the number of hospitalizations averted and on cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows that across pandemic scenarios, antiviral treatment can be cost-saving for population groups at high risk of influenza-related complications.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Decision Trees , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Pandemics , Ambulatory Care/economics , Ambulatory Care/methods , Antiviral Agents/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza, Human/economics , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom/epidemiology
7.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 57(10): 1726-1734, 2018 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29901743

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To examine temporal trend in uptake of seasonal influenza vaccine (SIV) in the UK and explore disease and demographic factors associated with vaccination. Methods: From the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, 32 751 people with auto-immune rheumatic diseases prescribed DMARDs between 2006 and 2016 were identified. The proportion vaccinated between 1 September of one year and 31 March of the next year was calculated and stratified by age, other indications for vaccination, auto-immune rheumatic diseases type and number of DMARDs prescribed. Stata and Joinpoint regression programs were used. Results: SIV uptake was high in those aged ⩾65 years (82.3 and 80.7% in 2006-07 and 2015-16, respectively). It was significantly lower in other age groups, but improved over time with 51.9 and 61.9% in the 45-64 year age group, and 32.3 and 50.1% in the <45 year age group being vaccinated in 2006-07 and 2015-16, respectively. While 64.9% of the vaccinations in those ⩾65 years old occurred by 3 November, in time to mount a protective immune response before the influenza activity becomes substantial in the UK, only 38.9% in the 45-64 year and 26.2% in the <45 year age group without any other reason for vaccination received SIV by this date. Women, those with additional indications for vaccination, on multiple DMARDs and with SLE were more likely to be vaccinated. Conclusion: SIV uptake is low in the under 65s, and the majority of them are not vaccinated in time. Additional effort is required to promote timely uptake of SIV in this population.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases/psychology , Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Rheumatic Diseases/psychology , Vaccination/trends , Adult , Aged , Autoimmune Diseases/virology , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Influenza, Human/psychology , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Prospective Studies , Rheumatic Diseases/virology , Seasons , Time Factors , United Kingdom , Vaccination/psychology
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 64(10): 1328-1334, 2017 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28199524

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While evidence exists to support the effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) in reducing mortality when given to hospitalized patients with A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection, the impact of outpatient treatment on hospitalization has not been clearly established. We investigated the impact of outpatient NAI treatment on subsequent hospitalization in patients with A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection. METHODS: We assembled general community and outpatient data from 9 clinical centers in different countries collected between January 2009 and December 2010. We standardized data from each study center to create a pooled dataset and then used mixed-effects logistic regression modeling to determine the effect of NAI treatment on hospitalization. We adjusted for NAI treatment propensity and preadmission antibiotic use, including "study center" as a random intercept to account for differences in baseline hospitalization rate between centers. RESULTS: We included 3376 patients with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, of whom 3085 (91.4%) had laboratory-confirmed infection. Eight hundred seventy-three patients (25.8%) received outpatient or community-based NAI treatment, 928 of 2395 (38.8%) with available data had dyspnea or respiratory distress, and hospitalizations occurred in 1705 (50.5%). After adjustment for preadmission antibiotics and NAI treatment propensity, preadmission NAI treatment was associated with decreased odds of hospital admission compared to no NAI treatment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.30). CONCLUSIONS: In a population with confirmed or suspected A(H1N1)pdm09 and at high risk of hospitalization, outpatient or community-based NAI treatment significantly reduced the likelihood of requiring hospital admission. These data suggest that community patients with severe influenza should receive NAI treatment.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/drug effects , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Neuraminidase/antagonists & inhibitors , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Care , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Outpatients , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , Young Adult
9.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 39(4): 805-812, 2017 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27915261

ABSTRACT

Background: Evidence on the effectiveness of community-based interventions in improving vaccination uptake in migrant populations is limited. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a community-based intervention to improve access to and uptake of childhood vaccinations among urban slum-dwelling migrant communities in Ludhiana, India. Methods: A mixed-methods evaluation was conducted involving a post-intervention comparison of vaccination uptake in six randomly selected intervention and control slum communities. Multilevel logistic regression to account for clustering of effects was used to investigate the impact of the intervention on vaccination uptake. Thematic analysis was used to analyse qualitative data. Results: Overall, vaccination uptake was significantly higher in the intervention clusters and the likelihood of full immunization by the age of 1 year was more than twice that in the control clusters [OR: 2.27 (95%CI: 1.12-4.60); P = 0.023]. Qualitative findings showed that stakeholders felt ownership of the intervention and that it was effective in increasing accessibility to and uptake of vaccinations. However, they emphasized the importance of continued government support for the intervention. Conclusions: Community-based interventions can significantly increase vaccination coverage in deprived populations with previously low uptake of childhood immunization but such initiatives need to be delivered in partnership with the government.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Promotion/methods , Immunization Programs/methods , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Community Health Services , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , India , Infant , Logistic Models , Male , Poverty Areas , Urban Population
10.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 25(11): 1263-1273, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27215827

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Bacterial superinfections, including pneumonia, are frequent complications of influenza-like illness (ILI). Clinical and laboratory evidence suggests that benzodiazepines and Z-drugs may influence susceptibility to infections and mortality. We investigated whether benzodiazepines and zopiclone modify the occurrence of ILI-related pneumonia and mortality. METHODS: We obtained data on 804 051 ILI patients from a comprehensive primary care database, the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The follow-up period started from the diagnosis of ILI for 30 days. Pneumonia and deaths occurring within the 30-day follow-up period were considered as potentially 'ILI related'. Exposure to benzodiazepines and zopiclone was determined in the period preceding a diagnosis of ILI with current use defined as a prescription for benzodiazepines in the month prior to ILI diagnosis. Cox regression was used for the analyses. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented. RESULTS: Influenza-like illness-related pneumonia and mortality were noted in 1117 and 707 ILI patients, respectively. Current exposure to benzodiazepines was associated with increased occurrence of both ILI-related pneumonia and mortality (ILI-related pneumonia adjusted HR 4.24, 95%CI [2.27, 7.95]; ILI-related mortality adjusted HR 20.69, 95%CI [15.54, 27.54]). A similar increase in ILI-related mortality but not pneumonia was observed with current zopiclone use (ILI-related mortality adjusted HR 10.86, 95%CI [6.93, 17.02]; ILI-related pneumonia adjusted HR 1.97, 95%CI [0.63, 6.12]). CONCLUSION: Benzodiazepines may increase the likelihood of pneumonia and mortality related to ILI. A cautionary approach to prescribing benzodiazepine is suggested in people known to be at increased risk of pneumonia or mortality. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/etiology , Benzodiazepines/administration & dosage , Pneumonia/etiology , Superinfection/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Azabicyclo Compounds/administration & dosage , Azabicyclo Compounds/adverse effects , Bacterial Infections/mortality , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Influenza, Human/complications , Influenza, Human/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Piperazines/administration & dosage , Piperazines/adverse effects , Pneumonia/mortality , Primary Health Care , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Superinfection/mortality , Survival Analysis , United Kingdom , Young Adult
11.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 24(8): 793-802, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26013409

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic drugs, benzodiazepines or zopiclone and the occurrence of asthma exacerbations and subsequent mortality in a cohort of asthma patients. METHODS: The number of patients that were included were 105,747 for those without asthma exacerbation and 25,895 for those with exacerbated asthma. A nested case-control study probed the association between benzodiazepines or zopiclone and occurrence of asthma exacerbation (primary outcome) using conditional logistic regression. Cox regression was used to determine the association between the drugs and all-cause mortality in patients with recorded asthma exacerbation. Adjusted matched odds ratios (adj mOR) and adjusted hazard ratios (adj HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) are presented. RESULTS: Current benzodiazepine use was associated with increased occurrence of asthma exacerbation (adj mOR 1.49; 95%CI [1.15, 1.93]; P = 0.001) as was current zopiclone use (adj mOR 1.59; 95%CI [1.37, 1.85]; P < 0.001). In patients with an asthma exacerbation, current benzodiazepine use was associated with increased all-cause mortality during a median follow-up of 2 years (adj HR 2.78; 95%CI [1.26, 6.12]; P = 0.011), and the association between zopiclone use and all-cause mortality showed borderline statistical significance (adj HR 1.58; 95%CI [0.98, 2.54]; P = 0.058). CONCLUSION: Benzodiazepines and zopiclone may increase the likelihood of asthma exacerbation, and benzodiazepines may also increase the likelihood of mortality following exacerbation. These data suggest that caution should be exercised when prescribing benzodiazepines to patients with asthma.


Subject(s)
Anti-Anxiety Agents/adverse effects , Asthma/mortality , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Asthma/diagnosis , Azabicyclo Compounds/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Cause of Death , Comorbidity , Databases, Factual , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Pharmacoepidemiology , Piperazines/adverse effects , Polypharmacy , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young Adult
12.
J Infect Dis ; 207(4): 553-63, 2013 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23204175

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) treatment on clinical outcomes of public health importance during the 2009-2010 pandemic has not been firmly established. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching 11 databases (2009 through April 2012) for relevant studies. We used standard methods conforming to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random effects models. RESULTS: Regarding mortality we observed a nonsignificant reduction associated with NAI treatment (at any time) versus none (OR, 0.72 [95% CI, .51-1.01]). However we observed significant reductions for early treatment (≤48 hours after symptom onset) versus late (OR, 0.38 [95% CI, .27-.53]) and for early treatment versus none (OR, 0.35 [95% CI, .18-.71]). NAI treatment (at any time) versus none was associated with an elevated risk of severe outcome (OR, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.22-2.54]), but early versus late treatment reduced the likelihood (OR, 0.41 [95% CI, .30-.56]). CONCLUSIONS: During the 2009-2010 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic, early initiation of NAI treatment reduced the likelihood of severe outcomes compared with late or no treatment. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42011001273.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/drug effects , Influenza, Human/complications , Influenza, Human/mortality , Neuraminidase/antagonists & inhibitors , Pandemics , Humans , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Influenza, Human/virology , Public Health , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
13.
Thorax ; 68(2): 163-70, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23220867

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Benzodiazepines have been associated with an increased incidence of infections, and mortality from sepsis, in the critically ill. Here, we determined the effect of community use of benzodiazepines on the occurrence of, and mortality following, pneumonia. METHODS: A nested case-control study using 29 697 controls and 4964 cases of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) from The Health Improvement Network, a UK primary care patient database (2001-2002), investigated the association between benzodiazepines and pneumonia occurrence using conditional logistic regression. Cox regression was then used to determine the impact of benzodiazepines on mortality in the 4964 cases of CAP. Results are presented as adjusted OR, adjusted HR and 95% CI. RESULTS: Exposure to benzodiazepines was associated with an increased risk of pneumonia (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.42 to 1.67). Individually diazepam, lorazepam and temazepam, but not chlordiazepoxide, were associated with an increased incidence of CAP. As a class, benzodiazepines were associated with increased 30-day (HR 1.22 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.39)) and long-term mortality (HR 1.32 (95% CI 1.19 to 1.47)) in patients with a prior diagnosis of CAP. Individually diazepam, chlordiazepoxide, lorazepam and temazepam affected long-term mortality in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Benzodiazepines were associated with an increased risk of, and mortality from, CAP. These hypothesis generating data suggest further research is required into the immune safety profile of benzodiazepines.


Subject(s)
Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Pneumonia/chemically induced , Pneumonia/mortality , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Community-Acquired Infections/chemically induced , Female , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Survival Analysis , Young Adult
15.
Thorax ; 67(8): 709-17, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22407890

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although generally mild, the 2009-2010 influenza A/H1N1 pandemic caused two major surges in hospital admissions in the UK. The characteristics of patients admitted during successive waves are described. METHODS: Data were systematically obtained on 1520 patients admitted to 75 UK hospitals between May 2009 and January 2010. Multivariable analyses identified factors predictive of severe outcome. RESULTS: Patients aged 5-54 years were over-represented compared with winter seasonal admissions for acute respiratory infection, as were non-white ethnic groups (first wave only). In the second wave patients were less likely to be school age than in the first wave, but their condition was more likely to be severe on presentation to hospital and they were more likely to have delayed admission. Overall, 45% had comorbid conditions, 16.5% required high dependency (level 2) or critical (level 3) care and 5.3% died. As in 1918-1919, the likelihood of severe outcome by age followed a W-shaped distribution. Pre-admission antiviral drug use decreased from 13.3% to 10% between the first and second waves (p=0.048), while antibiotic prescribing increased from 13.6% to 21.6% (p<0.001). Independent predictors of severe outcome were age 55-64 years, chronic lung disease (non-asthma, non-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), neurological disease, recorded obesity, delayed admission (≥5 days after illness onset), pneumonia, C-reactive protein ≥100 mg/litre, and the need for supplemental oxygen or intravenous fluid replacement on admission. CONCLUSIONS: There were demographic, ethnic and clinical differences between patients admitted with pandemic H1N1 infection and those hospitalised during seasonal influenza activity. Despite national policies favouring use of antiviral drugs, few patients received these before admission and many were given antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Infant , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young Adult
16.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 17(4): 592-8, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21470446

ABSTRACT

To determine clinical characteristics of patients hospitalized in the United Kingdom with pandemic (H1N1) 2009, we studied 1,520 patients in 75 National Health Service hospitals. We characterized patients who acquired influenza nosocomially during the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 outbreak. Of 30 patients, 12 (80%) of 15 adults and 14 (93%) of 15 children had serious underlying illnesses. Only 12 (57%) of 21 patients who received antiviral therapy did so within 48 hours after symptom onset, but 53% needed escalated care or mechanical ventilation; 8 (27%) of 30 died. Despite national guidelines and standardized infection control procedures, nosocomial transmission remains a problem when influenza is prevalent. Health care workers should be routinely offered influenza vaccine, and vaccination should be prioritized for all patients at high risk. Staff should remain alert to the possibility of influenza in patients with complex clinical problems and be ready to institute antiviral therapy while awaiting diagnosis during influenza outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/physiology , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Pandemics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infection Control , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Influenza, Human/mortality , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Vaccination , Young Adult
17.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 18(8): 697-703, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19455553

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is a common diagnosis in general practice in the United Kingdom. Previous studies suggest that commonly prescribed drugs in general practice may influence pneumonia mortality. AIM: We investigated whether statins, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2-receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs) have an impact on short-term and long-term mortality in pneumonia cases. DESIGN OF STUDY: Population-based cohort study SETTTING: United Kingdom METHODS: Data on 3681 pneumonia cases above the age of 40 years were obtained from a comprehensive database called the health improvement network (THIN) which has computerised medical records from 300 general practice surgeries in the United Kingdom. We used Cox regression for our analyses. RESULTS: Current statin use was associated with a 67% decrease in 30-day mortality (adj. HR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.19-0.58) and a 55% decrease in long-term mortality (adj. HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.32-0.62) over a median follow-up of 2.8 years as compared to no-use. Current ACEI use decreased the 30-day mortality risk by nearly 38% as compared to no-use (adj. HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.47-0.82) but was not associated with long-term mortality. No significant impact on mortality was observed for either gastric acid suppressant. CONCLUSION: The use of statins is associated with a lower risk of short- and long-term mortality following pneumonia whereas the use of ACEIs is associated with a decreased mortality risk only in the short-term.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Histamine H2 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Pneumonia/mortality , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Pneumonia/prevention & control , Population Surveillance , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Assessment , Time Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiology
18.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 18(4): 269-75, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19235776

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that treatment with gastric acid suppressants may be associated with an increased risk of pneumonia whilst the use of statins and ACE inhibitors (ACEI) may decrease the risk of acquiring pneumonia. The evidence is conflicting however. Our aim was to investigate the effect of these drugs on pneumonia using population-based data from the UK. METHODS: We conducted a general population-based case-control study using the health improvement network (THIN), a comprehensive UK general practice database. Conditional multiple logistic regression was used to assess the association between the exposures and pneumonia. RESULTS: After adjusting for potential confounders, a current prescription for statins was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of pneumonia (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.94). Similarly, a current prescription for ACEI was associated with a reduction in the risk of pneumonia (adjusted OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65-0.86). Contrary to previous study results we did not find a significant association between current prescription for histamine 2 receptor antagonist (H(2)RA) and pneumonia risk (adjusted OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.92-1.40) but current prescriptions for proton pump inhibitors (PPI) were associated with an increased risk of pneumonia (adjusted OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.38-1.77). CONCLUSIONS: Statins and ACE inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of pneumonia but these effects were smaller than those observed in previous studies. People prescribed a PPI, but not an H(2)RA at an increased risk of acquiring pneumonia.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antacids/adverse effects , Community-Acquired Infections/etiology , Histamine H2 Antagonists/adverse effects , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Pneumonia/etiology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Community-Acquired Infections/prevention & control , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Medical Records Systems, Computerized , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Pneumonia/prevention & control , Population Surveillance , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiology
19.
Eur J Public Health ; 19(5): 521-6, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19549803

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is a common diagnosis in general practice in the United Kingdom and yet there is little known about the short- and long-term prognosis of people with a diagnosis of pneumonia in general practice. We investigated the short- and long-term survival of people with pneumonia diagnosed in general practice as compared to the general population for all ages. METHODS: This was a general population-based cohort study. Data was obtained from a comprehensive general practice database called The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database which has computerized medical records from 300 general practice surgeries in the United Kingdom. We used Cox regression for our analyses. RESULTS: For pneumonia cases the 30-day mortality was 18.5% and the 3-year mortality was 30.8%. The equivalent figures for the general population controls were 0.4% and 10.3% respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality (for total follow-up time) in pneumonia cases vs. general population was 4.64 (95% CI 4.35-4.95). For the first 30 days the risk of mortality in cases was 46 times more (adj. HR 45.90, 95% CI 36.80-55.20). Even in the period of follow-up 91 days after diagnosis cases were almost 20% more likely to die compared to general population (adj. HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.08-1.31). CONCLUSION: People in general practice who have a diagnosis of pneumonia have a markedly increased mortality in the short-term but some increase in mortality persists during longer-term follow-up.


Subject(s)
Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Time Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young Adult
20.
Br J Gen Pract ; 69(686): e605-e611, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31262845

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement (QI) is a priority for general practice, and GPs are expected to participate in and provide evidence of QI activity. There is growing interest in harnessing the potential of electronic health records (EHR) to improve patient care by supporting practices to find cases that could benefit from a medicines review. AIM: To develop scalable and reproducible prescribing safety reports using patient-level EHR data. DESIGN AND SETTING: UK general practices that contribute de-identified patient data to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). METHOD: A scoping phase used stakeholder consultations to identify primary care QI needs and potential indicators. QI reports containing real data were sent to 12 pilot practices that used Vision GP software and had expressed interest. The scale-up phase involved automating production and distribution of reports to all contributing practices that used both Vision and EMIS software systems. Benchmarking reports with patient-level case review lists for two prescribing safety indicators were sent to 457 practices in December 2017 following the initial scale-up (Figure 2). RESULTS: Two indicators were selected from the Royal College of General Practitioners Patient Safety Toolkit following stakeholder consultations for the pilot phase involving 12 GP practices. Pilot phase interviews showed that reports were used to review individual patient care, implement wider QI actions in the practice, and for appraisal and revalidation. CONCLUSION: Electronic health record data can be used to provide standardised, reproducible reports that can be delivered at scale with minimal resource requirements. These can be used in a national QI initiative that impacts directly on patient care.


Subject(s)
Drug Utilization Review , Electronic Health Records , Patient Safety , Primary Health Care , Quality Improvement , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , General Practice , Heart Failure , Humans , Pilot Projects , Risk Assessment , Thiazolidinediones/therapeutic use , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL