Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Br J Haematol ; 179(1): 66-74, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28653400

ABSTRACT

Panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone demonstrated a significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival benefit compared with placebo, bortezomib and dexamethasone in the phase 3 PANORAMA 1 (Panobinostat Oral in Multiple Myeloma 1) trial. Despite this benefit, patients in the panobinostat arm experienced higher rates of adverse events (AEs) and higher rates of discontinuation due to AEs. This PANORAMA 1 subanalysis examined AEs between 2 treatment phases of the study (TP1 and TP2), in which administration frequency of bortezomib and dexamethasone differed per protocol. The incidences of several key AEs were lower in both arms following the planned reduction of bortezomib dosing frequency in TP2. In the panobinostat arm, rates of thrombocytopenia (grade 3/4: TP1, 56·7%; TP2, 6·0%), diarrhoea (grade 3/4: TP1, 24·1%; TP2, 7·1%), and fatigue (grade 3/4: TP1, 16·3%; TP2, 1·8%) were lower in TP2 compared with TP1. Dose intensity analysis of panobinostat and bortezomib by cycle in the panobinostat arm showed reductions of both agent doses during cycles 1-4 due to dose adjustments for AEs. Exposure-adjusted analysis demonstrated a reduction in thrombocytopenia frequency in TP1 following dose adjustment. These results suggest that optimization of dosing with this regimen could improve tolerability, potentially leading to improved patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bortezomib/administration & dosage , Combined Modality Therapy , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Disease Progression , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Hydroxamic Acids/administration & dosage , Indoles/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Panobinostat , Recurrence , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Clin Invest ; 109(12): 1579-85, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12070305

ABSTRACT

Whole-body irradiation at the minimal lethal dose causes bone marrow failure and death within 12-18 days. To identify the principal components of the hematopoietic system that are radioprotective, we transplanted lethally irradiated mice with purified progenitors: common myeloid progenitors (CMPs), megakaryocyte/erythrocyte-restricted progenitors (MEPs), or granulocyte/monocyte-restricted progenitors (GMPs). Transplanted CMPs gave rise to cells both of the granulocyte/monocyte (GM) series and the megakaryocyte/erythrocyte series, whereas GMPs or MEPs showed reconstitution of only GM or ME cells, respectively. CMPs and MEPs but not GMPs protected mice in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting that erythrocytes, platelets, or both are the critical effectors of radioprotection. Accordingly, CMPs and MEPs formed robust colonies in recipient bone marrow and spleen, whereas GMPs formed small colonies that rapidly disappeared. Direct comparisons of spleen CFU (CFU-S) potentials among each progenitor subset showed that MEPs contain the vast majority of day 8 CFU-S activity, suggesting that day 8 CFU-S are the precursors of radioprotective cell subsets. All animals radioprotected for 30 days subsequently survived for at least 6 months post-transplant, and showed only host-derived hematopoiesis after 30 days. These findings suggest that rare hematopoietic stem cells survive myeloablation that can eventually repopulate irradiated hosts if myeloerythroid-restricted progenitors transiently rescue ablated animals through the critical window of bone marrow failure.


Subject(s)
Erythroblasts/physiology , Granulocytes/physiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Megakaryocytes/physiology , Monocytes/physiology , Radiation Injuries, Experimental/therapy , Animals , Cell Differentiation , Erythroblasts/cytology , Erythroid Precursor Cells/cytology , Erythroid Precursor Cells/physiology , Granulocytes/cytology , Megakaryocytes/cytology , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Monocytes/cytology , Whole-Body Irradiation
3.
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health ; 36(5): 1216-20, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16438148

ABSTRACT

Anemia in HIV-infected patients is a common clinical manifestation. We report on a 31-year-old Thai male, who had been HIV positive for 6 years, did not harbor any opportunistic infection, and had been receiving Highly Active Anti Retroviral Therapy (HAART) for one month, and who developed severe anemia. Investigation revealed pure red cell aplasia, suspected secondary to parvovirus B19 infection. This diagnosis was confirmed by the detection of parvovirus B19 DNA in his serum. He received blood transfusions for supportive treatment and continued on HAART to improve his immune status and to resolve the anemia. This case suggests that parvovirus B19 infection should be considered as a possible cause of anemia in HIV-infected individuals.


Subject(s)
AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/complications , Parvoviridae Infections/complications , Parvovirus B19, Human/isolation & purification , Red-Cell Aplasia, Pure/etiology , Adult , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Base Sequence , DNA Primers , DNA, Viral/blood , Humans , Male , Parvovirus B19, Human/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Thailand
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL