ABSTRACT
Crossovers (COs) between homologous chromosomes ensure their faithful segregation during meiosis. We identify C. elegans COSA-1, a cyclin-related protein conserved in metazoa, as a key component required to convert meiotic double-strand breaks (DSBs) into COs. During late meiotic prophase, COSA-1 localizes to foci that correspond to the single CO site on each homolog pair and indicate sites of eventual concentration of other conserved CO proteins. Chromosomes gain and lose competence to load CO proteins during meiotic progression, with competence to load COSA-1 requiring prior licensing. Our data further suggest a self-reinforcing mechanism maintaining CO designation. Modeling of a nonlinear dose-response relationship between IR-induced DSBs and COSA-1 foci reveals efficient conversion of DSBs into COs when DSBs are limiting and a robust capacity to limit cytologically differentiated CO sites when DSBs are in excess. COSA-1 foci serve as a unique live cell readout for investigating CO formation and CO interference.
Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Caenorhabditis elegans/cytology , Crossing Over, Genetic , Cyclins/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Meiosis , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolism , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Chromosomes/metabolism , Cyclins/genetics , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Models, Molecular , MutationABSTRACT
During meiosis, chromosomes align with their homologous pairing partners and stabilize this alignment through assembly of the synaptonemal complex (SC). Since the SC assembles cooperatively yet is indifferent to homology, pairing and SC assembly must be tightly coordinated. We identify HAL-2 as a key mediator in this coordination, showing that HAL-2 promotes pairing largely by preventing detrimental effects of SC precursors (SYP proteins). hal-2 mutants fail to establish pairing and lack multiple markers of chromosome movement mediated by pairing centers (PCs), chromosome sites that link chromosomes to cytoplasmic microtubules through nuclear envelope-spanning complexes. Moreover, SYP proteins load inappropriately along individual unpaired chromosomes in hal-2 mutants, and markers of PC-dependent movement and function are restored in hal-2; syp double mutants. These and other data indicate that SYP proteins can impede pairing and that HAL-2 promotes pairing predominantly but not exclusively by counteracting this inhibition, thereby enabling activation and regulation of PC function. HAL-2 concentrates in the germ cell nucleoplasm and colocalizes with SYP proteins in nuclear aggregates when SC assembly is prevented. We propose that HAL-2 functions to shepherd SYP proteins prior to licensing of SC assembly, preventing untimely interactions between SC precursors and chromosomes and allowing sufficient accumulation of precursors for rapid cooperative assembly upon homology verification.
Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Chromosome Pairing/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Protein Precursors/metabolism , Synaptonemal Complex/metabolism , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/cytology , Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolism , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Chromosomes/genetics , Chromosomes/metabolism , Microtubules , Mutation , Nuclear Envelope , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Protein Precursors/genetics , Synaptonemal Complex/geneticsABSTRACT
During early meiotic prophase, a nucleus-wide reorganization leads to sorting of chromosomes into homologous pairs and to establishing associations between homologous chromosomes along their entire lengths. Here, we investigate global features of chromosome organization during this process, using a chromosome painting method in whole-mount Caenorhabditis elegans gonads that enables visualization of whole chromosomes along their entire lengths in the context of preserved 3D nuclear architecture. First, we show that neither spatial proximity of premeiotic chromosome territories nor chromosome-specific timing is a major factor driving homolog pairing. Second, we show that synaptonemal complex-independent associations can support full lengthwise juxtaposition of homologous chromosomes. Third, we reveal a prominent elongation of chromosome territories during meiotic prophase that initiates prior to homolog association and alignment. Mutant analysis indicates that chromosome movement mediated by association of chromosome pairing centers (PCs) with mobile patches of the nuclear envelope (NE)-spanning SUN-1/ZYG-12 protein complexes is not the primary driver of territory elongation. Moreover, we identify new roles for the X chromosome PC (X-PC) and X-PC binding protein HIM-8 in promoting elongation of X chromosome territories, separable from their role(s) in mediating local stabilization of pairing and association of X chromosomes with mobile SUN-1/ZYG-12 patches. Further, we present evidence that HIM-8 functions both at and outside of PCs to mediate chromosome territory elongation. These and other data support a model in which synapsis-independent elongation of chromosome territories, driven by PC binding proteins, enables lengthwise juxtaposition of chromosomes, thereby facilitating assessment of their suitability as potential pairing partners.
Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Meiosis , X Chromosome/genetics , Animals , Chromosome Painting , Gonads/metabolism , Reproduction/geneticsABSTRACT
Homologous chromosome pairs (bivalents) undergo restructuring during meiotic prophase to convert a configuration that promotes crossover recombination into one that promotes bipolar spindle attachment and localized cohesion loss. We have imaged remodeling of meiotic chromosome structures after pachytene exit in Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosome shortening during diplonema is accompanied by coiling of chromosome axes and highly asymmetric departure of synaptonemal complex (SC) central region proteins SYP-1 and SYP-2, which diminish over most of the length of each desynapsing bivalent while becoming concentrated on axis segments distal to the single emerging chiasma. This and other manifestations of asymmetry along chromosomes are lost in synapsis-proficient crossover-defective mutants, which often retain SYP-1,2 along the full lengths of coiled diplotene axes. Moreover, a gamma-irradiation treatment that restores crossovers in the spo-11 mutant also restores asymmetry of SYP-1 localization. We propose that crossovers or crossover precursors serve as symmetry-breaking events that promote differentiation of subregions of the bivalent by triggering asymmetric disassembly of the SC.
Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , Meiotic Prophase I/physiology , Synaptonemal Complex/physiology , Animals , Aurora Kinase B , Caenorhabditis elegans/physiology , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Immunohistochemistry , Meiotic Prophase I/genetics , Nerve Tissue Proteins/metabolism , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolismABSTRACT
A universal feature of meiotic prophase is the pairing of homologous chromosomes, a fundamental prerequisite for the successful completion of all subsequent meiotic events. HIM-3 is a Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis-specific non-cohesin component of chromosome axes that is required for synapsis. Our characterization of new him-3 alleles reveals previously unknown functions for the protein. HIM-3 is required for the establishment of initial contacts between homologs, for the nuclear reorganization characteristic of early meiotic prophase, and for the coordination of these events with synaptonemal complex (SC) assembly. Despite the absence of homolog alignment, we find that recombination is initiated efficiently, indicating that initial pairing is not a prerequisite for early steps of the recombination pathway. Surprisingly, RAD-51-marked recombination intermediates disappear with apparent wild-type kinetics in him-3 null mutants in which homologs are spatially unavailable for recombination, raising the possibility that HIM-3's presence at chromosome axes inhibits the use of sister chromatids as templates for repair. We propose that HIM-3 is a molecular link between multiple landmark events of meiotic prophase; it is critical for establishing chromosome identity by configuring homologs to facilitate their recognition while simultaneously imposing structural constraints that later promote the formation of the crossover essential for proper segregation.
Subject(s)
Alleles , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Chromosome Pairing/physiology , Chromosomes/metabolism , Recombination, Genetic/physiology , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Indoles , Microscopy, Fluorescence , Prophase/physiology , Protein Structure, Tertiary , Rad51 Recombinase , Rec A Recombinases/metabolismABSTRACT
In differentiated cells, chromosomes are packed inside the cell nucleus in an organised fashion. In contrast, little is known about how chromosomes are packed in undifferentiated cells and how nuclear organization changes during development. To assess changes in nuclear organization during the earliest stages of development, we quantified the mobility of a pair of homologous chromosomal loci in the interphase nuclei of Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. The distribution of distances between homologous loci was consistent with a random distribution up to the 8-cell stage but not at later stages. The mobility of the loci was significantly reduced from the 2-cell to the 48-cell stage. Nuclear foci corresponding to epigenetic marks as well as heterochromatin and the nucleolus also appeared around the 8-cell stage. We propose that the earliest global transformation in nuclear organization occurs at the 8-cell stage during C. elegans embryogenesis.
Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans/embryology , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Chromosomes , Embryonic Development/genetics , Animals , Genome , Molecular Imaging , Whole Genome SequencingABSTRACT
Most sexually reproducing organisms depend on the regulated formation of crossovers, and the consequent chiasmata, to accomplish successful segregation of homologous chromosomes at the meiosis I division. A robust, chromosome-wide crossover control system limits chromosome pairs to one crossover in most meioses in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans; this system has been proposed to rely on structural integrity of meiotic chromosome axes. Here, we test this hypothesis using a mutant, him-3(me80), that assembles reduced levels of meiosis-specific axis component HIM-3 along cohesin-containing chromosome axes. Whereas pairing, synapsis, and crossing over are eliminated when HIM-3 is absent, the him-3(me80) mutant supports assembly of synaptonemal complex protein SYP-1 along some paired chromosomes, resulting in partial competence for chiasma formation. We present both genetic and cytological evidence indicating that the him-3(me80) mutation leads to an increased incidence of meiotic products with two crossovers. These results indicate that limiting the amount of a major axis component results in a reduced capacity to communicate the presence of a (nascent) crossover and/or to discourage others in response.
Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Chromosomes/physiology , Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , Meiosis/physiology , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/physiology , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/physiology , Chromosome Pairing/physiology , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Genetic Linkage , Mutation , Rad51 Recombinase , X Chromosome/physiologyABSTRACT
Successful gamete production is ensured by meiotic quality control, a process in which germ cells that fail in bivalent chromosome formation are eliminated during meiotic prophase. To date, numerous meiotic mutants have been isolated in a variety of model organisms, using defects associated with a failure in bivalent formation as hallmarks of the mutant. Presumably, the meiotic quality control mechanism in those mutants is overwhelmed. In these mutants, all germ cells fail in bivalent formation, and a subset of cells seem to survive the elimination process and develop into gametes. It is possible that mutants that are partially defective in bivalent formation were missed in past genetic screens, because no evident meiotic defects associated with failure in bivalent formation would have been detectable. Meiotic quality control effectively eliminates most failed germ cells, leaving predominately successful ones. Here, we provide evidence supporting this possibility. The Caenorhabditis elegans mrg-1 loss-of-function mutant does not appear to be defective in bivalent formation in diakinesis oocytes. However, defects in homologous chromosome pairing and synapsis during the preceding meiotic prophase, prerequisites for successful bivalent formation, were observed in most, but not all, germ cells. Failed bivalent formation in the oocytes became evident once meiotic quality control was abrogated in the mrg-1 mutant. Both double-strand break repair and synapsis checkpoints are partly responsible for eliminating failed germ cells in the mrg-1 mutant. Interestingly, removal of both checkpoint activities from the mrg-1 mutant is not sufficient to completely suppress the increased germline apoptosis, suggesting the presence of a novel meiotic checkpoint mechanism.
Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolism , Chromosome Pairing , Germ Cells/metabolism , Meiosis , Animals , Apoptosis , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans/growth & development , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , Germ Cells/cytology , Meiotic Prophase I/physiology , Microscopy, Fluorescence , Mutation , Oocytes/metabolism , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/metabolismABSTRACT
We report here that 6.9% (68/987) of randomly selected cDNA clones from an S. pombe cDNA library lack apparently long open reading frames which we denote prl. One of them, prl1, was examined further because multiple bands were observed when it was used as a probe in northern blot analysis. These multiple bands appear to be derived from overlapping transcripts from both DNA strands, including non-coding RNAs and antisense RNAs in addition to mRNA. Such mechanisms may increase the transcriptional variation in S. pombe cells.
Subject(s)
Open Reading Frames , Poly A , RNA/genetics , Schizosaccharomyces/genetics , Blotting, Northern , DNA, Complementary/metabolism , Gene Library , Models, Genetic , Molecular Sequence Data , Oligonucleotides, Antisense/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Transcription, GeneticABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Dosage compensation is a specialized gene regulatory mechanism which equalizes X-linked gene expression between sexes. In Caenorhabditis elegans, dosage compensation is achieved by the activity of the dosage compensation complex (DCC). The DCC localizes to both X chromosomes in hermaphrodites to downregulate gene expression by half. The DCC contains a subcomplex (condensin I(DC)) similar to the evolutionarily conserved condensin complexes which play fundamental roles in chromosome dynamics during mitosis and meiosis. Therefore, mechanisms related to mitotic chromosome condensation have been long hypothesized to mediate dosage compensation. However experimental evidence was lacking. RESULTS: Using 3D FISH microscopy to measure the volumes of X and chromosome I territories and to measure distances between individual loci, we show that hermaphrodite worms deficient in DCC proteins have enlarged interphase X chromosomes when compared to wild type. By contrast, chromosome I is unaffected. Interestingly, hermaphrodite worms depleted of condensin I or II show no phenotype. Therefore X chromosome compaction is specific to condensin I(DC). In addition, we show that SET-1, SET-4, and SIR-2.1, histone modifiers whose activity is regulated by the DCC, need to be present for the compaction of the X chromosome territory. CONCLUSION: These results support the idea that condensin I(DC), and the histone modifications regulated by the DCC, mediate interphase X chromosome compaction. Our results link condensin-mediated chromosome compaction, an activity connected to mitotic chromosome condensation, to chromosome-wide repression of gene expression in interphase.
ABSTRACT
Meiotic recombination is initiated by the programmed induction of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs), lesions that pose a potential threat to the genome. A subset of the DSBs induced during meiotic prophase become designated to be repaired by a pathway that specifically yields interhomolog crossovers (COs), which mature into chiasmata that temporarily connect the homologs to ensure their proper segregation at meiosis I. The remaining DSBs must be repaired by other mechanisms to restore genomic integrity prior to the meiotic divisions. Here we show that HIM-6, the Caenorhabditis elegans ortholog of the RecQ family DNA helicase BLM, functions in both of these processes. We show that him-6 mutants are competent to load the MutSγ complex at multiple potential CO sites, to generate intermediates that fulfill the requirements of monitoring mechanisms that enable meiotic progression, and to accomplish and robustly regulate CO designation. However, recombination events at a subset of CO-designated sites fail to mature into COs and chiasmata, indicating a pro-CO role for HIM-6/BLM that manifests itself late in the CO pathway. Moreover, we find that in addition to promoting COs, HIM-6 plays a role in eliminating and/or preventing the formation of persistent MutSγ-independent associations between homologous chromosomes. We propose that HIM-6/BLM enforces biased outcomes of recombination events to ensure that both (a) CO-designated recombination intermediates are reliably resolved as COs and (b) other recombination intermediates reliably mature into noncrossovers in a timely manner.
Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/enzymology , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Meiosis/geneticsABSTRACT
Successful chromosome segregation during meiosis depends on the synaptonemal complex (SC), a structure that stabilizes pairing between aligned homologous chromosomes. Here we show that SC assembly is a temperature-sensitive process during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. Temperature sensitivity of SC assembly initially was revealed through identification of the germline-specific P-granule component PGL-1 as a factor promoting stable homolog pairing. Using an assay system that monitors homolog pairing in vivo, we showed that depletion of PGL-1 at 25° disrupts homolog pairing. Analysis of homolog pairing at other chromosomal loci in a pgl-1-null mutant revealed a pairing defect similar to that observed in mutants lacking SC central region components. Furthermore, loss of pgl-1 function at temperatures ≥25° results in severe impairment in loading of SC central region component SYP-1 onto chromosomes, resulting in formation of SYP-1 aggregates. SC assembly is also temperature sensitive in wild-type worms, which exhibit similar SYP-1 loading defects and formation of SYP-1 aggregates at temperatures ≥26.5°. Temperature shift analyses suggest that assembly of the SC is temperature sensitive, but maintenance of the SC is not. We suggest that the temperature sensitive (ts) nature of SC assembly may contribute to fitness and adaptation capacity in C. elegans by enabling meiotic disruption in response to environmental change, thereby increasing the production of male progeny available for outcrossing.
Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Caenorhabditis elegans/physiology , Meiosis/physiology , RNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Synaptonemal Complex/metabolism , Temperature , Adaptation, Physiological , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolism , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , RNA Interference , RNA-Binding Proteins/geneticsABSTRACT
In preparation for meiotic chromosome segregation, homologous chromosomes need to pair, synapse (i.e., assemble the synaptonemal complex, SC), and then recombine to generate a physical linkage (i.e., chiasma) between them. In many organisms meiotic pairing capacity distributed along the entire chromosome length supports presynaptic alignment. In contrast, the prevailing model for C. elegans proposes that presynaptic homologous pairing is performed solely by a master pairing-site, the pairing center (PC). In this model, the remaining chromosomal regions (the non-PC regions) are not actively involved in presynaptic pairing, and the SC assembling from the PC aligns the homologous chromosomes along non-PC regions and holds them together. Our recent work, however, demonstrates that C. elegans chromosomes establish presynaptic alignment along the entire chromosome length, suggesting that the non-PC regions are also actively involved in the presynaptic pairing process. Furthermore, we have also discovered that the chromodomain protein MRG-1 facilitates this presynaptic non-PC pairing. The phenotype of the mrg-1 mutant indicates that the PC and the non-PC collaborate in successful pairing and synapsis. Therefore, homologous pairing mechanisms in C. elegans possibly share more similarity with those in other organisms than previously thought. Here, we elaborate on these observations and discuss a hypothetical model for presynaptic pairing in C. elegans based on our novel findings.
ABSTRACT
Successful meiotic recombination is driven by a series of programmed chromosome dynamics that include changes in the protein composition of meiotic chromosomes and the juxtaposition of homologous chromosomes. The simultaneous visualization of both chromosome-bound proteins and the status of homologous association is an important experimental approach to analyze the mechanisms supporting proper meiotic chromosome association. One of a number of model organisms used for meiosis research, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans offers an excellent environment to study meiotic chromosome dynamics. Here I will describe how to visualize both chromosome structure and specific chromosomal loci simultaneously, in a whole-mount C. elegans germ line. It combines immunofluorescent (IF) staining for a meiotic chromosome structural component with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).
Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Chromosomes/metabolism , Meiosis/genetics , Animals , In Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceABSTRACT
DNA injected into the Caenorhabditis elegans germline forms extrachromosomal arrays that segregate during cell division [1, 2]. The mechanisms underlying array formation and segregation are not known. Here, we show that extrachromosomal arrays form de novo centromeres at high frequency, providing unique access to a process that occurs with extremely low frequency in other systems [3-8]. De novo centromerized arrays recruit centromeric chromatin and kinetochore proteins and autonomously segregate on the spindle. Live imaging following DNA injection revealed that arrays form after oocyte fertilization via homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining. Individual arrays gradually transition from passive inheritance to active segregation during the early embryonic divisions. The heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family proteins HPL-1 and HPL-2 are dispensable for de novo centromerization even though arrays become strongly enriched for the heterochromatin-associated H3K9me3 modification over time. Partial inhibition of HP1 family proteins accelerates the acquisition of segregation competence. In addition to reporting the first direct visualization of new centromere formation in living cells, these findings reveal that naked DNA rapidly builds de novo centromeres in C. elegans embryos in an HP1-independent manner and suggest that, rather than being a prerequisite, HP1-dependent heterochromatin antagonizes de novo centromerization.
Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans/embryology , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Centromere/metabolism , DNA, Helminth/metabolism , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolism , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/genetics , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , Homologous Recombination , Kinetochores/metabolismABSTRACT
Heteromorphic sex chromosomes, such as the X/Y pair in mammals, differ in size and DNA sequence yet function as homologs during meiosis; this bivalent asymmetry presents special challenges for meiotic completion. In Caenorhabditis elegans males carrying mnT12, an X;IV fusion chromosome, mnT12 and IV form an asymmetric bivalent: chromosome IV sequences are capable of pairing and synapsis, while the contiguous X portion of mnT12 lacks a homologous pairing partner. Here, we investigate the meiotic behavior of this asymmetric neo-X/Y chromosome pair in C. elegans. Through immunolocalization of the axis component HIM-3, we demonstrate that the unpaired X axis has a distinct, coiled morphology while synapsed axes are linear and extended. By showing that loci at the fusion-proximal end of IV become unpaired while remaining synapsed as pachytene progresses, we directly demonstrate the occurrence of synaptic adjustment in this organism. We further demonstrate that meiotic crossover distribution is markedly altered in males with the asymmetric mnT12/+ bivalent relative to controls, resulting in greatly reduced crossover formation near the X;IV fusion point and elevated crossovers at the distal end of the bivalent. In effect, the distal end of the bivalent acts as a neo-pseudoautosomal region in these males. We discuss implications of these findings for mechanisms that ensure crossover formation during meiosis. Furthermore, we propose that redistribution of crossovers triggered by bivalent asymmetry may be an important driving force in sex chromosome evolution.
Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Chromosome Pairing/genetics , Evolution, Molecular , Meiosis/genetics , Recombination, Genetic , Sex Chromosomes/genetics , Animals , Crossing Over, Genetic , MaleABSTRACT
Homologous chromosome pairing is a prerequisite to establish physical linkage between homologs, which is critical for faithful chromosome segregation during meiosis I. The establishment of pairing is genetically separable from subsequent synapsis, defined as stabilization of pairing by the synaptonemal complex (SC). The underlying mechanism of presynaptic pairing is poorly understood. In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, a unique cis-acting element, the pairing center (PC), is essential for presynaptic pairing; however, it is not known whether and how the remainder of the chromosome contributes to presynaptic pairing. Here we report direct evidence for presynaptic pairing activity intrinsic to non-PC regions, which is facilitated by a conserved chromodomain protein, MRG-1. In mrg-1 loss-of-function mutants, pairing is compromised specifically in non-PC regions, leading to nonhomologous SC assembly. Our data support a model in which presynaptic alignment in non-PC regions collaborates with initial PC pairing to ensure correct homologous synapsis.
Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolism , Chromosome Pairing/genetics , Chromosome Pairing/physiology , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Caenorhabditis elegans/cytology , Genes, Helminth , Meiosis/genetics , Meiosis/physiology , Mutation , Synaptonemal Complex/genetics , Synaptonemal Complex/metabolismABSTRACT
During the course of meiotic prophase, intrinsic double-strand breaks (DSBs) must be repaired before the cell can engage in meiotic nuclear division. Here we investigate the mechanism that controls the meiotic progression in Schizosaccharomyces pombe that have accumulated excess meiotic DSBs. A meiotic recombination-defective mutant, meu13Delta, shows a delay in meiotic progression. This delay is dependent on rec12+, namely on DSB formation. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis revealed that meiotic DSB repair in meu13Delta was retarded. We also found that the delay in entering nuclear division was dependent on the checkpoint rad+, cds1+ and mek1+ (the meiotic paralog of Cds1/Chk2). This implies that these genes are involved in a checkpoint that provides time to repair DSBs. Consistently, the induction of an excess of extrinsic DSBs by ionizing radiation delayed meiotic progression in a rad17(+)-dependent manner. dmc1Delta also shows meiotic delay, however, this delay is independent of rec12+ and checkpoint rad+. We propose that checkpoint monitoring of the status of meiotic DSB repair exists in fission yeast and that defects other than DSB accumulation can cause delays in meiotic progression.
Subject(s)
Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins , Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases , Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins/genetics , Schizosaccharomyces/genetics , Blotting, Western , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , Checkpoint Kinase 2 , DNA Damage , DNA Repair , Endonucleases/genetics , Gamma Rays , Meiosis , Mutation , Phosphorylation , Protein Kinases/genetics , Recombination, Genetic , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Overlapping genes that are transcribed from the same genomic regions are rare in eukaryotes and to date few detailed functional analyses have been reported. RESULTS: We report here three novel overlapping transcripts that are specifically expressed during meiosis of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. They are denoted as omt1+, omt2+ and omt3+ after overlapping meiotic transcripts. omt1+ encodes a 12-kDa protein and omt2+ encodes a 11-kDa protein with homology to the bifunctional mammalian protein DCoH/PCBD. omt3+ does not have a significant open reading frame. The omt2+ transcript overlaps with both the omt1+ and omt3+ transcripts but the latter two transcripts do not overlap. omt1Delta and omt2Delta but not omt3Delta failed to form mature spore walls. The Omt1-GFP and Omt2-GFP fusion proteins localized to the outside and the inside of the spore walls, respectively. The sporulation-specific protein Meu10 and the spore wall components were abnormally localized in the spore walls of omt1Delta and omt2Delta. CONCLUSION: The overlapping genes omt1+ and omt2+ express functional proteins that participate in spore wall maturation, indicating that gene overlap does not affect the physiological functions of the proteins encoded by these genes. Generation of overlapped RNA may be due to loose regulation of transcription termination during meiosis of S. pombe.