Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Ann Biomed Eng ; 52(5): 1335-1346, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38341399

ABSTRACT

Blood pressure gradient ( Δ P ) across an aortic coarctation (CoA) is an important measurement to diagnose CoA severity and gauge treatment efficacy. Invasive cardiac catheterization is currently the gold-standard method for measuring blood pressure. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of Δ P estimates derived non-invasively using patient-specific 0D and 3D deformable wall simulations. Medical imaging and routine clinical measurements were used to create patient-specific models of patients with CoA (N = 17). 0D simulations were performed first and used to tune boundary conditions and initialize 3D simulations. Δ P across the CoA estimated using both 0D and 3D simulations were compared to invasive catheter-based pressure measurements for validation. The 0D simulations were extremely efficient ( ∼ 15 s computation time) compared to 3D simulations ( ∼ 30 h computation time on a cluster). However, the 0D Δ P estimates, unsurprisingly, had larger mean errors when compared to catheterization than 3D estimates (12.1 ± 9.9 mmHg vs 5.3 ± 5.4 mmHg). In particular, the 0D model performance degraded in cases where the CoA was adjacent to a bifurcation. The 0D model classified patients with severe CoA requiring intervention (defined as Δ P ≥ 20 mmHg) with 76% accuracy and 3D simulations improved this to 88%. Overall, a combined approach, using 0D models to efficiently tune and launch 3D models, offers the best combination of speed and accuracy for non-invasive classification of CoA severity.


Subject(s)
Aortic Coarctation , Humans , Aortic Coarctation/diagnostic imaging , Blood Pressure , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods , Blood Flow Velocity , Computer Simulation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL