A randomized trial of continuous glucose monitoring to improve post-transplant glycemic control.

INTRODUCTION: This study examines whether the use of inpatient Continuous Glucose Monitors provides improved glycemic control over finger-stick glucose monitoring post-transplant. METHODS: This is a single-site, prospective randomized controlled trial of 40 patients receiving conventional finger-stick glucose monitoring or continuous monitoring using the Medtronic Guardian Sensor 3 during the first 5 days post-transplant. Included patients were adult renal transplant recipients with a diagnosis of diabetes. Assessed endpoints included post-transplant daily median glucose level, hyperglycemic (≥180 mg/dL) and hypoglycemic (≤80 mg/dL) episodes, number of post-transplant bacterial infections and length of stay. RESULTS: Groups were well matched in demographic variables. Median daily glucose was significantly lower in the intervention group. There were also significantly less episodes of hyperglycemia on postoperative days 2, 3, 4, and 5. There were no differences in the incidences of hypoglycemia, postoperative bacterial infections, or length of stay. CONCLUSION: In this randomized study, the use of a continuous glucose monitor to guide post-transplant glucose management significantly lowered the incidence of hyperglycemic episodes and median glucose levels through the first 5 days post-transplant without increasing the number of hypoglycemic episodes. The use of these devices can be considered in the immediate post-renal transplant setting.

Outcomes of kidney transplantation in patients with myeloma and amyloidosis in the USA.

BACKGROUND: Recent improvement in treatment and patient survival has opened the eligibility of kidney transplantation to patients who developed end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) from plasma cell dyscrasias (PCDs). Data on clinical outcomes in this population are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network dataset (2006-2018) to compare patient and graft outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with ESKD due to PCD versus other causes. RESULTS: Among 168 369 adult first kidney transplant recipients, 0.22-0.43% per year had PCD as the cause of ESKD. The PCD group had worse survival than the non-PCD group for both living and deceased donor types {adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.24 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67-2.99] and aHR 1.40 [95% CI 1.08-1.83], respectively}. The PCD group had worse survival than the diabetes group, but only among living donors [aHR 1.87 (95% CI 1.37-2.53) versus aHR 1.16 (95% CI 0.89-1.2)]. Graft survival in patients with PCD were worse than non-PCD in both living and deceased donors [aHR 1.72 (95% CI 1.91-2.56) and aHR 1.30 (95% CI 1.03-1.66)]. Patient and graft survival were worse in amyloidosis but not statistically different in multiple myeloma compared with the non-PCD group. CONCLUSION: The study data are crucial when determining kidney transplant eligibility and when discussing transplant risks in patients with PCD.

Kidney transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: narrative analysis and review of the last two decades.

There have been significant advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma in the last two decades. Approximately 25% of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma have some degree of kidney impairment. During the course of illness, nearly 50% of myeloma patients will develop kidney disease. Moreover, ∼10% of myeloma patients have advanced kidney disease requiring dialysis at presentation. Hemodialysis is associated with a significantly reduced overall survival (OS). In the setting of prolonged long-term OS due to the use of newer immunotherapeutic agents in the treatment of myeloma, patients with myeloma and advanced kidney disease may benefit from more aggressive management with kidney transplantation (KTx). Unfortunately, most data regarding outcomes of KTx in patients with myeloma come from single-center case series. With the advent of novel treatment choices, it remains unclear if outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with myeloma have improved in recent years. In this descriptive systematic review, we coalesced published patient data over the last 20 years to help inform clinicians and patients on expected hematologic and KTx outcomes in this complex population. We further discuss the future of KTx in patients with paraproteinemia.

A multi-center study on safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients with kidney transplant.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used for various malignancies. However, their safety and efficacy in patients with a kidney transplant have not been defined. To delineate this, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study of 69 patients with a kidney transplant receiving ICIs between January 2010 and May 2020. For safety, we assessed the incidence, timing, and risk factors of acute graft rejection. For efficacy, objective response rate and overall survival were assessed in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma, the most common cancers in our cohort, and compared with stage-matched 23 patients with squamous cell carcinoma and 14 with melanoma with a kidney transplant not receiving ICIs. Following ICI treatment, 29 out of 69 (42%) patients developed acute rejection, 19 of whom lost their allograft, compared with an acute rejection rate of 5.4% in the non-ICI cohort. Median time from ICI initiation to rejection was 24 days. Factors associated with a lower risk of rejection were mTOR inhibitor use (odds ratio 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.72) and triple-agent immunosuppression (0.67, 0.48-0.92). The objective response ratio was 36.4% and 40% in the squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma subgroups, respectively. In the squamous cell carcinoma subgroup, overall survival was significantly longer in patients treated with ICIs (median overall survival 19.8 months vs. 10.6 months), whereas in the melanoma subgroup, overall survival did not differ between groups. Thus, ICIs were associated with a high risk of rejection in patients with kidney transplants but may lead to improved cancer outcomes. Prospective studies are needed to determine optimal immunosuppression strategies to improve patient outcomes.

An early experience on the effect of solid organ transplant status on hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

We compared the outcome of COVID-19 in immunosuppressed solid organ transplant (SOT) patients to a transplant naïve population. In total, 10 356 adult hospital admissions for COVID-19 from March 1, 2020 to April 27, 2020 were analyzed. Data were collected on demographics, baseline clinical conditions, medications, immunosuppression, and COVID-19 course. Primary outcome was combined death or mechanical ventilation. We assessed the association between primary outcome and prognostic variables using bivariate and multivariate regression models. We also compared the primary endpoint in SOT patients to an age, gender, and comorbidity-matched control group. Bivariate analysis found transplant status, age, gender, race/ethnicity, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, COPD, and GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 to be significant predictors of combined death or mechanical ventilation. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, SOT status had a trend toward significance (odds ratio [OR] 1.29; 95% CI 0.99-1.69, p = .06). Compared to an age, gender, and comorbidity-matched control group, SOT patients had a higher combined risk of death or mechanical ventilation (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.03-1.74, p = .027).

Hepatitis C-positive donor to negative recipient kidney transplantation: A real-world experience.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that transplanting a hepatitis C virus (HCV)-negative recipients with a HCV-positive donor is feasible in a research setting. In February 2018, we began transplanting HCV-negative recipients with HCV-positive donors as standard of care. METHODS: All patients, except those with previously cured HCV and those with cirrhosis, were consented for HCV NAT-positive donor kidneys. After transplantation, patients were tested for HCV RNA until viremic. A direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agent was prescribed based on genotype and insurance approval. Sustained virologic response (SVR) at weeks 4 and 12 was recorded. Renal function and death censored graft survival at 1 year were evaluated and compared to recipients of HCV NAT-negative kidneys. RESULTS: A total of 25 HCV NAT-positive donor kidney transplants from February to October 2018 were performed. All patients received basiliximab and maintained with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Median time from viremia to start of DAA was 13 (8-22) days. The most common genotype was 1a (60%), followed by 3a (28%). The most commonly prescribed DAA was ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (56%), followed by velpatasvir/sofosbuvir (32%), and then glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (12%). All patients achieved initial SVR12, except one. One patient had a mixed-genotype infection requiring retreatment to achieve SVR12. Death censored graft survival was 96%. Recipients of HCV NAT-positive organs compared to HCV NAT-negative organs received younger donors (mean 35 ± 8.9 vs 45.1 ± 15.7 years; P < .01) and spent less time on the waitlist (median 479 (93-582) vs 1808 (567-2263) days; P = .02). CONCLUSION: HCV NAT-negative recipients can be safely and successfully transplanted with HCV NAT-positive donor kidneys outside of a research protocol. Access to DAA and timely administration of therapy is important and an insurance approval process within the transplant center can be beneficial to patients. A case of mixed-genotype infection was presented, and although not as common, can be successfully treated. HCV organs can expand the organ pool and should no longer be considered experimental. The use of these organs in HCV-negative recipient's decreases waiting time, have excellent outcomes, and should be considered standard of care.

COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients.

There is minimal information on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in immunocompromised individuals. We have studied 10 patients treated at 12 adult care hospitals. Ten kidney transplant recipients tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by polymerase chain reaction, and 9 were admitted. The median age was 57 (interquartile range [IQR] 47-67), 60% were male, 40% Caucasian, and 30% Black/African American. Median time from transplant to COVID-19 testing was 2822 days (IQR 1272-4592). The most common symptom was fever, followed by cough, myalgia, chills, and fatigue. The most common chest X-ray and computed tomography abnormality was multifocal patchy opacities. Three patients had no abnormal findings. Leukopenia was seen in 20% of patients, and allograft function was stable in 50% of patients. Nine patients were on tacrolimus and a mycophenolic antimetabolite, and 70% were on prednisone. Hospitalized patients had their antimetabolite agent stopped. All hospitalized patients received hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. Three patients died (30%), and 5 (50%) developed acute kidney injury. Kidney transplant recipients infected with COVID-19 should be monitored closely in the setting of lowered immunosuppression. Most individuals required hospitalization and presenting symptoms were similar to those of nontransplant individuals.

Kidney oxalate crystal deposition in adult patients: A relatively common finding
.

AIMS: We aim to describe the clinical and histological findings in patients with the finding of any tubular oxalate deposits in kidney biopsy specimens. BACKGROUND: The prevalence, manifestation, and outcome of secondary oxalate nephropathy have not been extensively studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed the clinical and histological findings in all patients with the finding of any tubular oxalate deposits in kidney biopsy specimens between July 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018, at Northwell Health Pathology Department (Manhasset, NY, USA). RESULTS: The prevalence of oxalate deposition on a kidney biopsy was 4.07% (25/615), and in 88% of cases was a major finding. Prior to biopsy, oxalate was anticipated in only 1 case. The etiology of oxalosis was clarified retrospectively in 14 cases, most commonly due to GI surgery (n = 10) and increased oxalate intake (n = 4). In 11 cases, etiology remained unknown, although at least 3 cases were exposed to antibiotics associated with secondary oxalosis. There was no significant clinical/pathological or survival difference between known vs. unknown cause groups. The overall 3-month renal survival rate was 76.0 ± 8.5%. Multivariate Cox regression showed that creatinine at the time of biopsy (HR: 1.79, 95% CI: 0.71 - 4.51), background histological chronicity change (HR: 1.82, 95% CI: 0.70 - 4.72) and oxalate density (HR: 2.27, 95% CI: 0.49 - 10.55) are associated with end-stage kidney disease. CONCLUSION: Oxalate deposition is common but rarely anticipated biopsy finding. Nephrologists need to consider surgical history and other secondary causes of oxalosis as causes of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease.

An unusual case of Kaposi sarcoma masquerading as cystitis in a kidney transplant recipient.

Human Herpes Virus-8 (HHV-8) may reactivate in immunocompromised patients including recipients of solid organ transplants. Reactivation of HHV-8 may result in Kaposi sarcoma (KS). KS typically occurs with dermatologic involvement but can affect virtually any other organ; most commonly the gastrointestinal tract. We present a diagnostically challenging case of KS in a South American woman 7 months after kidney transplant. She presented with recurrent urinary tract infection manifested by pelvic pain and dysuria. Imaging studies revealed bladder thickening with pelvic lymphadenopathy. Findings on tissue biopsied from the bladder and lymph nodes were consistent with KS. Her skin was not affected. This case illustrates that KS and other HHV-8-related diseases should be on the differential diagnosis as a cause of mass lesions as well as lymphadenopathy in transplant recipients. The case exemplifies the need to pursue a tissue diagnosis in immunocompromised patients when a diagnosis is uncertain.

Pre-liver transplant renal dysfunction and association with post-transplant end-stage renal disease: A single-center examination of updated UNOS recommendations.

Simultaneous liver-kidney allocation protocols allocate dual organs based on a sustained eGFR of 30 mL/min or less. A 2017-UNOS update includes CKD3 as dual organ candidates but only when the listing eGFR is <30 mL/min while recommending a "safety net" for prioritized kidney listing post-LT. We retrospectively reviewed adult LTs examine whether the UNOS proposal captured the LT population at highest risk for developing post-LT ESRD. Among 290 LT recipients, 67 had pre-LT CKD3, 141 had AKI, of whom 47 required dialysis (<4 weeks). During follow-up, 25 (8.62%) developed ESRD, while 70 (24.1%) died. In adjusted Cox models, CKD3 had an independent association with post-LT ESRD (adjusted HR 4.8; P = 0.001), independent of AKI. Interestingly, CKD3 with listing GFR >30 mL/min was still significantly associated with post-LT ESRD. AKI was associated with reduced post-LT survival (adjusted HR 1.9; P = 0.02), albeit only in the first-year post-LT. Severe AKI-D was associated with post-LT ESRD and mortality. The safety net would have captured only 60% of all post-LT ESRD cases in our cohort. Pre-LT CKD3 was associated with increased risk of post-LT ESRD above the recommended cutoff for listing GFR. These findings, if generalizable in larger cohorts have important implications for dual organ allocation.

Membrane potential and dynamics in a ternary lipid mixture: insights from molecular dynamics simulations.

Transmembrane potential (Vm) plays critical roles in cell signaling and other functions. However, the impact of Vm on the structure and dynamics of membrane lipids and proteins, which are critical for the regulation of signaling, is still an open question. All-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is emerging as a useful technique to address this issue. Previous atomistic MD simulations of pure or binary model membranes indicated that both ion imbalance and electric field can be used to generate Vm, but both approaches failed to yield structural changes in lipids with statistical significance. We hypothesized that a possible reason for this could be oversimplified membrane composition or limited sampling. In this work, we tested if and how Vm modulates the structure and dynamics of lipids in a physiologically relevant model membrane. Using a detailed side-by-side comparison, we first show that while both ion imbalance and electric field generate Vm in our complex membranes, only the latter could produce physiologically relevant Vm. We further show that double bonds in lipid acyl chains have a relatively large sensitivity to Vm. A single-bilayer model with an electric field showed the highest sensitivity in simulations under the isothermal-isobaric (NPT) ensemble, reproducing expected responses of head-group dipoles to Vm and suggesting that this approach may be more suitable for studying the structural effects of Vm. Our findings also shed light on the relationship between the macroscopic Vm and its atomic-level underpinnings.

Kidney transplant wait list: Review and current trends.

Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease. Improved success of renal transplantation has led to a growing number of US patients waiting for a transplant and longer waits to obtain kidneys. This article discusses the process and challenges of getting on the wait list, kidney organ allocation, and areas being explored to increase available organs for renal transplantation.

The high incidence of severe chronic kidney disease after intestinal transplantation and its impact on patient and graft survival.

INTRODUCTION: Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), cumulative incidence, risk factors for, and impact on survival of severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) in intestinal transplantation (ITx) recipients were assessed. METHODS: First-time adult ITx recipients transplanted in the United States between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2012 were included. Severe CKD after ITx was defined as: glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 , chronic hemodialysis initiation, or kidney transplantation (KTx). Survival analysis and extended Cox model were conducted. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of severe CKD 1, 5, and 10 years after ITx was 3.2%, 25.1%, and 54.1%, respectively. The following characteristics were significantly associated with severe CKD: female gender (HR 1.34), older age (HR 1.38/10 year increment), catheter-related sepsis (HR 1.58), steroid maintenance immunosuppression (HR 1.50), graft failure (HR 1.76), ACR (HR 1.64), prolonged requirement for IV fluids (HR 2.12) or TPN (HR 1.94), and diabetes (HR 1.54). Individuals with higher GFR at the time of ITx (HR 0.92 for each 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 increment), and those receiving induction therapies (HR 0.47) or tacrolimus (HR 0.52) showed lower hazards of severe CKD. In adjusted analysis, severe CKD was associated with a significantly higher hazard of death (HR 6.20). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of CKD after ITx is extremely high and its development drastically limits post-transplant survival.

Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir is effective and well tolerated in postkidney transplant patients with chronic hepatitis C virus.

Patients with end-stage renal diseases on hemodialysis have a high prevalence of hepatitis C infection (HCV). In most patients, treatment for HCV is delayed until postrenal transplant. We assessed the effectiveness and tolerance of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) in 32 postkidney transplant patients infected with HCV. The group was composed predominantly of treatment-naïve (75%) African American (68.75%) males (75%) infected with genotype 1a (62.5%). Most patients received a deceased donor kidney graft (78.1%). A 96% sustained viral response (SVR) was reported (27/28 patients). One patient relapsed. One patient with baseline graft dysfunction developed borderline rejection. No graft loss was reported. Six HIV-coinfected patients were included in our analysis. Five of these patients achieved SVR 12. There were four deaths, and one of the deaths was in the HIV group. None of the deaths were attributed to therapy. Coinfected patients tolerated therapy well with no serious adverse events. Serum creatinine remained stable at baseline, end of therapy, and last follow-up, (1.351±.50 mg/dL; 1.406±.63 mg/dL; 1.290±.39 mg/dL, respectively). In postkidney transplant patients with HCV infection with or without coinfection with HIV, a combination of LDV/SOF was well tolerated and effective.

Early conversion to belatacept after renal transplantation.

Belatacept is a non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressive agent, which may make it the ideal agent for patients with delayed or slow graft function on calcineurin inhibitors. There are limited data on conversion of patients to belatacept within 6 months of transplantation. Between January 2012 and December 2015, 16 patients were converted to belatacept for delayed or poor graft function (eGFR<30 mL/min/1.73 m2 , MDRD); three were HIV positive. Conversion protocols were analyzed in patients ≤4 months and 4-6 months post-transplantation. Mean serum creatinine levels after belatacept conversion were compared with preconversion levels. Patient survival was 100%, and graft survival was 88%. The mean creatinine fell from 3.9±1.82 mg/dL prebelatacept conversion to 2.1±1.1 mg/dL at 6 months and 1.9±0.47 mg/dL (median 1.8 mg/dL) at 12 months postconversion. There was no significant increased risk of rejection, infection, or malignancy. HIV parameters remained largely stable. Early conversion to belatacept in patients with DGF or slow graft function is safe and efficacious, in a single-center nonrandomized retrospective analysis.

Can transition to adult care for transplant recipients be improved by intensified services while patients are still in pediatrics?

Context-Transferring out of pediatrics is a vulnerable time for transplant recipients. Use of a transition coordinator before and after transfer improves outcomes, although it is unclear whether placing a transition coordinator in pediatrics alone is beneficial. Objective-To determine if incorporating a transition coordinator in pediatrics only is associated with stable outcomes for kidney transplant recipients. Design-A retrospective chart review was conducted on outcomes for kidney transplant recipients who shifted service location between 2008 and 2012. Setting-A pediatric and adult transplant unit. Patients-Twenty-two patients transferred during the study period. Intervention-Twelve patients received more intensified preparation from the team's social worker, whose role was aligned with a transition coordinator position; 10 patients received standard care. Main Outcome Measures-The primary outcome was medication adherence, using a validated measure, standard deviations of tacrolimus blood levels. A standard deviation greater than 2.5 has been established as a threshold associated with poor outcomes such as rejection. Standard deviation of tacrolimus levels was compared for 1 year before and 1 year after transfer. Results-Medication adherence worsened from 1 year before (2.03 [SD, 0.75]) to 1 year after transfer (2.95 [SD, 1.38]; t = -;3.07, P = .007). A repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated that this pattern was the same for patients who did and patients who did not receive intensified services in pediatrics (F1,16 = 1.07, P = .32).