Does diagnostic mammography need to be a routine component of the initial evaluation of a breast symptom in women 30-39 years of age?

Diagnostic mammography is routinely ordered, along with targeted breast ultrasound, to evaluate breast symptoms in women 30-39 years of age. However, in this age group, mammography is often limited by breast density and the probability of detecting an occult malignancy is low. We sought to evaluate whether diagnostic mammography detected any new incidental malignancies in women aged 30-39 years presenting with focal breast symptoms. This retrospective study included women 30-39 years of age who had a diagnostic mammogram performed for focal breast symptoms at a single institution from 2002 to 2017. Descriptive analyses were performed to determine the rate of incidental mammographic findings outside of the region of the presenting symptom that 1) led to additional imaging and/or biopsies and 2) were found to be malignant. During the 16-year study period, 1770 evaluations were performed, of which 249 (14.1%) were found to have an additional incidental mammographic abnormality. Further diagnostic imaging was required in 211 (11.3%), core biopsy in 67 (3.8%), and excisional biopsy in 8 (0.5%). None of the mammographically detected incidental findings resulted in a new diagnosis of breast cancer. In the evaluation of focal benign breast symptoms in women 30-39 years of age, diagnostic mammography did not detect any new incidental malignancies outside of the area of interest, but instead led to additional unavailing imaging and biopsy procedures. The mammography component of the diagnostic evaluation of younger average-risk women may potentially be omitted if the presenting symptom is determined to be benign with ultrasound alone.

Single Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancers Have Distinct Characteristics and Survival.

BACKGROUND: Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status is pivotal to determining the prognosis and treatment of human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) receptor-negative invasive breast cancer. Frequently ER-positive (ER+) and/or PR-positive (PR+) cancers are labeled nonspecifically as "hormone receptor-positive" although only one is positive. This study aimed to evaluate and characterize the ER+PR- and ER-PR+ breast cancer phenotypes in reference to ER+PR+ cancers. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of female patients with HER2-negative (HER2-) invasive breast cancer diagnosed in 2010-2015 was performed using the National Cancer Database. Cases were grouped into ER+PR+, ER-PR+, ER+PR-, and ER-PR- phenotypes to determine differences in patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and overall survival. RESULTS: Of 823,969 cases, 619,050 (75.1%) were ER+PR+, 79,777 (9.7%) were ER+PR-, 7006 (0.9%) were ER-PR+, and 118,136 (14.3%) were ER-PR-. Compared with the ER+PR+ group, the ER+PR- and ER-PR+ groups were more likely to be high-grade cancer (16.0% vs. 34.2% and 80.0%, respectively; p < 0.001), to have lymphovascular invasion (17.9% vs. 19.6% and 23.0%; p < 0.001), to be node-positive (13.5% vs. 19.7% and 26.3%; p < 0.001), to be stage 4 cancer (3.6% vs. 5.9% and 6.7%; p < 0.001), to have a higher multigene assay score (mean, 16.0 vs. 27.8 and 38.1; p < 0.001), and to have a worse survival (90.6% vs. 83.8% and 78.1%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Single hormone receptor-positive breast cancer subtypes (ER+PR- and ER-PR+) are more likely to have unfavorable characteristics and worse survival than the ER+PR+ subtype, with the ER-PR+ subtype having outcomes similar to those for ER-PR- cancers. The single hormone receptor-positive subtypes, representing 10% of HER2- cancers, should be considered clinically distinct from ER+PR+ disease.