Pharmacokinetics of sildenafil after single oral doses in healthy male subjects: absolute bioavailability, food effects and dose proportionality.

AIMS: To determine the absolute bioavailability, dose proportionality and the effects of food on the pharmacokinetics of single oral doses of sildenafil citrate. METHODS: Three open-label, randomized crossover studies were conducted in healthy male subjects. Absolute bioavailability was determined by comparing pharmacokinetic data after administration of single oral and intravenous 50-mg doses of sildenafil (n=12 subjects). Food effects were examined by comparing pharmacokinetic data for sildenafil and its primary circulating metabolite, UK-103,320, after administration of a single oral 100-mg dose in the fasted and fed states (n=34 subjects). Dose proportionality was assessed from pharmacokinetic data obtained after administration of four single oral doses of sildenafil (25, 50, 100 and 200 mg) to 32 subjects. The safety and tolerability of sildenafil were also assessed in all of these studies. RESULTS: The calculated absolute oral bioavailability of sildenafil was 41% (90% CI: 36--47). Food slowed the rate of absorption, delaying mean tmax by approximately 1 h and reducing Cmax by 29% (90% CI: 19--38). Systemic exposure, as assessed by the mean area under the plasma concentration--time curve (AUC), was reduced by 11% (90% CI: 6--16). These food effects were not considered to be of clinical significance. There was statistical evidence of nonproportionality in Cmax and AUC over the dose range 25--200 mg. However the degree of nonproportionality was small, with predicted increases in Cmax and AUC of 2.2- and 2.1-fold, respectively, for a doubling in dose, and was thought to be clinically nonsignificant. Sildenafil was well tolerated in the three studies; the majority of adverse events were mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil had a mean absolute bioavailability of 41%. Food caused small reductions in the rate and extent of systemic exposure; these reductions are unlikely to be of clinical significance. Across the dose range of 25--200 mg, systemic exposure increased in a slightly greater than dose-proportional manner.

Pharmacodynamic effect of continuous vs intermittent dosing of dofetilide on QT interval.

AIMS: To investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dofetilide 1 mg twice daily continuously for 24 days compared with intermittent single dose treatments. METHODS: A randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multiple-dose study design was utilized. Healthy male volunteer subjects were randomized into three groups. Group 1 received dofetilide 1.0 mg twice daily for 23 days and once on day 24. Group 2 received matching placebo capsules under the same regimen as group 1. Group 3 received a single dose of dofetilide 1.0 mg on days 1, 5, 10, 17, and 24 with identical placebo capsules administered at all other times to match the dosing pattern of the other groups. RESULTS: Continuous administration of dofetilide resulted in the achievement of steady-state concentrations by day 5. Pharmacokinetic parameters following intermittent treatment showed no accumulation. Maximum daily QTc interval (mean +/- s.e. mean) increased in response to continuous twice-daily dofetilide from baseline (373 +/- 5) to day 2 (453 +/- 9) but thereafter decreased slightly, but not beyond day 5, by which time the mean maximum QTc was 440 +/- 7 ms. In contrast, single doses of dofetilide in the intermittently treated group led to reproducible increases in QTc. Thus mean (+/- s.e. mean) maximum QTc increased from a baseline of 387 +/- 7-467 +/- 14, 467 +/- 18, 469 +/- 14 and 458 +/- 10 ms on days 5, 10, 17 and 24, respectively. In view of the pharmacokinetic accumulation on continuous dosing, the attenuation of responsiveness is best represented by the slope of the QTc vs plasma concentration relationship. In the continuously treated group, an initial decrease in the value of the mean slope between day 1 (14.2 +/- 1.7 ms/ng ml(-1)) and day 5 (9.1 +/- 0.8 ms/ng ml(-1)) did not progress beyond day 5. The mean difference in slopes (95% CI) between the intermittent and continuously treated groups were 4.4 (1.3, 7.4) on day 5, 4.9 (1.6, 8.2) on day 10, 5.2 (1.1, 9.2) on day 17 and 4.4 (0.4, 8.4) on day 24. CONCLUSIONS: With continuous twice-daily administration the QT interval responsiveness to dofetilide is greater after the first dose than it is at steady state. After day 5 the relationship between dofetilide plasma concentration and its QT interval effect is predictable and stable over time.