ABSTRACT
We detected a highly divergent SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant in an immunocompromised person several months after the latest detection of the Alpha variant in the Netherlands. The patient was infected for 42 weeks despite several treatment regimens and disappearance of most clinical symptoms. We identified several potential immune escape mutations in the spike protein.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mutation , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/immunology , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Netherlands , SARS-CoV-2/classification , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/geneticsABSTRACT
Pneumocystis jirovecii (Pj) is a fungal pathogen that can cause severe and potential fatal pneumonia (Pneumocystis pneumonia, PCP) in immunocompromised patients. Microbiological diagnosis is necessary to confirm PCP, for which mainly real-time PCR assays are used by detecting Pj from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens. In this study, we evaluate the performance of the CE-IVD PneumoGenius® assay and CE-IVD RealStar® Pneumocystis jirovecii PCR assay in comparison to the lab developed test (LDT) that is used in routine diagnostics. Comparison was done by including 100 BAL specimens: 25 retrospective specimens, selected based on results obtained with LDT (15 positive/10 negative), and 75 prospectively collected specimens. LDT (targeting MSG) was performed according to local procedures and the PneumoGenius® (targeting mtLSU and DHPS fas) and RealStar® assays (targeting mtLSU) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Combining results of retrospective and prospective analysis, sensitivity was 69.7, 100 and 100% for the LDT, PneumoGenius® and RealStar®, respectively. Specificity was 100% for LDT and Pneumogenius®, whereas RealStar® showed a specificity of 97%. Correlation of fungal loads found with the PneumoGenius® and RealStar® assays was high (R2: 0.98). The PneumoGenius® and RealStar® assays performed comparable, and both showed high sensitivity in comparison to the LDT. For optimal diagnosis of PCP, the LDT has to be replaced by another, more sensitive assay. LAY SUMMARY: In this study, we evaluated the performance of two commercially available CE-IVD cleared real-time PCR assays to detect Pneumocystis jirovecii in comparison to the lab-developed test as used in routine diagnostics. Performance of the CE-IVD real-time PCR assay was superior to the lab-developed test.
Subject(s)
Pneumocystis carinii , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid , Humans , Pneumocystis carinii/genetics , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis/diagnosis , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Clostridioides difficile is the main causative agent of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Prompt diagnosis is required for initiation of timely infection control measures and appropriate adjustment of antibiotic treatment. The cobas Cdiff assay for use on the cobas Liat system enables a diagnostic result in 20 minutes. A total of 252 prospective (n = 150) and retrospective (n = 102) stool specimens from The Netherlands, France, and Switzerland were tested on the cobas Cdiff assay using the Xpert C. difficile assay as a reference method. The overall positive and negative percent agreement (PPA and NPA, respectively) of the cobas Cdiff assay compared with the Xpert C. difficile assay was 98.0% (100/102; 95% confidence interval [CI], 93.1% to 99.5%) and 94.0% (141/150; 95% CI, 89.0% to 96.8%), respectively. When comparing the PPAs of cobas Cdiff and Xpert C. difficile with culture, the results were 91.7% (55/60; 95% CI, 81.9% to 96.4%) and 85.0% (51/60; 95% CI, 73.9% to 91.9%), respectively. The difference was not statistically significant. The cobas Cdiff assay offers a very rapid alternative for diagnosing C. difficile infection. The 20-minute turnaround time provides the potential for point-of-care testing so that adequate infection control measures can be initiated promptly.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Toxins/genetics , Clostridioides difficile/genetics , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Humans , RibotypingABSTRACT
Rapid diagnosis of respiratory infections is of great importance for adequate isolation and treatment. Due to the batch-wise testing, laboratory-developed real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays (LDT) often result in a time to result of one day. Here, LDT was compared with rapid ePlex® Respiratory Pathogen (RP) Panel testing of GenMark Diagnostics (Carlsbad, CA, USA) with regard to time to result, installed isolation precautions, and antibacterial/antiviral treatment. Between January and March 2017, 68 specimens of 64 patients suspected of an acute respiratory infection were tested with LDT and the ePlex® RP panel. The time to result was calculated as the time between sample reception and result reporting. Information regarding isolation and antibacterial/antiviral treatment was obtained from the patient records. Thirty specimens tested LDT positive (47%) and 29 ePlex® RP panel positive (45%). The median time to result was 27.1 h (range 6.5-96.6) for LDT versus 3.4 h (range 1.5-23.6) for the RP panel, p-value < 0.001. In 14 out of 30 patients, isolation was discontinued based on the ePlex® RP panel results, saving 21 isolation days. ePlex® RP panel test results were available approximately one day ahead of the LDT results in the 19 patients receiving antiviral/antibacterial treatment. In addition, two bacterial pathogens, not requested by the physician, were detected using the RP panel. Analysis of respiratory infections with the ePlex® RP panel resulted in a significant decrease in time to result, enabling a reduction in isolation days in half of the patients. Furthermore, syndromic RP panel testing increased the identification of causative pathogens.
Subject(s)
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Respiratory Tract Infections , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Bacterial/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Polymerase Chain Reaction/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important pathogen that has been responsible for major nosocomial epidemics worldwide. For infection control programs, rapid and adequate detection of MRSA is of great importance. We developed a rapid and high-throughput molecular screening approach that consists of an overnight selective broth enrichment, followed by mecA, mecC, and S. aureus-specific (SA442 gene) real-time PCR assays, with subsequent confirmation using a staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec element (SCCmec)-orfX-based real-time PCR assay (GeneOhm MRSA assay) and culture. Here, the results of the screening approach over a 2-year period are presented. During this period, a total of 13,387 samples were analyzed for the presence of MRSA, 2.6% of which were reported as MRSA positive. No MRSA isolates carrying the mecC gene were detected during this study. Based on the results of the real-time PCR assays only, 95.2% of the samples could be reported as negative within 24 h. Furthermore, the performance of these real-time PCR assays was evaluated using a set of 104 assorted MRSA isolates, which demonstrated high sensitivity for both the combination of mecA and mecC with SA442 and the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay (98.1% and 97.1%, respectively). This molecular screening approach proved to be an accurate method for obtaining reliable negative results within 24 h after arrival at the laboratory and contributes to improvement of infection control programs, especially in areas with a low MRSA prevalence.
Subject(s)
High-Throughput Screening Assays , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time FactorsABSTRACT
The STARlet All-In-One system is a modular platform that integrates the complete molecular diagnostic workflow from nucleic acid extraction of clinical samples to PCR set-up and amplification. The platform was evaluated in comparison with laboratory developed tests (LDT) on fecal samples from patients with suspected viral gastro-enteritis. In a retrospective study, 72 positive samples were analysed, including all pathogens detected by the Seegene Allplex™ GI-virus assay, adenovirus, astrovirus, norovirus GI and GII, sapovirus, and rotavirus. Concordant results were obtained for 69 samples (96â¯%). Three discordant results were observed, one norovirus GII positive that gave an invalid result in the AIOS and two samples that were negative in the AIOS. One adenovirus positive that was subtyped as a genotype 2 virus, which is not associated with gastro-enteritis, and a sapovirus. In the prospective part of the study, 661 fecal samples were included. A total of 61 positive samples were detected, of which 60 were also detected by the AIOS. One norovirus GII positive sample (CT 35.2) was tested negative in the AIOS. Two additional sapovirus positive samples, CT 37 and 38, were detected by the AIOS but not by the LDT. The STARlet All-In-One platforms results in an automated molecular workflow with reduced hands-on time and enables running assays during out of office hours. Application of the Seegene Allplex™ GI-virus assay showed excellent concordance to the current diagnostic LDT. In a prospective comparison, only three discordant results were observed, all with CT values over 35 and therefore unlikely of clinical relevance.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), can manifest with varying disease severity and mortality. Genetic predisposition influences the clinical course of infectious diseases. We investigated whether genetic polymorphisms in candidate genes ACE2, TIRAP, and factor X are associated with clinical outcomes in COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre retrospective cohort study. All patients who visited the emergency department with SARS-CoV-2 infection proven by polymerase chain reaction were included. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in ACE2 (rs2285666), TIRAP (rs8177374) and factor X (rs3211783) were assessed. The outcomes were mortality, respiratory failure and venous thromboembolism. Respiratory failure was defined as the necessity of >5 litres/minute oxygen, high flow nasal oxygen suppletion or mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Between March and April 2020, 116 patients (35% female, median age 65 [inter quartile range 55-75] years) were included and treated according to the then applicable guidelines. Sixteen patients (14%) died, 44 patients (38%) had respiratory failure of whom 23 required endotracheal intubation for mechanical ventilation, and 20 patients (17%) developed venous thromboembolism. The percentage of TIRAP polymorphism carriers in the survivor group was 28% as compared to 0% in the non-survivor group (p = 0.01, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.02). Genotype distribution of ACE2 and factor X did not differ between survivors and non-survivors. CONCLUSION: This study shows that carriage of TIRAP polymorphism rs8177374 could be associated with a significantly lower mortality in COVID-19. This TIRAP polymorphism may be an important predictor in the outcome of COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/genetics , COVID-19/mortality , Membrane Glycoproteins/genetics , Receptors, Interleukin-1/genetics , Aged , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2/genetics , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2/metabolism , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Factor X/genetics , Factor X/metabolism , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Genotype , Humans , Male , Membrane Glycoproteins/metabolism , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/genetics , Receptors, Interleukin-1/metabolism , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) is a sexually transmitted bacterium in which macrolide resistance is rapidly increasing, limiting treatment options. We validated a new assay to detect the presence of macrolide resistance-associated mutations in MG (MG-MRAM). In 2018, symptomatic and asymptomatic clients visiting sexually transmitted infections (STI) clinics in Amsterdam or The Hague were tested for MG using transcription mediated amplification (TMA) assays. The sensitivity to detect MG of the newly developed MG-MRAM qPCR was compared to the MgPa qPCR, both in relation to the TMA assay. For the sensitivity and specificity to detect relevant mutations the MG-MRAM qPCR was compared to 23SrRNA sequencing analysis. The qPCR was subsequently used to determine the presence of MG-MRAM at different anatomical locations and to identify risk factors for MG-MRAM. MG-positive clients (402) providing 493 MG-positive samples were included. In total 309/493 (62.7%) samples from 291 (72.4%) clients were successfully typed with the MG-MRAM qPCR. The MG-MRAM qPCR had a sensitivity of 98.6% (95%CI 91.1%-99.9%) and specificity of 94.1% (95%CI 78.9%-99.0%) to detect MG-MRAM compared to sequencing analysis. Infection with MG-MRAM was detected in 193/291 (66.3%) clients: in 129/178 (72.5%) men and 64/113 (56.6%) women (p = 0.005). Prevalence of MG-MRAM was significantly higher in men, clients with a higher education, HIV-positive clients and clients with >10 sexual partners in the previous six months, but in multivariable analysis no factor was significantly associated with MG-MRAM presence. Since MG-MRAM prevalence was very high, testing for MG-MRAM is essential if treatment for MG is considered, and can be performed with this sensitive and specific qPCR test in routine diagnostics.
Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Microbial/genetics , Mycoplasma genitalium/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Female , Humans , Macrolides/pharmacology , Male , Mycoplasma Infections/microbiology , Netherlands , Prevalence , RNA, Ribosomal, 23S/genetics , Risk Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
A prominent feature of severe streptococcal infections is the profound inflammatory response that contributes to systemic toxicity. In sepsis the dysregulated host response involves both immunological and nonimmunological pathways. Here, we report a fatal case of an immunocompetent healthy female presenting with toxic shock and purpura fulminans caused by group B streptococcus (GBS; serotype III, CC19). The strain (LUMC16) was pigmented and hyperhemolytic. Stimulation of human primary cells with hyperhemolytic LUMC16 and STSS/NF-HH strains and pigment toxin resulted in a release of proinflammatory mediators, including tumor necrosis factor, interleukin (IL)-1ß, and IL-6. In addition, LUMC16 induced blood clotting and showed factor XII activity on its surface, which was linked to the presence of the pigment. The expression of pigment was not linked to a mutation within the CovR/S region. In conclusion, our study shows that the hemolytic lipid toxin contributes to the ability of GBS to cause systemic hyperinflammation and interferes with the coagulation system.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Toxins/toxicity , Leukocytes/immunology , Pigments, Biological/toxicity , Streptococcal Infections/immunology , Streptococcus agalactiae/immunology , Streptococcus agalactiae/pathogenicity , Thrombosis/immunology , Bacterial Toxins/genetics , Bacterial Toxins/immunology , Hemolysis/immunology , Humans , Interleukin-1beta/immunology , Interleukin-6/immunology , Leukocytes/microbiology , Leukocytes/pathology , Pigments, Biological/genetics , Pigments, Biological/immunology , Streptococcal Infections/genetics , Streptococcal Infections/pathology , Streptococcus agalactiae/genetics , Thrombosis/genetics , Thrombosis/microbiology , Thrombosis/pathologyABSTRACT
The emergence of the plasmid-mediated mcr colistin resistance gene in the community poses a potential threat for treatment of patients, especially when hospitalized. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of all currently known mcr mediated colistin resistance gene in fecal samples of patients attending a tertiary care hospital. From November 2014 until July 2015, fecal samples of patients attending the Leiden University Medical Center were collected and screened for presence of mcr using real-time PCR. Two of 576 patients were positive for mcr-1, resulting in a prevalence of 0.35%, whereas no mcr-2 was found. One of these samples was culture negative, the second sample contained a blaCMY-2 and mcr-1 containing E.coli. This strain belonged to Sequence Type 359 and serotype O177:H21. The mcr-1 containing E.coli was phenotypically susceptible to colistin with a MIC of ≤ 0.25mg/l, due to a 1329bp transposon IS10R inserted into the mcr-1 gene as identified by WGS. This prevalence study shows that mcr-1 is present in low levels patients out of the community attending a hospital. Furthermore the study underlines the importance of phenotypical confirmation of molecular detection of a mcr-1 gene.