Electrocardiographic abnormalities and NT-proBNP levels at long-term follow-up of patients with dyspnea after pulmonary embolism.

OBJECTIVES: Electrocardiogram (ECG) and measurement of plasma brain natriuretic peptides (BNP) are established markers of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in the setting of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) but their value at long-term follow-up is largely unknown. The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the prevalence of ECG abnormalities, describe levels of N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP), and establish their association with dyspnea at long-term follow-up after PE. DESIGN: All Swedish patients diagnosed with acute PE in 2005 (n = 5793) were identified through the Swedish National Patient Registry. Surviving patients in 2007 (n = 3510) were invited to participate. Of these, 2105 subjects responded to a questionnaire about dyspnea and comorbidities. Subjects with dyspnea or risk factors for development of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension were included in the study in a secondary step, which involved collection of blood samples and ECG registration. RESULTS: Altogether 49.3% had a completely normal ECG. The remaining participants had a variety of abnormalities, 7.2% had atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF). ECG with any sign of RVD was found in 7.2% of subjects. Right bundle branch block was the most common RVD sign with a prevalence of 6.4%. An abnormal ECG was associated with dyspnea. AF was associated with dyspnea, whereas ECG signs of RVD were not. 61.2% of subjects had NT-proBNP levels above clinical cut-off (>125 ng/L). The degree of dyspnea did not associate independently with NT-proBNP levels. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the value of ECG and NT-proBNP in long term follow-up after PE lies mostly in differential diagnostics.

Chronic Airflow Limitation, Emphysema and Impaired Diffusing Capacity in Relation to Smoking Habits in a Swedish Middle-Aged Population.

RATIONALE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) includes respiratory symptoms and chronic airflow limitation (CAL). In some cases, emphysema and impaired diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) are present, but characteristics and symptoms vary with smoking exposure. OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence of CAL, emphysema and impaired DLCO in relation to smoking and respiratory symptoms in a middle-aged population. METHODS: We investigated 28,746 randomly invited individuals (52% women) aged 50-64 years across six Swedish sites. We performed spirometry, DLCO, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and asked for smoking habits and respiratory symptoms. CAL was defined as post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second divided by forced expiratory volume (FEV1/FVC)<0.7. RESULTS: The overall prevalence was for CAL 8.8%, for impaired DLCO (DLCO

Dyspnea after pulmonary embolism: a nation-wide population-based case-control study.

Dyspnea is common after a pulmonary embolism. Often, but not always, the dyspnea can be explained by pre-existing comorbidities, and only rarely by chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). CTEPH is probably the extreme manifestation of a far more common condition, called the post-pulmonary embolism syndrome. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the prevalence and predictors of dyspnea among Swedish patients that survived a pulmonary embolism, compared to the general population. All Swedish patients diagnosed with an acute pulmonary embolism in 2005 (n = 5793) were identified via the Swedish National Patient Registry. Patients that lived until 2007 (n = 3510) were invited to participate. Of these, 2105 patients responded to a questionnaire about dyspnea and comorbidities. Data from the general population (n = 1905) were acquired from the multinational MONItoring of trends and determinants in CArdiovascular disease health survey, conducted in 2004. Patients with pulmonary embolism had substantially higher prevalences of both exertional dyspnea (53.0% vs. 17.3%, odds ratio (OR): 5.40, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 4.61-6.32) and wake-up dyspnea (12.0% vs. 1.7%, OR: 7.7, 95% CI: 5.28-11.23) compared to control subjects. These differences remained after adjustments and were most pronounced among younger patients. The increased risk for exertional dyspnea and wake-up dyspnea remained after propensity score matching (OR (95% CI): 4.11 (3.14-5.38) and 3.44 (1.95-6.06), respectively). This population-based, nation-wide study demonstrated that self-reported dyspnea was common among patients with previous pulmonary embolism. This finding suggested that a post-pulmonary embolism syndrome might be present, which merits further investigation.

Reliability of the prospective data collection protocol of the Swedish Spine Register: test-retest analysis of 119 patients.

BACKGROUND: The Swedish Lumbar Spine Register has been collecting patient-based data since 2000, and more than 80% of all spinal units in Sweden are now including their patients. In a few years, it will produce useful clinical information just as arthroplasty registers have, but to permit proper interpretation of data in the future, the reliability of the protocol must be tested. METHODS: Between January 2000 and March 2003, a sample of 122 patients was asked to fill in the questionnaire twice: 63 preoperatively and 59 postoperatively. Test-retest reliability was calculated with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) or weighted kappa when appropriate. RESULTS: Test-retest interval varied (range 0-235 days); in the "worst case scenario", the lowest ICC for SF-36 was 0.62 for the postoperative RE. Other values were above 0.70; for non-SF variables, ICC was in the range 0.79-0.89. Kappa values for the ordinal outcomes were high (0.74-0.91). INTERPRETATION: When separate reliability analysis was performed according to the time interval, a 0-2 days interval produced a significant memory effect; after 3 weeks, the reliability seemed to drop in the preoperative group, whereas results were reproducible up to 9 weeks postoperatively. The protocol studied can reliably detect postoperative improvements between large groups of patients such as in a register.