Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Front Pharmacol ; 14: 1258236, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37854715

ABSTRACT

Background: Preliminary evidence for efficacy in pulmonary sarcoidosis has been shown for efzofitimod. Here we present supportive evidence of efficacy based on an exposure-response analysis. Methods: Data from two studies (Phase 1, N = 24, single dose in healthy volunteers, and Phase 1b/2a, N = 25, multiple doses over 24 weeks in participants with pulmonary sarcoidosis) were used to build a population pharmacokinetic model. Using this model, the relationship between efzofitimod exposure and three prespecified efficacy parameters [mean daily oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose, percent-predicted forced vital capacity (ppFVC) and King's Sarcoidosis Questionnaire-Lung (KSQ-Lung) score] was explored. Linear regression described the relationship of efzofitimod exposure and OCS reduction, ppFVC and KSQ-Lung score. Logistic regression related efzofitimod exposure to the probability of achieving a minimal clinically important difference for ppFVC and KSQ-Lung score. Due to the small study size, trends (not statistical significance) in relationships are reported. Results: In patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis, as efzofitimod exposure increased, the mean daily OCS dose decreased, and ppFVC and KSQ-Lung score improved over baseline. The slope for all the endpoints by both linear and logistic regression showed an improving trend with increased exposure. Conclusion: These preliminary findings of a positive exposure-response across multiple efficacy endpoints support the claim that proof of concept has been established for the use of efzofitimod in pulmonary sarcoidosis. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03824392.

2.
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis ; 40(1): e2023011, 2023 Mar 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36975051

ABSTRACT

Efzofitimod is a first-in-class biologic based on a naturally occurring splice variant of histidyl-tRNA synthetase (HARS) that downregulates immune responses via selective modulation of neuropilin-2 (NRP2). Preclinical data found high expression of NRP2 in sarcoidosis granulomas. Treatment with efzofitimod reduced the granulomatous inflammation induced by P. acnes in an animal model of sarcoidosis. A dose escalating trial of efzofitimod in sarcoidosis with chronic symptomatic pulmonary disease found that treatment with efzofitimod was associated with improved quality of life with a trend towards reduced glucocorticoid use and stable to improved pulmonary function. These studies have led to a large Phase 3 trial of efzofitimod in symptomatic pulmonary sarcoidosis.

3.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 103(4): 1364-1366, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32828137

ABSTRACT

As the global COVID-19 pandemic continues, unabated and clinical trials demonstrate limited effective pharmaceutical interventions, there is a pressing need to accelerate treatment evaluations. Among options for accelerated development is the evaluation of drug combinations in the absence of prior monotherapy data. This approach is appealing for a number of reasons. First, combining two or more drugs with related or complementary therapeutic effects permits a multipronged approach addressing the variable pathways of the disease. Second, if an individual component of a combination offers a therapeutic effect, then in the absence of antagonism, a trial of combination therapy should still detect individual efficacy. Third, this strategy is time saving. Rather than taking a stepwise approach to evaluating monotherapies, this strategy begins with testing all relevant therapeutic options. Finally, given the severity of the current pandemic and the absence of treatment options, the likelihood of detecting a treatment effect with combination therapy maintains scientific enthusiasm for evaluating repurposed treatments. Antiviral combination selection can be facilitated by insights regarding SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology and cell cycle dynamics, supported by infectious disease and clinical pharmacology expert advice. We describe a clinical evaluation strategy using adaptive combination platform trials to rapidly test combination therapies to treat COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Epidemiologic Research Design , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , Clinical Trials as Topic , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Drug Combinations , Drug Repositioning/methods , Humans , Interferon beta-1b/therapeutic use , Lopinavir/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Ribavirin/therapeutic use , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Antivir Ther ; 20(8): 815-25, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26015411

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The influenza antiviral oseltamivir is not licensed for infants aged <1 year in most countries outside the United States. More information is needed on oseltamivir safety at different dosing levels in this vulnerable age group. METHODS: In this prospective, observational, non-randomized study, infants aged <1 year with laboratory-confirmed influenza were treated with oral oseltamivir for 5 days. Cohorts 1, 2 and 3 (aged 91-364, 31-90 and 0-30 days, respectively), received twice-daily dosages of 3, 2.5 and 2 mg/kg, respectively. Assessments included pharmacokinetics, on-treatment adverse events, resistance testing and viral shedding. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients were enrolled: 40, 20 and 5 in cohorts 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Systemic exposure to oseltamivir carboxylate (active metabolite) reached therapeutic levels in all patients, with an adequate safety margin. On-treatment adverse events (n=48) were reported by 32 patients (49%). At least one adverse event was reported by 43%, 65% and 40% of infants in cohorts 1, 2 and 3, respectively; most frequently vomiting and diarrhoea. Eight serious adverse events were reported, all of which were considered unrelated to treatment by the investigator. No deaths occurred and no patient had treatment withdrawn. Oseltamivir resistance mutations were detected in eight patients. CONCLUSIONS: Oseltamivir dosages of 2-3 mg/kg were well tolerated in infants aged <1 year and achieved therapeutic exposure levels. The current study supports the adoption of a universal dosing recommendation for infants. Clinicaltrials.gov unique identifier NCT00988325.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Influenza, Human/virology , Oseltamivir/pharmacology , Oseltamivir/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Influenza A virus/drug effects , Influenza A virus/physiology , Influenza B virus/physiology , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/mortality , Inhibitory Concentration 50 , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Treatment Outcome , Virus Shedding
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL