Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(7): 3197-3206, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31712950

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of delivering a functional exercise-based prehabilitation intervention and its effects on postoperative length of hospital stay, preoperative physical functioning and health-related quality of life in elective colorectal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomised controlled feasibility trial, 22 elective colorectal surgery patients were randomly assigned to exercise prehabilitation (n = 11) or standard care (n = 11). Feasibility of delivering the intervention was assessed based on recruitment and compliance to the intervention. Impact on postoperative length of hospital stay and complications, preoperative physical functioning (timed up and go test, five times sit to stand, stair climb test, handgrip dynamometry and 6-min walk test) and health-related quality of life were also assessed. RESULTS: Over 42% of patients (84/198) screened were deemed ineligible for prehabilitation due to insufficient time existing prior to scheduled surgery. Of those who were eligible, approximately 18% consented to the trial. Median length of hospital stay was 8 [range 6-27] and 10 [range 5-12] days respectively for the standard care and prehabilitation groups. Patterns towards preoperative improvements for the timed up and go test, stair climb test and 6-min walk test were observed for all participants receiving prehabilitation but not standard care. CONCLUSIONS: Despite prehabilitation appearing to convey positive benefits on physical functioning, short surgical wait times and patient engagement represent major obstacles to implementing exercise prehabilitation programmes in colorectal cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/rehabilitation , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Exercise Therapy/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/rehabilitation , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Period , Preoperative Care/methods , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life
2.
J Strength Cond Res ; 28(1): 273-80, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23660571

ABSTRACT

The use of nutritional supplements to improve sporting performance and increase training adaptations is commonplace among athletes and is an expanding market in terms of product choice and availability. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of 2 ergogenic aids with extracellular blood buffering potential, namely sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) and a lactate supplement, during a 40-km cycling time trial. Seven recreationally active men (age, 22.3 ± 3.3 years; height, 182.5 ± 6.5 cm; body mass, 79.2 ± 6.3 kg) completed five 40-km cycling time trials, including a familiarization trial in a randomized, blind, double placebo-controlled design. Subjects ingested (a) 300 mg·kg-1 body mass NaHCO3 (BICARB), (b) 45 mg·kg-1 body mass sodium chloride (PL-BICARB) as the placebo for the NaHCO3 trial, (c) 1115 mg lactate (LACTATE), or (d) plain flour as the placebo for the lactate trial (PL-LACTATE) 60 minutes before exercise. There was no significant difference in performance between the 4 conditions (p > 0.05). Although NaHCO3 ingestion induced significant changes in all the acid-base variables (all p < 0.05), no significant change was seen following lactate ingestion (p > 0.05). Subjects in the LACTATE condition did have a significantly higher heart rate (p < 0.05) without experiencing any greater perceived exertion (p > 0.05) than the other 3 conditions. Neither NaHCO3 nor lactate supplementation seem to improve 40-km cycling time trial performance. However, the potential benefits following LACTATE regarding perceived exertion require further research.


Subject(s)
Athletic Performance/physiology , Bicycling/physiology , Dietary Supplements , Lactic Acid/pharmacology , Sodium Bicarbonate/pharmacology , Acid-Base Equilibrium/drug effects , Acid-Base Equilibrium/physiology , Adult , Buffers , Double-Blind Method , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration/drug effects , Lactic Acid/blood , Male , Physical Exertion/drug effects , Young Adult
3.
Trials ; 20(1): 261, 2019 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31068223

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data from a feasibility study suggest that the use of an inelastic, short-stretch compression bandage following total knee arthroplasty is a safe technique that may improve patient-reported health outcomes, and that it is feasible to recruit to a full-scale study. METHODS: We will conduct a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of 2600 adult patients, which has 80% power to detect a 1 point difference in the Oxford Knee Score (a patient self-reported assessment of knee pain and function) at 52 weeks. Short stretch compression bandaging will be compared with standard wool and crepe bandaging following total knee arthroplasty. Recruitment will take place in orthopaedic units across the United Kingdom. Secondary outcomes include the EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)-5 L and EQ-5D-3 L scores, pain, length of hospital stay, and complications. DISCUSSION: The Knee Replacement Bandaging Study (KReBS) is a large study which aims to contribute to the evidence base for informing clinical decisions for the use of compression bandaging following knee arthroplasty. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Register, ISRCTN 87127065 . Registered on 20 February 2017.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/rehabilitation , Compression Bandages , Knee Joint/surgery , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Biomechanical Phenomena , Humans , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic , Recovery of Function , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom
4.
Int J Surg ; 56: 328-333, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29730070

ABSTRACT

The Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) model integrates several elements of perioperative care into a standardised clinical pathway for surgical patients. ERAS programmes aim to reduce the rate of complications, improve surgical recovery, and limit postoperative length of hospital stay (LOHS). One area of growing interest that is not currently included within ERAS protocols is the use of exercise prehabilitation (PREHAB) interventions. PREHAB refers to the systematic process of improving functional capacity of the patient to withstand the upcoming physiological stress of surgery. A number of recent systematic reviews have examined the role of PREHAB prior to elective intra-cavity surgery. However, the results have been conflicting and a definitive conclusion has not been obtained. Furthermore, a summary of the research area focussing exclusively on the therapeutic potential of exercise prior to intra-cavity surgery is yet to be undertaken. Clarification is required to better inform perioperative care and advance the research field. Therefore, this "review of reviews" provides a critical overview of currently available evidence on the effect of exercise PREHAB in patients undergoing i) coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), ii) lung resection surgery, and iii) gastrointestinal and colorectal surgery. We discuss the findings of systematic reviews and meta-analyses and supplement these with recently published clinical trials. This article summarises the research findings and identifies pertinent gaps in the research area that warrant further investigation. Finally, studies are conceptually synthesised to discuss the feasibility of PREHAB in clinical practice and its potential role within the ERAS pathway.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass/rehabilitation , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/rehabilitation , Elective Surgical Procedures/rehabilitation , Exercise Therapy/methods , Preoperative Care/methods , Thoracic Surgical Procedures/rehabilitation , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Critical Pathways , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Thoracic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL