Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Neoplasma ; 71(4): 374-386, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39267534

ABSTRACT

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the mainstay in the treatment of germ cell tumors (GCTs). Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are polymorphic enzymes that catalyze the glutathione conjugation of alkylating agents, platinum compounds, and free radicals formed by chemotherapy and are thus implicated in developing treatment resistance. This study aimed to assess the expression level of GST mu 1 (GSTM1) and its association with treatment outcomes in patients with GCT. This translational study included tumor specimens from 207 patients with newly diagnosed GCTs, as well as cisplatin-sensitive GCT cell line xenografts and their resistant variants for all histological variants of GCTs. GSTM1 expression was detected by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibodies, scored by the multiplicative quickscore (QS) method. GSTM1 expression was correlated with patient/tumor characteristics and treatment outcomes. The highest GSTM1 expression was observed in seminoma, followed by choriocarcinoma, embryonal carcinoma, and yolk sac tumor, while the lowest was observed in teratoma (p<0.0001). There was no association between GSTM1 expression in tumor tissue and patient/tumor characteristics. The low GSTM1 expression was associated with significantly better relapse-free survival compared with high GSTM1 (HR=0.50, 95% CI 0.23-1.09, p=0.03) but not overall survival (HR=0.61, 95% CI 0.24-1.54, p=0.22). Multivariate analysis showed that the prognostic value of GSTM1 was independent of the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) score. These data revealed the prognostic value of GSTM1 in GCTs, with a high GSTM1 expression associated with worse outcomes, suggesting that GSTM1 could be responsible, in part, for treatment resistance in GCTs.


Subject(s)
Glutathione Transferase , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal , Humans , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/drug therapy , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/pathology , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/metabolism , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/mortality , Glutathione Transferase/metabolism , Glutathione Transferase/genetics , Male , Adult , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Testicular Neoplasms/drug therapy , Testicular Neoplasms/pathology , Testicular Neoplasms/metabolism , Testicular Neoplasms/mortality , Adolescent , Animals , Female , Prognosis , Cell Line, Tumor , Mice
2.
Neoplasma ; 68(3): 613-620, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33502887

ABSTRACT

Following orchiectomy, patients with clinical stage I (CSI) testicular seminoma may be managed by active surveillance (S) or adjuvant treatment (radiotherapy or chemotherapy). In view of the published data on long-term toxicity, especially second malignant neoplasms (SMNs), adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) is currently no longer recommended as an adjuvant therapy option for these patients. The purpose of our recent study was to compare the impact of two selected treatment approaches - S versus adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) on the survival of patients with CSI testicular seminoma. This cross-sectional study analyzed a total of 139 patients collected at a single center between 10/2011-5/2020, with CSI testicular seminoma, stratified into two groups according to risk-adapted therapeutic approaches. In the S group (low-risk - without rete testis invasion - RTI, primary tumor size <4 cm), consisting of 77 patients, who underwent S, relapse occurred in 10 (13.0%) patients after a mean follow-up of 14.3 months. In the ACT group (high-risk - RTI and/or primary tumor size >4 cm), consisting of 62 patients, who were treated with ACT, relapse occurred in 5 (8.1%) patients after a mean follow-up of 11.6 months. Overall survival of patients in both groups was 100% with a mean follow-up of 43.9 months. A statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between these two groups was not found. Based on our findings, ACT seems to be an adequate treatment for patients with a high risk of relapse, as well as S for those with a low risk of relapse. Despite its excellent prognosis, optimal management of CSI testicular seminoma remains controversial, with variations in expert opinion and international guidelines.


Subject(s)
Seminoma , Testicular Neoplasms , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Combined Modality Therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Seminoma/drug therapy , Seminoma/pathology , Testicular Neoplasms/drug therapy
3.
Front Oncol ; 14: 1360678, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38496757

ABSTRACT

Background: Germ cell tumors (GCTs) represent the most frequent solid malignancy in young men. This malignancy is highly curable by cisplatin (CDDP)-based chemotherapy. However, there is a proportion of patients having a poor prognosis due to refractory disease or its relapse. No reliable biomarkers being able to timely and accurately stratify poor prognosis GCT patients are currently available. Previously, we have shown that chemotherapy-naïve GCT patients with higher DNA damage levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) have significantly worse prognosis compared to patients with lower DNA damage levels. Methods: DNA damage levels in PBMCs of both chemotherapy-naïve and first cycle chemotherapy-treated GCT patients have been assessed by standard alkaline comet assay and its styrene oxide (SO)-modified version. These levels were correlated with clinico-pathological characteristics. Results: We re-confirm prognostic value of DNA damage level in chemotherapy-naïve GCT patients and reveal that this prognosticator is equally effective in GCT patients after first cycle of CDDP-based chemotherapy. Furthermore, we demonstrate that SO-modified comet assay is comparably sensitive as standard alkaline comet assay in case of patients who underwent first cycle of CDDP-based chemotherapy, although it appears more suitable to detect DNA cross-links. Conclusion: We propose that DNA damage levels in PBMCs before and after first cycle of CCDP-based chemotherapy are comparable independent prognosticators for progression-free and overall survivals in GCT patients. Therefore, their clinical use is highly advised to stratify GCT patients to identify those who are most at risk of developing disease recurrence or relapse, allowing tailoring therapeutic interventions to poor prognosis individuals, and optimizing their care management and treatment regimen.

4.
Front Oncol ; 13: 1149432, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37114140

ABSTRACT

Background: Testicular cancer is the most common malignancy among young men. Vitamin D has pluripotent effects on cancer pathogenesis and plays a role in the metastatic cascade. The aim of this study is to analyze plasma vitamin D in association with clinico-pathological findings and prognosis in patients with germ-cell tumors (GCTs). Methods: This study included 120 newly diagnosed and/or relapsed GCT patients treated from April 2013 to July 2020, for whom plasma was available in the biobank. Blood samples were drawn the 1st chemotherapy cycle as well as before the 2nd cycle. Plasma vitamin D was measured using ELISA and correlated with disease characteristics and the outcome. For survival analysis, the cohort was dichotomized into "low" and "high" based on median vitamin D. Results: There was no significant difference in vitamin D plasma levels between healthy donors and GCT patients (p = 0.71). Vitamin D level was not associated with disease characteristics except for brain metastases, where patients with brain metastases had a vitamin D level that was 32% lower compared to patients without brain metastases, p = 0.03. Vitamin D was also associated with response to chemotherapy, with an approximately 32% lower value in patients with an unfavorable response compared to a favorable response, p = 0.02. Moreover, low plasma levels of vitamin D were significantly associated with disease recurrence and inferior progression-free survival (PFS), but not with overall survival (OS) (HR = 3.02, 95% CI 1.36-6.71, p = 0.01 for PFS and HR = 2.06, 95% CI 0.84-5.06, p = 0.14 for OS, respectively). Conclusion: Our study suggests the prognostic value of pretreatment vitamin D concentrations in GCT patients. Low plasma vitamin D was associated with an unfavorable response to therapy and disease recurrence. However, it remains to be determined whether the biology of the disease confirms a causative role for low vitamin D and whether its supplementation affects the outcome.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL