ABSTRACT
Gene expression is a regulated process fueled by ATP consumption. Therefore, regulation must be coupled to constraints imposed by the level of energy metabolism. Here, we explore this relationship both theoretically and experimentally. A stylized mathematical model predicts that activators of gene expression have variable impact depending on metabolic rate. Activators become less essential when metabolic rate is reduced and more essential when metabolic rate is enhanced. We find that, in the Drosophila eye, expression dynamics of the yan gene are less affected by loss of EGFR-mediated activation when metabolism is reduced, and the opposite effect is seen when metabolism is enhanced. The effects are also seen at the level of pattern regularity in the adult eye, where loss of EGFR-mediated activation is mitigated by lower metabolism. We propose that gene activation is tuned by energy metabolism to allow for faithful expression dynamics in the face of variable metabolic conditions.
Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Repressor Proteins , Animals , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila/metabolism , Energy Metabolism/genetics , Gene Expression , ErbB Receptors/genetics , ErbB Receptors/metabolismABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Accurately predicting postoperative outcomes is fundamental to informed clinical decision making, and alignment of patient, and family expectations. The AMPREDICT Decision Support Tool is a predictive tool designed to assess the probability of mortality one year after major and minor amputations. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of AMPREDICT in our Veteran patient population. METHODS: Retrospective review of lower extremity amputations completed at the West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs hospital from 2000 to 2020. Staged open amputations, and previous minor amputations were excluded. Using the AMPREDICT tool, the probability of mortality one-year post-surgery for single stage transfemoral and transtibial amputations was calculated, then compared with observed patient outcomes. Observed to predicted mortality was compared through boxplots, at one year after surgery, confidence intervals were calculated, and group means were compared using Students T-test. Receiver operator curves were constructed to assess discriminatory capacity of the tool. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: 423 patients underwent 650 lower extremity amputations during our study period. 267 patients underwent single stage transfemoral or transtibial amputations comprising our study cohort. The average age at amputation was 66 years with an average age of death at 71 years. AMPREDICT tool's prognostic capability varied across the two amputations studied. For single staged transfemoral amputations, prediction aligned closely with observed outcomes, as indicated by a significant p-value of 0.0002 (C.I. 12.73 - 36.37). For single stage transtibial amputations, the predictions were also significant, p-value 0.0017 (C.I. 5.25 - 21.20), though had a wider prediction range. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the reliability of the AMPREDICT tool in predicting one-year mortality for patients undergoing major lower limb amputations. The predictive accuracy was found to be statistically significant for both single staged transfemoral and transtibial amputations. These findings suggest that AMPREDICT may be a valuable tool in the clinical setting for patients undergoing major lower limb amputation.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is an infrequent condition which results in disability in use of upper extremity. While TOS is often associated with manual labor, industrial workers, and accidents, it has not been reported in a physician (MD) population. Given the investment of time and effort in training to become a MD, the impact of TOS may be devastating. Our objective is to report the presentation and outcome of TOS in MDs. METHODS: A prospectively surgical database was reviewed for MDs who sought care of disabling TOS between 1997 and 2022. Demographic, clinical, outcome and pathological data were reviewed. Outcomes were assessed based on Somatic Pain Scale (SPS), Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores, and Derkash scores. Results were also assessed based on return to employment. RESULTS: A total of 19 MDs were identified, from 1,687 TOS cases. The group included 13 (63%) men, 6 (31%) women, average age 45 years (range 27-57). Presentations included 1 (5.3%) arterial TOS (ATOS), 9 (47.4%) venous TOS (VTOS), and 9 (47.4) neurogenic TOS (NTOS). All patients were right-handed, and symptomatic side was dominant hand in 7 (37%) patients. Etiologies included repetitive motion injury, athletic injury, and congenital bony abnormalities. Repetitive motion was associated with 3/9 (33%) NTOS. Significant athletic activities were noted in 12 of 19 (63%) MDs, including 8/9 (89%) VTOS and 4/9 (44%) NTOS. Athletic activities associated with VTOS included triathletes (2), rock climbing (1), long distance swimming (2), and weightlifting (3). Of the 9 NTOS cases, 3 were associated with weightlifting and 1 with skiing. Congenital causes included 1 (5%) abnormal first rib and 1 (5%) cervical rib. Time from symptom onset to consultation varied significantly according to diagnosis: ATOS 6 days, VTOS 97 days, and NTOS 2,335 days (P < 0.05). All underwent first rib resection (FRR), and 4 (4) patients required contralateral FRR. Time from surgery to last follow-up averaged 1,005 days (range: 37-4,535 days). On presentation, 6 patients were work disabled and 13 patients were work restricted. Following surgery, 4 MDs remained work restricted with mild to moderate symptoms. After surgery, standardized outcomes (SPS, Quick DASH, and Derkash score) improved in all metrics. All who were initially disabled returned to work without restriction. Significant non-TOS related comorbidities were present in all who had residual restriction. Return to work was documented in all. CONCLUSIONS: Although it has not been reported, MDs are subject to developing TOS. Causes include repetitive motions, athletic injuries, and congenital bony abnormalities. Surgical decompression is beneficial with significant reduction in pain and disability. MDs are highly motivated and insightful; accordingly, they have a very high probability of successful work resumption, with all returning to their medical positions.
Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Cervical Rib , Physicians , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome , Male , Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome/diagnosis , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome/epidemiology , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome/therapy , Cervical Rib/surgery , Decompression, Surgical/adverse effects , Decompression, Surgical/methods , Upper Extremity/surgery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Frailty is a known risk factor for adverse outcomes following surgery and affects at least 3 of every 10 US Veterans aged 65 years and older. We designed a study to characterize the association between frailty and complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared to open aneurysm repair (OAR) at our regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center. METHODS: Veterans who underwent either OAR or EVAR at our institution between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2020 were identified. We examined medical history, procedure characteristics, perioperative complications, and frailty as measured by the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5). Frailty was defined as an mFI-5 score ≥2. Primary endpoints were postoperative complications, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay. Tests of association were performed with t-test and chi-squared analysis. RESULTS: Over the 21-year period, we identified 314 patients that underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair with 115 (36.6%) OAR and 199 EVAR (63.4%) procedures. Patients undergoing EVAR were older on average (72.1 years vs. 70.2 years) and had a higher average mFI-5 compared to the open repair group (1.49 vs. 1.23, P = 0.036). When comparing EVAR and OAR cohorts, patients undergoing OAR had a larger AAA diameter (6.5 cm, standard deviation [SD]: 1.5) compared to EVAR (5.5 cm, SD: 1.1 P < 0.0001). Fewer frail patients underwent OAR (n = 40, 34.8%) compared to EVAR (n = 86, 43.2%), and frail EVAR patients had higher AAA diameter (5.8 cm, SD: 1.0) compared to nonfrail EVAR patients (5.3 cm, SD 1.2), P = 0.003. Among OAR procedures, frail patients had longer operative times (296 min vs. 253 min, P = 0.013) and higher incidence of pneumonia (17.5% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.035). Among frail EVAR patients, operative time and perioperative complications including wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, and pneumonia were not significantly different than their nonfrail counterparts. Overall, frail patients had more early complications (n = 55, 43.7%) as compared to nonfrail patients (n = 48, 25.5%, P = 0.001). OAR patients had higher rates of postoperative complications including wound dehiscence (7.0% vs. 0.5%, P = 0.001), surgical site infections (7.0% vs. 1.0%, P = 0.003), and pneumonia (9.6% vs. 0.5%, P=<0.0001). Open repair was also associated with overall longer average intensive care unit stays (11.0 days vs. 1.6 days, P < 0.0001) and longer average hospitalizations (13.5 days vs. 2.4 days, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that frailty is associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes in open repair compared to EVAR. Patients who underwent open repair had higher rates of wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, and pneumonia, compared to those undergoing endovascular repair. Frailty was associated with larger AAA diameter in the EVAR cohort and longer operative times, with higher frequency of postoperative pneumonia in the OAR cohort. Frailty is a strong risk factor that should be considered in the management of aortic aneurysms.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Frailty , Veterans , Humans , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/complications , Frailty/complications , Frailty/diagnosis , Surgical Wound Dehiscence/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Risk Factors , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Veterans are disproportionately affected by housing insecurity (HI), which can lead to adverse health outcomes and reduced life expectancy. We sought to examine the impact of HI on the outcomes of veterans who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair at our regional Veterans Affairs medical center. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent AAA repair at our institution between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2020. We examined medical history, procedure details, hospitalization course, and postoperative outcomes. Primary endpoints were a 30-day mortality and median survival. Secondary endpoints were hospital length of stay, readmission rate, and perioperative complications. Hypothesis testing was performed with t-test and chi-squared analysis. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier estimation. RESULTS: Of the 314 veterans that underwent AAA repair (mean age of 71.4 ± 7.8 years, 99.7% male) over the 21-year period, we identified 39 (12.4%) patients with a history of HI. The HI was associated with a positive smoking history (100% vs. 88.0%, P = 0.022), lower rate of hypertension diagnosis (69.2% vs. 84.0%, P = 0.024), and increased rate of surgical site infections (SSI) (10.3% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.016). The median postoperative survival was lower in the HI group (7.6 years [CI 6.0-11.2] vs. 8.9 [CI 6.9-10.3]). CONCLUSIONS: HI was associated with reduced median postoperative survival, greater readmission rate, and increased risk of SSI following AAA repair.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Veterans , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Female , Retrospective Studies , Housing Instability , Treatment Outcome , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Risk Factors , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effectsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Most patients with acute Paget-Schroetter syndrome (PSS) present in one of two manners: (1) thrombosis managed initially with thrombolysis and anticoagulation and then referred for surgery, and (2) initial treatment with anticoagulation only and later referral for surgery. Definitive benefits of thrombolysis in the acute period (the first 2 weeks after thrombosis) over anticoagulation alone have not been well reported. Our goal was to compare patients managed with early thrombolysis and anticoagulation followed by first rib resection (FRR) and later postoperative venography with venoplasty (PTA) with those managed with anticoagulation alone followed by FRR and PTA using vein patency assessed with venography and standardized outcome measures. METHODS: We reviewed a prospectively collected database from 2000 to 2019. Two groups were compared: those managed with early thrombolysis at our institution (Lysis) and those managed with anticoagulation alone (NoLysis). All patients underwent FRR. Venography was routinely performed before and after FRR. Standardized outcome measures included Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores and Somatic Pain Scale. RESULTS: A total of 50 Lysis and 50 NoLysis patients were identified. Pre-FRR venography showed that thrombolysis resulted in patency of 98% of veins, whereas 78% of NoLysis veins were patent. After FRR, postoperative venography revealed that 46 (92%) patients in the Lysis group and 37 (74%) patients in the NoLysis group achieved vein patency. Thrombolysis was significantly associated with final vein patency (odds ratio: 17 [4-199]; P < .001). Lysis patients had a trend toward lower QuickDASH scores from pre-FRR to post-FRR compared with NoLysis patients with a mean difference of -16.4 (±19.7) vs -5.2 (±15.6) points (P = .13). The difference in reduction of Somatic Pain Scale scores was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolysis as initial management of PSS, combined with anticoagulation, followed by FFR and VenoPTA resulted in improved final vein patency and may lead to an improved functional outcome measured with QuickDASH scores. Therefore, clinical protocols using thrombolysis as initial management should be considered when planning the optimal treatment strategy for patients with acute PSS.
Subject(s)
Nociceptive Pain , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome , Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Decompression, Surgical/adverse effects , Humans , Nociceptive Pain/drug therapy , Nociceptive Pain/surgery , Prospective Studies , Ribs/diagnostic imaging , Ribs/surgery , Subclavian Vein/surgery , Thrombolytic Therapy/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis/drug therapy , Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis/etiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Patients can choose between open repair and endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). However, the factors associated with patient preference for one repair type over another are not well-characterized. Here we assess the factors associated with preference of choice for open or endovascular AAA repair among veterans exposed to a decision aid to help with choosing surgical treatment. METHODS: Across 12 Veterans Affairs hospitals, veterans received a decision aid covering domains including patient information sources and understanding preference. Veterans were then given a series of surveys at different timepoints examining their preferences for open versus endovascular AAA repair. Questions from the preference survey were used in analyses of patient preference. Results were analyzed using χ2 tests. A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with preference for open repair or preference for EVAR. RESULTS: A total of 126 veterans received a decision aid informing them of their treatment choices, after which 121 completed all preference survey questions; five veterans completed only part of the instruments. Overall, veterans who preferred open repair were typically younger (70 years vs 73 years; P = .02), with similar rates of common comorbidities (coronary disease 16% vs 28%; P = .21), and similar aneurysms compared with those who preferred EVAR (6.0 cm vs 5.7 cm; P = .50). Veterans in both preference categories (28% of veterans preferring EVAR, 48% of veterans preferring open repair) reported taking their doctor's advice as the top box response for the single most important factor influencing their decision. When comparing the tradeoff between less invasive surgery and higher risk of long-term complications, more than one-half of veterans preferring EVAR reported invasiveness as more important compared with approximately 1 in 10 of those preferring open repair (53% vs 12%; P < .001). Shorter recovery was an important factor for the EVAR group (74%) and not important in the open repair group (76%) (P = .5). In multivariable analyses, valuing a short hospital stay (odds ratio, 12.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-135.70) and valuing a shorter recovery (odds ratio, 15.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-240.20) were associated with a greater odds of preference for EVAR, whereas finding these characteristics not important was associated with a greater odds of preference for open repair. CONCLUSIONS: When faced with the decision of open repair versus EVAR, veterans who valued a shorter hospital stay and a shorter recovery were more likely to prefer EVAR, whereas those more concerned about long-term complications preferred an open repair. Veterans typically value the advice of their surgeon over their own beliefs and preferences. These findings need to be considered by surgeons as they guide their patients to a shared decision.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Humans , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Odds Ratio , Patient Selection , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effectsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The PReferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (PROVE-AAA) trial aimed to determine the efficacy of a validated decision aid to enable better alignment between patient preference and their ultimate repair. We sought to determine the key factors influencing the decision-making of veterans for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) or open surgical repair (OSR). METHODS: A total of 235 veterans in the PROVE-AAA trial were asked their information sources regarding repairs, employment status, and preferred intervention. Answers were coded and analyzed using conventional content analysis to generate nonoverlapping themes, then stratified by employment status. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (17.8% of enrollees) provided their source of information for OSR prior to using a decision aid. 81% of retired veterans were greater than 70 y old, while 58% of nonretired veterans were greater than 70 (P = 0.003). The most common information source was from a vascular surgeon/professional or unspecified MD/other health professionals (51.4%), while sources from outside this group made up the remaining 48.5%. The most preferred procedure was EVAR. However, nonretired individuals were more likely to prefer OSR. These data on information source and preferred procedure were similar in patients who provided their source for EVAR. CONCLUSIONS: Veterans in the PROVE-AAA study were more likely to be retired and more likely to rely on information from an unspecified MD/other health professionals for EVAR. Although both retired and nonretired veterans preferred EVAR the most, nonretired veterans were more likely to prefer OSR despite being younger.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Humans , Patient Preference , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We hypothesize among patients undergoing lower extremity amputation, access to pre-, and post operative rehabilitation services; as well as improved medical care, have led to higher rates of postoperative ambulation, and improved survival. METHODS: Retrospective single center review of all major lower extremity amputations performed at the Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System from 2000-2020 stratified into multiyear cohorts. We abstracted demographics, operative indication, comorbidities, preoperative medical management, perioperative complications, discharge location, and pre and postoperative ambulatory status. Odds of ambulation after amputation were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Survival was analyzed using multivariate logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Multivariate logistic predictors were selected based on prior literature and clinical experience. RESULTS: We identified 654 operations in our study, noting fewer amputations performed in the latest 3 cohort years as compared to the initial cohort (2000-2004). Patients undergoing below-knee amputations (BKA) had 2.7 times (P < 0.05) greater odds of postoperative ambulation and 86% (P < 0.05) increased odds of survival compared to above-knee amputations (AKA). The odds of ambulation increased by 8.8% (P < 0.05) for each consecutive study year. Ambulation post-amputation conferred 13.2 times (P < 0.05) greater odds of survival. The odds of survival in "emergent" operations decreased by 48% (P < 0.05) compared to an "elective" operation. For each additional comorbidity, the odds of survival decreased by 18% (P < 0.05). Patients with any perioperative complication had a 48% (P < 0.05) lower odds of survival. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates demonstrated significant survival difference between patients by amputation level and postoperative ambulatory status (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory status following distal amputation has improved over time and is significantly associated with increased survival post-amputation. Patients undergoing a BKA or discharged home were most likely to ambulate postoperatively. Amputation level, preoperative comorbidities, and perioperative complications remain strong predictors of survival.
Subject(s)
Veterans , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Amputation, Surgical/adverse effects , Lower Extremity/surgery , Risk Factors , Postoperative ComplicationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endovenous ablation techniques have replaced greater saphenous vein (GSV) ligation and stripping for treatment of venous insufficiency. Our objective was to investigate our initial procedural experience and clinical presentation of patients undergoing mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) at a single institution. We hypothesized that closure level and success rate improved over time and were comparable to other endovenous ablation techniques. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all MOCA procedures performed at the Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Hospital from 2015 - 2020. Variables included CEAP and VCSS scores, patient symptoms, post procedure duplex ultrasound, closure level, and need for anticoagulation. Success was defined as GSV thrombosis on initial post procedure duplex ultrasound. Procedure associated extension of thrombus into the deep veins was defined using the American Venous Forum (AVF) endothermal heat induced thrombosis (EHIT) classification. RESULTS: 104 venous ablation procedures were performed on 86 patients. Eleven (12.8%) patients received bilateral interventions, and six (7%) patients had asynchronous interventions on the same leg. The average age was 58.4 years (SD 12) and 93% were male. Pre-procedural symptoms included pain (102, 98.1%), varicose veins (87, 83.7%), edema (58, 55.8%), and active ulcers (19, 18.3%). A CEAP category of C2 was the most common indication (34.6%), followed by C3 (22.1%) and C6 (21.2%). Forty-five (43.2%) patients had deep system reflux, and 53% had concomitant phlebectomies. Average VCSS score was 7.5 (SD 3.5).We observed a GSV ablation rate of 92.7% (n = 89) in the 96 procedures which had post-procedure follow up, with no temporal evidence of a learning curve. On post procedure duplex of the 89 technically successful ablations, 77 (86.5%) patients had AVF EHIT level 1 closure, three (3.4%) had level 2 closure, eight (8.9%) had level 3 closure, and one had a level 4 closure. Fourteen (15.7%) patients were newly started on anticoagulation for an average of 33.2 days (SD 34.1). Of the 19 legs treated for active venous ulcers, 13 (68.4%) had improvement or resolution of their venous ulcers. No pulmonary embolic complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a successful GSV thrombosis rate of 92.7% using MOCA without evidence of a learning curve and comparable to that reported in the literature. The rate of thrombus extension into the deep veins was 14.6%, with no adverse effects associated with anticoagulation or clinically significant sequelae of AVF EHIT level 2 or greater. Comparisons with MOCA associated thrombus extension into deep veins in the literature are limited as post procedure screening duplex are not standard of care. However, we demonstrated that MOCA ablation of the GSV is a safe procedure that may be performed with good technical success.
Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Varicose Ulcer , Varicose Veins , Venous Insufficiency , Venous Thrombosis , Anticoagulants , Female , Humans , Laser Therapy/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Saphenous Vein/diagnostic imaging , Saphenous Vein/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Varicose Ulcer/surgery , Varicose Veins/complications , Varicose Veins/diagnostic imaging , Varicose Veins/surgery , Venous Insufficiency/complications , Venous Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Venous Insufficiency/surgery , Venous Thrombosis/etiologyABSTRACT
Spatiotemporal patterns of Spartina alterniflora belowground biomass (BGB) are important for evaluating salt marsh resiliency. To solve this, we created the BERM (Belowground Ecosystem Resiliency Model), which estimates monthly BGB (30-m spatial resolution) from freely available data such as Landsat-8 and Daymet climate summaries. Our modeling framework relied on extreme gradient boosting, and used field observations from four Georgia salt marshes as ground-truth data. Model predictors included estimated tidal inundation, elevation, leaf area index, foliar nitrogen, chlorophyll, surface temperature, phenology, and climate data. The final model included 33 variables, and the most important variables were elevation, vapor pressure from the previous four months, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) from the previous five months, and inundation. Root mean squared error for BGB from testing data was 313 g m-2 (11% of the field data range), explained variance (R2 ) was 0.62-0.77. Testing data results were unbiased across BGB values and were positively correlated with ground-truth data across all sites and years (r = 0.56-0.82 and 0.45-0.95, respectively). BERM can estimate BGB within Spartina alterniflora salt marshes where environmental parameters are within the training data range, and can be readily extended through a reproducible workflow. This provides a powerful approach for evaluating spatiotemporal BGB and associated ecosystem function.
Subject(s)
Ecosystem , Poaceae , Biomass , Nitrogen , WetlandsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Shared medical decision making is most important when there are competing options for repair such as in treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). We sought to understand the sources of patients' pre-existing knowledge about AAA to better inform treating physicians about patients' needs for preoperative counseling. METHODS: We performed a multicenter survey of patients facing AAA repair at 20 Veterans Affairs hospitals across the United States as part of the Preferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of AAA study. A validated survey instrument was administered to examine the sources of information available and commonly used by patients to learn about their repair options. The survey was administered by study personnel before the patient had any interaction with the vascular surgeon because survey data were collected before the vascular clinic visit. RESULTS: Preliminary analysis of data from 99 patients showed that our cohort was primarily male (99%) and elderly (mean age 73 years). Patients commonly had a history of hypertension (86%), prior myocardial infarction (32%), diabetes (32%), and were overweight (58%). Patients arrived at their surgeon's office appointment with limited information. A majority of patients (52%) reported that they had not talked to their primary care physician at all about their options for AAA repair, and one-half (50%) reported that their view of the different surgical options had not been influenced by anyone. Slightly less than one-half of patients reported that they did not receive any information about open surgical aneurysm repair and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (41% and 37%, respectively). Few patients indicated using the internet as their main source of information about open surgical aneurysm repair and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (10% and 11%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients are commonly referred for AAA repair having little to no information regarding AAA pathology or repair options. Fewer than one in five patients searched the internet or had accessed other sources of information on their own. Most vascular surgeons should assume that patients will present to their first vascular surgery appointment with minimal understanding of the treatment options available to them.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Aged , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Female , Humans , Information Seeking Behavior , Male , Prospective Studies , Self ReportABSTRACT
For patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), randomized trials have found endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) is associated with lower perioperative morbidity and mortality than open surgical repair (OSR). However, OSR has fewer long-term aneurysm-related complications, such as endoleak or late rupture. Patients treated with EVAR and OSR have similar survival rates within two years after surgery, and OSR does not require intensive surveillance. Few have examined if patient preferences are aligned with the type of treatment they receive for their AAA. Although many assume that patients may universally prefer the less-invasive nature of EVAR, our preliminary work suggests that patients who value the lower risk of late complications may prefer OSR. In this study, called The PReferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (PROVE-AAA) trial, we describe a cluster-randomized trial to test if a decision aid can better align patients' preferences and their treatment type for AAA. Patients enrolled in the study are candidates for either endovascular or open repair and are followed up at VA hospitals by vascular surgery teams who regularly perform both types of repair. In Aim 1, we will determine patients' preferences for endovascular or open repair and identify domains associated with each repair type. In Aim 2, we will assess alignment between patients' preferences and the repair type elected and then compare the impact of a decision aid on this alignment between the intervention and control groups. This study will help us to accomplish two goals. First, we will better understand the factors that affect patient preference when choosing between EVAR and OSR. Second, we will better understand if a decision aid can help patients be more likely to receive the treatment strategy they prefer for their AAA. Study enrollment began on June 1, 2017. Between June 1, 2017 and November 1, 2018, we have enrolled 178 of a total goal of 240 veterans from 20 VA medical centers and their vascular surgery teams across the country. We anticipate completing enrollment in PROVE-AAA in June 2019, and study analyses will be performed thereafter.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Choice Behavior , Decision Support Techniques , Endovascular Procedures , Patient Preference , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States , Veterans Health ServicesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The transaxillary approach to thoracic outlet decompression in the presence of cervical ribs offers the advantage of less manipulation of the brachial plexus and associated nerves. This may result in reduced incidence of perioperative complications, such as nerve injuries. Our objective was to report contemporary data for a series of patients with thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) and cervical ribs managed through a transaxillary approach. METHODS: We reviewed a prospectively maintained database for all consecutive patients who underwent surgery for TOS and who had a cervical rib. Symptoms, preoperative evaluation, surgical details, complications, and postoperative outcomes form the basis of this report. RESULTS: Between 1997 and 2016, there were 818 patients who underwent 1154 procedures for TOS, including 873 rib resections. Of these, 56 patients underwent 70 resections for first and cervical ribs. Cervical ribs were classified according to the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards: 25 class 1, 17 class 2, 5 class 3, and 23 class 4. Presentations included neurogenic TOS in 49 patients and arterial TOS in 7. Operative time averaged 141 minutes, blood loss was 47 mL, and hospital stay averaged 2 days. No injuries to the brachial plexus, long thoracic, or thoracodorsal nerves were identified. One patient had partial phrenic nerve dysfunction that resolved. No hematomas, lymph leak, or early rehospitalizations occurred. Average follow-up was 591 days. Complete resolution or minimal symptoms were noted in 52 (92.8%) patients postoperatively. Significant residual symptoms requiring ongoing evaluation or pain management were noted in four (7.1%) at last follow-up. Somatic pain scores were reduced from 6.9 (preoperatively) to 1.3 (at last visit). Standardized evaluation using shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores indicated improvement from 60.4 (preoperatively) to 31.3 (at last visit). CONCLUSIONS: This series of transaxillary cervical and first rib resections demonstrates excellent clinical outcomes with minimal morbidity. The presence of cervical ribs, a positive response to scalene muscle block, and abnormalities on electrodiagnostic testing are reliable indicators for surgery. A cervical rib in a patient with TOS suggests that there is excellent potential for improvement after first and cervical rib excision.
Subject(s)
Decompression, Surgical/methods , Osteotomy , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Blood Loss, Surgical , Cervical Rib/abnormalities , Cervical Rib/surgery , Databases, Factual , Decompression, Surgical/adverse effects , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Osteotomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome/diagnosis , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome/etiology , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for the management of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The potential benefits of this therapy include more rapid resolution of symptoms and possible reduction in the long-term sequelae. Many patients diagnosed with DVT in the inpatient setting have contraindications to lytic therapy, but less is known regarding the suitability of thrombolysis for outpatients diagnosed with acute DVT. We sought to determine the proportion of patients who were candidates for thrombolytic therapy and referred to a vascular specialist for evaluation. METHODS: A manual search of an outpatient vascular laboratory associated with a tertiary medical center was performed to identify all patients referred for the purpose of ruling out DVT between January 2013 and December 2014. Vascular laboratory studies conducted for evaluation of venous insufficiency were excluded. The electronic medical records were reviewed to evaluate for contraindications for thrombolysis. RESULTS: Over a 2-year period, there were 689 referrals to the outpatient vascular laboratory for the evaluation of patients with suspected DVT. Of the 689 referrals, 47 (6.8%) were found to have acute DVT, and 66 (9%) were found to have chronic DVT. Of the 47 patients with acute DVT, 41 involved the lower extremities. Fifteen of the 41 patients (37%) with extensive acute iliofemoral DVT had no absolute or major contraindications for CDT. Of these 15 patients, only 33% were referred to a vascular specialist (4 to vascular surgery and 1 to IR). Two patients (13%) agreed to and underwent successful CDT. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of patients with acute lower extremity DVT diagnosed in the outpatient vascular laboratory were not candidates for thrombolysis, one-third of those who may have benefited from CDT were referred to a vascular specialist to discuss lytic therapy. Given the potential benefits of CDT, it is imperative that patients with acute iliofemoral or extensive femoral DVT be offered an evaluation by a vascular specialist to optimize outcomes after this diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Health Services Misuse , Thrombolytic Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Venous Thrombosis/drug therapy , Clinical Decision-Making , Contraindications, Drug , Contraindications, Procedure , Electronic Health Records , Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Tertiary Care Centers , Thrombolytic Therapy/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Venous Thrombosis/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This article aims to evaluate whether midtrimester cervical length (CL) is associated with improved prediction of preterm delivery in women presenting with preterm labor. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of women with a singleton gestation who underwent routine CL screening between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation between 2010 and 2014 who were later evaluated for preterm labor. Women were stratified by midtrimester CL quartile. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors independently associated with preterm birth <37 weeks, <34 weeks, and delivery within 7 days of evaluation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created for multivariable equations with and without CL quartile to determine whether addition of CL improved the predictive capacity of the model for predicting preterm birth. RESULTS: A total of 460 women were evaluated for preterm labor and had midtrimester CL measurements available. When CL quartile was incorporated into a regression model including demographic and clinical characteristics associated with preterm birth, the area under the ROC curve was not improved (0.775 vs. 0.786, p = 0.20). CONCLUSION: While a shorter midtrimester CL quartile is associated with an increased incidence of preterm delivery in women evaluated for preterm labor, the addition of this variable to an existing model does not improve prediction of preterm birth.
Subject(s)
Cervical Length Measurement , Cervix Uteri/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Illinois/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Predictive Value of Tests , Pregnancy , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
The presence of a nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve (NRLN) during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may significantly limit the exposure of the surgical field during this operation. Although its reported incidence is rare, NRLN typically overlies the carotid bifurcation and failure to recognize this anatomic variation increases the risk of NRLN injury. A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent CEA for hemodynamically significant extracranial carotid stenosis between January 2005 and December 2014 was performed. All patients with NRLN encountered intraoperatively were identified. Clinical outcomes, surgical techniques, and complications were reviewed and reported. Four left-sided NRLN were identified and 4 were right sided. No cranial nerve deficits or injuries occurred after CEA in patients where NRLN was encountered. Two distinct surgical techniques were used to manage patients with NRLN and they are discussed in detail.
Subject(s)
Carotid Artery, Common/surgery , Carotid Stenosis/surgery , Dissection , Endarterectomy, Carotid/methods , Laryngeal Nerves/surgery , Aged , Carotid Artery, Common/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Artery, Common/physiopathology , Carotid Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Stenosis/physiopathology , Endarterectomy, Carotid/adverse effects , Hemodynamics , Humans , Laryngeal Nerves/abnormalities , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vagus Nerve/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Delusional infestation may present as a primary disorder or secondary to another disorder (e.g. schizophrenia). In this report we focus on the issue of inadequacies in mental state examinations leading to diagnostic uncertainty. METHODS: Case studies were identified for this review through searching the academic databases MedLine, PSYCInfo and PubMed. We developed a template that contained 36 headings and independently examined each case study report. Our percentage agreement for the first 42 case studies we reviewed was 91%. RESULTS: We identified diagnostic uncertainty due to inadequacies in the reporting of mental state examinations. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians need to provide mental state information to an adequate standard that would allow confirmation of a diagnosis of delusions of infestation or exclude other possibilities.
Subject(s)
Delusional Parasitosis/diagnosis , Mental Status and Dementia Tests/standards , HumansABSTRACT
Acroangiodermatitis (AD) is a rare angioproliferative disease manifesting with cutaneous lesions clinically similar to Kaposi's sarcoma. AD is a benign hyperplasia of preexisting vasculature and may be associated with acquired or congenital arteriovenous malformations (AVM), or severe chronic venous insufficiency (because of hypostasis, elevated venous pressure, arteriovenous shunting). Stewart-Bluefarb syndrome is the rare syndrome in which AD is associated with a congenital AVM. We present the case of a young veteran with a painful, chronic nonhealing ulcer and ipsilateral popliteal artery occlusion likely because of trauma, who elected transmetatarsal amputation for symptomatic relief. A 24-year-old male veteran presented with a 5-year history of a nonhealing dorsal left foot ulcer, resulting from a training exercise injury. He ultimately developed osteomyelitis requiring antibiotics, frequent debridements, multiple trials of unsuccessful skin substitute grafting, and severe unremitting pain. He noted a remote history of left digital deformities treated surgically as a child, and an AVM, previously endovascularly treated at an outside facility. Arterial duplex revealed somewhat dampened left popliteal, posterior tibial (PT), and dorsalis pedis (DP) artery signals with arterial brachial index of 1.0. CT angiography showed occlusion of the proximal to mid popliteal artery with significant calcifications felt initially to be a result of prior trauma. Pedal pulses were palpable and transcutaneous oxygen measurements revealed adequate oxygenation. Because of unremitting pain, the patient opted for amputation. Pathology revealed vascular proliferation consistent with AD. This case illustrates an unusual diagnosis of acroangiodermatitis, and a rare syndrome when associated with his underlying AVM (Stewart-Bluefarb syndrome). This resulted in a painful, chronic ulcer and was further complicated by trauma-related arterial occlusive disease. AD disease can hinder wound healing even in the presence of clinically evident blood flow. Although rare, such unusual diagnoses should be entertained particularly in the unusually young vascular surgical patient.
Subject(s)
Acrodermatitis/etiology , Arteriovenous Malformations/complications , Skin/blood supply , Veterans , Acrodermatitis/diagnosis , Acrodermatitis/surgery , Amputation, Surgical , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/etiology , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/surgery , Arteriovenous Malformations/diagnosis , Arteriovenous Malformations/surgery , Biopsy , Chronic Disease , Foot Ulcer/etiology , Foot Ulcer/surgery , Humans , Male , Popliteal Artery/diagnostic imaging , Popliteal Artery/injuries , Popliteal Artery/surgery , Syndrome , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , Vascular System Injuries/complications , Vascular System Injuries/surgery , Wound Healing , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recurrent symptoms of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) after first rib resection have varying etiologies. Regrowth of a first rib is a rare event. Recurrent symptoms in the presence of a regrown rib strongly suggest a causal relationship. We report our experience with recurrent symptoms of TOS and regrown first ribs. METHODS: We identified patients with recurrent TOS symptoms and regrown first ribs presented between 1995 and 2012. Details regarding their presentation, evaluation, and treatment were gathered. RESULTS: Eight patients (6 women and 2 men) presenting with recurrent TOS symptoms and regrown first ribs underwent 10 decompression surgeries. Prior surgeries included supraclavicular first rib resection (5), transaxillary first rib resection (5), scalenectomy (5), cervical rib resection (1). The average period between initial surgery and reoperation was 4.7 years. Average age at current presentation was 40.8 years (range 29-52). All patients (8) represented with neurogenic symptoms and 1 patient with concomitant venous TOS symptoms. Presenting symptoms included pain (8), numbness and tingling (7), weakness (6), headache (2), and venous congestion (3). Initial treatment included physical therapy in all. Preoperative assessment included chest X-rays (8), magnetic resonance imaging (7), electrodiagnostic studies (8), venography (2), and anterior scalene muscle block (2). Surgical approach included transaxillary resection of the regrown first rib (10), neurolysis of brachial plexus (10), scalenectomy (5), and lysis of subclavian vein (1). After an average follow-up of 10.8 months, resolution of symptoms included 4 complete and 4 partial. CONCLUSIONS: Regrowth of the first rib is a rare event. There is a concordance between a regrown rib and TOS symptoms. Patients presenting with recurrent TOS symptoms and a regrown first rib have a high probability of improvement with resection of the regrown rib.