ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality, manifesting as increased adverse outcomes in the first 30 days, extending to 12 months. This study aimed to investigate trends in sudden unexpected deaths between 2018 and 2022, with a focus on CV deaths. METHOD: A retrospective analysis was performed on autopsy reports (n=9,330) obtained from New South Wales Coroners Court, Australia, specifically targeting cases of unexplained deaths that occurred between 2018 and 2022. Statistical analysis was conducted using chi-square tests and a post hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction, as well as analysis of variance with multiple comparisons. RESULTS: There were 349 (18.3%) CV deaths in 2018, 346 (18.0%) in 2019, 338 (17.5%) in 2020, 395 (21.9%) in 2021, and (23.4%) 413 in 2022 (p=0.0002). Among CV deaths, the number of deaths from sudden arrhythmic death syndrome were 25 (7.2%) in 2018, 26 (7.5%) in 2019, 18 (5.3%) in 2020, 52 (13.2%) in 2021, and 80 (19.4%) in 2022 (p=0.0001). Atherosclerosis was the most common cause of death among all CV categories; there were 196 (56.2%) atherosclerosis deaths in 2018, 207 (59.8%) in 2019, 192 (56.8%) in 2020, 221 (56.0%) in 2021, and 197 (47.7%) in 2022 (p=0.43). The average age of death from sudden arrhythmic death syndrome (42.8Ā±19.1 years) across 2018-2022 was younger than atherosclerosis (56.2Ā±12.4 years) and total groups (53.1Ā±15.1 years) (p<0.001). Males comprised 76% of all CV deaths from 2018 to 2022 (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with pre-pandemic data, a noteworthy increase in CV deaths was observed in occurrence with the escalation in COVID-19 cases in Australia. This may be attributed to direct or indirect factors, such as lifestyle modifications, disrupted access to routine cardiac care, or COVID-19 infection-triggered CV deaths.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cardiac screening of elite athletes including a 12Ālead electrocardiogram (ECG) is recommended by numerous international bodies. Current athlete ECG interpretation guidelines recommend the Bazett method to correct the QT interval (QTc). OBJECTIVE: This study sought to investigate normative QTc changes by age using athlete screening ECGs and different QT correction methods in a population of elite cricketers. METHODS: Initial cardiac screening ECGs from an existing database of elite Australian cricketers aged 14-35Ā years were examined. Average QT interval, QTcB (corrected QT-Bazett), QTcF (Fridericia), QTcH (Hodges), and heart rate (HR) were analyzed by age and sex. RESULTS: A total of 1310 athletes (66% male, 34% female) were included with mean age 19.1Ā years and mean heart rate 66.9Ā bpm (range 38-121Ā bpm). With increasing age, HR decreased and absolute QT increased. The pattern of QTc change with age differed depending on the method of correction: Bazett correction (QTcB) demonstrated a "dish-shaped" or broad U-shaped appearance; while Fridericia and Hodges corrections showed a linear increase in QTc from young to older age. The Bazett method had a stronger correlation of HR with QTc (R2Ā =Ā 0.32) than either Fridericia (R2Ā =Ā 0.0007) or Hodges (R2Ā =Ā 0.009) methods. CONCLUSIONS: The Bazett method is not the most accurate QT correction in athletes, especially during adolescence. In elite cricketers, QTcB revealed a drop in QTc from adolescence to early adulthood due to mis-correction of the QT interval. The Fridericia method has the smoothest correction of HR and least QT variation by age and may be preferred for athlete screening.
Subject(s)
Electrocardiography , Heart Diseases , Female , Male , Humans , Adult , Young Adult , Heart Rate , AustraliaABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Describe the proportion of upper lumbar bone stress injuries (LBSI; T12-L3) relative to all LBSI, and the clinical presentation and diagnosis of upper LBSI in elite cricketers. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Professional domestic and international cricket teams over a 9-year period. PARTICIPANTS: Elite Australian cricketers. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Symptomatic upper LBSI diagnosed based on clinical findings and medical imaging. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence, injury history, and clinical management. RESULTS: Twenty-four pace bowlers (22 male and 2 female) sustained 39 cases of upper LBSI (T12:2, L1:3, L2:20, L3:14). Upper lumbar vertebrae were involved in 41% (95% CI 31-51) of all LBSI in this cohort. Twenty-seven (69%, 54-81) cases had an injury that occurred only on the side contralateral to the bowling arm. Ipsilateral injuries tended to occur secondary to a contralateral nonunited defect. In all 7 cases with known radiology follow-up that had a contralateral then ipsilateral LBSI, the contralateral injury did not achieve bony union before the onset of the ipsilateral LBSI. For stress fractures with imaging follow-up, those who achieved bony union took longer to return to bowling training [median 152 days (IQR 117-188)], compared to those who achieved partial or no union [median 68 days (IQR 46-115)]. CONCLUSIONS: Upper LBSI in elite cricketers occurs in approximately 2 out of 5 cases of LBSI. Clinicians should allow sufficient time for upper LBSI to resolve and unite (if a fracture) because cases that returned to bowling training earlier were less likely to achieve bony union, and those that failed to unite commonly went on to have a recurrent LBSI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy/prognosis/diagnosis level 2b.
Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Back Injuries , Fractures, Stress , Sports , Athletic Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Athletic Injuries/etiology , Australia , Female , Fractures, Stress/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Stress/epidemiology , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries , MaleABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To provide a review and discussion of a range of legal and ethical issues commonly faced by team physicians, with reference to high-profile international integrity crises in sport that have involved doctors. The article also presents some recommendations and guidance for team doctors and sporting organizations. DATA SOURCES: Media reports, legal cases, and journal articles describing recent sporting integrity crises that have involved medical issues and governance reforms which are emerging in response. MAIN RESULTS: Many of the modern "integrity crises" in sport have a medical aspect (eg, doping cases, catastrophic injuries and illnesses, "Bloodgate" and other "medical cheating," sexual contact between doctors and athletes, harassment/bullying of doctors, concussion mismanagement, and management of the coronavirus pandemic in sport). A key issue is that while doctors bear ultimate responsibility for any perceived medical negligence, they do not always have ultimate power in decision-making. This is common in the traditional governance structure where the coach/manager "outranks" the doctor and can overrule medical decisions. There can be a blurring of the traditional doctor-patient relationship, especially on tour, and conflicts of interests occur when the needs of the employer/sporting organization differ from the player (patient). Further issues can arise in treating other staff members and players' family members. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors must be aware of range of important legal and ethical issues that arise in the team setting. Medical integrity crises have inspired governance reforms, such as policy development, appointment of chief medical officers, medical staff reporting to integrity departments, and sanctions of teams that breach medical integrity requirements. Sporting organizations must continue to implement and strengthen frameworks reinforcing doctors' seniority in the medical area.
Subject(s)
Doping in Sports , Physicians , Sports Medicine , Sports , Humans , Physician-Patient RelationsABSTRACT
Summarising and synthesising the evidence on cricket health and wellbeing can help inform cricket stakeholders and navigate future research directions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between cricket participation, health and wellbeing at all ages and playing standards, and identify research gaps in the existing literature. A scoping review was performed from inception to March, 2020. Studies were included if they assessed a construct related to health and/or wellbeing in cricketers, available in English. 219 articles were eligible. Injury incidence per 1,000 player exposures ranged from 1.8-5.7 injuries. 48% of former cricketers experienced persistent joint pain. However, former cricketers reported greater physical activity levels and mental-components of quality of life compared to the general population. Heat injury/illness and skin cancer are concerns and require further research. Cricket participation is associated with an inherent injury risk, which may have negative implications for musculoskeletal health in later life. However, cricket participation is associated with high quality of life which can persist after retirement. Gaps in the literature include prospective studies on health and wellbeing of cricketers, female cricketers, injury prevention strategies, and the impact of cricket participation on metabolic health and lifetime physical activity.
Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Cricket Sport , Female , Humans , Cricket Sport/injuries , Exercise , Prospective Studies , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
Athletes sometimes experience transient arrhythmias during intense exercise, which may be difficult to capture with traditional Holter monitors. New and highly portable technology, such as smartphone electrocardiogram (ECG) devices, may be useful in documenting and contribute to diagnosis of exercise-induced arrhythmias. There are little data available regarding the new Kardia 6 lead device (6L) and no data regarding its use in athletic populations. In this short communication, we present pilot data from 30 healthy athletes who underwent a 12Ālead ECG and subsequent 6L reading. Our pilot data show relatively high levels of agreement for QTc and PR interval and QRS duration, with the 6L readings slightly but significantly shorter on average.
Subject(s)
Electrocardiography , Smartphone , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Athletes , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of local anesthetic painkilling injections to improve player availability is common practice in elite-level sport. OBJECTIVE: To document the published use of local anesthetic injections in sport, according to number of injections, sites of injections, and complications reported. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews, SportDiscus, EBSCO Host, and Google Scholar. RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred seventy local anesthetic injections reported on 540 athletes in 10 studies (from rugby league, American football, Australian football, and soccer) were reviewed. The most common areas of injection were as follows: the acromioclavicular (AC) joint; hand (including fingers); sternoclavicular joint (including sternum); rib injuries; and iliac crest contusions. DISCUSSION: This review found some evidence of long-term safety for a limited number of injection sites (eg, AC joint) and some evidence of immediate complications and harmful long-term consequences for other sites. The quality of evidence is not high, with little long-term data and a lack of independent verification of the effects of the injections. Ideally, long-term follow-up should be conducted to determine whether these injections are safe, with follow-up undertaken independently of the treating physician and team. CONCLUSIONS: Based on limited publications, there is some evidence of long-term safety; however, there is a lack of clear proof of either absolute safety or long-term harm for many of these procedures. Physicians and players in professional sport should proceed with caution in using local anesthetic injections.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Injections , Pain Management/methods , Athletes , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare cardiovascular screening policies of Australian elite sporting organizations. DESIGN: Online survey. SETTING: Elite/professional sports in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Chief medical officers (CMOs) of elite/professional sports in Australia, including rugby union and league, cricket, tennis, Australian football, and cycling. ASSESSMENT OF VARIABLES: Survey questions about each sport's cardiac screening policy: which screening components were included [eg, history and physical (H&P), resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)], whether screening was mandatory, whether the policy applied to elite junior and/or adult players, and which criteria were used to interpret ECGs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Which sports had a formal cardiac screening policy, which athletes the policy applied to, components of screening, ECG interpretation criteria used. RESULTS: Chief medical officers for 22/31 (71%) sports responded, representing >5000 athletes. Of these, 19/22 (86%) perform regular screening (100% H&P; 89% included ECG) with international cyclists also having routine echocardiograms and stress testing. Thirty-three percent of CMOs used the 2017 International Criteria for athlete ECG interpretation. Screening was mandatory with enforcement (26%), mandatory without enforcement (48%), and opt-out (26%). All screened adult elite athletes, and 68% screened junior elite athletes. Forty-two percent indicated athletes were required to pay for screening tests, and 63% required athletes to pay for follow-up tests. Almost all (94%) sports with a sports physician as the CMO screened athletes. CONCLUSIONS: Most sports have a screening policy, with reasonable uniformity of components. All included H&P, and almost all included ECG. Only one sport included an echocardiogram and stress test as a standard (international players only). Promoting the latest ECG interpretation criteria may reduce false-positives and cost. Future work should explore cardiac emergency plans, screening infrastructure, cost, and long-term follow-up.
Subject(s)
Athletes , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Mass Screening , Sports Medicine/standards , Sports , Adult , Australia , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Electrocardiography , Humans , Mass Screening/standardsABSTRACT
Coding in sports medicine generally uses sports-specific coding systems rather than the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), because of superior applicability to the profile of injury and illness presentations in sport. New categories for coding were agreed on in the 'International Olympic Committee (IOC) consensus statement: Methods for recording and reporting of epidemiological data on injury and illness in sports 2020.' We explain the process for determining the new categories and update both the Sport Medicine Diagnostic Coding System (SMDCS) and the Orchard Sports Injury and Illness Classification System (OSIICS) with new versions that operationalise the new consensus categories. The author group included members from an expert group attending the IOC consensus conference. The primary authors of the SMDCS (WM) and OSIICS (JO) produced new versions that were then agreed on by the remaining authors using expert consensus methodology. The SMDCS and OSIICS systems have been adjusted and confirmed through a consensus process to align with the IOC consensus statement to facilitate translation between the two systems. Problematic areas for defining body part categories included the groin and ankle regions. For illness codes, in contrast to the ICD, we elected to have a taxonomy of 'organ system/region' (eg, cardiovascular and respiratory), followed by an 'aetiology/pathology' (eg, environmental, infectious disease and allergy). Companion data files have been produced that provide translations between the coding systems. The similar structure of coding underpinning the OSIICS and SMDCS systems aligns the new versions of these systems with the IOC consensus statement and also facilitates easier translation between the two systems. These coding systems are freely available to the sport and exercise research community.
Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/classification , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Clinical Coding , Sports Medicine/classification , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine the rates of muscle strain injury recurrence over time after return to play in Australian football and to quantify risk factors. METHODS: We analysed Australian Football League player data from 1992 to 2014 for rates of the four major muscle strain injury types (hamstring, quadriceps, calf and groin) diagnosed by team health professionals. Covariates for analysis were: recent history (≤8 weeks) of each of the four muscle strains; non-recent history (>8 weeks) of each; history of hip, knee anterior cruciate ligament, knee cartilage, ankle sprain, concussion or lumbar injury; age; indigenous race; match level and whether a substitute rule was in place. RESULTS: 3647 (1932 hamstring, 418 quadriceps, 458 calf and 839 groin) muscle strain injuries occurred in 272 759 player matches. For all muscle strains combined, the risk of injury recurrence gradually reduced, with recurrence risks of 9% (hamstring), 5% (quadriceps), 2% (calf) and 6% (groin) in the first match back and remaining elevated for 15 weeks after return to play. The strongest risk factor for each muscle injury type was a recent history of the same injury (hamstring: adjusted OR 13.1, 95% CI 11.5 to 14.9; calf OR 13.3, 95% CI 9.6 to 18.4; quadriceps: OR 25.2, 95% CI 18.8 to 33.8; groin OR 20.6, 95% CI 17.0 to 25.0), followed by non-recent history of the same injury (hamstring: adjusted OR 3.5, 95% CI 3.2 to 3.9; calf OR 4.4, 95% CI 3.6 to 5.4; quadriceps OR 5.2, 95% CI 4.2 to 6.4; groin OR 3.5, 95% CI 3.0 to 4.0). Age was an independent risk factor for calf muscle strains (adjusted OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.0). Recent hamstring injury increased the risk of subsequent quadriceps (adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.7) and calf strains (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.6). During the 'substitute rule' era (2011-2014), hamstring (adjusted OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.86), groin (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.93) and quadriceps (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.92) strains were less likely than outside of that era but calf (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.9) strains were more likely than before the substitute rule era. CONCLUSION: Recent injury is the greatest risk factor for the four major muscle strains, with increased risk persisting for 15 weeks after return to play.
Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Muscle, Skeletal , Return to Sport , Sprains and Strains , Humans , Age Factors , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Australia/epidemiology , Competitive Behavior/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/injuries , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Sprains and Strains/epidemiology , Time Factors , SportsABSTRACT
Injury and illness surveillance, and epidemiological studies, are fundamental elements of concerted efforts to protect the health of the athlete. To encourage consistency in the definitions and methodology used, and to enable data across studies to be compared, research groups have published 11 sport-specific or setting-specific consensus statements on sports injury (and, eventually, illness) epidemiology to date. Our objective was to further strengthen consistency in data collection, injury definitions and research reporting through an updated set of recommendations for sports injury and illness studies, including a new Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist extension. The IOC invited a working group of international experts to review relevant literature and provide recommendations. The procedure included an open online survey, several stages of text drafting and consultation by working groups and a 3-day consensus meeting in October 2019. This statement includes recommendations for data collection and research reporting covering key components: defining and classifying health problems; severity of health problems; capturing and reporting athlete exposure; expressing risk; burden of health problems; study population characteristics and data collection methods. Based on these, we also developed a new reporting guideline as a STROBE Extension-the STROBE Sports Injury and Illness Surveillance (STROBE-SIIS). The IOC encourages ongoing in- and out-of-competition surveillance programmes and studies to describe injury and illness trends and patterns, understand their causes and develop measures to protect the health of the athlete. Implementation of the methods outlined in this statement will advance consistency in data collection and research reporting.
Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Checklist , Epidemiologic Research Design , Sports Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Athletic Injuries/classification , Disease/classification , Humans , Sports Medicine/classificationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is no cure for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and typically patients live approximately 30-years with the disease. Most common medical treatments result in short-term palliation of symptoms with little consideration of long-term risk. This systematic review aims to appraise the current evidence for the long-term (≥12 months) safety of common treatments for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). METHODS: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Medline and PubMed were systematically searched from 1990 to July 2017, inclusive. Inclusion criteria were 1) peer-reviewed publications investigating treatments for KOA referred to in the Australian Clinical Care Standard and/or Therapeutic Guidelines: Rheumatology 2) specifically addressing safety of the treatments 3) with ≥12 months of follow-up and 4) Downs and Black quality score ≥ 13. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Lifestyle modifications (moderate exercise and weight loss), paracetamol, glucosamine, Intraarticular Hyaluronic Acid (IAHA) and platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) injections have a low risk of harm and beneficial ≥12 month outcomes. Although Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) provide pain relief, they are associated with increased risk of medical complications. Cortisone injections are associated with radiological cartilage degeneration at > 12 months. Arthroscopy for degenerative meniscal tears in KOA leads to a 3-fold increase in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). TKA improves primary outcomes of KOA but has a low rate of significant medical complications. CONCLUSIONS: Given the safety and effectiveness of lifestyle interventions such as weight loss and exercise, these should be advocated in all patients due to the low risk of harm. The use of NSAIDs should be minimized to avoid gastrointestinal complications. Treatment with opioids has a lack of evidence for use and a high risk of long-term harm. The use of IAHA and PRP may provide additional symptomatic benefit without the risk of harm. TKA is associated with significant medical complications but is justified by the efficacy of joint replacement in late-stage disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International prospective register for systematic reviews; registration number CRD42017072809 .
Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy/trends , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Pain Management/trends , Risk Reduction Behavior , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/trends , Exercise Therapy/methods , Humans , Injections, Intra-Articular/adverse effects , Injections, Intra-Articular/trends , Pain Management/methods , Time FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Lumbar bone stress injury ('bone stress injury') is common in junior fast bowlers. The repetitive loading of cricket fast bowling may cause bone marrow oedema (BMO), detectable on MRI, before the bowler suffers from symptomatic bone stress injury. We investigated the temporal relationship between BMO, bone stress injury, along with bowling workload correlates, in elite junior fast bowlers throughout a cricket season. METHODS: 65 junior fast bowlers were prospectively monitored for one 8-month cricket season. For research purposes, participants had up to six MRI scans at set times in the season; findings were withheld from them and their clinicians. Standard practices for bowling workload monitoring and injury diagnosis were followed. RESULTS: 15 (23%) participants developed bone stress injury during the study. All 15 of these participants had BMO detected on at least one of the preceding MRI scans, including the scan immediately prior to diagnosis. The risk of BMO progressing to bone stress injury during the season was greatest for participants with BMO present 2 weeks prior to the national championship tournament (period of high load) (RR=18.9, OR=44.8). Both bone stress injury and BMO were associated with bowling a higher percentage of days in training and having a shorter bowling break during the season. The number of balls bowled and acute-to-chronic workload were not associated with imaging abnormalities or injury. CONCLUSION: The presence of BMO on MRI in asymptomatic junior cricket fast bowlers confers a very high risk for bone stress injury. The risk may be managed by MRI screening and monitoring bowling frequency.
Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Back Injuries/diagnosis , Bone Marrow Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Edema/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Bone Marrow/pathology , Cohort Studies , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Risk Factors , Sports , WorkloadABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Video review has become an important tool in professional sporting codes to help sideline identification and management of players with a potential concussion. AIM: To assess current practices related to video review of concussion in professional sports internationally, and compare protocols and diagnostic criteria used to identify and manage potential concussions. METHODS: Current concussion management guidelines from professional national and international sporting codes were reviewed. Specific criteria and definitions of video signs associated with concussion were compared between codes. Rules and regulations adopted across the codes for processes around video review were also assessed. RESULTS: Six sports with specific diagnostic criteria and definitions for signs of concussion identified on video review participated in this study (Australian football, American football, world rugby, cricket, rugby league and ice hockey). Video signs common to all sports include lying motionless/loss of responsiveness and motor incoordination. The video signs considered by the majority of sports as most predictive of a diagnosis of concussion include motor incoordination, impact seizure, tonic posturing and lying motionless. Regulatory requirements, sideline availability of video, medical expertise of video reviewers and use of spotters differ across sports and geographical boundaries. By and large, these differences reflect a pragmatic approach from each sport, with limited underlying research and development of the video review process in some instances. CONCLUSIONS: The use of video analysis in assisting medical staff with the diagnosis or identification of potential concussion is well established across different sports internationally. The diagnostic criteria used and the expertise of the video review personnel are not clearly established, and research efforts would benefit from a collaborative harmonisation across sporting codes.
Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Sports Medicine/methods , Video Recording , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of video to assist professional sporting bodies with the diagnosis of sport-related concussion (SRC) has been well established; however, there has been little consistency across sporting codes with regards to which video signs should be used, and the definitions of each of these signs. AIM: The aims of this study were to develop a consensus for the video signs considered to be most useful in the identification of a possible SRC and to develop a consensus definition for each of these video signs across the sporting codes. METHODS: A brief questionnaire was used to assess which video signs were considered to be most useful in the identification of a possible concussion. Consensus was defined as >90% agreement by respondents. Existing definitions of these video signs from individual sports were collated, and individual components of the definitions were assessed and ranked. A modified Delphi approach was then used to create a consensus definition for each of the video signs. RESULTS: Respondents representing seven sporting bodies (Australian Football League, Cricket Australia, Major League Baseball, NFL, NHL, National Rugby League, World Rugby) reached consensus on eight video signs of concussion. Thirteen representatives from the seven professional sports ranked the definition components. Consolidation and refinement of the video signs and their definitions resulted in consensus definitions for six video signs of possible concussion: lying motionless, motor incoordination, impact seizure, tonic posturing, no protective action-floppy and blank/vacant look. CONCLUSIONS: These video signs and definitions have reached international consensus, are indicated for use by professional sporting bodies and will form the basis for further collaborative research.
Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Sports Medicine/standards , Video Recording , Consensus , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To review the literature guiding all aspects of the use of injectable corticosteroids for painful musculoskeletal conditions, with a focus on the treatment of athletes. DATA SOURCES: An extensive search of the literature was completed including search terms of corticosteroid, steroid, athlete, and injection, among others. Additional articles were used after being identified from previously reviewed articles. MAIN RESULTS: Injections of corticosteroids for a variety of painful conditions of the extremities and the axial spine have been described. Numerous minor and major complications have been reported, including those with a high degree of morbidity. There is a dearth of published research on the use of corticosteroid injections in athletes, with most of the research on this topic focused on older, nonathlete populations. Generally, these injections are well tolerated and can provide short-term pain improvement with little or no long-term benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroid injections should be used cautiously in athletes and only after a full consideration of the pharmacology, pathogenesis of disease, potential benefits, complications, factors specific to the athlete, and rules of athletic governing bodies. Corticosteroid injections are just one component of a comprehensive rehabilitation plan available to the physician providing care to athletes.
Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Injections , Pain Management , Sports , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Athletes , Humans , Musculoskeletal Pain/drug therapy , PainABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess and evaluate the long-term safety of local anesthetic injections before or during games in professional rugby league players. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Professional rugby league team. PARTICIPANTS: Sydney Roosters players over a 6-year period (2008-2013), who had been administered a local anesthetic injection for an injury before or during a match to aid return to play. INTERVENTIONS: Follow-up survey (no active intervention). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Player self-reported satisfaction. Survey results were compared with a previous cohort who had received local anesthetic injection from 1998 to 2007. RESULTS: Thirty-two players who had been injected with local anesthetic on 249 occasions for 81 injuries completed the current survey at an average of 5.64 years postinjection. In the cohort of 2008 to 2013, fewer injections were performed to areas deemed higher risk compared with the 1998 to 2007 cohort (P < 0.00002). The vast majority of players (80/81 cases) would repeat the injection in the same circumstances and reported that ongoing side effects were uncommon. There were 6 cases (8%) in which players reported significant ongoing pain in the area of injection at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study affirmed the long-term safety of injections in most cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Athletic Injuries/drug therapy , Football , Injections , Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Pain Perception , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To establish whether the use of ultrasound to direct shock waves to the area of greater calcification in calcaneal enthesopathies was more effective than the common procedure of directing shock waves to the point where the patient has the most tenderness. DESIGN: Two-armed nonblinded randomized control trial with allocation concealment. SETTING: The Sports Clinic at Sydney University. PATIENTS: Participants 18 years or older with symptomatic plantar fasciitis (PF) (with heel spur) or calcific Achilles tendinopathy (CAT). Seventy-four of 82 cases completed treatment protocol and 6-month follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either ultrasound-guided (UG) or patient-guided (PG) shock wave at weekly intervals over 3 to 5 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reduced pain on visual analog scale (VAS) and improved functional score on Maryland Foot Score (MFS) (for PF) or Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) (for CAT). Follow-up was at 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Comparative 6-month improvements in MFS for the 47 PF cases were PG +20/100 and UG +14/100 (P = 0.20). Comparative 6-month improvement in VISA-A score for the 27 CAT cases were PG +35/100 and UG +27/100 (P = 0.37). Comparative (combined PF and CAT) 6-month improvement in VAS pain scores for all 38 PG cases were +38/100 with +37/100 for all 36 UG shock wave cases. CONCLUSIONS: Although both treatment groups had good clinical outcomes in this study, results for the 2 study groups were almost identical. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study shows that there is no major advantage in the addition of ultrasound for guiding shock waves when treating calcaneal enthesopathies (PF and CAT).
Subject(s)
Fasciitis, Plantar/therapy , High-Energy Shock Waves/therapeutic use , Tendinopathy/therapy , Ultrasonography , Achilles Tendon/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain MeasurementABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: For elite athletes to train and compete at peak performance levels, it is necessary to manage their pain efficiently and effectively. A recent consensus meeting on the management of pain in elite athletes concluded that there are many gaps in the current knowledge and that further information and research is required. This article presents the crystallization of these acknowledged gaps in knowledge. DATA SOURCES: Information was gathered from a wide variety of published scientific sources that were reviewed at the consensus meeting and the gaps in knowledge identified. MAIN RESULTS: Gaps have been identified in the epidemiology of analgesic use, the management of pain associated with minor injuries, and the field of play management of pain for athletes with major injuries. From a pharmacological perspective, there is a lack of information on the prescribing of opioid medications in elite athletes and more data are required on the use of local anesthetics injections, corticosteroids, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during training and in competition. Pain management strategies for the general population are widely available, but there are few for the elite sporting population and virtually none for elite athletes with a disability. More research is also needed in assessing cognitive-behavior therapies in improving specific outcomes and also into the new process of psychologically informed physiotherapy. A key issue is the paucity of data relating to incidence or prevalence of persistent pain and how this relates to persistent dysfunction, exercise performance, and physiological function in later life. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of the gaps in knowledge in the management of pain in elite athletes will provide a unified direction for the retrieval of information and further research that will provide reassurance, speed return to active sport, and benefit performance.