ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate predictors for return to work for people struggling with common mental disorders on sick leave or at risk of sick leave. The first aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a set of statements exploring different conditions at the workplace and assumptions about working with health problems, by investigating the factor structure, reliability and construct validity of these statements. The second aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of the identified factors. METHODS: A total of 797 patients from an outpatient mental health clinic were included in a naturalistic observational study. The study design was longitudinal. The participants filled out self-report questionnaires pre- and post-treatment. RESULTS: A principal component factor analysis with a varimax rotation identified two factors, Negative beliefs about working with health problems and Support at work, displaying high internal consistency, 0.83 and 0.84, respectively. Separately, both factors were significant predictors of full return to work after treatment. The final multivariable analysis including both factors left Negative beliefs about working with health problems as a significant predictor explaining unique variance. CONCLUSIONS: Negative beliefs about working with health problems and Support at work are important predictors for work status after treatment and should therefore be addressed during treatment for common mental disorders to assist people return to work.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: In Metacognitive therapy (MCT), homework is used, for example, to increase awareness of thoughts and thought processes, to challenge metacognitive beliefs in real-life situations, and to practice new ways of processing thoughts, feelings, and symptoms. All MCT treatment manuals include homework assignments to be given between each session. METHOD: The following study provides a detailed description of the implementation of homework in a group-based MCT treatment for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) at an outpatient clinic in Norway. The treatment described in this case consisted of 10 weekly group sessions (7 patients) lasting two hours. RESULTS: This case study demonstrates that group-based MCT can be used to treat GAD and describes how the use of homework can facilitate therapeutic change. CONCLUSION: Overall, the effectiveness of MCT was found to be high. Homework gives patients the opportunity to take charge of their therapy and develop a sense of responsibility for their own progress, both during and after treatment.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Metacognition , Psychotherapy, Group , Humans , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , EmotionsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Studies investigating the long-term effect of attention bias modification (ABM) in clinical samples are lacking. This study investigates the 6-months follow-up effect of ABM on depressive symptoms in participant with major depressive disorder with and without comorbid disorders. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind randomized sham-controlled trial in 101 participants between 19 November 2019, and 17 August 2021. Follow-up ended 3 April 2022. Participants were allocated to ABM or sham condition twice daily for 14 consecutive days. Primary outcomes were the total score on the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) at 6 months, mean Brief State Rumination Inventory (BSRI) score post-treatment and reduction in BSRI post-treatment. Secondary outcome was change in attentional bias (AB). The trial was preregistered in ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT04137367). RESULTS: A total of 118 patients aged 18-65 years were assessed for eligibility, and 101 were randomized and subjected to intention-to-treat analyses. At 6 months, ABM had no effect on depression and anxiety compared to a sham condition. While rumination decreased during the intervention, there was no effect of condition on rumination and AB. Predictor analysis did not reveal differences between participants with ongoing major depressive episode or comorbid anxiety. CONCLUSION: Compared to sham training, there was no effect of ABM on depressive symptoms at 6-months follow-up. Since the intervention failed at modifying AB, it is unclear whether changes in AB are related to long-term outcomes.
Subject(s)
Attentional Bias , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major , Humans , Depression , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The EQ-5D is a commonly used generic measure of health but evidence on its responsiveness to change in mental health is limited. This study aimed to explore the responsiveness of the five-level version of the instrument, the EQ-5D-5 L, in patients receiving treatment for depression and anxiety. METHODS: Patient data (N = 416) were collected at baseline and at end of treatment in an observational study in a Norwegian outpatient clinic. Patients were adults of working age (18-69 years) and received protocol-based metacognitive or cognitive therapy for depression or anxiety according to diagnosis. Responsiveness in the EQ-5D was compared to change in the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Effect sizes (Cohen's d), Standardised response mean (SRM), and Pearson's correlation were calculated. Patients were classified as "Recovered", "Improved", or "Unchanged" during treatment using the BDI-II and the BAI. ROC analyses determined whether the EQ-5D could correctly classify patient outcomes. RESULTS: Effect sizes were large for the BAI, the BDI-II, the EQ-5D value and the EQ VAS, ranging from d = 1.07 to d = 1.84. SRM were also large (0.93-1.67). Pearson's correlation showed strong agreement between change scores of the EQ-5D value and the BDI-II (rs -0.54) and moderate between the EQ-5D value and the BAI (rs -0.43). The EQ-5D consistently identified "Recovered" patients versus "Improved" or "Unchanged" in the ROC analyses with AUROC ranging from 0.72 to 0.84. CONCLUSION: The EQ-5D showed good agreement with self-reported symptom change in depression and anxiety, and correctly identified recovered patients. These findings indicate that the EQ-5D may be appropriately responsive to change in patients with depression and anxiety disorders, although replication in other clinical samples is needed.
The EQ-5D is a questionnaire that people fill in to report their subjective health. It is often used in clinics or hospitals to better understand how patients are affected by their illnesses, and if their health improves after treatment. For this information to be trustworthy, we need to verify how accurately the EQ-5D measures health for the particular patients we want to use it with. This is often done by comparing EQ-5D scores with scores from other questionnaires. For example, if we want to use the EQ-5D with a group of patients with depression, we compare the scores of the EQ-5D with scores from questionnaires that are commonly used to measure depression symptoms.In this study, we compared the scores of the EQ-5D with scores from questionnaires measuring symptoms of depression and anxiety. Their performances were similar, and the EQ-5D scores could also correctly identify which patients had recovered during treatment. This implies that the EQ-5D can be a useful tool for understanding the impact of depression and anxiety and can help in decision-making regarding these patients.
Subject(s)
Depression , Quality of Life , Adult , Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Quality of Life/psychology , Depression/therapy , Depression/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Health Status , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Reproducibility of Results , PsychometricsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation of the anterior thalamic nucleus (ANT-DBS) is an established option in treatment-resistant epilepsy and obtained FDA approval in 2018. Increased psychiatric comorbidity is well known in epilepsy. The main objective of this study was to investigate possible neuropsychiatric treatment-related changes in patients receiving ANT-DBS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bilateral ANT electrodes were implanted in 18 adult patients with refractory epilepsy in a randomized, double-blinded study. Immediately after implantation, patients were randomized to stimulation ON (n = 8) or OFF (n = 10) for the first 6 months (blinded phase). During the next six months (open phase), both groups received active stimulation. Neuropsychiatric assessment was conducted before implantation (T1), at the end of the blinded period (T2), and 1 year after implantation (T3). RESULTS: Comparing preoperative status (T1) and 12 months (T3), postoperative outcome in all patients did not show significant differences between the two groups for any of the applied tests. Groupwise comparisons across the two first time points (the blinded period, representing the randomized controlled trial) showed no significant differences between the two groups in any of the neuropsychiatric parameters studied. Comparing test results after 6 months of stimulation in both groups (sum of ON group T1 to T2 and OFF group T2 to T3) did not show significant changes for any of the psychiatric assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that ANT-DBS has limited effect concerning psychiatric issues. Subjective side effects were, however, reported in individual patients.
Subject(s)
Anterior Thalamic Nuclei , Deep Brain Stimulation , Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Epilepsy , Adult , Anterior Thalamic Nuclei/physiology , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Double-Blind Method , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/therapy , Epilepsy/therapy , HumansABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Cardiometabolic disease in patients with severe mental illness is a major cause of shortened life expectancy. There is sparse evidence of real-world clinical risk prevention practice. We investigated levels of assessments of cardiometabolic risk factors and risk management interventions in patients with severe mental illness in the Norwegian mental health service according to an acknowledged international standard. METHODS: We collected data from 264 patients residing in six country-wide health trusts for: (a) assessments of cardiometabolic risk and (b) assessments of levels of risk reducing interventions. Logistic regressions were employed to investigate associations between risk and interventions. RESULTS: Complete assessments of all cardiometabolic risk variables were performed in 50% of the participants and 88% thereof had risk levels requiring intervention according to the standard. Smoking cessation advice was provided to 45% of daily smokers and 4% were referred to an intervention program. Obesity was identified in 62% and was associated with lifestyle interventions. Reassessment of psychotropic medication was done in 28% of the obese patients. Women with obesity were less likely to receive dietary advice, and use of clozapine or olanzapine reduced the chances for patients with obesity of getting weight reducing interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly nine out of the ten participants were identified as being at cardiometabolic high risk and only half of the participants were adequately screened. Women with obesity and patients using antipsychotics with higher levels of cardiometabolic side effects had fewer adequate interventions. The findings underscore the need for standardized recommendations for identification and provision of cardiometabolic risk reducing interventions in all patients with severe mental illness.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Mental Disorders , Humans , Female , Cardiometabolic Risk Factors , Mental Health , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/psychology , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the Return-to-Work Self-efficacy Questionnaire (RTW-SE) in a Norwegian sample of patients with common mental disorders. The secondary aim was to provide validated cut-off scores for the RTW-SE. Methods Among patients receiving work-focused therapy (N = 626), the RTW-SE was measured pre-and post-treatment, and work status was assessed up to one-year post-treatment. The factor structure, internal consistency and construct validity were assessed. Furthermore, post-treatment cut-off scores were calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for patients on sick leave at baseline (n = 314) and at the end of treatment (n = 145). The predictive ability of the suggested RTW-SE cut-off scores were investigated longitudinally. Results Exploratory principal component analysis identified a one-factor solution with high internal consistency (0.91). RTW-SE exhibited small to moderate negative correlations with measures of depression and anxiety, and was significantly different between subgroups of patients with different work status, supporting construct validity. Pre- and post-treatment RTW-SE scores significantly predicted full return to work at 3, 6 and 12 months post-treatment. ROC analysis suggested an upper cut-off score of 4.6, associated with full RTW, and lower cut-off score of 3.7, associated with partial RTW. These cut-offs showed acceptable discriminative ability and significant longitudinal predictive ability. Conclusion The RTW-SE possesses good psychometric properties and the suggested cut-off scores have significant predictive ability in a clinical setting.
Subject(s)
Return to Work , Sick Leave , Anxiety , Depression , Humans , Self Efficacy , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate morphometric correlates of auditory hallucinations in bipolar disorder (BD) by comparing cortical thickness and cortical surface area in bipolar disorder patients with (BD+) and without (BD-) a lifetime history of auditory hallucinations. Based on previous findings in schizophrenia patients, we hypothesized that the cortex would be thinner in the auditory cortex in BD+ compared to BD-. METHODS: Bipolar disorder spectrum (n = 157) patients and healthy controls (n = 279) underwent 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning. Hypothesis-driven analyses of cortical thickness and surface area in regions of the auditory cortex (Heschl's gyrus [HG], planum temporale and superior temporal gyrus) were conducted comparing BD+ (n = 49) and BD- (n = 108) using linear regression models, covaried for age and sex. Furthermore, we explored vertex-wise group differences in thickness and surface area across the whole cerebral cortex. RESULTS: Hypothesis-driven analyses:BD+ had significantly thicker cortex in the left HG compared to BD- (B = 0.128, P = .0046). The finding was not explained by duration of illness, global functioning, bipolar subtype, IQ or use of antipsychotic, antidepressant or antiepileptic medication, or by lithium. Exploratory analyses: A small region of thicker cortex in BD+ compared to BD- was seen in the left superior parietal lobule (false discovery rate <0.05). There were no significant group differences in cortical surface area. CONCLUSION: A lifetime history of auditory hallucinations in BD was associated with cortical thickness alterations in both the left HG and the superior parietal lobule. Contrary to our hypothesis, BD+ showed thicker, rather than thinner cortex compared to BD-. Replications in independent samples are needed.
Subject(s)
Auditory Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Bipolar Disorder , Hallucinations , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Temporal Lobe/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/complications , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Correlation of Data , Female , Hallucinations/diagnosis , Hallucinations/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of coercive mental healthcare contravenes the principle of voluntary examination and treatment. However, it should be possible for persons at acute risk to receive imperative health assistance. MATERIAL AND METHOD: After evaluating 37 emergency interviews in psychiatric outpatient clinics where the use of coercive mental health care was considered, interviews were conducted with emergency assistance staff. RESULTS: The study includes interviews that resulted in involuntary hospitalisation (n = 15), coerced observation (n = 2), voluntary hospitalisation (n = 14) and follow-up by the outpatient clinic (n = 6). Important factors in assessing the use of coercion were the severity of psychotic symptoms, suicide risk and risk for others, and difficult social circumstances. Three-quarters of emergency assistance staff were in some degree of doubt, and 16 out of 37 experienced uneasiness during the assessment. With a view to enhancing the patient's perception of having been met with respect, the emergency assistance staff emphasised the need for the patient's opinion to be heard. Where the emergency assistance staff were in doubt, a number of professional and ethical issues were highlighted in the process of reaching a decision. DISCUSSION: Latitude should be given for ethical and professional reflection in relation to assessing the use of coercion in daily clinical practice, as well as training in measures to reinforce patients' experience of participation during the interview.
Subject(s)
Clinical Decision-Making , Commitment of Mentally Ill , Involuntary Treatment, Psychiatric , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Decision-Making/ethics , Coercion , Community Mental Health Centers , Emergency Services, Psychiatric , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Involuntary Treatment, Psychiatric/ethics , Mental Health Services , Norway , Patient Participation , Suicidal IdeationABSTRACT
This prospective observational cohort study is an extension of a previous study reporting effects of cytomegalovirus (CMV) on graft and patient survival in 471 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 1994 and 1997. CMV pp65 antigen was measured every 7-14 d during the first three months after transplantation, given as number of CMV pp65-positive cells per 10(5) leukocytes. A positive test was defined as CMV infection. None of the patients received CMV prophylaxis or preemptive treatment. During a median of 13.7 (7.1-14.9) yr, the number of death-censored graft losses was 118 (25%) and of patient deaths 224 (48%). CMV infection was an independent significant risk factor for mortality in multivariate analysis (HR = 1.453, 95% CI 1.033-2.045, p = 0.032), adjusting for patient and donor age, preemptive transplantation, HLA-DR and -AB mismatches, living donor, acute rejection during the first three months, donor-recipient CMV IgG antibody status and diabetic nephropathy. In univariate analysis, CMV infection was significantly associated with death-censored graft loss but the association was not significant in multivariate model. CMV infection early after kidney transplantation is a predictor of overall mortality but not of death-censored graft loss after a median observation period of 13.7 yr.
Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections/mortality , Graft Rejection/mortality , Graft Survival , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation , Postoperative Complications , Adolescent , Adult , Cytomegalovirus/pathogenicity , Cytomegalovirus Infections/etiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Graft Rejection/etiology , Graft Survival/physiology , Humans , Kidney Function Tests , Male , Middle Aged , Phosphoproteins/blood , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Viral Matrix Proteins/blood , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Victims of workplace bullying represent a group characterised by severe negative health complaints at risk of losing their foothold in working life. To date, very few studies have investigated the effect of psychological treatment of the health-related problems often facing victims of bullying. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate if victims of workplace bullying suffering from common mental disorders (CMD) benefit from clinical treatment for their mental health problems at an outpatient clinic treating patients using Metacognitive or Cognitive Behavioural Therapy with work-focus. Criteria were symptom reduction and change in workplace participation. Comparisons were made between the victims of workplace bullying with CMD, a wait-list control group consisting of patients who had also been exposed to bullying yet now awaiting treatment, and other patients not exposed to bullying. METHODS: The sample comprised of 405 patients from an outpatient clinic in Norway. The study used a naturalistic observational design and data was collected pre-treatment and post-treatment. RESULTS: The results showed the treatment to be effective in symptom reduction for victims of bullying to a similar degree as patients otherwise not exposed to bullying. Even more, victims receiving treatment had a larger improvement compared to the wait-list control group (pâ<â0.001). Yet, among patients on sick leave pre-treatment, fewer victims of bullying were fully working by the end of treatment compared to the patients not exposed to workplace bullying. CONCLUSION: The findings provide ground for optimism for this treatment as an efficient way of dealing with the aftermath of workplace bullying.
Subject(s)
Bullying , Mental Disorders , Occupational Stress , Humans , Mental Health , Workplace/psychology , Bullying/psychology , Mental Disorders/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Depression highly impairs function and reduces quality of life. Therefore, both symptomatic and functional recovery are important treatment goals. Depression consists of several cognitive, somatic, and affective symptom factors that differently affect function. However, it is unclear whether changes in these domains predict return to work (RTW) after treatment. METHODS: Data were collected during treatment from patients on full or partial sick leave reporting depression symptoms (N = 300) at an out-patient clinic. Information on work status was assessed pre- and post-treatment and at 6 months follow-up. Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate if residualized changes in symptom factors predicted full RTW, controlling for gender, education level, and age. RESULTS: Changes (as symptom improvement) in the cognitive, somatic, and affective factor scores each significantly predicted full RTW post-treatment and at follow-up for patients on full and partial sick leave, even after controlling for gender, education level, and age. The change in the somatic factor explained the largest proportion of variance for full work post-treatment in patients on full sick-leave, while change in the cognitive factor explained most unique variance for patients on graded sick leave. LIMITATIONS: The sample consisted of a majority of women with a relatively high level of education. This study should be replicated in more heterogeneous samples. CONCLUSION: Changes in depression symptom domains are significant predictors for RTW work post-treatment. The change in the somatic factor explained the largest proportion of variance in patients on full sick leave and thus may particularly influence RTW after treatment.
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Return to Work , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Mental Disorders/psychology , Quality of Life , Return to Work/psychology , Sick LeaveABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We investigated whether the heparin-coated AN69 ST hemodialysis (HD) filter induced less hypercoagulability during HD than a conventional polysulfone filter (F×8). METHODS: In a crossover design, 11 patients were treated alternately with AN69 ST and F×8 filters (45 sessions). All filters were primed with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and unadsorbed UFH was removed by saline flushing. Half the conventional dalteparin dose was given as a bolus dose at the start of HD. Clotting was evaluated hourly in the venous air trap. Prothrombin fragments 1 and 2 (PF1 + 2), antithrombin (AT), ß-TG and anti-FXa activity were repeatedly measured. RESULTS: One patient treated with enalapril had two repeated adverse reactions to the AN69 ST filter and was excluded from the study. Use of the AN69 ST filter did not decrease the mean clot score or PF1 + 2, but decreased ß-TG compared to the F×8 filter. CONCLUSION: The heparin-coated AN69 ST filter did not induce less coagulation when compared to the F×8 filter.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/pharmacology , Blood Coagulation/drug effects , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Heparin/pharmacology , Membranes, Artificial , Polymers , Renal Dialysis/instrumentation , Sulfones , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Renal Dialysis/methodsABSTRACT
Objectives: The EQ-5D is a generic, self-report measure of health that is increasingly used in clinical settings, including mental health. The EQ-5D captures health using five dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain/discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. The validity of the EQ-5D is previously unexplored in patients on or at risk of sick leave due to depression and anxiety. The study's aim was to examine its validity in this group of patients. Methods: Baseline data were collected from self-report questionnaires in an observational study (N=890) at a Norwegian outpatient-clinic. Participants were adults on or at risk of sick leave due to depression and anxiety who were referred for treatment by general practitioners. The crosswalk methodology was applied to estimate the EQ-5D value. Validity was assessed by comparing responses on the EQ-5D with the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Subjective Health Complaints (SHC). An ordinal regression model was used to assess known-groups validity. Convergent validity was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient, and a multivariate regression model that included sociodemographic characteristics. Results: The mean EQ-5D value was 0.631, indicating reduced health status compared to "full health" anchored at 1.0, and patients reported moderate levels of depression and anxiety. Ordinal regression indicated that the EQ-5D could discriminate between different levels of symptom severity for depression and anxiety. The EQ-5D value showed significant correlation with the clinical measures; r=-0.52 for the BDI-II, r=-0.49 for the BAI, and r=-0.44 for SHC. The multivariate regression showed that the clinical variables significantly predicted the EQ-5D value, explaining 40.1% of the variance. Depression and anxiety scores were the largest determinants of EQ-5D value, respectively, whilst sick leave, subjective health complaints, and gender made moderate contributions. Conclusion: The EQ-5D showed indication of validity in patients on or at risk of sick leave due to depression and anxiety in the present study. The EQ-5D value was sensitive to both symptom severity and functional impairment in the form of sick leave. The findings support the EQ-5D as a feasible and relevant measure of health status in these patients.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Sick leave due to anxiety and depression is a heterogeneous process constituting a pressing public health issue. This longitudinal study aimed to identify sick leave trajectories among patients before, during and after work-focused treatment, in all 29.5 months. We then aimed to determine the background and clinical characteristics of these trajectory groups. METHODS: Background and clinical data were collected by patient self-report (N=619) in an observational study in a specialised mental healthcare clinic. Sick leave was recorded from national registry data. A latent growth mixture model identified trajectories. Multinomial logistic regression determined differences in background characteristics while a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) identified clinical differences. RESULTS: We identified three trajectories: The 'Resilient' group (47.7%) had low sick leave throughout the period. The two other groups ('Recovery', 31.8% and 'High risk', 20.5%) had similar pretreatment trajectories: lower sick leave one year prior which increased to high sick leave at the start of treatment. After treatment, the 'Recovery' group made an almost full return to work while the 'High risk' group remained at high sick leave. The two groups with high sick leave had more women and higher age compared with the 'Resilient' group. All groups had similar clinical scores at the start of treatment, but the 'High risk' groups had residual depressive symptoms at the end of treatment. Effect sizes for anxiety and depression were moderate or large for all groups, (Cohen's d=0.74-1.81), and 87.2% of the total sample were fully working one year after treatment. CONCLUSION: We found three subgroups with distinctly different trajectories. Female gender and higher age were associated with high sick leave at the start of treatment, while residual depressive symptoms at the end of treatment predicted continued sick leave. The study points to the possibility of improving patient outcomes in the future by stratifying and tailoring treatment to patient characteristics.
Subject(s)
Return to Work , Sick Leave , Anxiety/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Longitudinal StudiesABSTRACT
The study investigated relationships between exposure to bullying behaviours, return to work self-efficacy (RTW-SE) and resilience, and if resilience moderates the bullying-RTW-SE relationship among patients on sick leave or at risk of sick leave due to common mental disorders (CMD). A sample of 675 patients treated in an outpatient clinic was analysed using regressions and moderation analyses by employing SPSS and the Process macro SPSS supplement. The results showed a negative relationship between exposure to bullying behaviours and RTW-SE. There was also a positive main effect for resilience, as patients with high resilience score significantly higher on RTW-SE than patients with low resilience irrespective of levels of bullying. Further, the resilience sub-dimension personal resilience moderated the bullying-RTW-SE relationship, while the sub-dimension interpersonal resilience did not. Patients high on personal resilience showed relatively lower RTW-SE scores when exposed to bullying behaviours, compared to those that were not bullied with high personal resilience levels. Hence, one should take note of the fact that even if resilience may strengthen RTW-SE, bullying is an adverse event which particularly affects individuals who present with relatively high levels of resilience resources, at least when it comes to RTW-SE.
Subject(s)
Bullying , Mental Disorders , Humans , Return to Work , Self Efficacy , Sick LeaveABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Common mental disorders such as depression and anxiety are major contributors to the global burden of disease. Affected individuals suffer reduced quality of life, impaired functioning and reduced capacity to work. Maintaining employment is an important determinant for health and wellbeing, and the economic impact of depression and anxiety is a significant societal expense. Treatments providing effective symptom reduction and helping patients return to work (RTW) would thus have substantial public health benefits. The present study will explore the effectiveness of metacognitive therapy (MCT) and work-focused interventions on reducing symptoms and increasing RTW rates for patients on sick leave due to depression and anxiety. METHODS: The study is a randomised controlled wait-list trial (RCT; N = 240). The intervention group will receive protocol-based MCT and work-focused interventions immediately after inclusion. The control condition is a wait-list control group. All patients will receive up to 12 weekly sessions. The study context is a Norwegian outpatient clinic part of a national programme aimed at reducing sick leave. The co-primary outcomes are change in RTW and symptoms of depression and anxiety at the end of treatment. In addition to self-report, sick leave will also be collected from national registries from 2 years prior to intervention to 4 years after intervention. Symptoms of scores will be collected by self-report at pre- and post-treatment and at 6 and 12 months follow-up after treatment. A cost-effectiveness analysis will use total cost and quality-adjusted life-years as the secondary outcomes. DISCUSSION: There is broad consensus on the importance of identifying treatment that effectively reduces depression and anxiety symptoms and aids RTW. This study is an important contribution to the field as it is the first RCT on MCT and work-focused interventions for patients on sick leave due to anxiety and depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03301922 . Registered on October 4, 2017.
Subject(s)
Depression , Sick Leave , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/therapy , Anxiety Disorders , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/therapy , Humans , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Common mental disorders (CMD) are leading causes of sickness absence. Treatments for CMD that both reduce symptoms and support work participation urgently need to be developed. OBJECTIVE: Determine the potential effects of work-focused therapy combining work interventions with either meta cognitive therapy or cognitive behavioural therapy (W-MCT/CBT) for patients with CMD on sick leave. METHODS: Naturalistic study with a quasi-experimental approach. Pre- and post-scores (return to work, symptoms, return-to-work self-efficacy, clinical recovery from depression and anxiety) were compared between the intervention group (nâ=â87) who received immediate treatment over an average of 10.40 sessions (SDâ=â3.09) and the non-randomized waitlist control group (nâ=â95) that had waited an average of 11.18 weeks (SDâ=â2.29). RESULTS: Significantly more patients returned fully to work in the intervention group (41.4%) than the control group (26.3%). Effect sizes for self-efficacy scores, depression and anxiety were large in the intervention group (dâ=â1.28, 1.01, 1.58), and significantly lower in the control group (dâ=â0.60, 0.14, 0.45). Significantly more patients in the treatment group than control group recovered from depression (54.1% vs. 12.8%) and anxiety (50.0% vs.10.6%). CONCLUSIONS: W-MCT/CBT may be an effective intervention for patients on sick leave due to CMD.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Sick Leave , Anxiety/therapy , Control Groups , Humans , Return to WorkABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Targets of workplace bullying tend to develop severe mental health complaints, having increased risk of sick leave and expulsion from the workplace. Hence, these individuals are likely to be overrepresented among patients seeking treatment for common mental disorders (CMD). This study investigated the prevalence of exposure to workplace bullying in a patient group seeking treatment for CMD. Further we explored if exposed and non-exposed patients differed on clinical and work-related characteristics. METHODS: The sample comprised of 675 patients from an outpatient clinic in Norway and consisted of 70% women and had a mean age of 39 (SD = 10.5) years. The study had a cross-sectional design and differences between the patient groups were analysed using chi-square, Mann-Whitney U-tests and independent sample t-tests. RESULTS: The prevalence of exposure to bullying was 25.8%. The patients exposed to bullying reported significantly more major depressive disorders (MDDs) measured with the MINI psychiatric interview, higher levels of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, subjective health complaints, alcohol use, and lower resilience as measured with questionnaires. Twice as many were on full-time sick leave, reported lower work ability, lower return to work self-efficacy, and lower job satisfaction. A majority preferred another job than the one they have today over returning to their current employment. CONCLUSION: Victims of workplace bullying are a vulnerable group at risk of expulsion from working life, being overrepresented among patients seeking mental health treatment for CMD. One in four patients represented with such experience have higher levels of psychological symptoms and are more often diagnosed with depression as compared to other patients. Thus, this is a problem that should be addressed in clinical settings. If not addressed there is an increased risk of sick leave and permanent exclusion from working life.
ABSTRACT
Vitamin D and folate deficiency are considered risk factors for schizophrenia and bipolar disorders, but it is unknown how vitamin D and folate influence the growing brain, cranium or the clinical phenotype. Serum vitamin D and folate levels are in part genetically regulated. We investigated whether adult vitamin D and folate levels are associated with the intracranial volume (ICV) under the hypothesis that developmental vitamin D or folate levels influence neurodevelopment and that current levels are associated with ICV. Ninety patients with severe mental disorders and 91 healthy controls underwent 3 T magnetic resonance imaging and serum sampling. Multiple linear regression was used to assess the contribution of serum vitamin D, folate and patient-control status on ICV. We show that vitamin D levels were within lower range for patients and controls (48.8 ± 22.1 nmol/l and 53.4 ± 20.0 nmol/l, respectively). A significant positive association was found between vitamin D and ICV (p = 0.003, r = 0.22), folate was trend-significantly associated with ICV. Folate and vitamin D were significantly associated (p = 0.0001, r = 0.28). There were nonsignificant patient-control differences and no interaction effects. The results suggest that Vitamin D is associated with ICV as detected in the adult. Further studies are warranted for replication and to investigate possible mechanisms and genetic associations.