ABSTRACT
Data comparing long-term effectiveness and safety of once-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo liver transplantation are scarce. We compared the effectiveness, pharmacokinetic profile, and safety of LCPT (Envarsus) and PR-Tac (Advagraf) for up to 12 months post-transplant. Adult de novo liver transplant recipients who started IR-Tac (Prograf) and were converted to LCPT or PR-Tac 3-5 days post-transplant were included. Data from 163 patients were analyzed, 87 treated with LCPT and 76 with PR-Tac. The incidence of treatment failure was 30.5% in the LCPT group versus 23.0% in the PR-Tac group (p = .291). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was reported in 26.8% of patients in the LCPT group and 17.6% in the PR-Tac group (p = .166). Graft loss was experienced in one patient (1.2%) in the LCPT group and three patients (4.1%) in the PR-Tac group (p = .346). Death was registered in three patients (3.7%) in the LCPT group and three patients (4.1%) in the PR-Tac group (p > .999). Patients in the LCPT group showed 45.7% higher relative bioavailability (Cmin /total daily dose [TDD]; p < .01) with similar Cmin and 33.3% lower TDD versus PR-Tac (p < .01). The evolution of renal function, safety profile, and the incidence of post-transplant renal failure, dyslipidemia, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus were similar in patients treated with LCPT and PR-Tac. In de novo liver transplant patients, LCPT and PR-Tac showed comparable effectiveness with higher relative bioavailability, similar Cmin and lower TDD in the LCPT group. Renal function, safety, and post-transplant complications were comparable in LCPT and PR-Tac groups.
Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Liver Transplantation , Adult , Humans , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use , Tacrolimus/pharmacokinetics , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacokinetics , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Prospective Studies , Graft Rejection/drug therapy , Graft Rejection/etiology , Transplant RecipientsABSTRACT
There is uncertainty regarding Wilson's disease (WD) management. OBJECTIVES: To assess, in a multicenter Spanish retrospective cohort study, whether the approach to WD is homogeneous among centers. METHODS: Data on WD patients followed at 32 Spanish hospitals were collected. RESULTS: 153 cases, 58% men, 20.6 years at diagnosis, 69.1% hepatic presentation, were followed for 15.5 years. Discordant results in non-invasive laboratory parameters were present in 39.8%. Intrahepatic copper concentration was pathologic in 82.4%. Genetic testing was only done in 56.6% with positive results in 83.9%. A definite WD diagnosis (Leipzig score ≥4) was retrospectively confirmed in 92.5% of cases. Chelating agents were standard initial therapy (75.2%) with frequent modifications (57%), particularly to maintenance zinc. Enzyme normalization was not achieved by one third, most commonly in the setting of poor compliance, lack of genetic mutations and/or presence of cardiometabolic risk factors. Although not statistically significant, there were trends for sex differences in number of diagnosed cases, age at diagnosis and biochemical response. CONCLUSIONS: Significant heterogeneity in diagnosis and management of WD patients emerges from this multicenter study that includes both small and large reference centers. The incorporation of genetic testing will likely improve diagnosis. Sex differences need to be further explored.
Subject(s)
Hepatolenticular Degeneration , Humans , Female , Male , Hepatolenticular Degeneration/diagnosis , Hepatolenticular Degeneration/genetics , Retrospective Studies , Chelating Agents/therapeutic use , Zinc , Copper , Penicillamine/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Postmortem normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is a rising preservation strategy in controlled donation after circulatory determination of death (cDCD). Herein, we present results for cDCD liver transplants performed in Spain 2012-2019, with outcomes evaluated through December 31, 2020. Results were analyzed retrospectively and according to recovery technique (abdominal NRP [A-NRP] or standard rapid recovery [SRR]). During the study period, 545 cDCD liver transplants were performed with A-NRP and 258 with SRR. Median donor age was 59 years (interquartile range 49-67 years). Adjusted risk estimates were improved with A-NRP for overall biliary complications (OR 0.300, 95% CI 0.197-0.459, p < .001), ischemic type biliary lesions (OR 0.112, 95% CI 0.042-0.299, p < .001), graft loss (HR 0.371, 95% CI 0.267-0.516, p < .001), and patient death (HR 0.540, 95% CI 0.373-0.781, p = .001). Cold ischemia time (HR 1.004, 95% CI 1.001-1.007, p = .021) and re-transplantation indication (HR 9.552, 95% CI 3.519-25.930, p < .001) were significant independent predictors for graft loss among cDCD livers with A-NRP. While use of A-NRP helps overcome traditional limitations in cDCD liver transplantation, opportunity for improvement remains for cases with prolonged cold ischemia and/or technically complex recipients, indicating a potential role for complimentary ex situ perfusion preservation techniques.
Subject(s)
Liver Transplantation , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Aged , Death , Graft Survival , Humans , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation/methods , Middle Aged , Organ Preservation/methods , Perfusion/methods , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tissue DonorsABSTRACT
Long-term humoral immunity and its protective role in liver transplantation (LT) patients have not been elucidated. We performed a prospective multicenter study to assess the persistence of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in LT recipients 12 months after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A total of 65 LT recipients were matched with 65 nontransplanted patients by a propensity score including variables with recognized impact on COVID-19. LT recipients showed a lower prevalence of anti-nucleocapsid (27.7% versus 49.2%; P = 0.02) and anti-spike IgG antibodies (88.2% versus 100.0%; P = 0.02) at 12 months. Lower index values of anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies were also observed in transplantation patients 1 year after COVID-19 (median, 0.49 [interquartile range, 0.15-1.40] versus 1.36 [interquartile range, 0.53-2.91]; P < 0.001). Vaccinated LT recipients showed higher antibody levels compared with unvaccinated patients (P < 0.001); antibody levels reached after vaccination were comparable to those observed in nontransplanted individuals (P = 0.70). In LT patients, a longer interval since transplantation (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.20) was independently associated with persistence of anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies 1 year after infection. In conclusion, compared with nontransplanted patients, LT recipients show a lower long-term persistence of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies. However, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination after COVID-19 in LT patients achieves a significant increase in antibody levels, comparable to that of nontransplanted patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Immunity, Humoral , Liver Transplantation , Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: reduction in calcineurin inhibitor levels is considered crucial to decrease the incidence of kidney dysfunction in liver transplant (LT) recipients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and impact of everolimus plus reduced tacrolimus (EVR + rTAC) vs. mycophenolate mofetil plus tacrolimus (MMF + TAC) on kidney function in LT recipients from Spain. METHODS: the REDUCE study was a 52-week, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, phase 3b study in de novo LT recipients. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) 28 days post-transplantation to receive EVR + rTAC (TAC levels ≤â¯5 ng/mL) or to continue with MMF + TAC (TAC levels = 6-10 ng/mL). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), clinical benefit in renal function, and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: in the EVR + rTAC group (nâ¯=â¯105), eGFR increased from randomization to week 52 (82.2 [28.5] mL/min/1.73â¯m2 to 86.1 [27.9] mL/min/1.73â¯m2) whereas it decreased in the MMF + TAC (nâ¯=â¯106) group (88.4â¯[34.3]â¯mL/min/1.73 m2 to 83.2â¯[25.2]â¯mL/min/1.73 m2), with significant (pâ¯<â¯0.05) differences in eGFR throughout the study. However, both groups had a similar clinical benefit regarding renal function (improvement in 18.6 % vs. 19.1 %, and stabilization in 81.4 % vs. 80.9 % of patients in the EVR + rTAC vs. MMF + TAC groups, respectively). There were no significant differences in the incidence of acute rejection (5.7 % vs. 3.8 %), deaths (5.7 % vs. 2.8 %), and serious adverse events (51.9 % vs. 44.0 %) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: EVR + rTAC allows a safe reduction in tacrolimus exposure in de novo liver transplant recipients, with a significant improvement in eGFR but without significant differences in renal clinical benefit 1 year after liver transplantation.
Subject(s)
Liver Transplantation , Tacrolimus , Drug Therapy, Combination , Everolimus/adverse effects , Graft Rejection/etiology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Graft Survival , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Kidney , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Mycophenolic Acid/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Tacrolimus/adverse effectsABSTRACT
The protective capacity and duration of humoral immunity after SARS-CoV-2 infection are not yet understood in solid organ transplant recipients. A prospective multicenter study was performed to evaluate the persistence of anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies in liver transplant recipients 6 months after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) resolution. A total of 71 liver transplant recipients were matched with 71 immunocompetent controls by a propensity score including variables with a well-known prognostic impact in COVID-19. Paired case-control serological data were also available in 62 liver transplant patients and 62 controls at month 3 after COVID-19. Liver transplant recipients showed a lower incidence of anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies at 3 months (77.4% vs. 100%, p < .001) and at 6 months (63.4% vs. 90.1%, p < .001). Lower levels of antibodies were also observed in liver transplant patients at 3 (p = .001) and 6 months (p < .001) after COVID-19. In transplant patients, female gender (OR = 13.49, 95% CI: 2.17-83.8), a longer interval since transplantation (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03-1.36), and therapy with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (OR = 7.11, 95% CI: 1.47-34.50) were independently associated with persistence of antibodies beyond 6 months after COVID-19. Therefore, as compared with immunocompetent patients, liver transplant recipients show a lower prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and more pronounced antibody levels decline.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Liver Transplantation , Female , Humans , Immunity, Humoral , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplant RecipientsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The incidence and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in immunocompromised patients are a matter of debate. METHODS: We performed a prospective nationwide study including a consecutive cohort of liver transplant patients with COVID-19 recruited during the Spanish outbreak from 28 February to 7 April, 2020. The primary outcome was severe COVID-19, defined as the need for mechanical ventilation, intensive care, and/or death. Age- and gender-standardised incidence and mortality ratios (SIR and SMR) were calculated using data from the Ministry of Health and the Spanish liver transplant registry. Independent predictors of severe COVID-19 among hospitalised patients were analysed using multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 111 liver transplant patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 (SIR = 191.2 [95% CI 190.3-192.2]). The epidemiological curve and geographic distribution overlapped widely between the liver transplant and general populations. After a median follow-up of 23 days, 96 patients (86.5%) were admitted to hospital and 22 patients (19.8%) required respiratory support. A total of 12 patients were admitted to the ICU (10.8%). The mortality rate was 18%, which was lower than in the matched general population (SMR = 95.5 [95% CI 94.2-96.8]). Overall, 35 patients (31.5%) met criteria of severe COVID-19. Baseline immunosuppression containing mycophenolate was an independent predictor of severe COVID-19 (relative risk = 3.94; 95% CI 1.59-9.74; p = 0.003), particularly at doses higher than 1,000 mg/day (p = 0.003). This deleterious effect was not observed with calcineurin inhibitors or everolimus and complete immunosuppression withdrawal showed no benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Being chronically immunosuppressed, liver transplant patients have an increased risk of acquiring COVID-19 but their mortality rates are lower than the matched general population. Upon hospital admission, mycophenolate dose reduction or withdrawal could help in preventing severe COVID-19. However, complete immunosuppression withdrawal should be discouraged. LAY SUMMARY: In liver transplant patients, chronic immunosuppression increases the risk of acquiring COVID-19 but it could reduce disease severity. Complete immunosuppression withdrawal may not be justified. However, mycophenolate withdrawal or temporary conversion to calcineurin inhibitors or everolimus until disease resolution could be beneficial in hospitalised patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Liver Transplantation , Transplant Recipients , Aged , COVID-19/mortality , Calcineurin Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Immunosuppression Therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Mycophenolic Acid/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Spain/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In recent years, interest in donation after cardiac death (DCD) has increased. Although DCD liver transplantation (LT) has demonstrated satisfactory long-term outcomes, different studies have shown poorer patient and graft survival after DCD than after donation after brain death (DBD). This study aimed to evaluate the results of LT using controlled DCD (cDCD) donors, specifically the incidence of primary non-function and ischemic cholangiopathy (IC), and to compare these results with those of LT using DBD in the same time period. METHODS: Between June 2012 and July 2018, we performed 66 transplants using cDCD and 258 with DBD grafts. RESULTS: The incidence of IC was similar in both groups (2% in DBD, 1.5% in DCD; P = .999). No significant differences were found for overall graft and patient survival rates between the groups at 1 and 2 years post-transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided evidence that cDCD donors exhibit excellent graft and patient survival outcomes. When the warm ischemia time is <30 minutes and cold ischemia time is <6 hours, the graft and patient survival rates and the incidence of IC in DCD are similar to those in DBD, even when using donors without age restrictions.
Subject(s)
Liver Transplantation , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Brain Death , Death , Graft Survival , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Tissue Donors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: biliary complications are an important cause of morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a therapeutic option, which is less invasive than surgical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: the endoscopic management with ERCP of patients with biliary complications after liver transplantation in the Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña between 2012 and 2018 was reviewed. RESULTS: there were 232 liver transplant recipients and biliary complications occurred in 70 (30.1 %) patients. Anastomotic strictures, most of them choledocho-choledochal, constituted the most frequent complication in 43 (61.4 %) patients. Biliary leak occurred in 16 (22.9 %) patients, non-anastomotic strictures in six (8.6 %) and choledocholithiasis in five (7.1 %). ERCP was performed in 39/43 patients with anastomotic strictures, achieving clinical success in 36 (92.3 %). All patients with a biliary leak were treated with CPRE, with a clinical resolution in 10/16 (62.5 %). ERCP was successful in 3/5 patients (60 %) with bile duct stones. In non-anastomotic strictures, ERCP was not effective in any case. Regarding complications, five (7.7 %) patients presented mild-moderate bleeding after biliary sphincterotomy. CONCLUSION: in our study, ERCP is useful in most biliary anastomotic strictures, early biliary leaks and choledocholithiasis after liver transplantation. The rate of ERCP complications in these patients was low and none were lethal.
Subject(s)
Biliary Tract Diseases , Choledocholithiasis , Liver Transplantation , Biliary Tract Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Biliary Tract Diseases/epidemiology , Biliary Tract Diseases/etiology , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Humans , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: chronic kidney disease is a frequent complication after liver transplantation. The use of calcineurin inhibitors is one of the causes of this complication. Current immunsuppression regimens that reduce the use of calcineurin inhibitors may be associated with an improved preservation of renal function. OBJECTIVE: the study aimed to assess the evolution of renal function after liver transplantation in the current routine clinical practice. METHODS: an observational, prospective, multicenter study in adult liver transplant recipients was performed. Two hundred and thirty patients with a good renal function before transplantation were assessed six months post-transplantation (baseline) and every six months until month 30. RESULTS: at baseline, 32% of the patients had a reduction in the glomerular filtration rate below < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. The mean glomerular filtration rate increased from 72.3 to 75.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 at baseline and month 30 respectively (p < 0.01). The mean serum creatinine levels (mg/dl) decreased from 1.13 to 1.09 (p < 0.01). The percentage of patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease decreased from 31.7% to 26.4%, whereas the percentage of patients with stage 4 remained unchanged (0.4% at baseline and 0.5% at month 30). No patients progressed to end-stage kidney disease that required dialysis or renal transplantation. CONCLUSION: in the routine clinical practice, a moderate deterioration of renal function is frequent after liver transplantation. However, advanced chronic kidney disease is infrequent in patients with a good pre-transplant renal function.
Subject(s)
Liver Transplantation , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Kidney Function Tests , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prevalence , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) combining daclatasvir (DCV) have reported good outcomes in the recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplant (LT). However, its effect on the severe recurrence and the risk of death remains controversial. We evaluated the efficacy, predictors of survival, and safety of DAC-based regimens in a large real-world cohort. A total of 331 patients received DCV-based therapy. Duration of therapy and ribavirin use were at the investigator's discretion. The primary end point was sustained virological response (SVR) at week 12. A multivariate analysis of predictive factors of mortality was performed. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol SVR were 93.05% and 96.9%. ITT-SVR was lower in cirrhosis (n = 163) (96.4% vs. 89.6% P = 0.017); the SVR in genotype 3 (n = 91) was similar, even in advanced fibrosis (96.7% vs. 88%, P = 0.2). Ten patients (3%) experienced virological failure. Therapy was stopped in 18 patients (5.44%), and ten died during treatment. A total of 22 patients (6.6%) died. Albumin (HR = 0.376; 95% CI 0.155-0.910) and baseline MELD (HR = 1.137; 95% CI: 1.061-1.218) were predictors of death. DCV-based DAA treatment is efficacious and safe in patients with HCV infection after LT. Baseline MELD score and serum albumin are predictors of survival irrespective of viral response.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Liver Transplantation , Postoperative Complications/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carbamates , Female , Hepatitis C/mortality , Hepatitis C/virology , Humans , Immunosuppression Therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Pyrrolidines , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology , Sustained Virologic Response , Valine/analogs & derivativesABSTRACT
A national, multicenter, retrospective study was conducted to assess the results obtained for liver transplant recipients with conversion to everolimus in daily practice. The study included 477 recipients (481 transplantations). Indications for conversion to everolimus were renal dysfunction (32.6% of cases), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; 30.2%; prophylactic treatment for 68.9%), and de novo malignancy (29.7%). The median time from transplantation to conversion to everolimus was 68.7 months for de novo malignancy, 23.8 months for renal dysfunction, and 7.1 months for HCC and other indications. During the first year of treatment, mean everolimus trough levels were 5.4 (standard deviation [SD], 2.7) ng/mL and doses remained stable (1.5 mg/day) from the first month after conversion. An everolimus monotherapy regimen was followed by 28.5% of patients at 12 months. Patients with renal dysfunction showed a glomerular filtration rate (4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) increase of 10.9 mL (baseline mean, 45.8 [SD, 25.3] versus 57.6 [SD, 27.6] mL/minute/1.73 m(2) ) at 3 months after everolimus initiation (P < 0.001), and 6.8 mL at 12 months. Improvement in renal function was higher in patients with early conversion (<1 year). Adverse events were the primary reason for discontinuation in 11.2% of cases. The probability of survival at 3 years after conversion to everolimus was 83.0%, 71.1%, and 59.5% for the renal dysfunction, de novo malignancy, and HCC groups, respectively. Everolimus is a viable option for the treatment of renal dysfunction, and earlier conversion is associated with better recovery of renal function. Prospective studies are needed to confirm advantages in patients with malignancy.
Subject(s)
Drug Substitution , Everolimus/administration & dosage , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Kidney/drug effects , Liver Transplantation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Drug Monitoring , Everolimus/adverse effects , Everolimus/blood , Female , Glomerular Filtration Rate/drug effects , Graft Rejection/immunology , Graft Survival/drug effects , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/blood , Kidney/physiopathology , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spain , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is an increasing discrepancy between the number of potential liver graft recipients and the number of organs available. Organ allocation should follow the concept of benefit of survival, avoiding human-innate subjectivity. The aim of this study is to use artificial-neural-networks (ANNs) for donor-recipient (D-R) matching in liver transplantation (LT) and to compare its accuracy with validated scores (MELD, D-MELD, DRI, P-SOFT, SOFT, and BAR) of graft survival. METHODS: 64 donor and recipient variables from a set of 1003 LTs from a multicenter study including 11 Spanish centres were included. For each D-R pair, common statistics (simple and multiple regression models) and ANN formulae for two non-complementary probability-models of 3-month graft-survival and -loss were calculated: a positive-survival (NN-CCR) and a negative-loss (NN-MS) model. The NN models were obtained by using the Neural Net Evolutionary Programming (NNEP) algorithm. Additionally, receiver-operating-curves (ROC) were performed to validate ANNs against other scores. RESULTS: Optimal results for NN-CCR and NN-MS models were obtained, with the best performance in predicting the probability of graft-survival (90.79%) and -loss (71.42%) for each D-R pair, significantly improving results from multiple regressions. ROC curves for 3-months graft-survival and -loss predictions were significantly more accurate for ANN than for other scores in both NN-CCR (AUROC-ANN=0.80 vs. -MELD=0.50; -D-MELD=0.54; -P-SOFT=0.54; -SOFT=0.55; -BAR=0.67 and -DRI=0.42) and NN-MS (AUROC-ANN=0.82 vs. -MELD=0.41; -D-MELD=0.47; -P-SOFT=0.43; -SOFT=0.57, -BAR=0.61 and -DRI=0.48). CONCLUSIONS: ANNs may be considered a powerful decision-making technology for this dataset, optimizing the principles of justice, efficiency and equity. This may be a useful tool for predicting the 3-month outcome and a potential research area for future D-R matching models.
Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Liver Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Tissue Donors , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Decision Making, Computer-Assisted , Female , Graft Survival , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Multivariate Analysis , Neural Networks, Computer , Prognosis , Spain , Transplant Recipients , Young AdultABSTRACT
Background: The Gender-Equity Model for liver Allocation corrected by serum sodium (GEMA-Na) and the Model for End-stage Liver Disease 3.0 (MELD 3.0) could amend sex disparities for accessing liver transplantation (LT). We aimed to assess these inequities in Spain and to compare the performance of GEMA-Na and MELD 3.0. Methods: Nationwide cohort study including adult patients listed for a first elective LT (January 2016-December 2021). The primary outcome was mortality or delisting for sickness within the first 90 days. Independent predictors of the primary outcome were evaluated using multivariate Cox's regression with adjusted relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The discrimination of GEMA-Na and MELD 3.0was assessed using Harrell c-statistics (Hc). Findings: The study included 6071 patients (4697 men and 1374 women). Mortality or delisting for clinical deterioration occurred in 286 patients at 90 days (4.7%). Women had reduced access to LT (83.7% vs. 85.9%; p = 0.037) and increased risk of mortality or delisting for sickness at 90 days (adjusted RR = 1.57 [95% CI 1.09-2.28]; p = 0.017). Female sex remained as an independent risk factor when using MELD or MELD-Na but lost its significance in the presence of GEMA-Na or MELD 3.0. Among patients included for reasons other than tumours (n = 3606; 59.4%), GEMA-Na had Hc = 0.753 (95% CI 0.715-0.792), which was higher than MELD 3.0 (Hc = 0.726 [95% CI 0.686-0.767; p = 0.001), showing both models adequate calibration. Interpretation: GEMA-Na and MELD 3.0 might correct sex disparities for accessing LT, but GEMA-Na provides more accurate predictions of waiting list outcomes and could be considered the standard of care for waiting list prioritization. Funding: Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Agencia Estatal de Investigación (Spain), and European Union.
ABSTRACT
Clinical management of transplant patients abruptly changed during the first months of COVID-19 pandemic (March to May 2020). The new situation led to very significant challenges, such as new forms of relationship between healthcare providers and patients and other professionals, design of protocols to prevent disease transmission and treatment of infected patients, management of waiting lists and of transplant programs during state/city lockdown, relevant reduction of medical training and educational activities, halt or delays of ongoing research, etc. The two main objectives of the current report are: 1) to promote a project of best practices in transplantation taking advantage of the knowledge and experience acquired by professionals during the evolving situation of the COVID-19 pandemic, both in performing their usual care activity, as well as in the adjustments taken to adapt to the clinical context, and 2) to create a document that collects these best practices, thus allowing the creation of a useful compendium for the exchange of knowledge between different Transplant Units. The scientific committee and expert panel finally standardized 30 best practices, including for the pretransplant period (n = 9), peritransplant period (n = 7), postransplant period (n = 8) and training and communication (n = 6). Many aspects of hospitals and units networking, telematic approaches, patient care, value-based medicine, hospitalization, and outpatient visit strategies, training for novelties and communication skills were covered. Massive vaccination has greatly improved the outcomes of the pandemic, with a decrease in severe cases requiring intensive care and a reduction in mortality. However, suboptimal responses to vaccines have been observed in transplant recipients, and health care strategic plans are necessary in these vulnerable populations. The best practices contained in this expert panel report may aid to their broader implementation.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Organ Transplantation , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Spain/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Organ Transplantation/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Self-administered subcutaneous hepatitis B immunoglobulin (s.c. HBIg) in combination with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUCs) has proved to be effective and safe in preventing hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS This non-interventional, prospective, single-arm, multicenter, international study collected data on long-term effectiveness, safety, patient satisfaction (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication, TSQM-11), and quality of life (EQ-5D questionnaire) in routine practice over a 2-year treatment period. Data analysis was based on 195 adults (82.1% male) transplanted for HBV-related liver diseases and treated with s.c. HBIg with/without NUC(s). RESULTS HBV recurrence (seropositivity of HBV surface antigen and/or HBV DNA) was observed in 7/195 (3.6%) patients (annual rate: 2.01%). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurred in 4/83 (4.8%) patients transplanted for HBV-HCC (annual rate: 2.88%). Twenty-nine adverse drug reactions occurred in 16/195 (8.2%) patients. Convenience and overall satisfaction scores of the TSQM-11 were significantly (P<0.05) improved under treatment at the 3-month, 2-year, and last follow-up visits. Quality of life remained constant over the entire observation period (EQ-5D index [P≥0.075]). S.c. HBIg was mainly self-administered (6458/9021 administrations, 71.6%) at home (8514/9021 administrations, 94.4%). CONCLUSIONS The results indicate long-term effectiveness and safety of s.c. HBIg in combination with NUC therapy in preventing post-transplant HBV reinfection under real-life conditions. The convenience of the therapy contributed to the high overall treatment satisfaction and acceptance by the patients.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Hepatitis B , Liver Neoplasms , Liver Transplantation , Adult , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/etiology , Female , Hepatitis B/drug therapy , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Humans , Immunoglobulins/therapeutic use , Liver Neoplasms/etiology , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Recurrence , Reinfection , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Liver cancer (LC) is one of the most frequent tumours, in which the potentially curative treatment is surgery: partial surgical resection or liver transplant. OBJECTIVES: To determine the morbidity and mortality, survival, and their associated factors in patients with LC, according to the type of surgical treatment: partial surgical resection or liver transplant. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, observational follow-up study of LC patients diagnosed and treated from June 1994 to December 2007. A descriptive analysis of the variables was performed, as well as a Kaplan- Meier survival analysis and Cox regression. RESULTS: The incidence of tumour recurrence in the 150 transplant patients was 13.3%, with a survival at 1, 3, and 5 years of 89.3%, 73.1% and 61.4%, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that only the histological grade/differentiation was an independent risk factor. In the 33 patients with partial surgical resection, the incidence of tumour was 51.5%, with a survival at 1, 3, and 5 years of 90.9%, 60.2%, and 38.6%, respectively. A significantly higher mortality was observed in patients with higher tumour and TNM staging. CONCLUSIONS: The survival throughout follow-up was higher in liver transplant, and tumour recurrence was more frequent in patients with partial surgical resection. The survival results in transplanted patients are consistent with the Spanish and European Liver Transplant Register and with the United Network for Organ Sharing register.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery , Hepatectomy , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hepatectomy/methods , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Spain , Survival RateABSTRACT
This open-label, randomized study compared the efficacy of a regimen of corticosteroids and tacrolimus (standard therapy group, n = 79) with a regimen of daclizumab induction therapy in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus (modified therapy group, n = 78) in primary liver transplant recipients. The primary endpoint was biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included time to rejection and patient and graft survival. The incidence of BPAR was significantly reduced in the modified therapy group compared to the standard therapy group (11.5% versus 26.6%, respectively, P = 0.017). The time to rejection was significantly shorter in the standard therapy group compared with the modified therapy group (P = 0.044). There was no significant difference between groups in patient or graft survival. Hepatitis C virus-positive patients exhibited no differences from hepatitis C virus-negative patients with respect to the incidence of BPAR. A steroid-sparing regimen of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus was effective and well tolerated in the prevention of BPAR in adult liver transplant recipients in comparison with a standard regimen of tacrolimus and steroids.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Graft Rejection/drug therapy , Immunoglobulin G/administration & dosage , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Liver Transplantation , Mycophenolic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Steroids/administration & dosage , Tacrolimus/administration & dosage , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Daclizumab , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Incidence , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Mycophenolic Acid/administration & dosage , Mycophenolic Acid/adverse effects , Opportunistic Infections/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Steroids/adverse effects , Tacrolimus/adverse effects , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There are unresolved issues regarding the security of liver transplantation with non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs). Recently, an increased incidence of biliary complications, mainly intrahepatic ischemic-type biliary strictures, has been described after controlled NHBDs. METHODS: We studied the incidence and risk factors for biliary complications among uncontrolled NHBDs recipients compared with a large population of HBD recipients. RESULTS: Overall, 16.8% of patients in the HBD group and 41.7% of patients in the NHBD group suffered any type of biliary complication (P=0.66). However, the incidence of nonanastomotic biliary strictures was significantly greater in the NHBD group (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that independent risk factors for nonanastomotic strictures were hepatic artery thrombosis (relative risk; 98.7) and receiving a liver from a NHBD (relative risk; 47.1). CONCLUSIONS: If this type of donors is accepted as a source of liver organs, the high incidence of biliary complications should be considered and efforts should be made to decrease ischemic injury.