Impact of coexistent celiac disease on phenotype and natural history of inflammatory bowel diseases.

OBJECTIVES: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and celiac disease are the two most common immune-mediated gastrointestinal diseases. There is limited knowledge regarding the course of IBD in those with coexisting celiac disease. We conducted this study to determine whether patients with coexisting celiac disease present a unique phenotype of IBD and to examine the frequency of co-occurrence of celiac disease and IBD in comparison with other autoimmune disorders. METHODS: This was a case-control study performed at two tertiary referral centers. Cases comprised of patients with known diagnoses of celiac disease and IBD. Two random IBD controls without celiac disease were selected for each case after matching for IBD type. Disease phenotype and natural history for both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) were noted from medical record review, and were compared between IBD patients with and without celiac disease. RESULTS: We identified a total of 51 patients with IBD (22 UC, 1 indeterminate colitis, 28 CD) and celiac disease. There was no significant difference in the age, gender, or ethnicity between celiac-IBD and controls. Pancolitis was more common in celiac-UC patients as compared with controls (odds ratio (OR) 3.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-21.50). There was also a trend toward increased use of immunomodulators (IMMs) among celiac-UC patients than in non-celiac UC controls (OR 2.83, 95% CI 0.95-8.48). No phenotypic differences were found in celiac-CD patients. There were no significant differences in IBD-related medication usage, hospitalizations, or surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with UC and celiac disease were more likely to have pancolitis and had a trend toward greater use of IMMs. Coexisting celiac disease did not influence natural history of CD.

Impact of mode of delivery on outcomes in patients with perianal Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) often affects women during the reproductive years. Although several studies have examined the impact of pregnancy on luminal disease, limited literature exists in those with perianal CD. Decision regarding mode of delivery is a unique challenge in such patients due to concerns regarding the effect of pelvic floor trauma during delivery on preexisting perianal involvement. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with CD with established perianal disease undergoing either vaginal delivery or caesarean section (C-section) at our institutions. We examined the occurrence of symptomatic perianal disease flares within 5 years after delivery in such women compared with nonpregnant CD controls. We also compared the occurrence of such flares between the 2 modes of delivery in women with established perianal CD. RESULTS: We identified 61 pregnant patients with CD with established perianal disease (11 vaginal delivery, 50 through C-section) and 61 nonpregnant CD controls with perianal disease. One-third of the C-sections were primarily for obstetric indications. Six of the vaginal deliveries were complicated. Approximately, 36% of cases had a symptomatic perianal flare within 1 year after delivery. This was similar across both modes of delivery (P = 0.53) and similar to nonpregnant patients with CD. There was no difference in the rates of perianal surgical intervention or luminal disease flares in our population based on mode of delivery or between pregnant patients with CD and nonpregnant CD controls. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no difference in risk of symptomatic perianal flares in patients with established perianal CD delivering vaginally or through C-section.