Immunotherapy in Gynecologic Cancers: Are We There Yet?

OPINION STATEMENT: Immune-targeted therapies have demonstrated durable responses in many tumor types with limited treatment options and poor overall prognosis. This has led to enthusiasm for expanding such therapies to other tumor types including gynecologic malignancies. The use of immunotherapy in gynecologic malignancies is in the early stages and is an active area of ongoing clinical research. Both cancer vaccines and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy continue to be extensively studied in gynecologic malignancies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, in particular, hold promising potential in specific subsets of endometrial cancer that express microsatellite instability. The key to successful treatment with immunotherapy involves identification of the subgroup of patients that will derive benefit. The number of ongoing trials in cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancer will help to recognize these patients and make treatment more directed. Additionally, a number of studies are combining immunotherapy with standard treatment options and will help to determine combinations that will enhance responses to standard therapy. Overall, there is much enthusiasm for immunotherapy approaches in gynecologic malignancies. However, the emerging data shows that with the exception of microsatellite unstable tumors, the use of single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors is associated with response rates of 10-15%. More effective and likely combinatorial approaches are needed and will be informed by the findings of ongoing trials.

Immune Microenvironment in Microsatellite-Instable Endometrial Cancers: Hereditary or Sporadic Origin Matters.

Purpose: Recent studies show that colorectal tumors with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) have increased immunogenicity and response to immunotherapy compared with microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumors. It is not yet clear whether MSI-H endometrial cancer may also benefit from these therapies. It is also unknown whether immune response is equivalent in MSI-H endometrial cancer with sporadic or inherited Lynch syndrome origins.Experimental Design: Multiplexed fluorescent IHC was used to compare matched MSI-H (n = 60) and MSS (n = 96) endometrial cancer specimens by evaluating immune cell populations in tumor and stroma compartments. Sporadic MSI-H and Lynch syndrome-associated (LS) MSI-H endometrial cancers were also directly compared.Results: Increased immune cells were present in stroma of MSI-H endometrial cancer compared with MSS, including granzyme B+ cells, activated CTLs (CD8+granzyme B+), and PD-L1+ cells. Granzyme B+ cells and activated CTLs were also increased in the tumor compartment of MSI-H endometrial cancers. Comparing sporadic and LS MSI-H endometrial cancer showed distinct differences in immune cell populations, indicating that mechanisms underlying microsatellite instability alter immune response. Specifically, LS MSI-H endometrial cancer showed increased CD8+ cells and activated CTLs in stroma, with reduced macrophages in stroma and tumor compared with sporadic MSI-H. Sporadic MSI-H had increased PD-L1+ macrophages in stroma and tumor compared with LS MSI-H endometrial cancer.Conclusions: MSI-H endometrial cancer has increased immune cell infiltration compared with MSS endometrial cancer and the hereditary or sporadic origin of microsatellite instability impacts immune response. Clinical trials to determine the role of immunotherapy in patients with MSI-H endometrial cancer must evaluate Lynch syndrome-related and sporadic MSI-H tumors separately. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4473-81. ©2017 AACR.

Endometrial Cancer Associated Symptoms: A Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: The majority of women with endometrial cancer (EC) present at an early stage with an associated 5-year survival rate of >90%. High rates of early detection are attributed to warning symptoms; however, the prevalence of such symptoms has not been well defined. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted assessing the prevalence of symptoms in EC patients at a large cancer center compared with healthy controls. Controls included patients seen for an annual gynecologic care visit (AV) or for a gynecological problem-based visit (PV). A self-administered questionnaire was given to all participants addressing EC-associated symptoms, at the time of initial clinic visit. Odds ratios (ORs) were used to compare prevalence of symptoms between EC cases and controls. Logistic regression was used to determine the impact of menopausal status and obesity on symptom prevalence. RESULTS: The cases (n = 75) were significantly older than the AV (n = 203) and PV (n = 151) controls (59.7 vs. 49.8 vs. 51.0 years, p < 0.01), had a higher body mass index (35.5 vs. 29.4 vs. 30.9 kg/m2, p < 0.01), and were more likely to be postmenopausal (76% vs. 53.7% vs. 52.0%, p < 0.01). The cases were more likely to report postmenopausal bleeding (OR = 32.99 and 5.83, p < 0.01) and abnormal vaginal discharge (OR = 8.8 and 3.3, p < 0.01) compared with the AV and PV groups. Overall, 55.4% of cases reported abnormal vaginal discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms of both postmenopausal bleeding and abnormal vaginal discharge were significantly higher in EC compared with controls. The presence of such symptoms should raise concern for malignant disease and prompt immediate gynecological evaluation.

Actinomyces bacteremia in association with tubo-ovarian abscesses and hysteroscopic sterilization.

BACKGROUND: Actinomyces infection is well-documented in intrauterine devices but has not been previously associated with hysteroscopic sterilization using coil inserts. Additionally, abscesses associated with these implants have been observed in few cases. CASE: A 31-year-old multiparous woman with a history of hysteroscopic sterilization with coil inserts 18 months previously presented with several weeks of pelvic pain. Despite percutaneous drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses, her pain and fevers persisted. Blood cultures were positive for Actinomyces infection, and exploratory laparotomy demonstrated abscesses at both coil sites. CONCLUSION: When a causative organism cannot be identified or the when patient does not respond to standard antibiotic therapy, Actinomyces infection should be considered because prolonged antibiotic therapy is necessary.