Laparoscopic approaches to the retropubic space: three alternatives with anatomical considerations.

INTRODUCTION: Many urogynecological and surgical laparoscopic interventions require access to the retropubic space, also known as the space of Retzius. Especially in patients with a history of previous surgery in this area or in general in the lower abdomen, the preparation may be complicated by adhesions and scar tissue. The necessity to combine several laparoscopic procedures in one surgical session may require consideration of the most appropriate way to approach the retropubic space. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We describe and discuss three different options to access the space of Retzius via laparoscopy: the medial transperitoneal, the extraperitoneal and the lateral transperitoneal approach. For all approaches, we used one umbilical trocar and two trocars in the lower abdomen. RESULTS: An algorithm was developed to select the most appropriate access route to the retropubic space, depending on the history of previous surgeries and accompanying interventions. CONCLUSION: The knowledge of different access routes to the retropubic space offers the possibility of adjusting the surgical procedure to the individual constellation of the patient.

Preclinical safety testing for morcellation and extraction for an endobag with sealable ports: in vitro pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Electromechanical power morcellation is an important tool of modern laparoscopy. Recent reports on the spread of previously undetected malignancy by power morcellation indicate the need for additional protective devices to reduce this risk. We conducted a study to obtain the first data concerning the safety of an endobag with three closable ports during morcellation and subsequent bag extraction under in vitro conditions, mimicking the settings in our operating theater. The second purpose of the study was to establish a minimal width of the skin incision necessary to safely extract the sealed bag after morcellation. METHODS: The morcellation test was carried out on 11 stained porcine muscle tissue samples with one additional sample as a control. The insufflation pressure was set at 12 mmHg. After filling the endobag with blue dye solution, an additional extraction test was conducted by pulling the closed bag through a template with apertures of various diameters. For each opening, a series of ten bag extractions was carried out. RESULTS: No loss of solid material or fluid was recorded during the morcellation test. The extraction test showed a loss of fluid for template openings smaller than 18 mm. The force necessary to extract the bag was inversely related to the width of the aperture. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that under the evaluated conditions, the use of a closable morcellation bag can considerably improve the patient's safety during morcellation. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the influence of the bag on operating time, intervention costs and complications.

Power morcellation inside a secure endobag: a pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Unprotected power morcellation can lead to a spread of previously undiagnosed malignancy. We present a new containment bag with two closable trocar insertion sites to reduce this risk. This pilot study was designed to assess the feasibility of this device under everyday conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The containment bag was used in ten laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies. We evaluated time requirement for bag insertion into the abdominal cavity and in-bag morcellation. A 2000 ml polyurethane morcellation bag was used for all interventions. All surgeries were carried out in a three-trocar setting. RESULTS: We carried out ten supracervical hysterectomies. No intraoperative complications and no bag ruptures occurred. The meantime requirement to insert the bag and prepare the specimen for morcellation was 10.5 min (range, 7-19 min). The mean specimen weight was 191.9 g (range, 32-710 g). Mean morcellation time was 10.5 min (range, 3-28 min), mean weight of remaining tissue and fluid in the bag after morcellation was 12.1 g (range, 7-19 g). CONCLUSIONS: The presented data demonstrate that the endobag can be successfully applied in the clinical routine. Further studies are required to evaluate additional characteristics, such as individual learning curve and time requirements.

Characterization of squamous cell cancers of the vulvar anterior fourchette by human papillomavirus, p16INK4a, and p53.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of vulvar squamous cell carcinomas located between the clitoris and urethra in young women is rising in distinct geographic regions, but characteristics of the tumors indicating certain carcinogenic mechanisms are unknown. The present study aimed at characterizing these vulvar cancers for their human papillomavirus (HPV), p16(INK4a), and p53 status, revealing potential pathways of carcinogenesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Squamous cell vulvar cancers of the anterior fourchette were retrospectively collected from 8 German hospitals, with additional squamous cell cancers located at other sites of the vulva from 2 of the hospitals. All tumors were analyzed for HPV DNA by polymerase chain reaction and for p16(INK4a) and p53 expression by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Potentially HPV-associated tumors (HPV and p16(INK4a) positive, 21.4% [27/126] of the anterior fourchette and 27.7% [13/47] from other locations), p53-overexpressing tumors (35.7% [45/126] and 29.8% [14/47]), and a third group (HPV/p16(INK4a) negative/p53 not overexpressed, 42.9% [54/126] and 42.6% [20/47]) were observed among tumors from the anterior fourchette as well as among vulvar cancers from other locations. Women with vulvar cancers of the anterior fourchette were of young age irrespective of the HPV/p16(INK4a)/p53 status. CONCLUSIONS: Different types of vulvar cancers can be found in squamous cell tumors of the anterior fourchette, similar to the finding in vulvar cancers from other locations and to what has previously been reported for vulvar squamous cell carcinomas in general.

Preclinical safety testing and initial experience of a morcellation bag with four sealable ports.

Electromechanical morcellation-so called power morcellation-is a minimally invasive approach to remove bulky lesions such as uterine fibroids. The spread of benign and malignant tissue due to morcellation is a major concern that might limit the use of laparoscopic interventions. We present an in vitro evaluation of the safety characteristics of a four-port endobag with closable trocar sleeves, and describe physical properties of the bag that may or may not allow passage through the hole. In addition, we report our preliminary experience of this tool when used for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies. The behavior of the endobag during the extraction process was analyzed by extracting opened and re-sealed bags filled with 20 ml blue dye solution through a wooden template, with incisions measuring 10 to 24 mm. The endobag was used in 50 subtotal hysterectomies during the morcellation procedure. In the in vitro test, no dye loss was recorded for incisions measuring 11-24 mm. The mean force required to pull the bag through the template was inversely proportional to incision size. No bag rupture occurred during the surgical procedures. The mean time taken to prepare the bag for morcellation was 7.1 min (range, 4-14 min), the mean duration of subtotal hysterectomy was 53.4 min (range, 20-194 min). The mean weight of the removed body of the uterus was 113.8 g (range, 13-896 g), the mean weight of tissue and fluid remaining in the bag after morcellation 7.9 g (range, 0-39 g). In the in vitro setting, the improved endobag signifies greater patient safety during bag extraction, along with less tissue traumatization due to a smaller incision in the abdominal wall. The improved ergonomic features of the bag permit the insertion of three trocars in the lower abdomen and avoid closure of unused access ports. Our preliminary experience has shown that the device can be used under routine conditions. Failure rates will be evaluated in future studies.