An immunological comparison of third companion in advanced drug-naive HIV-infected patients.

An immunological comparison of three different third companions (abacavir [ABC], efavirenz [EFV], ritonavir-boosted indinavir [IDVr]) on a backbone of either zidovudine plus didanosine (AZT/ddI) or zidovudine plus lamivudine (AZT/3TC) was performed in 76 HIV-infected, advanced-naive patients. Baseline median CD4 count and viremia were 217/microL and 238,301 copies/mL, respectively. Immunologic parameters were measured at baseline and after months of therapy. By the end of the study, 36 patients (mostly in the protease inhibitor [PI]-containing arms) had dropped out of the study; 22/36 cases of drop out were due to tolerability issues. All regimens resulted in increases in CD4 counts, with the most solid changes seen in patients using ABC as a third companion. Median HIV plasma viremia at month 12 was <50 copies/mL, and viremia was undetectable in 26/38 patients (68%). At the end of the study period, HIV antigen- and mitogen-stimulated proliferation overall was better in patients using either of the PI-boosted third companions. In these patients, the strongest down-modulation of activation marker-bearing cells was also observed. Finally, CD8+/28-/CD45RA+ lymphocytes (effector cells) were increased in all groups of patients with the exception of individuals receiving PI-boosted therapies. Results of this pilot study, although very preliminary, suggest that different combinations of antivirals result in a range of effects on immune cell functions. The clinical implications of these results need to be further analyzed in follow-up studies and in larger cohorts of patients.

Immunomodulation induced by tucaresol in HIV infection: results of a 16 week pilot Phase I/II trial.

OBJECTIVE: Immune reconstitution in highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)-treated individuals is incomplete and immunomodulatory compounds are needed to improve the outcome of HIV therapy. In a Phase I/II clinical trial performed on HIV-positive patients we analysed the safety and immunomodulating effects of tucaresol, a novel compound that has previously been described tn enhance cell-mediated immune responses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen weeks pulse dose escalation protocol. Four groups of HIV-positive patients were enrolled: group A (n=6): HAART, CD4+ 300-500 cells/microl, HIV RNA <80 copies/ml; group B (n=6): HAART-naive, CD4+ <500 cells/microl, HIV RNA >10 000 copies/ml; group C (n=3): HAART-naive, CD4+ >500 cells/microl, HIV RNA <10000 copies/ml; and group D (n=6): HAART, CD4+ <200cells/microl, HIV RNA <80 copies/ml. Tucaresol was added to HAART in group A and D patients; group B patients started tucaresol with HAART, group C patients received tucaresol alone. Clinical and immunological analyses were performed at different time points. RESULTS: Tucaresol-related serious adverse events were observed in the first week of therapy in 2/21 patients who were viraemic when commencing treatment, but did not occur in patients on stable HAART. Tucaresol did not affect HIV viraemia whereas increases in CD4+ percentages, mainly supported by naive CD4+ cells, were observed. CD8+/28-/45RA+ cells and HIV-specific CD8+ IFNgamma- and perforin-producing cells improved whereas IL-10 mRNA diminished in tucaresol-treated patients. The effects were greater with 25 mg given every other day for 1 week. CONCLUSION: In HAART-receiving patients with proper virus suppression, tucaresol was not associated with serious adverse events and resulted in qualitative and quantitative stimulation of HIV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity and generation of naive T cells. These data may support further exploration of tucaresol use in reconstitution of immune system parameters in HIV patients with proper virus suppression while on HAART.

Transient restoration of anti-viral T cell responses induced by lamivudine therapy in chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Lamivudine therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B can induce the recovery of antiviral T cell responses. It is unknown whether the recovery of T cell responsiveness is long-lasting and persists throughout the treatment and whether the elevation of viremia which follows therapy withdrawal can restore a condition of T cell unresponsiveness. METHODS: Frequency and function of circulating hepatitis B virus (HBV)-specific CD4 and CD8 cells from 12 hepatitis e surface antigen + patients with chronic hepatitis B were studied longitudinally before, during and after lamivudine therapy by intracellular cytokine staining, proliferation and cytotoxicity assays against HBV proteins and peptides. CD4-mediated responses were analyzed in all patients, whereas CD8 cells were studied in 6 HLA-A2+ patients. RESULTS: HBV-specific CD4 and CD8 reactivity showed a bi-phasic behavior under lamivudine therapy with an early enhancement of T cell frequency and intensity of responses followed by a persistent decline starting from the 5th to 6th month of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Since restoration of HBV-specific T cell reactivity is only transient, our study indicates that therapeutic stimulation of HBV-specific T cell responses to complement lamivudine treatment should be done early after the initiation of lamivudine. Moreover, the transient nature of the immune reconstitution may represent a favorable condition for virus reactivation once lamivudine therapy is withdrawn.