Investigating mother-child inter-brain synchrony in a naturalistic paradigm: A functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) hyperscanning study.

Successful social interactions between mothers and children are hypothesised to play a significant role in a child's social, cognitive and language development. Earlier research has confirmed, through structured experimental paradigms, that these interactions could be underpinned by coordinated neural activity. Nevertheless, the extent of neural synchrony during real-life, ecologically valid interactions between mothers and their children remains largely unexplored. In this study, we investigated mother-child inter-brain synchrony using a naturalistic free-play paradigm. We also examined the relationship between neural synchrony, verbal communication patterns and personality traits to further understand the underpinnings of brain synchrony. Twelve children aged between 3 and 5 years old and their mothers participated in this study. Neural synchrony in mother-child dyads were measured bilaterally over frontal and temporal areas using functional Near Infra-red Spectroscopy (fNIRS) whilst the dyads were asked to play with child-friendly toys together (interactive condition) and separately (independent condition). Communication patterns were captured via video recordings and conversational turns were coded. Compared to the independent condition, mother-child dyads showed increased neural synchrony in the interactive condition across the prefrontal cortex and temporo-parietal junction. There was no significant relationship found between neural synchrony and turn-taking and between neural synchrony and the personality traits of each member of the dyad. Overall, we demonstrate the feasibility of measuring inter-brain synchrony between mothers and children in a naturalistic environment. These findings can inform future study designs to assess inter-brain synchrony between parents and pre-lingual children and/or children with communication needs.

Pathophysiological dissociation of the interaction between time pressure and trait anxiety during spatial orientation judgments.

Spatial orientation is achieved by integrating visual, vestibular and proprioceptive cues. Individuals that rely strongly upon visual cues to facilitate spatial orientation are termed visually dependent. Heightened visual reliance commonly occurs in patients following vestibular dysfunction and can influence clinical outcome. Additionally, psychological factors, including anxiety, are associated with poorer clinical outcome following vestibular dysfunction. Given that visual dependency measures are affected by psychological and contextual influences, such as time pressure, we investigated the interaction between time pressure and anxiety upon visual dependency in healthy controls and vestibular migraine patients. Visual dependency was assessed using a "Rod and Disk" task at baseline and under time pressure (3 s to complete the task). Non-situational (trait) and situational (state) anxiety levels were quantified using the Spielberg State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. We calculated the change in visual dependency (VD) [∆VD = VDtime pressure  - VDbaseline ] and correlated it with participants' trait anxiety scores. We observed a significant negative correlation between trait anxiety and the change in VD (R2  = .393, p < .001) in healthy controls and a positive correlation in dizzy patients (R2  = .317, p < .001). That is, healthy individuals that were more anxious became less visually dependent under time pressure (i.e., more accurate), whereas less anxious individuals became more visually dependent. The reverse was observed in vestibular migraine patients. Our results illustrate that anxiety can differentially modulate task performance during spatial orientation judgements under time pressure in healthy individuals and dizzy patients. These findings have potential implications for individualised patient rehabilitation therapies.

Self-Assessment of Cochlear Health by New Cochlear Implant Recipients: Daily Impedance, Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and Electrocochleography Measurements Over the First Three Postoperative Months.

HYPOTHESES: In newly implanted cochlear implant (CI) users, electrically evoked compound action (eCAPs) and electrocochleography (ECochGs) will remain stable over time. Electrode impedances will increase immediately postimplantation due to the initial inflammatory response, before decreasing after CI switch-on and stabilizing thereafter. BACKGROUND: The study of cochlear health (CH) has several applications, including explaining variation in CI outcomes, informing CI programming strategies, and evaluating the safety and efficacy of novel biological treatments for hearing loss. Very early postoperative CH patterns have not previously been intensively explored through longitudinal daily testing. Thanks to technological advances, electrode impedances, eCAPs, and ECochGs can be independently performed by CI users at home to monitor CH over time. METHODS: A group of newly implanted CI users performed daily impedances, eCAPs, and ECochGs for 3 months at home, starting from the first day postsurgery (N = 7) using the Active Insertion Monitoring system by Advanced Bionics. RESULTS: Measurement validity of 93.5, 93.0, and 81.6% for impedances, eCAPs, and ECochGs, respectively, revealed high participant compliance. Impedances increased postsurgery before dropping and stabilizing after switch-on. eCAPs showed good stability, though statistical analyses revealed a very small but significant increase in thresholds over time. Most ECochG thresholds did not reach the liberal signal-to-noise criterion of 2:1, with low threshold stability over time. CONCLUSION: Newly implanted CI recipients can confidently and successfully perform CH recordings at home, highlighting the valuable role of patients in longitudinal data collection. Electrode impedances and eCAPs are promising objective measurements for evaluating CH in newly implanted CI users.

Priming overconfidence in belief systems reveals negative return on postural control mechanisms.

BACKGROUND: Modulation of postural control strategies and heightened perceptual ratings of instability when exposed to postural threats, illustrates the association between anxiety and postural control. RESEARCH QUESTION: Here we test whether modulating prior expectations can engender postural-related anxiety which, in turn, may impair postural control and dissociate the well-established relationship between sway and subjective instability. METHODS: We modulated expectations of the difficulty posed by an upcoming postural task via priming. In the visual priming condition, participants watched a video of an actor performing the task with either a stable or unstable performance, before themselves proceeding with the postural task. In the verbal priming paradigm, participants were given erroneous verbal information regarding the amplitude of the forthcoming platform movement, or no prior information. RESULTS: Following the visual priming, the normal relationship between trunk sway and subjective instability was preserved only in those individuals that viewed the stable but not the unstable actor. In the verbal priming experiment we observed an increase in subjective instability and anxiety during task performance in individuals who were erroneously primed that sled amplitude would increase, when in fact it did not. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings show that people's subjective experiences of instability and anxiety during a balancing task are powerfully modulated by priming. The contextual provision of erroneous cognitive priors dissociates the normally 'hard wired' relationship between objective measures and subjective ratings of sway. Our findings have potential clinical significance for the development of enhanced cognitive retraining in patients with balance disorders, e.g. via modifying expectations.